toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: Windows Roaming Profiles on CIFS?
by David Papas 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

We've been running roaming profiles to our F820 since DOT 6.1 w/o too much difficulty. Have you already ruled out permissions or network conditions type issues? -D. > -----Original Message----- > From: WILLIAMS VIGIL, NIS-3/DEC MS-D440, 505-667-3587 > [mailto:wvigil@nisdp0.lanl.gov] > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 12:58 PM > To: TOASTERS(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Windows Roaming Profiles on CIFS? > > > Hi: > > I'd like to know if anyone is using a filesever to host > windows roaming profiles? Works OK from a W2K/NT4 windows > server but the error message I see when trying from a filer > is: > > "Cannot copy file \\toaster\users\unsername... to C:\..." > > "Windows cannot load the profile and is loging you in with > a temporary profile..." > > Could this be a timing issue? Profile needed too early > in the login process? > > Ws > Williams E. VIGIL 505-667-3587 Pager: 104-4728 > -------------------------------------------------------- > "... description is not explanation and when it comes to > primary causes science explains nothing." D. Grinspoon >

1 0

Windows Roaming Profiles on CIFS?
by WILLIAMS VIGIL, NIS-3/DEC MS-D440, 505-667-3587 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

Hi: I'd like to know if anyone is using a filesever to host windows roaming profiles? Works OK from a W2K/NT4 windows server but the error message I see when trying from a filer is: "Cannot copy file \\toaster\users\unsername... to C:\..." "Windows cannot load the profile and is loging you in with a temporary profile..." Could this be a timing issue? Profile needed too early in the login process? Ws Williams E. VIGIL 505-667-3587 Pager: 104-4728 -------------------------------------------------------- "... description is not explanation and when it comes to primary causes science explains nothing." D. Grinspoon

1 0

PC�\�t�g��̔��I�I�I
by dmdmdm 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

��Ãr�W�l�X�\�t�g�̔�! �l�C��i��W�߂ăZ�b�g�̔��܂� http://www.websamba.com/soft0000/ http://softsoft.maisonx.com/ http://www.online.in.th/softsoft/cd/ http://softsoft.maddsites.com/ http://soft123.www3.dotnetplayground.com/

1 0

LTO 2 Support
by David Dalby 31 Mar '03

31 Mar '03

Hi, Does anyone have HP Ultrium 2 working directly off the back of a filer yet ? I understand NetApp are currently testing and support is due for relase some time in April but I do not have a confirmed date. I am guessing this will take the form of a dynamic tape configuration file for using in the etc/tape_config directory. I have created a dynamic tape config file but am struggling to get the HP hex codes for density codes (l,m,h and a) and corresponding density alogrithms which are required for the tape_config file ? Anyone have the hex codes I require for the HP Ultrium 2 or a working dynamic tape config file ? We are running DOT 6.3.1R1 .... Thanks Dave Dalby Systems Engineer - Storage Solutions ASI Solutions - Perth **** ASI Solutions Disclaimer **** The material transmitted may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended only for the addressee. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material immediately. ASI will protect your Privacy according to the 10 Privacy Principles outlined under the new Privacy Act, Dec 2001. This email is also subject to copyright. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments. **** END OF MESSAGE ****

1 0

Strange folders cropping up
by Jay Newton (Email) 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

I keep getting these folders on one of my CIFS volumes. I don't think the Filer is responsible but I'm having trouble finding the cause. Below is an example of a folder name. There is sometimes a symbols folder underneath the main folder but not in every case. There are no files under the folder at all. 69fe9e1137e5bed8e0a0ba9782268d5e Does anyone else recognize this or know what causes it? Jay Newton Systems Engineer Chesapeake Energy Corporation Natural Gas - Natural Advantages Building 6112, Room 114 (405)848-8000 ext. 683 jnewton(a)chkenergy.com

2 1

rescan of a scsi dlt?
by Toal, Dave 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

