As others have said, aggr renames are OK.
However, I'm not entirely sure why volume renames would be a problem since clients see the junction path rather than the actual volume name.
From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jeffrey Sent: 08 July 2011 00:26 To: NDMP List (toasters@mathworks.com) Subject: RE: aggregate rename
Thanks to everyone who responded. Looks like renaming an aggregate has zero impact on concurrent client access.
Thanks.
Jeff Kennedy Qualcomm, Incorporated QCT Engineering Compute 858-651-6592
From: owner-toasters@mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Kennedy, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 1:59 PM To: NDMP List (toasters@mathworks.com) Subject: aggregate rename
My question is specifically around 8CM but I would be surprised if it applied differently to 7mode.
Can an aggregate be renamed without impacting NFS access by clients? Volumes cannot, obviously, but nowhere is a client aware of aggregate info so had I to guess I'd say it could be renamed with impunity.
But I'd rather not guess...
Thanks.
Jeff Kennedy Qualcomm, Incorporated QCT Engineering Compute 858-651-6592
To report this email as spam click herehttps://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==.
Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom More information can be found at www.csr.com. Follow CSR on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CSR_PLC and read our blog at www.csr.com/blog