You mention this filer is used for a DB. I'll assume Oracle. You really should have a direct crossover connection between the filer and the Sun, preferably gigabit ethernet.
Aaron
-----Original Message----- From: foo [mailto:foo+netapp@eek.org] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 12:18 AM To: toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Performance probs with UDP NFSv3.
Has anyone else experienced performance problems using UDP NFSv3 between Solaris 2.7 and an F760 (running 5.3.5R2)?
Using v3 I get the following errors intermittently:
Jul 27 20:41:07 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 not responding still trying Jul 27 20:41:07 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 ok Jul 27 20:42:06 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 not responding still trying Jul 27 20:42:06 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 ok Jul 27 20:43:30 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 not responding still trying Jul 27 20:43:30 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 ok Jul 27 20:45:40 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 not responding still trying Jul 27 20:45:40 bullwinkle unix: NFS server 10.20.10.10 ok
When I switched the mount to v2 (udp), these errors went away, and performance seemed to increase. Netapp documentation recommends v3, but it doesnt seem to work very well in my environment.
Since this filer is used for a DB, this is causing huge problems. Should I just leave it at v2, or is worth trying to determine why v3 is performing poorly?
-Brian