toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13529 discussions

RE: Spares kits.
by Palinckx, Gregory 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Hi Shaun, Since they have different motherboards, they will have different spares kits - though some parts will be the same. Shelf spares could be the same (FC7 or FC8 etc...). Greg SE - Rockies -----Original Message----- From: Shaun T. Erickson [mailto:ste@research.bell-labs.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 12:14 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Spares kits. Do the F720, F740 & F760 filers use the same spares kit, or are there different ones for each one? -ste -- Work: (908) 582-7629 Pager: (800) 756-1133 Cell: (201) 310-9941

1 0

Netfiler, NT & Notes
by Patrick.Day.B＠bayer.com 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Has anyone implemented the Lotus Domino Server as described by netapp? We are trying to, and have run across a snag. We have Notes in stalled on an NT server that is direct connected (crossover cable w/ dedicated nics) to a 740 (DOT 5.2.1). We are able get the Notes Server to map the drive at boot time and work. When someone (the notes service account or anyone) logs onto the server, the mapped drive is present. The problem arises when the person logs off. The network connection is dropped and Notes is unable to access the directory until we do a reboot. Has anyone had this experience or found a work around. I really hate the idea that once someone logs onto the server they have to stay logged on or reboot the server. Thanx ahead of time! --Patrick Day Sys Admin Bayer Corp.

1 0

files that differ by case only (via CIFS); forced 8.3 notation sticks when one is removed
by Todd C. Merrill 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

This may not be a bug, may just be the way NT handles files that differ by case only, but I just wanted to be sure.... Say I have two files, created via NFS, that differ in case only, that are longer than 8 characters: %touch foobar123 %touch fooBar123 %/bin/ls -alF foo* -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:46 fooBar123 -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:45 foobar123 On a Windows NT box (4.0 SP3), they appear as: H:>\ dir foo* 06/18/99 11:45a 0 foobar123 06/18/99 11:46a 0 FOOBAR~1 If I remove foobar123 from an NFS mount: %rm foobar123 the Windows box then shows: H:>\ dir foo* 06/18/99 11:46a 0 FOOBAR~1 Why doesn't it show the file as "fooBar123" now? How come it is stuck with the forced 8.3 notation? It still appears with the original name via the NFS mount: %/bin/ls -alF foo* -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:46 fooBar123 The only way I can force it back is to rename it to something else and then rename it back to the original name: % mv fooBar123 fb; mv fb fooBar123 % /bin/ls -alF foo* -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:46 fooBar123 H:>\ dir foo* 06/18/99 11:46a 0 fooBar123 I don't fully understand the behavoiur of Windows naming, so any light shed upon this would be great. If this is expected behaviour, well, I guess we'll just have to deal with these errors as they crop up in our automated test environment. (NetApp Release 5.2.1P2: Tue Mar 16 10:41:03 PST 1999) Until next time... Todd C. Merrill The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7792 24 Prime Park Way, Natick, MA 01760-1500 508-647-7012 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

2 1

RE: files that differ by case only (via CIFS); forced 8.3 notatio n sticks when one is removed
by Hawley, Rob 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Once a file is detected as having a name conflict we do not reexamine it once the duplicate file is deleted. We do that for performance reasons and functionality reasons. The performance reason is that we do not wish to revist the 8.3 name generation every time we delete a file. The functionality reason is that something may now depend on the name of the file being FOOBAR~1. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mailto: hawleyr(a)netapp.com <mailto:hawleyr@netapp.com> US Mail: Network Appliance Inc. > Phone: 408-822-6661 2770 San Tomas Expressway > FAX: 408-822-4457 Santa Clara, CA 95051 -----Original Message----- From: Todd C. Merrill [mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 8:58 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Todd C. Merrill; Michael Mirman Subject: files that differ by case only (via CIFS); forced 8.3 notation sticks when one is removed This may not be a bug, may just be the way NT handles files that differ by case only, but I just wanted to be sure.... Say I have two files, created via NFS, that differ in case only, that are longer than 8 characters: %touch foobar123 %touch fooBar123 %/bin/ls -alF foo* -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:46 fooBar123 -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:45 foobar123 On a Windows NT box (4.0 SP3), they appear as: H:>\ dir foo* 06/18/99 11:45a 0 foobar123 06/18/99 11:46a 0 FOOBAR~1 If I remove foobar123 from an NFS mount: %rm foobar123 the Windows box then shows: H:>\ dir foo* 06/18/99 11:46a 0 FOOBAR~1 Why doesn't it show the file as "fooBar123" now? How come it is stuck with the forced 8.3 notation? It still appears with the original name via the NFS mount: %/bin/ls -alF foo* -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:46 fooBar123 The only way I can force it back is to rename it to something else and then rename it back to the original name: % mv fooBar123 fb; mv fb fooBar123 % /bin/ls -alF foo* -rw-r--r-- 1 toddc users 0 Jun 18 11:46 fooBar123 H:>\ dir foo* 06/18/99 11:46a 0 fooBar123 I don't fully understand the behavoiur of Windows naming, so any light shed upon this would be great. If this is expected behaviour, well, I guess we'll just have to deal with these errors as they crop up in our automated test environment. (NetApp Release 5.2.1P2: Tue Mar 16 10:41:03 PST 1999) Until next time... Todd C. Merrill The Mathworks, Inc. 508-647-7792 24 Prime Park Way, Natick, MA 01760-1500 508-647-7012 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

