The reason is someone added 9gb drives to an 18gb drive volume ( or vice versa, hard to tell which was first ). They're not different effective disk sizes, they are different *actual* disk sizes. Effective size diff would be
RAID Disk HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks) --------- ----- ------------ ---- -------------- -------------- data 8.18 8 2 2 FC:A 8600/17612800 17366/35566480
Which is not the case. The physical column will always report the actual disk size.
~JK
Premanshu Jain wrote:
Hi, Can anybody tell me the reason, Same raidgroup having different effective size disk. Thanks
RAID group 1RAID Disk HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks)
parity 8.24 8 3 0 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.18 8 2 2 FC:A 8600/17612800 8683/17783112 data 8.0 8 0 0 FC:A 8600/17612800 8683/17783112 data 8.19 8 2 3 FC:A 8600/17612800 8683/17783112 data 8.45 8 5 5 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.44 8 5 4 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.25 8 3 1 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.26 8 3 2 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.27 8 3 3 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.46 8 5 6 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480 data 8.43 8 5 3 FC:A 17000/34816000 17366/35566480