agreed. the 16TB aggregate limits severely limit us as well. for several large image and video workloads we have to create multiple aggregates and shares which is silly.
-- Daniel Leeds Manager, Storage Operations Edmunds.com 310.309.4999 dleeds@edmunds.com ________________________________________ From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of James Beal [james_@catbus.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 10:22 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: HSM/ILM for Netapp
To me, the big issue I want to see addressed is the size of NetApp Aggregates. 16Tb aggregates are *stupid* esp since they have Raid Groups.
This is a serious issue for us, one group in particular will not consider any file system less than 50Tb.