6 Mar
2009
6 Mar
'09
3:31 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Darren Sykes wrote:
Having said all that, I think SMVI generally works better with non-NFS stores; we're still having occasional issues due to NFS related issues.
Darren --
Can you elaborate on those issues for those of us eyeing both NFS for datastores and SMVI for snap management/operations?
Thanks.
- -- Nick Silkey
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkmxQcIACgkQrDQjhjXrMeI3swCeMtEBzZp/kM3Rk+2Qen33BSGU
ockAn3i5ZdQ73icMtcUttPzJ4scr0h5K
=yKLa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----