A while ago, someone posted a command to rescan an FC bus, I believe. I've got a dlt 7000 on an F740; the dlt is inside a storagetek 9710 which was recently ipl'd. The dlt stops working when this happens, I'm not sure why (veritas netbackup shows it as 'down'). Rebooting the netapp fixes it; is there a way to reset the adapter on the dlt without doing that? statler*> fcadmin rescan 1 fcadmin rescan: Channel 1 is not a FC loop channel. statler*> sysconfig -v NetApp Release 6.1.3R2: Mon Jun 17 01:40:16 PDT 2002 slot 1: SCSI Host Adapter 1 (Qlogic ISP 1040B) Fast/Wide, Differential Firmware Version 4.66.00 Clock Rate 60MHz. 0: Tape: Quantum DLT7000 276A -- this is not a .sig

2 1

Anyone using f700 and f800 series filers with Cisco 6509's?
by kyle 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

I recently just ran into an issue where I see "Out-Discard" errors on my switch on some of my gigabit ports the filers are on(sh port mac mod/port). Has anyone else run into this problem? On the netapps which are plugged into ports which show no issue, I can not find any difference in configuration - either on the netapp or switch. So, I want to know two things: 1. If you are using a f700 and/or a f800 filer on a Cisco Cat6509 switch with gigabit ports(WS-X6416-GBIC) and you are not showing any In or Out-Discard errors, do you mind sending me your config on the port to compare with my own? 2. I know there is an issue due to the buffer size on the port on cat6500 series, but since this problem doesnt exist on all of my switches, has anyone experienced this problem, and if so, what did you do to correct it? Thanks, K.

2 1

RE: Security on Win2k
by Nail, Larry 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

Bill, Not sure where you're going here? File shares are controlled by the ACL's of the Share & the File ACL's. This is the excact same way an NT/W2K file server controls access. If the Share is set to read only, the access to the share & the files in it are limited to read only. Even if the file level ACL's are set to full control, the access is still read only. Think "most restrictive". Regards, Larry -----Original Message----- From: Bill Bello [mailto:Bill.Bello@hds.com] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:46 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com All, A question has come up in our lab on the subject. If 'read only' is set on the filer for a CIFS share, a user can still have full rights to that share IF security is NOT set in Win2k as well. Has anyone figured a way to make the share secure from the filer only? Thanks in advance. Regards, Bill Bello ATC PreSales Open Systems Support Westchester Office (914) 773-9131 New York Office (212) 827-1314

1 0

RE: Security on Win2k
by Mike Sphar 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

This doesn't sound correct to me. Have you actually tested it? In windows network permissions, share permissions are applied first, then individual file or directory ACLs are applied, and the most restrictive permissions always apply. So if a share is read-only to a user, then even if all the files in that share are writeable by everyone, then that user should not be able to update those files or create any new files or directories in that share. I would be very surprised to find that Netapp was not emulating the standard windows file server behavior in this case. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Remedy, a BMC Software Company -----Original Message----- From: Bill Bello [mailto:Bill.Bello@hds.com] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 6:46 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Security on Win2k All, A question has come up in our lab on the subject. If 'read only' is set on the filer for a CIFS share, a user can still have full rights to that share IF security is NOT set in Win2k as well. Has anyone figured a way to make the share secure from the filer only? Thanks in advance. Regards, Bill Bello ATC PreSales Open Systems Support Westchester Office (914) 773-9131 New York Office (212) 827-1314

1 0

Security on Win2k
by Bill Bello 28 Mar '03

28 Mar '03

All, A question has come up in our lab on the subject. If 'read only' is set on the filer for a CIFS share, a user can still have full rights to that share IF security is NOT set in Win2k as well. Has anyone figured a way to make the share secure from the filer only? Thanks in advance. Regards, Bill Bello ATC PreSales Open Systems Support Westchester Office (914) 773-9131 New York Office (212) 827-1314

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters