Arguably, any message that should be disregarded shouldn't be logged in the first place; should we simply suppress (unless some option is turned on to display them - probably some option less crude than cranking the "syslog" level up so it logs stuff at "debug" level, which causes tons of crap to be logged) messages that are either never significant or that haven't occurred often enough to be significant?
So are NetApp now saying that they are disregarding the disk errors from NetAppCache machines as syslog as of version 3.3 NetAppCache code does not log messages about such disk error events. Amazing disk errors went away after 3.2 to 3.3 code upgrade.
Guy - I know my quoteing may have been taken out of context but I think it is still relevent.
Colin Johnston SA PSINET UK