1 0

Backup
by sroche 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

I am experiencing a problem with dump since upgrading the filers to 5.2.2. I contacted Netapp for help as you can see below. Netapp is still working on this problem and said no one has reported anything like this and this is first of its kind. Netapp cannot duplicate the problem because they don't have autoloader inhouse. I was hoping perhap you can contact some of your customers who has a simular setup as I do here. I have a DLT4700 connected to a filer. I dump the filer to tapes and use restore to restore or list the content of the tapes. Since the upgrade I notice on the dump log the inode from a next tape is not steadily increase but start from 0. I didn't expect the dump could be bad because what have written to tape's number increment steadily. I would greatly appreciated if you can look into this. Thank you in advance for any help you can. --Ling. Steven B. Roche Senior Account Executive Open Systems Solutions ph 508-359-4248 ext. 319 fx 508-359-5215 em sroche(a)opensystems.com

3 2

RE: Backup a filer using Omniback
by Palinckx, Gregory 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Hello Jan, In case you are not aware of it, there is a group within HP over in Germany that is working on the NDMP solution for OmniBack - Last update I received was late last year and they were shooting for a June 99 early release date. You might want to check with HP on the status - Let me know if your HP reps are unaware of the project and I'll see if I can track down a contact and/or the latest release date. To answer your question though, I know you can back up a filer with OmniBack over a NFS mount, but am not sure if it will back up a share or UNC path - if so, I would *suspect* that it will retain ACLs as well as UNIX permissions. Regards, Greg ----------------------------------------------------- Greg Palinckx Phone: 303.770.9158 System Engineer Mobile: 303.882.5996 Network Appliance Email: palinckx(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Schepers, Jan [mailto:Jan.Schepers@nl.origin-it.com] Sent: Friday, June 18, 1999 2:37 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Backup a filer using Omniback Hello people, it is very likely that there is somebody who has experience to backup a Netapp filer using HP/Omniback. Questions are: o is it possible ? o Is it possible to backup/restore both CIFS and UNIX meta data like ACL's ? o What about performance ? o What configuration (of the backup client) is required ? TIA, Jan Schepers =============== Origin - Sharing The Power Of Knowledge =============== Jan Schepers Building HCZ 4B.20 Computer Systems & Architectures Vonderweg 11 Origin/Technical Automation 5611 BK Eindhoven mailto:Jan.Schepers@nl.origin-it.com The Netherlands SERI schepers@nlorigin FAX :(+31-40-27)56171 Mobex :(+31-40-27)96025 Phone :(+31-40-27)57503 =======================================================================

1 0

Backup a filer using Omniback
by Schepers, Jan 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Hello people, it is very likely that there is somebody who has experience to backup a Netapp filer using HP/Omniback. Questions are: o is it possible ? o Is it possible to backup/restore both CIFS and UNIX meta data like ACL's ? o What about performance ? o What configuration (of the backup client) is required ? TIA, Jan Schepers =============== Origin - Sharing The Power Of Knowledge =============== Jan Schepers Building HCZ 4B.20 Computer Systems & Architectures Vonderweg 11 Origin/Technical Automation 5611 BK Eindhoven mailto:Jan.Schepers@nl.origin-it.com The Netherlands SERI schepers@nlorigin FAX :(+31-40-27)56171 Mobex :(+31-40-27)96025 Phone :(+31-40-27)57503 =======================================================================

1 0

RE: Named Pipes?
by Muhlestein, Mark 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Named pipes are used to communicate between software components. That would imply that there is some software loaded on the server which the DB application is talking to. Since we are not running NT on the filer, there is no way to do that. What you need to find out is if the DB supports running with the files on a remote drive, either using a mapped drive letter or UNC names. Many DB's (for example Oracle), do support that mode and can thus use the filer as back-end storage. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Brian Shamblin [mailto:shamblin.brian@Mayo.EDU] Sent: Thursday, June 17, 1999 6:40 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Named Pipes? We are trying to move our database files (not the database, just the data) from an NT server to our filer. The database application, DOCS Open from PC DOCS, insists on using Named Pipes to access the files (we're telling the application that they reside on NTFS). It appears that the filer has no support for this type of access method. Has anyone else encountered this problem? Any plans to add this support to ONTAP? Thanks in advance. ==================================================================== Brian Shamblin shamblin(a)mayo.edu Mayo Foundation voice: (507)284-4069 Rochester, MN fax: (507)284-9171 ====================================================================

2 1

Named Pipes?
by Brian Shamblin 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

We are trying to move our database files (not the database, just the data) from an NT server to our filer. The database application, DOCS Open from PC DOCS, insists on using Named Pipes to access the files (we're telling the application that they reside on NTFS). It appears that the filer has no support for this type of access method. Has anyone else encountered this problem? Any plans to add this support to ONTAP? Thanks in advance. ==================================================================== Brian Shamblin shamblin(a)mayo.edu Mayo Foundation voice: (507)284-4069 Rochester, MN fax: (507)284-9171 ====================================================================

2 1

Re: Virus
by yann.golanski＠ThePLAnet.net 17 Jun '99

17 Jun '99

Quoting Mark D Fowle <Fowle_Mark_D(a)CAT.com>: > Our NT Administrator wants to know how to protect the NetApps from viruses. > Unlike running on an NT server he > says he can't autoprotect data. Does anyone know how this might be done? Two ways. Use exim as a mail agent (yes, that DOES involve having a *nix box) and set a filter so that all attachemtn that match a list are `canned' or frozen. Then he can look thrugh them and only allow those he knows are not viruses. Of course, a list of known viruses can be set up to send the mail to /dev/null. The second: move to *nix. Check out VMware as a way to migrate. Remeber the filer is an appliance. It stores data. That's it. The security needs to come from somewhere else. -- Yann Golanski Internet Systems Developer yann.golanski(a)theplanet.net The Planet Online

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters