Jeff, I personally don't like active data on vol0. In the past I have put archive data on vol0 because it is low impact. I happen to be a little more paranoid than some but that is just me and we have been bitten before by putting highly volatile on the root volume. Chris
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 02:02:14PM -0800, Jeff Kennedy wrote:
Now that the R100 has come out I was wondering what people think of the seperate vol0 concept? In the old days it wasn't quite so bad; ok, so you wasted a 4gb drive or maybe even an 18gb drive. But now we're looking at tossing a 136gb drive for what? Squat really.
So what's the new thought on this? Do you not waste the disk on a seperate vol0 and just keep tight reigns on qtrees? Or is there still an argument for vol0 on it's own?
Thanks.
===================== Jeff Kennedy Unix Administrator AMCC jlkennedy@amcc.com