I do.. Lots of stuff you can do with the networking pieces with these filers, but I try to keep mine simple. Learned a lot from these folks that post stuff..
I run everything across the 10gb interface. I don't even come close to saturation. Other mileage may vary (if you are facebook for example..) Some folks like to setup snapmirror down a set of interfaces, iSCSI down one, and maybe CIFS on its own.. Sometimes doing protocols on there own interfaces helps with troubleshooting issues, that about it.
From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Chris Picton Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:43 AM Cc: toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Re: Separating management and data traffic (e0M vs replication interfaces)
I had seen the suggestion elsewhere. Is there any real point to the e0M interface then, as is it not truly out of band.
Do you then do other remote management (system manager/snmp monitoring/etc) via the data interfaces?
On 2013/03/21 5:37 PM, Brian Beaulieu wrote: Same here. On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Klise, Steve <klises@sutterhealth.orgmailto:klises@sutterhealth.org> wrote: What I do is just disable the management port, and use the RLM, or SP for management. It's an additional hop, but is your saving grace to entry if the filer panics..
-----Original Message----- From: toasters-bounces@teaparty.netmailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net [mailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.netmailto:toasters-bounces@teaparty.net] On Behalf Of Chris Picton Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 8:31 AM To: toasters@teaparty.netmailto:toasters@teaparty.net Subject: Separating management and data traffic (e0M vs replication interfaces)
Hi all
I have two pairs of 3210s. The default gateway of the systems are via the management interface IP range, so that they are reachable remotely on the e0M interfaces.
However, this is causing snapmirror replication to use those interfaces as well, which is undesirable from a speed/data path persepctive.
I have considered putting e0M into its own ipspace, but then how would I manipulate its routing table as it would not be in a vfiler.
Any other ideas about having e0M reachable from anywhere, but still use a different vif as the default gateway for generic traffic on the system? Chris _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.netmailto:Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters
_______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters@teaparty.netmailto:Toasters@teaparty.net http://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters