toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

Re: full duplex on FE
by Arnie Thompson 10 Apr '97

10 Apr '97

If FE means Fast Ethernet, the answer is yes for the PCI-based models (220, 330 & 540). You need software release 4.X to support full duplex. Arnie from Netapp At 12:42 PM 4/8/97 -0400, Tom Yates wrote: >anyone know if the FE ports on the toasters can run full duplex? > > Tom Yates - Unix Chap - The Mathworks, Inc. - +1 (508) 647 7561 > MAG#65061 DoD#0135 AMA#461546 > 1024/CFDFDE39 0C E7 46 60 BB 96 87 05 04 BD FB F8 BB 20 C1 8C > > > >

4 4

NFS research study -- sorry if you got this twice
by Rich Boberg 09 Apr '97

09 Apr '97

I just came across this email and it looked like it might be of interest to people on this mailing list. I apologize if you have already received a copy of this email via other paths. -- Rich (Note: NetApp has no formal relationship to this project, but it looks interesting :) >Forwarded message: >> Message-Id: <3.0.32.19970409112118.006cc3dc(a)postoffice3.mail.cornell.edu> >> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 1997 11:21:19 -0400 >> From: Ethan Rafferty <eer2(a)cornell.edu> ... >> >> On the following web site resides the research instrument for the NFS >> server research project. It is a simple form which should take 15 or 20 >> minutes to complete. It's kind of fun: you get to analyze different >> attributes of an NFS server and make trade-offs between them. >> >> 1. Please forward this e-mail right away to anyone you know of who may be >> interested in participating in the research project. >> 2. Please complete and submit the form on the web site below by Friday, >> April 11. >> >> <http://www.gsm.cornell.edu/courses/nba564/NFS.htm> >> >> This study is being performed by MBA students at Cornell's Johnson Graduate >> School of Management in order to analyze the market for NFS service in >> general and for specialized NFS server appliances in particular. The >> submission of the form is anonymous unless you choose to fill out the >> fields asking who you are. >> >> Thank you for your participation! >> >> Ethan Rafferty >> eer2(a)cornell.edu

1 0

NAC's CIFS
by Aamer Latif 09 Apr '97

09 Apr '97

I'd like to find out about using NAC's CIFS to support file sharing for a mixed UNIX+NT/PC environment. Specifically, how is file services performance when running both NFS and SMB on the same box. Also, how is level of integration of the a toaster running CIFS with an NT environment (e.g. support of domain security, WINS, File/directory Permissions, use of File/Server Manager tools). Any other experience information would be appreciated. Latif (a.latif(a)ieee.org)

1 0

full duplex on FE
by Tom Yates 08 Apr '97

08 Apr '97

anyone know if the FE ports on the toasters can run full duplex? Tom Yates - Unix Chap - The Mathworks, Inc. - +1 (508) 647 7561 MAG#65061 DoD#0135 AMA#461546 1024/CFDFDE39 0C E7 46 60 BB 96 87 05 04 BD FB F8 BB 20 C1 8C

2 1

Re: NetApp F220 worth it?
by fred.abounader＠vantis.com 02 Apr '97

02 Apr '97

---} Yes, you can get a Sun and throw 20G worth of disks for about the same price ---} (or less) but you do not get the same performance, administration or ---} reliability. I do agree on two points above: 'administration' and 'reliability'. Upgrading the OS takes only a few minutes and so far the F200 has had 100% uptime. However, on the third issue 'performance', I'm experiencing slower (almost 50%) read performance from my F220 than from a Sun Sparc20 NFS server. This issue has been looked at by NetApp's and so far no solution or reason to this anomaly. I have had very good response from NetApps support in the past and have faith that they will resolve this problem. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ Fred Abounader Vantis (AMD's PLD Subsidiary) ~ ~ email: fred.abounader(a)vantis.com Mailstop 546 ~ ~ voice: (512)-602-1644 5300 E. Ben White Blvd. ~ ~ FAX: (512)-602-4148 Austin, TX 78741 ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2 1

NetApp F220 worth it?
by Janne Frosen 02 Apr '97

02 Apr '97

Hello, I just joined this mailing list, mainly to hear comments about the NetApps in practice. Our lab is planning to (maybe) purchase a NetApp F220. The simple question is: Is it worth it? ie. where are the true savings that justify the high price? As a comparison, it's possible to get the same amount of NFS disk with 2-3 times less $$. Will the additional features make up for it.. What was the deciding factor for you to get it? (Sorry if this is a boring FAQ) //Janne -- Janne Fr|sen <a href="http://iki.fi/jaf/"> jaf(a)iki.fi </a> Finland, Helsinki University of Technology, CS

3 2

Re: NetApp F220 worth it?
by David Drum 02 Apr '97

02 Apr '97

Tom Yates penned: > i reckon this is going to be a full-blown FAQ. you fancy collating > those replies, sorting them into some kind of summary, and posting > that when the question's asked? or maybe just volunteering to send > it to anyone who asks the question? to coin a rec.motoism, you could > end up being the KotWSGATTAFAQ (Keeper of the What's So Great About > Them Toasters Anyway? FAQ). I'll be happy to collate/summarize what I have received so far, but I can't yet guarantee to be a permanent keeper of the FAQ because we don't have and might not get a toaster. If worse comes to worst, I'll have to pass along what I collected to someone else. Regards, David K. Drum david(a)more.net -- "That man has a rare gift for obfuscation." -- ST:DS9 * "It's hard to be bored when you're as stupid as a line." -- Vernor Vinge * "Reality has a tendency to be so uncomfortably real." -- Neil Peart * "You can only measure the size of your head from the inside." -- Larry Wall

1 0

Re: How do *you* manage snapshots?
by Steve Gremban 01 Apr '97

01 Apr '97

Vishy, I am backing up the toasters through nfs mounts on the OpenVision Netbackup server. The server is a Sun Ultra2 running Solaris 2.5.1. This means that nfs is multi-threaded and won't block if a mount hangs. It also means that the pathname to the mounted directory is no longer a link to /tmp_mnt/... which means it can be used without worrying about running a prebackup script to mount the directory and then backing up through /tmp_mnt. The toasters are fddi attached as is the backup server. The drives I use are DLT7000 drives and they are in an STK9710 tape library. Each tape holds 35GB native and the STK can hold 560 tapes. Our NFAS-1300 and NFAS-1400 toasters backup at about 2.6GB/hour and the F330 toasters at about 4.3GB/hour. OpenVision is working on a toaster client using the NDMP API developed by NAC and Budtool but I don't know when it will be available. I hope sooner than later. regards, Steve Gremban gremban(a)ti.com ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- >From gplkrshv(a)cig.mot.com Tue Apr 1 07:47:08 1997 From: Vishy Gopalakrishnan <gplkrshv(a)cig.mot.com> Subject: Re: How do *you* manage snapshots? To: gremban(a)msp.sc.ti.com (Steve Gremban) Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 07:45:29 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Steve, Could you describe your NetApp-OpenVision setup ? Our site has 3 F330s which we have to start using NetBackup on (we currently do an nfs mount and use some home grown scripts). What kind of performance (transfer rates) have you been getting ? Are you using DLT drives/jukeboxes ? Has OpenVision mentioned anything about NetApp-native NetBackup clients ? Any pinters appreciated. Thanks Vishy -- Vishy Gopalakrishnan | Motorola CIG ITS ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------

1 0

How do *you* manage snapshots?
by Steve Gremban 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

> We have the following policy: "snap sched 2 6 12", 2 > weeklies, 6 nightlys, and 12 hourlies. Since the data on our toasters is being edited interactively there is a high probability that lost or corrupted data will be discovered the day it occurs. By using 12 without the @ I can get back to good data to within an hour of when it was messed up on the day of occurrence. This has worked out well for us. NOTE: I am using up 20 snapshots which is the limit. If you are doing a dump (which creates its own snapshot) you should leave off 1 snapshot from the schedule. We are backing up toasters using nfs mounts and OpenVision Netbackup software. regards, Steve Gremban gremban(a)ti.com ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- >From madhatta(a)turing.mathworks.com Mon Mar 31 16:43:31 1997 From: sterling(a)netapp.com (Bruce Sterling Woodcock) Subject: How do *you* manage snapshots? To: gremban(a)msp.sc.ti.com (Steve Gremban) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 14:41:50 -0800 (PST) Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > We have the following policy: "snap sched 2 6 12", 2 > weeklies, 6 nightlys, and 12 hourlies. Interesting. I use "snap sched 1 6 7@8,10,12,14,16,18,20". This tends to translate to about a 10 - 20% snapshot reserve depending on our filer's usage pattern... I like to keep that snapshot reserve 50 - 75% full most of the time so I have a buffer to handle large deletes gracefully when they occur. What snap reserve do you use? I am curious to hear from other admins on this issue as well. Someone else mentioned that when both the filesystem and snapshots are full, it can be very tricky and may require manually deleteing snapshots. This is quite true. As I think the manual mentions, "preventing" a snapshot from growing could lead to strange behavior (i.e. rm *failing* due to lack of disk space). The only real workaround is to keep a snap reserve large enough for your desired schedule. If you need to, buy more disk. :) Bruce -- Bruce Sterling Woodcock ------ Systems Administrator ][ sterling(a)netapp.com Network & Systems Administration - Network Appliance ][ sterling(a)netcom.com ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------

1 0

Re: Considering buying an F330
by Steve Gremban 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

1) Minimizing downtime was one of our major requirements. That includes downtime due to admin tasks like patch installs and OS upgrades as well as downtime due to hardware malfunction. Fast boot time (2 minutes or so) is ensured by keeping a snapshot of the filesystem in NVRAM and journaling nfs requests that arrived since the snapshot. If the system is shut off without halting, upon bootup it will write the snapshot from NVRAM and run the journaled nfs requests guaranteeing a consistent filesystem. You don't need to run "fsck" or some other filesystem consistency checker which can take a long time to run. Most patch installs and OS upgrades are easy: untar, download, and reboot takes all of 5 minutes. The toaster has raid4 to protect against disk failure. A disk is the most likely component to fail. When a disk dies the system runs in degraded mode and your filesystem is at risk from another disk failure. The toaster can be configured for a hot spare so that raid redundancy can be restored quickly and automatically. 2) Snapshots when used correctly can save alot of time and wasted effort. If your data is created and deleted and recreated etc. etc. recurrently such as doing edit/compile/run or when running simulations over and over with incremental changes then snapshots are not a good thing. They will take over all available filesystem space (caveat: depends on how often snapshots are done, the size of your filesystem, and the amount of data that is created/deleted/changed). I restrict the data going to our toasters to that created interactively by our designers using Cadence. An IC design database may have 6 or more people working in it and if a cell disappears or the database becomes corrupted (for any of a million reasons) we only lose at most a few hours of effort by copying back a previous hourly from snapshots. We have the following policy: "snap sched 2 6 12", 2 weeklies, 6 nightlys, and 12 hourlies. regards, Steve Gremban gremban(a)ti.com

3 2

Re: Considering buying an F330
by Steve Gremban 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

I use the default 20% value for snapshot reserve. On an F330 our setup looks like this: 10 disks data (35.2 GB) 2 disks snapshots (8.8 GB) 1 disk parity 1 disk hot swap. Snapshot reserve usage stays about 20% to 50% except when the toaster gets full. As Jim Davis says in his message: >This has been a sticky problem with our F220. We currently use the >default schedule in the sysadmin guide, more or less, and that means >once you get close to running out of disk space you have a problem >-- deleting files just shuffles them from the filesystem to >.snapshot, so there's no net savings in disk space. And the >.snapshot space will cheerfully spill over the 20% default. In our case you can delete 8.8GB of data in a 2 week period (we keep 2 weekly snapshots) and see an 8.8GB increase in user free space. If you delete anything beyond 8.8GB you will not see any further increase in user free space. The 8.8GB snapshot reserve has been sufficient for us on toasters where I have restricted the type of data to interactive design databases. The toaster that I allowed simulations on could only run a few hourly and 1 nightly snapshot. regards, Steve Gremban gremban(a)ti.com ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- On Mon, 31 Mar 1997, Steve Gremban wrote: > I restrict the data going to our toasters to that created > interactively by our designers using Cadence. An IC design > database may have 6 or more people working in it and if a cell > disappears or the database becomes corrupted (for any of a > million reasons) we only lose at most a few hours of effort by > copying back a previous hourly from snapshots. > > We have the following policy: "snap sched 2 6 12", 2 > weeklies, 6 nightlys, and 12 hourlies. what is your snap reserve set at, may i ask? Tom Yates - Unix Chap - The Mathworks, Inc. ------------- End Forwarded Message -------------

1 0

How does a Netapp toaster keep time?
by craig Rodrigues 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

Hi, I just got a Netapp box installed where I work, and the damn thing doesn't keep time properly. For some reason, the Netapp time keeps setting itself 2 hours behind the current system time. (We have a bunch of Solaris boxes mounting the Netapp). The sysadmin who looks after it in my office claims that Netapp tech support told him that the only why to correctly set the time is to type rdate on the Netapp box!!! This seems fishy to me because even after our sysadmin does this, the Netapp seems to drift back to 2 hours behind the current system time (of our Sun boxes). Any ideas? -- Craig Rodrigues craigr(a)gis.net

2 1

Re: How does a Netapp toaster keep time?
by sthaug＠nethelp.no 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

> I just got a Netapp box installed where I work, > and the damn thing doesn't keep time properly. > For some reason, the Netapp time keeps setting itself > 2 hours behind the current system time. Sounds like a time zone problem. > The sysadmin who looks after it in my office claims that Netapp tech > support told him that the only why to correctly set the time > is to type rdate on the Netapp box!!! I haven't found any other way either. Not that rdate is a big deal, but I'd like to have it run regularly, *without* enabling rsh access to the NetApp. I'd like ntp even better, of course :-) Btw, our F330 is about 30 secs fast after 14 days of uptime. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug(a)nethelp.no

1 0

Re: Considering buying an F330
by David Drum 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

David Drum penned: > If you the choice to make again, would you buy another Network > Appliance, or would you get the biggest disk array you could find for > the same money? Why? Thanks for all your replies. I didn't expect the responses to be any different, really. Regards, David -- "That man has a rare gift for obfuscation." -- ST:DS9 * "It's hard to be bored when you're as stupid as a line." -- Vernor Vinge * "Reality has a tendency to be so uncomfortably real." -- Neil Peart * "You can only measure the size of your head from the inside." -- Larry Wall

1 0

Anybody else have a F210? (black cover)
by Meng Chua 31 Mar '97

31 Mar '97

Just wondering if anyone else out ther has a F210, Black cover. We have one, and its working out great for our needs. Just wondering if anyone knows why the sales dept does not publich this product. Meng Chua meng(a)beamtech.com

2 1

Re: Considering buying an F330
by kls＠netapp.com 29 Mar '97

29 Mar '97

> > If you the choice to make again, would you buy another Network > > Appliance, or would you get the biggest disk array you could > > find for the same money? Why? > > *provided i needed RAID5*, that's a no-brainer. it's noticeably better > than any of the other RAID5 offerings i've tried, and likely cheaper than > RAID0+1 with anyone's discs and arrays. Thanks for the kind words! However, lest anyone get too confused, our filers use RAID-4, not RAID-5. Still parity and the same degree of data protection, just on one disk instead of being interleaved amongst all disks as RAID-5 does. The advantage of RAID-5 is that you can use a traditional file system, designed for a single disk and not for RAID, and distribute the parity workload amongst the disks instead of it being focused on one disk. NetApp uses a file system designed for RAID to avoid the parity disk bottleneck. RAID-4 has the advantage of allowing you to expand the RAID group (even by just one disk), and of using disks of varying geometry in the same RAID group. RAID-5 requires all disks to have the same geometry and cannot itself be expanded, though you can expand the filesystem by concatenating an additional RAID group (not just one disk, and more space is lost to parity). -- Karl

1 0

Re: Considering buying an F330
by Caroline Brossi Yates 28 Mar '97

28 Mar '97

> > *provided i needed RAID5*, that's a no-brainer. it's noticeably better > than any of the other RAID5 offerings i've tried, and likely cheaper than DEC makes a screamingly fast RAID 5 box... > RAID0+1 with anyone's discs and arrays. administration interface, > snapshots, ease of dumping and nice blue faceplate (just kidding) are all > factors for me, too. Service is also an important factor, which NetApp is +very+ adept at. David, if you buy F330s, though, make sure they send you BLUE NettApp tee-shirts. We bought a pair of F330s last fall and are still waiting for ours. Maybe their sales department needs to take lessons from their support department... ho hum! -Caroline

2 1

Considering buying an F330
by David Drum 28 Mar '97

28 Mar '97

Hello anyone and everyone, I found the article announcing this list on comp.protocols.nfs via Deja News. Rather than lurk for a while, I need to jump right in and ask a leading question: If you the choice to make again, would you buy another Network Appliance, or would you get the biggest disk array you could find for the same money? Why? We're about to buy an F330, and I am in search of decision reassurance. I can't help but think I am splurging some. Regards, David K. Drum david(a)more.net -- "That man has a rare gift for obfuscation." -- ST:DS9 * "It's hard to be bored when you're as stupid as a line." -- Vernor Vinge * "Reality has a tendency to be so uncomfortably real." -- Neil Peart * "You can only measure the size of your head from the inside." -- Larry Wall

1 0

non-F toasters
by Tom Yates 21 Mar '97

21 Mar '97

is there anyone out there who's still got non F-series toasters? particularly, has anyone got 450s? Tom Yates - Unix Chap - The Mathworks, Inc. - +1 (508) 647 7561 MAG#65061 DoD#0135 AMA#461546 1024/CFDFDE39 0C E7 46 60 BB 96 87 05 04 BD FB F8 BB 20 C1 8C

2 1

Re: "DU" lying on sunos5 machines
by Amy Chused 20 Mar '97

20 Mar '97

It's 'cuz Solaris du counts blocks, not K, and the netapp blocks are 16K, not 1/2 K. I think there's an option to du to tell it how big the bloody blocks are or to make it count K, not blocks. 'Course, if I remember correctly, that option is broken in the stock install, but there's a patch available from sun that fixes it, I think. Amy -- answering off the top of her head, with an answer worth what you paid for it. At 10:40 AM 3/20/97 -0600, Jim Fondren wrote: >I sent the following report to support but also wanted to ask the >user community about this... > >The unix "du" command is lying to me on Sunos5 machines... > >sanantonio: ll arc >-rw-rw-rw- 1 rich users 1053700 Aug 12 1996 arc > >sanantonio: du -sk arc >65 arc > >sanantonio: /files/home/jim/ftp/fileutils-3.16/src/du -sk arc >65 arc > >sanantonio: uname -a >SunOS sanantonio 5.5 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1 > > >A Sunos4 box says... > >[dallas] ll arc >-rw-rw-rw- 1 rich users 1053700 Aug 12 1996 arc >[dallas] du -s arc >2072 arc >[dallas] uname -a >SunOS dallas 4.1.3_U1 1 sun4m >Any known work-arounds? I checked NETAPPs' FAQ and didn't see anything. > >My Netapps box is a F220... NetApp Release 4.0a: Wed Oct 16 05:03:33 PDT 1996

3 2

DU Lying to me on Sunos5 (last word)
by Jim Fondren 20 Mar '97

20 Mar '97

Hello again, Just a last update on my problem with DU which has now been happily resolved. :-) The patch for sol 2.5 (2.5.1 includes it) is now up to 103477-07. I'm mirroring it at ftp.cartotech.com/pub/sunpatch/103477-07.tar.gz Symptoms are DU returning erroneous info on filesystems mounted from a NETAPP device using NFS V3. Thanks, Jim F CARTOTECH

1 0

"DU" lying on sunos5 machines
by Jim Fondren 20 Mar '97

20 Mar '97

Hello, I sent the following report to support but also wanted to ask the user community about this... The unix "du" command is lying to me on Sunos5 machines... sanantonio: ll arc -rw-rw-rw- 1 rich users 1053700 Aug 12 1996 arc sanantonio: du -sk arc 65 arc sanantonio: /files/home/jim/ftp/fileutils-3.16/src/du -sk arc 65 arc sanantonio: uname -a SunOS sanantonio 5.5 Generic sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1 A Sunos4 box says... [dallas] ll arc -rw-rw-rw- 1 rich users 1053700 Aug 12 1996 arc [dallas] du -s arc 2072 arc [dallas] uname -a SunOS dallas 4.1.3_U1 1 sun4m Any known work-arounds? I checked NETAPPs' FAQ and didn't see anything. My Netapps box is a F220... NetApp Release 4.0a: Wed Oct 16 05:03:33 PDT 1996 Thanks, ----------------------- Jim.Fondren(a)PoBox.Com --------------------------- Jim Fondren Unix Systems and GIS Programming jim(a)cartotech.com CARTOTECH 210-657-1500 11900 Crownpoint Suite 100 San Antonio, TX 78233 USA NO UNSOLICITED COMMERCIAL EMAIL - NO EXCEPTIONS

2 1

DU lying on sunos5 machines (update)
by Jim Fondren 20 Mar '97

20 Mar '97

Thankyou to all that responded. Your hints let met get closer to a solution. http://puma.join.ad.jp/tech/faq-e/sun/solaris2/Q5.51.html ...contains a related reference and mentions a patch to 2.5, 103226 (SPARC). Apparently solaris 2.5.1 doesn't have this bug (and I verified that on one of my 2.5.1 boxes). Thanks again, ----------------------- Jim.Fondren(a)PoBox.Com --------------------------- Jim Fondren Unix Systems and GIS Programming jim(a)cartotech.com CARTOTECH 210-657-1500 11900 Crownpoint Suite 100 San Antonio, TX 78233 USA

1 0

Re: "DU" lying on sunos5 machines
by Ketil Kirkerud 20 Mar '97

20 Mar '97

Jim Fondren <jim(a)cartotech.com> writes: > > Hello, > > I sent the following report to support but also wanted to ask the > user community about this... > > The unix "du" command is lying to me on Sunos5 machines... Theis is a known bug in SunOS 5.? Their nfs client/server code has a bug in it that makes du report wrongly. There are patches available. (I can't remember offhand what their IDs are, though) regards, ---Ketil Kirkerud, Scandinavia Online

1 0

Write operations using NFS v2?
by Ragnar Lonn 18 Mar '97

18 Mar '97

Hello, Thought I'd try out this list in the hope of sharing some info with others as opposed to bugging NetApp support only for my own sake ;) (but I'll CC them at least) I'm setting up an F540 as a newsspool NFS server. That is, I will store Usenet news articles on it. A handful of machines will mount the filesystem read-only and these machines will accept user newsreader connections. Then I will have one single machine that mount the filesystem read/write - it will be the machine that stores incoming articles and removes old ones from the filer. Now, for news I've got the advice to use NFS v2 because clients using v3 issue the readdir+ operation unique to v3 and this operation does some extra stuff (as opposed to v2's readdir) that most applications take advantage of but news software (INN nnrpd) has no use of the extra data returned by readdir+ and this makes it a performance loss to use v3 in this particular case. But... I've read that NFS writes are much faster in NFS v3 than v2. This, of course, leads me to my question (ta-daa) : Actually, I'll make it two questions. If the anser to the first one is no, the second one is not so interesting anymore ;) 1. Are write operations slower on a NetApp server if you use NFS v2 compared to when you're using NFS v3? (and if so, about how much does it differ?) 2. (if the answer to the above question was 'yes') Could I leave the option "nfs.v3.enable" ON, on the NetApp and mount the filesystem from the reader clients using e.g "mount -o vers=2,proto=udp" (can't remember the exact syntax) while at the same time, from the client that is supposed to be doing a lot of *writing* to the NetApp, mount using version 3 to speed up the writes? This machine won't be running nnrpd so it won't be doing any readdir+ in vain. Regards, /Ragnar, Algonet

4 8

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters