30 Aug
1999
30 Aug
'99
9:41 p.m.
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 sirbruce@ix.netcom.com wrote:
A cautionary note - much of the supposedly "in-spec" memory Kingston or other vendors sell is not capable of handling the strict timing and loading requirements of a Netapp filer.
This sounds like FUD. In fact it sounds like something Kingston would say about other memory vendors. Do you have data to substantiate this? I'm not saying don't buy memory from NetApp. We buy it there and will continue to buy it there because we want to maintain our service agreements. However, since you're making claims that memory sold by NetApp is superior please show me the data from an independent source.
Tom