Hi John
Thanks for the reply made a lot or progress going forward didn’t notice the SVM was bound to e1a only after migrating to the trunk a0a - all now works against the test plan with link failures and switch failures for all four ports e1a,e1b,e1c and e1d for both nodes!
But I spotted a partial message in the config which is concerning?
I’ll get details tomorrow
Thanks again for responding to this
Andrew
Sent from Outlook for iOShttps://aka.ms/o0ukef ________________________________ From: John Stoffel john@stoffel.org Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 8:05:31 PM To: Andrew Hancock andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk Cc: toasters@teaparty.net toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: LACP configuration with NetApp FAS2820
"Andrew" == Andrew Hancock andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk writes:
Anyone here on this list familiar with Dell 4840-ON and Port Channel LACP configurations with two node FAS2820
Not with the Dell side, but the Netapp side.
Usually by network is good (he says! 😊
So what's your configuration look like?
It’s definitely not working as expected, e.g. fail a port and access is lost, so somethings not right, and I’m wondering if the SVM which is attached to current port e1a, is the issue, and it should be connected to the trunk a0a, or a0a-2033 – the VLAN
We need more details. But start at the bottom. Can you show:
ifgrp show -instance
The key would be to see if the LACP policy agrees on both ends.