9 Jun
2004
9 Jun
'04
11:41 a.m.
Scott W wrote: **** And one more would be, what makes you think that Exchange using a filer is in any way under-performing?
And finally, why would you want to expend occasional effort/downtime to gain some extra performance when that performance will decay away necessitating another expenditure of effort/downtime, when the filer and
Exchange between them will probably settle into a not-perfect-but-not-pathological steady-state anyway? ****
Chronological instantiation of data in a database is inefficient. When we "defrag", we get back about 30GB for each of the 8 info stores we maintain.