I've done the upgrade to v2.0RC1 and it's *much* more useful. The upgrade was easy, esp since I only had a week or so's worth of data to convert and upgrade. Still not ideal... I semi wish there was more of a 'top' command.
I have used 'qos statistics workload performance show' but it has a bug where you can't see the volume names because they're truncated, which makes it difficult to use. And it doesn't pay attention to the width of the terminal...
And you can refresh the display nicely too. But I can't figure out how to widen some of the columns without doing something like:
set -showseperator " : "
but that still doesn't work properly, the various fields are truncated in 8.2.3P2, though it's also useful to look at
statistics show-periodic
but it's still not quite there in my mind.
Christopher> If you're still on OPM 1.0, upgrading to 1.1 and then to Christopher> 2.0 RC is a little easier than going to 2.0 directly.
Christopher> From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Matthew Kleifgen < Christopher> matthew.kleifgen@rackspace.com> Christopher> Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 8:54 AM Christopher> To: Basil basilberntsen@gmail.com, John Stoffel john@stoffel.org Christopher> Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Christopher> Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager
Christopher> If you missed it, there was a release on Friday of 2.0RC1. I upgraded the 1.1 vsphere version Christopher> I was using, and I’m very impressed with the new version. Instead of having to search for Christopher> only a few object types, the new version has drill down from the cluster level and data on Christopher> lifs, ports, nodes, etc. The upgrade was basically painless, also.
Christopher> -- Christopher> Matt Kleifgen
Christopher> From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net on behalf of Basil basilberntsen@gmail.com Christopher> Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 7:35 AM Christopher> To: John Stoffel john@stoffel.org Christopher> Cc: "toasters@teaparty.net" toasters@teaparty.net Christopher> Subject: Re: Deleted Performance Manager
Christopher> No, it's barely functional. It's got a lot of promise, but lacks some very basic features I'd Christopher> have expected in 1.0. Storage performance management is the achilles heel of most storage Christopher> vendors, and this is no exception. I hope Netapp will put together some sort of focus group to Christopher> guide the next few iterations. It really does have promise- of all the useless performance Christopher> applications I've used, this one does the coolest useless tricks... like their algorithm for Christopher> determining bully volumes and telling you which layer the problem is at.
Christopher> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, John Stoffel john@stoffel.org wrote:
Christopher> So has anyone actually found a good use for performance manager? I'm Christopher> running the latest version against a fairly busy but unbalanced two Christopher> node cluster and I keep getting frustrated that I can't drill down or Christopher> move up to get a better overview of things.
Christopher> I *know* I've got some performance and space issues, but I'd like to Christopher> be able to see the overall system state and then drill down into Christopher> things so I understand them better before I make changes or try to fix Christopher> stuff.
Christopher> Maybe I'm just not using it right, wouldn't be the first time...
Christopher> John Christopher> _______________________________________________ Christopher> Toasters mailing list Christopher> Toasters@teaparty.net Christopher> http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters