toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

SNMP Vulnerabilities ?
by Ketil Kirkerud Elgethun 13 Feb '02

13 Feb '02

Many of you have probably read about the various vulnerabilities discovered in most SNMP implementations (http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2002-03.html). Does anyone know if the SNMP agent in OnTap is vulnerable ? -- ---Ketil Kirkerud Elgethun, Genuity Norway http://www.genuity.no Mobile: +47 934 11 394

1 0

RE: win2k native mode and ontap integration
by Mike Sphar 12 Feb '02

12 Feb '02

Whether you're in native or mixed mode should have nothing to do with the Netapp's, since the netapps are not domain controllers, and native mode just means that you can't have NT 4.0 domain controllers. Being in native mode does not mean that all your clients must be win2k... http://www.2000tutor.com/tutorials/modes.htm From a white paper at http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3113.html Filers may be installed into either mixed-mode or native-mode active directory domains. Mixed-mode domains resemble the Windows NT or pre-Windows 2000 domain environments. Native domains use and expose the active directory infrastructure. Both domain styles support pre-Windows 2000 computers. The difference lies in the administrative structure and methods. The filer will attempt to sense what type of domain exists on the network. Filers running Data ONTAP 6.1 will first search for an active directory domain controller by querying DNS for an active directory/LDAP server.* If the filer cannot locate an active directory server, it will default to looking for a Windows NT domain controller using the NetBIOS protocol. Filers may also be specifically configured as a Windows NT domain or an Active Directory domain file server. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Kumar, Rahul [mailto:Rahul.Kumar@sdrc.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 8:56 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: win2k native mode and ontap integration Importance: High Hi All, We are using win2k ad in mixed mode...We are also have 3-4 filers running 6.1.1R2. Will the filers be able to work in native mode of window2000 ad. If not then which version of ontap supports this. ----------- Rahul

1 0

microsoft dfs and cifs.homedir
by Colin Eric Johnson 12 Feb '02

12 Feb '02

So I'm wondering if anyone is using microsofts dfs and the cifs.homedir functionality on their netapp together? I'd like to be able to point my users homedirs (Win2k) at a dfs share and from their direct them to \\netapp\username but it's not clear if I can make this work. it would be nice becuase then if/when we decide we need a new/different netapp I only have to change the name once and not for each user. I'm not really convinced that I can make this work but I thought I might ask. -- Colin E. Johnson | colinj(a)ccs.neu.edu Dumbfounding Question 1: Someone once asked me if I could answer a question without telling a story. I couldn't imagine an answer that wasn't a story.

1 0

Library device not created
by Frank Bonnet 12 Feb '02

12 Feb '02

Hi we have a HP DLT 8000 connected to our F85 ( 6.1.1.R2 ) and we are not able to access the library we can dump to a tape but cannot use the library thru NDMP . mcxx devices are not created ... do we have to create them manually or is it automated when the filer boot up ? ( we have reboot it without any effect ) thanks

1 0

Support for HVD LTO Seagate tape drives?
by Mike Ball 11 Feb '02

11 Feb '02

Does anyone know when Netapp plans on supporting HVD Seagate LTO tape drive? I know they support the LVD Seagate LTO in 6.1.2.

1 0

FS: F760 Cluster with NFS, CIFS
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 09 Feb '02

09 Feb '02

One of our NetApp customers must find a buyer for the following system by Feb. 22: F760 Clustered Pair -- NFS, CIFS and CLUSTER software licenses 84 x 18gb FC-AL disk drives All software will be transferred by Network Appliance free of charge to the new end-user. Disk Shelf and PCI card configurations can be re-configured by Union Computer to suit the buyer's specific needs. Discounted "Snap" software products can also be provided. This equipment will go for less than 25 cents on the dollar -- should you have any interest, please let us know as soon as possible. Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 Phone: 952 935 7282 FAX: 952 935 5056 scott(a)unioncomputer.com

1 0

wins authentication
by Timothy Cook 08 Feb '02

08 Feb '02

Admins, I have been tasked with setting up my filers so that win95/98 users can map my cifs shares without authenticating to my NT domain. Is it possible to do this without converting my filers from members of my NT domain to members of a workgroup? Two things that I am trying to avoid is the need to give every PC user an NT login, and the need to have a usermap.cfg entry for everybody in the company!

1 0

RE: upgrade from 6.1.1 to 6.1.2?
by Melvin, Grant 08 Feb '02

08 Feb '02

Thanks Chris, > That should of course have been "Grant Melvin". I appreciate the repost. I'm pretty much used to getting called "Melvin" as a first name instead of Grant [ its better than some of the other names people call me ;-D ]. > Apologies, but why is it that everyone at NetApp > uses an MUA that generates headers like > From: "Melvin, Grant" <Grant.Melvin(a)netapp.com> A bunch of us (especially manager types) use OutLook here and that's what it produces (at least the way its setup here). I agree it certainly adds to the confusion. Cheers, Grant For information on NetApp's Data Protection Solutions view http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:02 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: upgrade from 6.1.1 to 6.1.2? I wrote: > Melvin Grant has already answered that, ^^^^^^^^^^^^ That should of course have been "Grant Melvin". Apologies, but why is it that everyone at NetApp uses an MUA that generates headers like From: "Melvin, Grant" <Grant.Melvin(a)netapp.com> ? It can only lead to confusion ... Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1(a)ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QH, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.

1 0

RE: Qtree based Snapshots
by Melvin, Grant 08 Feb '02

08 Feb '02

Hi Uros, Its always good practice to discuss topics like this with your NetApp Sales account team. Its not NetApp's policy to have discussions around speculative or new functionality in this forum. Cheers, Grant For information on NetApp's Data Protection Solutions view http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html <http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html> . -----Original Message----- From: Uros Lampret [mailto:uros.lampret@ourspace.si] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:29 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Qtree based Snapshots Is there sometning new with qtree based snapshots? What about ONTAP 6.2? _____________________________ Uros Lampret _____________________________

1 0

Re: upgrade from 6.1.1 to 6.1.2?
by Chris Thompson 08 Feb '02

08 Feb '02

I wrote: > Melvin Grant has already answered that, ^^^^^^^^^^^^ That should of course have been "Grant Melvin". Apologies, but why is it that everyone at NetApp uses an MUA that generates headers like From: "Melvin, Grant" <Grant.Melvin(a)netapp.com> ? It can only lead to confusion ... Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1(a)ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QH, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters