FYI, when you have LOTS of clients, you have better distribution from the NetApp using "port" instead of IP --tmac
*Tim McCarthy, **Principal Consultant*
*Proud Member of the #NetAppATeam https://twitter.com/NetAppATeam*
*I Blog at TMACsRack https://tmacsrack.wordpress.com/*
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 9:11 PM Andrew Hancock < andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk> wrote:
Yes thanks to John, I went away and had a look at configs, and yes Michael correct, the LAG was not up across the switches!
I had a rethink, on the MC-LAG between the switches as these use VLT
And I'd left a command out!
So this is, with the correct command
vlt port channel 1
Thanks for the sounding board guys!
Re-test later today against the test-plan, still not sure how it was working before!
Regards
Andrew
Node: NA-2820-A-01 Interface Group Name: a0a Distribution Function: ip Create Policy: multimode_lacp MAC Address: d2:39:ea:be:45:cf Port Participation: full Network Ports: e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d Up Ports: e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d Down Ports: -
Node: NA-2820-A-02
Interface Group Name: a0a Distribution Function: ip Create Policy: multimode_lacp MAC Address: d2:39:ea:be:43:f1 Port Participation: partial Network Ports: e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d Up Ports: e1a, e1c Down Ports: e1b, e1d 2 entries were displayed.
-----Original Message----- From: Fenn, Michael Michael.Fenn@DEShawResearch.com Sent: 30 October 2024 00:59 To: Andrew Hancock andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk Cc: toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: LACP configuration with NetApp FAS2820
On the Dell side, you'd need to configure VLT on the port-channels in order to have both switches participate the same LACP bond. Assuming they're running DNOS10, here's the link to the config guide: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000102901/dell-emc-networking-os10-... .
Thanks, Michael
On 10/29/24, 8:30 PM, "Andrew Hancock" < andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk mailto: andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk> wrote:
This message was sent by an external party.
Ah! I think I see the reason for Partial now
Although, not sure how this is working against the test plan!
NA-2820-A::> ifgrp show Port Distribution Active Node IfGrp Function MAC Address Ports Ports
NA-2820-A-01 a0a ip d2:39:ea:be:45:cf partial e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d NA-2820-A-02 a0a ip d2:39:ea:be:43:f1 partial e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d 2 entries were displayed.
NA-2820-A::> ifgrp show -instance
Node: NA-2820-A-01 Interface Group Name: a0a Distribution Function: ip Create Policy: multimode_lacp MAC Address: d2:39:ea:be:45:cf Port Participation: partial Network Ports: e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d Up Ports: e1a, e1c Down Ports: e1b, e1d
Node: NA-2820-A-02 Interface Group Name: a0a Distribution Function: ip Create Policy: multimode_lacp MAC Address: d2:39:ea:be:43:f1 Port Participation: partial Network Ports: e1a, e1b, e1c, e1d Up Ports: e1a, e1c Down Ports: e1b, e1d 2 entries were displayed.
And those Down Ports, or though appearing as up on the switches, are on the second switch, so the LACP port channel is not LAG across both switches.
interface port-channel1 description NA-2820-A-01-LAG no shutdown switchport access vlan 2033 mtu 9216 lacp fallback enable lacp fallback timeout 1 ! interface port-channel2 description NA-2820-A-02-LAG no shutdown switchport access vlan 2033 mtu 9216 lacp fallback enable lacp fallback timeout 1
interface ethernet1/1/7 description "NA-2820-A-01 e1a" no shutdown channel-group 1 mode active no switchport mtu 9216 flowcontrol receive off ! interface ethernet1/1/8 description "NA-2820-A-02 e1a" no shutdown channel-group 2 mode active no switchport flowcontrol receive off ! interface ethernet1/1/9 --more-- description "NA-2820-A-01 e1c" no shutdown channel-group 1 mode active no switchport flowcontrol receive off ! interface ethernet1/1/10 description "NA-2820-A-02 e1c" no shutdown channel-group 2 mode active no switchport flowcontrol receive off !
nterface port-channel1 description NA-2820-A-01-LAG no shutdown switchport access vlan 2033 mtu 9216 lacp fallback enable lacp fallback timeout 1 --more--! interface port-channel2 description NA-2820-A-02-LAG no shutdown switchport access vlan 2033 mtu 9216 lacp fallback enable lacp fallback timeout 1
interface ethernet1/1/7 description "NA-2820-A-01 e1b" no shutdown channel-group 1 mode active no switchport mtu 9216 flowcontrol receive off ! interface ethernet1/1/8 description "NA-2820-A-02 e1b" no shutdown channel-group 2 mode active no switchport flowcontrol receive off ! interface ethernet1/1/9 description "NA-2820-A-01 e1d" --more-- no shutdown channel-group 1 mode active no switchport flowcontrol receive off ! interface ethernet1/1/10 description "NA-2820-A-02 e1d" no shutdown channel-group 2 mode active no switchport flowcontrol receive off
Thanks
-----Original Message----- From: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org mailto:john@stoffel.org> Sent: 29 October 2024 20:06 To: Andrew Hancock <andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk mailto: andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk> Cc: toasters@teaparty.net mailto:toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: LACP configuration with NetApp FAS2820
"Andrew" == Andrew Hancock <andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk
mailto:andrew.hancock@cyrus-consultants.co.uk> writes:
Anyone here on this list familiar with Dell 4840-ON and Port Channel LACP configurations with two node FAS2820
Not with the Dell side, but the Netapp side.
Usually by network is good (he says! 😊
So what's your configuration look like?
It’s definitely not working as expected, e.g. fail a port and access is lost, so somethings not right, and I’m wondering if the SVM which is attached to current port e1a, is the issue, and it should be connected to the trunk a0a, or a0a-2033 – the VLAN
We need more details. But start at the bottom. Can you show:
ifgrp show -instance
The key would be to see if the LACP policy agrees on both ends.
toasters mailing list -- toasters@lists.teaparty.net mailto: toasters@lists.teaparty.net To unsubscribe send an email to toasters-leave@lists.teaparty.net mailto: toasters-leave@lists.teaparty.net
toasters mailing list -- toasters@lists.teaparty.net To unsubscribe send an email to toasters-leave@lists.teaparty.net