20 Jul
2005
20 Jul
'05
5:32 p.m.
I think the jist is..dont infringe on Netapps legal rights/etc, and they wont have to take it away from you.
On 7/20/05 2:31 AM, "Tom Yates" madlists@teaparty.net wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Tom Yates wrote:
has anyone else noticed this in the purchase agreement? does it worry anyone? what's the big idea?
thanks to those who replied. prevailing wisdom seems to be that IP-indemnification clauses are now quite common, and certainly sought-after by purchasing departments, possibly as a result of the whole SCO bunfight. whether or not it makes any sense, or helps, or indeed whether the cure might be worse than the disease, seems not often to be addressed!