You may have been confusing this with the Symantec Netbackup SnapVault (SnapVault for Netbackup) integrated version. That product is EOL, but SnapVault itself (FAS->FAS and OSSV->FAS) most definitely not!
________________________________
From: hollandwl@gmail.com [mailto:hollandwl@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 19:50 To: Klise; Steve; toasters@mathworks.com Subject: Re: RE: Avamar VS SMVI
Snapvault is not EOL. The next version of SMVI will be including snapvault support. In the interim, Matt Robinson of NetApp has written SV SMVI (Snapvault for Snapmanager for Virtual Infrastructure). I've tried it in our development lab and it seems to work really well. Take a look at it at http://communities.netapp.com/docs/DOC-1868;jsessionid=A4775C7EF68BD0E62 8BE54033CB9D59B
The S550 is being discontinued and therefore snapvault primary for it is EOL. However, snapvault for the FAS series is not EOL.
On Feb 9, 2009 11:40am, "Klise, Steve" klises@pamf.org wrote:
I think snapvault is EOL but is supported
through 7.3. For some reason, the backup guys don't want to do it,
not
sure about the specifics, but our VAR (who is great btw), has been
trying to
push us in that direction.
IF it is EOL, that is a nail in that
coffin.
From:
owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On
Behalf Of Bill Holland
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009
4:00 AM
To: Klise,
Steve; toasters@mathworks.com
Subject: Re: Avamar VS SMVI
Have you looked at Snapvault from NetApp?
----- Original Message -----
From: steve
klise
To: toasters@mathworks.com
Sent: Saturday, February
07, 2009 2:16 PM
Subject: Avamar VS SMVI
We are starting an eval of SMVI and Avamar for backup/recovery of
VM's.
We are planning on having snapmirrors to another filer for backup
(NDMP) and or
DR purposes, but are doing the sm to a local filer for now. Avamar has
some
good selling point, but it seems to be a waste to buy yet another
storage
platform. We are heavily invested in netapp now with a VTL (1400), and
NetBackup. Does anyone have any feed back? It seems to make sense to
to SMVI
but with Avamar I get longer retention. I was only going to keep a
weeks worth
of SMVI snapshots. With Avamar, it seem indefinite. The downside of
the avamar
is you seem to need two for going to tape. Avamar can do the single
file
restores, which SMVI 2.0 is supposed to do. Anyhow, any feedback is
appreciated.
View this message in context: Avamar VS
SMVI
Sent from the Network Appliance
- Toasters mailing list archive at Nabble.com.