I opened a ticket with netapp support, it's not progressing fast, i'll keep you posted guys.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 1:22 PM, andrei.borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com andrei.borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com wrote:
Any progress on this? Looking at how Linux kernel presents LUN numbers, 4194304 = 0x400000 translates to LUN 0000:0040 on the wire; and this looks pretty unexpected.
With best regards
Andrei Borzenkov Senior system engineer FTS WEMEAI RUC RU SC TMS FOS
FUJITSU Zemlyanoy Val Street, 9, 105 064 Moscow, Russian Federation Tel.: +7 495 730 62 20 ( reception) Mob.: +7 916 678 7208 Fax: +7 495 730 62 14 E-mail: Andrei.Borzenkov@ts.fujitsu.com Web: ru.fujitsu.com Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint This communication contains information that is confidential, proprietary in nature and/or privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient(s) or the person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient(s), please note that any form of dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original communication. Thank you for your cooperation. Please be advised that neither Fujitsu, its affiliates, its employees or agents accept liability for any errors, omissions or damages caused by delays of receipt or by any virus infection in this message or its attachments, or which may otherwise arise as a result of this e-mail transmission.
-----Original Message----- From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Momonth Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 11:03 AM To: John Stoffel Cc: toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: CentOS 6.7 + cDOT 8.3.1: kernel: scsi: host X channel Y id Z lun4194304 has a LUN larger than allowed by the host adapter
Yes, I think I have to open a ticket at this point .. it's just I have CentOS which is strictly speaking not supported, but I'll give it a try.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, John Stoffel john@stoffel.org wrote:
Ouch... sounds more and more like a cluster wide issue. Have you opened a ticket with Netapp yet on this? Can you show the output (sanitized of course) of 'lun show -m' maybe? But honestly, this is a job for support to deal with.
Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters