toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13520 discussions

HSM and Netapps
by Graham C. Knight 12 Apr '00

12 Apr '00

Has anyone sucessfully used a fairly large HSM solution with Netapp based storage? Any suggestions for the best product to use? We have ~20 filers in a mixed Unix/NT environment. Veritas tells us that their product won't work with netapps. That was a bit surprising. Anyone know otherwise? Thx, Graham

2 1

HTTP directory listings
by Ethan Torretta 12 Apr '00

12 Apr '00

I would like to permit web directory listings on a filer, but I cannot find the equivalent of "Options Indexes." It just looks as if it isn't supported, but it also seems like exactly the sort of thing that might exist but be hidden. Does anyone know if there's an unlisted option to control this (or if I just missed something obvious)? ejt

1 0

Backup Devices Technologies
by Sateesh Mucharla 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

I just became part ofthe toasters mailing list. It is very exciting to be here. I am currently using DLT4000 and DLT7000 drives for backing my unix network and considering buying a workgroup backup solution which includes buying a tape library along with the software. I am considering DLT7000 based solution because of its capacity and popularity in the inductry. I would like to know whether there is any better technology/drive to use as part of the backup solution. Can somebody point me to a location where i can find comparison chart of all the backup media and technologies. Thanks in advance. Sateesh

2 1

Trunking?
by John Stacey 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

I have an old Alteon Aceswitch 110, and cannot find any docs for it. Will it trunk with a filer over multiple interfaces? Thanks

1 0

Alteon 180S Switch for Etherchannel Trunking
by Kirschner, Lewis 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

Hello , . Appreciate if anyone can tell me if you have tried etherchannel trunking from filer to a Alteon 180S Switch . Thanks Lew Kirschner

1 0

NOW web site improvements
by G D Geen 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

I just wanted to say that I like the recent improvements to the NOW web site. I much prefer the Serial Number search over browsing through a list. The list is inconsistent so I must view all filers for my company in order to find my filer. With the search feature up front, it is much easier to input a SN and "Go!". I wish to make one suggestion the the "Submit a Case". Would it be possible to add a copy list when submitting a case? I have several people assisting me in maintaining 21 of these monsters and sometimes more than one person will report the problem due to the time it takes to generate the case number and forward it out to the group. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- G D Geen mailto:geen@ti.com Texas Instruments Phone : (972)480.7896 System Administrator FAX : (972)480.7676 --------------------------------------------------------------- Life is what happens while you're busy making other plans. -J. Lennon

1 0

Impact of NFS mount mgmt on NetApps
by johnj.sasso＠ps.ge.com 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

Our site has about 800 UNIX systems, each NFS-mounting ~10 directories from our NetApp (an F760 running ONTAP 5.3.4) via the automounter. Does managing all these mounts critically impact the filer? The reason I ask is that if I have an automounter map with the following indirect mount entries: framemaker -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol/framemaker netscape -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol/netscape proe -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol/proe metaflo -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol/metaflo (etc...) Then would changing these to framemaker -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol:framemaker netscape -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol:netscape proe -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol:proe metaflo -rw,nosuid,intr,hard nassrv:/app_vol:metaflo (etc...) (which is supposed to reduce the number of mounts from the NetApp) provide significant improvement in performance on the NetApp? Would this significantly lower the load on the NetApp? Our UNIX systems are such that they do not reboot often, although I am unable to quantify how many mount requests to the filer occur in, say, an hour. --john

1 0

RE: Lucent Switch for Etherchannel Trunking
by Ken Chua 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

Hello , I have a F740 filer , NFS . Appreciate if anyone can tell me if you have tried etherchannel trunking from filer to a Lucent switch . Thanks Best Regards , Ken .

1 0

RE: NetApp backup recommendations
by Cliff Dobbs 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

I've only just got on to toasters, so sorry if this is a bit late. I was present at a demo of NetBackup last week at which we got the guy doing the demo to restore an NDMP backup to a new directory. I don't remember where the option was, but he just specified a new path to restore to. We've also been doing this with BudTool for ages. Cliff On 10/04/2000 18:53:56 Kelly Wyatt wrote: >On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Marion Hakanson wrote: >> >> I've been told that NetBackup can only restore NDMP dumps in place, >> too -- not to an alternate directory, for example (I haven't >> verified that with the vendor). > > QuickRestore 2.6 can restore an NDMP backup to an alternate *root* >path, if I understand the documentation correctly. If you backup >/depot/src as a single set, and you want to restore just >/depot/src/utilities/billing, you can put that into >/otherdir/utilities/billing, but not /otherdir/billing (i.e., the >directory pathname beneath the root of the backup must be preserved). >A quick call to Workstation Solutions should clear that up, or I can >dig out the manual when I'm back at the office on Monday. >-- >Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) >"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" Cliff Dobbs Systems Administrator ARM Ltd Tel: +44 1223 400430 Fax: +44 1223 400410 e-mail: Cliff.Dobbs(a)arm.com

1 0

Linux & NetApp
by Fabio Pietrosanti 11 Apr '00

11 Apr '00

Hi, i've a Server farms of VaLinux based on kernel 2.2.7-1.23 that use a F740 NetApp . Now, NetApp's engineer tell us that linux it's not the better choice for using NetApp . We mount share with this parameter : nfs rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr,soft sometimes( every 2 or 3 week), on some server(different every time) the NetApp does not respond to server, and i see in the log : kernel: nfs: server netapp-2-1 not responding, timed out The load average remain very high until i don't reboot the machine. does someone had the same problem? p.s.: the logs on the NetApp are normal .

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters