is this a trick question? Why do you have a snapmirror license if you weren't going to use it to transfer data from one filer to another? Is this your cryptic way of saying it's to slow and you tried scp instead? There's a story here that I'm not getting. I'd like to see how you do with snapmirror see if that's good enough or not.
-Blake
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 10:54 PM, Steve Rieger lists@up-south.com wrote:
Snapmirror a snapshot ? We have snapmirror, snapvault, cifs, nfs, and many more, money is not the issue speed is Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message----- From: "Glenn Walker" ggwalker@mindspring.com
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 01:12:48 To:"Blake Golliher" thelastman@gmail.com,lists@up-south.com Cc:"Fox, Adam" Adam.Fox@netapp.com,toasters@mathworks.com Subject: RE: snapshot copy
There's always the possibility of getting a demo license of snapmirror.
I know it's not cheap, but this is exactly what it is designed to do and is well worth the $.
Glenn
-----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Blake Golliher Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 12:52 AM To: lists@up-south.com Cc: Fox, Adam; toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: snapshot copy
You can still ndmpcopy just a directory. Give it a path like /vol/root/etc will just copy the etc directory. Try /vol/root/.snapshot/hourly.0/etc/ that should work.
-Blake
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Steve Rieger lists@up-south.com wrote:
Ndmcopy is volume level, i need to copy a napshot. The vol is alive.
I mounted the snapshot and am using scp to copy it to dest filer.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-----Original Message----- From: "Blake Golliher" thelastman@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:30:39 To:"Mailing Lists" lists@up-south.com Cc:"Fox, Adam" Adam.Fox@netapp.com, toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: snapshot copy
ndmpcopy might work. It's filer to filer, and works fairly well, unless your problem is regarding a lot of files. It'll work well enough for a few thousand, but getting into several million it gets a bit nasty, but then any file based replication method for millions of files tends to suck.
It doesn't need a license, and is trival to setup and use on the filer console.
-Blake
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Mailing Lists lists@up-south.com
wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Fox, Adam Adam.Fox@netapp.com
wrote:
If you can take the data down for a single pass, then vol copy is
pretty
easy. If not, and you have a SnapMirror license, you could do your first
pass
while the data is being accessed, then do an incremental while it's down.
This assumes that you have the same volume type (trad/flex) on each
side.
If not, you'll have to use a more logical way of moving data like
ndmpcopy
or Qtree-based SnapMirror.
-- Adam Fox adamfox@netapp.com
snapmirror is not an option,
thanx though,