Does a host route override a network route on a netapp head?
I have an interface plugged into one switch with IP 192.168.5.6 netmask 255.255.255.0 and
I have a second interface plugged into a different switch with IP 192.168.5.7 netmask 255.255.255.0
One switch is "primary" and the other is "standby" for redundancy.
There is obviously a routing ambiguity here. Which port does the filer use to reach the 192.168.5 network? It seems to have picked one port (fortunately on the 'active' switch) which I see listed in the routing table. The other port is not listed in any routes at all.
But I was wondering if I could add explicit host routes to the IP addresses on the standby switch. I tried this and it didn't work (ping failed). The destination IP that I tried to ping was on another filer head. It occurred to me that I probably need to set the corresponding route on the other head, so I did that. The routes are listed in the route table, but ping still does not work. I checked the ARP table and neither head has the MAC address of the other in its ARP table. So I suppose that despite the host route, the ARP broadcast is going out the wrong interface.
I think we need separate subnets here but I'm just the storage guy and did not configure the hosts that are plugged into these two switches.
Things are working, all traffic is on the active switch. But I sure don't see how things could ever fail over to the standby switch without manual intervention.
Steve Losen scl@virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640
University of Virginia ITC Unix Support