toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

Re: Obnoxious Satisfaction Survey
by Jason D. Kelleher 03 Feb '99

03 Feb '99

In message <7F608EC0BDE6D111B53A00805FA7F7DA02BE9004(a)TAHOE.netapp.com>, "Sul livan, Shelly" writes: >Jason, > >I'm looking into this now. I don't know at this point if this is a >problem with our mail server, CustomerCast's or some other glitch. Are >you getting spammed for the same exact case, or have different cases >been closed over the last few days? > >We're certainly not in the business of trying to spam anyone, especially >after they had nice things to say about us :) > >I'm investigating now and will get back to you with the outcome. > >Thanks, > >Shelly Sullivan >Technical Support Shift Manager >Network Appliance, Inc. >2770 San Tomas Expressway >Santa Clara, CA 95051 >408-367-3531, 408-367-3450 Fax All the email concerns the same case number. Thanks for you help with this, it's greatly appreciated. BTW, I the email stated that surveys will be sent out after every closed case. Was sampling considered at all? It might be better received than email after every case. Then again, I wonder how many people actually have to open cases more than every couple of months. jason

2 1

RE: Obnoxious Satisfaction Survey
by Sullivan, Shelly 03 Feb '99

03 Feb '99

Jason, I'm looking into this now. I don't know at this point if this is a problem with our mail server, CustomerCast's or some other glitch. Are you getting spammed for the same exact case, or have different cases been closed over the last few days? We're certainly not in the business of trying to spam anyone, especially after they had nice things to say about us :) I'm investigating now and will get back to you with the outcome. Thanks, Shelly Sullivan Technical Support Shift Manager Network Appliance, Inc. 2770 San Tomas Expressway Santa Clara, CA 95051 408-367-3531, 408-367-3450 Fax > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason D. Kelleher [mailto:kelleher@susq.com] > Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 1999 7:34 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Obnoxious Satisfaction Survey > > > > Anyone open a service call with NetApp within the last week? I > opened two last week. After closing the first call, I received an > email with the subject "Your Satisfaction with Network Appliance" > that contained a survey to evaluate my satisfaction with the call. > Since I was happy with the outcome I decided to fill out > the survey > and sing the proaises of NetApp tech support. (I can be a real > bastard when I have a problem and need their help and I was hoping > this would somehow make up for that in the cosmic scheme of > things.) That done I deleted the email and went back to pretending > to work. > > The next morning, after closing my second service call, I received > another email survey from NetApp. (Actually, the email > says NetApp > "engaged CustomerCast, an independent research company, to conduct > the following short email survey".) I decided that since I just > sent out a glowing report I could ignore this surevey. ...But I > was wrong!!! > > Every morning since I colsed the call I've received this > survey. I > even called NetApp yesterday to see if this could be stopped and > this morning I received two copies of the survey! Does > anyone know > who I can call? Where to I send my first born to put and end to > this? The email address we have listed with NetApp is an internal > mailing list (so the other 6 people in my group can handle issues > if I'm out) and I'm getting nasty grams... :( > > Getting spam'd by some weasely little con-artist trying to get me > to take part in a "MAKE MONEY FAST" scheme is one thing, but I > certainly don't expect this from a company I do business with. > > jason > > --- > Jason D. Kelleher kelleher(a)susq.com > Susquehanna Partners, G.P. 610.617.2721 (voice) > 401 City Line Ave, Suite 220 610.617.2916 (fax) > Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004-1122 >

1 0

Re: A tale of two domains...
by Keith Brown 03 Feb '99

03 Feb '99

>The problem: I need to be able for clients of Dom1 to place data onto the filer >so that members of Dom2 can access the data and vice versa. Ordinarily, users in one domain are not permitted to access resources in another domain unless there is a trust relationship betwixt the domains. This holds for any Windows NT resident resource (shares, printers etc...) as well as filer based resources. If you can not put the needed trust relationship in place (for whatever reason), your only option is to enable and use the so-called "anonymous access" provision which is provided within the Windows NT security model. On a filer, this is quite simple (as ever! :-)). You just need to set the "cifs.guest_account" option to a valid user identity that is defined within the filer's /etc/passwd file (or the NIS passwd.byname equivalent thereof). So, for example, if you... options cifs.guest_account dom2usrs ... then the CIFS users defined in Dom2 will be able to access the filer anonymously, and they will be mapped to the UNIX "dom2usrs" account (which in turn maps to a UNIX UID) for the puproses of assessing what they can and cannot do to the file system. More specifically, their "dom2usrs" identity will be used to assess what they can and cannot do to a UNIX-Style file system. On an NTFS-Style file system, they will be controlled by NTFS permissions, and their identity will, I believe, be defined as the Windows NT "AnonymousLogon" well known SID (S-1-5-7, if you care! :-)). The shares that the users in Dom2 want to connect to, as well as the areas of the file system they wish to access will have to be somehow accessible to these accounts. This will usually mean manipulating file system permissions and share level ACLs to provide these users with the level of access they need. Unfortunately you do not have the option to control these users access individually. Keith

1 0

A tale of two domains...
by Patrick.Day.B＠bayer.com 02 Feb '99

02 Feb '99

I am in need of some help. Here is the background... I have two NT domains, Dom1 and Dom2. The domains are NOT trusted and Dom2 is essentially a closed network, making no connections whatsoever to Dom1. I have one netfiler (740 with Ontap 5.1.2r3) who (through CIFS) is a member of Dom1. One NIC port is connected to Dom1's Subnet and another NIC port is connected to Dom2. Whew, thanks for staying with me so far. The problem: I need to be able for clients of Dom1 to place data onto the filer so that members of Dom2 can access the data and vice versa. Has anyone attempted this or does anyone have any suggestions? Any constructive input would be appreciated. I thank you ahead of time. Patrick Day Sys Admin Bayer Corporation patrick.day.b(a)bayer.com

1 0

ndmpcopy license
by Daniel Quinlan 30 Jan '99

30 Jan '99

Maybe someone at NetApp can answer this question... What are the copying/license terms for ndmpcopy? The source code is copyright Network Appliance and PDC, contains a few disclaimers, but no terms for source modification and copying. Maybe an Open Source license would be in order. - Dan

4 3

Using MORE than one narrow shelf on a single Wide Bus
by Weeks, Thomas 29 Jan '99

29 Jan '99

Hi all... Here's a question that I still have never got a straight answer on from anyone: Using a F230 server with two wide SCSI busses. I have a wide shelf on my 9b bus, and a narrow DEC-Shelf (with personality module) on my 9a bus. My Q is this: On my 9a bus(only); since the personality module allows you to set the beginning SCSI/Wide address of the narrow shelf on the wide bus, could one essentially run TWO narrow shelves on a wide bus? This would be done by setting the first narrow shelf to map narrow-SCSI ID's 0-6 to the wide-SCSI bus 0-6, and setting the personality module in the SECOND narrow shelf (on 9a) to superposition the second narrow-SCSI shelf's ID's 0-6 to the SCSI-wide bus ID's of 8-15? If SO... then I could buy a personality module for one of my extra narrow shelves lying around and use TWO narrow shelves on the 9a bus of our F230! If not.. I am thinking about ripping it all out and putting it on a Linux box running SW RAID and SAMBA. But I would really like to keep it set up on the NetApp box if possible. Anyone know for SURE if this can be done (the former.. not the latter). Thomas Weeks GTE SYSTEMS ENGINEER Testing-Integration Center "The Pit" Brooks AFB, DSN 240-5444

1 0

Used NetApps?
by Brian Marcotte 29 Jan '99

29 Jan '99

I'm looking into the possibility of buying used Filers from companies who resell used equipment, or directly from other end users. I've seen no mention of this idea on the list. Does anyone know of any such companies (or do you have a filer you'd like to sell me?) Thanks. -- - Brian

1 0

RE: multiple CIFS HOME directories?
by Hawley, Rob 29 Jan '99

29 Jan '99

The symlink feature works due to a quirk in the implementation. Home Dirs work by resolving the path <cifs.home_dir>/<user_name> using an internal NFS like operation. Since the operation is NFS like, it knows how to follow symlinks. As Keith said, we now have the root of a virtual share so we obey the NT security model from that point on. You can't follow the symlink in CIFS due to the current security restrictions on respecting share boundaries. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > mailto: hawleyr(a)netapp.com <mailto:hawleyr@netapp.com> US Mail: Network Appliance Inc. > Phone: 408-367-3254 2770 San Tomas Expressway > FAX: 408-367-3451 Santa Clara, CA 95051 -----Original Message----- From: Graham Knight [mailto:grahamk@ast.lmco.com] Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 4:27 AM To: Keith Brown Cc: quinlan(a)transmeta.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com; support(a)netapp.com Subject: Re: multiple CIFS HOME directories? Keith Brown wrote: > >Is it possible to have multiple default shares for CIFS homes? > > Not at the moment, although some enhancements are currently being made in this > area. For people who have UNIX though, there is a workaround. Here's the gig... > > The idea is that you create a single home directories > directory and populate it with symbolic links to the real home directories > which can be anywhere on the filer. > > So, if: > > options cifs.home_dir {/vol/vol0}/home > > and joe and bill have home directories in /vol/vol5/home, then from a UNIX > client you can: > > % cd /filer/vol0/home > % ln -s /vol/vol5/home/joe ./joe > % ln -s /vol/vol5/home/bill ./bill We do this and it works very well. One thing that has always confused me though - the cifs.homedir works - but if i set up /filer/vol0/home as a share and browse to it all i see are the unresolved links. How come it can do one and not the other? It'd be nice to be able to browse to one spot on the filer and see all the home dirs.... Graham

1 0

ndmpcopy error?
by Anthony Fiarito 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

First off, thanks to those who replied to my previous post about moving large amounts of data between netapps. I am trying most of the recommendations and have come to ndmpcopy. I have everything set up to copy data from one netapp to a second one, but I am getting an error. Has anyone come across the following error and know of any way to remedy it? adminhost# ./ndmpcopy na1:/vol/mail/testdata na2:/vol/mail -l 0 \ -v -sa root:rootpw -da root:rootpw Connecting to na1. Connecting to na2. na1: CONNECT: Connection established. na2: CONNECT: Connection established. na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: creating "/vol/mail/.snapshot/snapshot_for_backup.0" snapshot. na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: Using Partial Volume Dump na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: Date of this level 0 dump: Thu Jan 28 23:06:32 1999. na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch. na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: Dumping /vol/mail/testdata/ to NDMP connection na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: mapping (Pass I)[regular files] na1: LOG: DUMP: na1: LOG: mapping (Pass II)[directories] na2: LOG: RESTORE: na2: LOG: restore: Can't create /etc/tmp directory: No such file or directory na2: Connection halted: HALT: Internal error! Elapsed time: 0 hours, 1 minutes, 39 seconds. Thanks a bunch in advance! -alf --- Anthony Fiarito alf(a)cp.net

2 1

Re: Samba 2.0 as Windows PDC ?
by Jason D. Kelleher 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

In message <199901281940.NAA21281(a)vortex.more.net>, David Drum writes: >Quoth Mark Muhlestein: > >> When LDAP support is available it should help the account synchronization >> problem greatly. We are planning to provide that in the Win2000 timeframe >. > >I don't think I will live that long. > >Regards, > >David K. Drum >david(a)more.net Don't worry, I hear there are cryogenics companies that will freeze your body and revive you when Win2000 ships... :) jason

1 0

Re: Samba 2.0 as Windows PDC ?
by Mark Muhlestein 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

When LDAP support is available it should help the account synchronization problem greatly. We are planning to provide that in the Win2000 timeframe. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan(a)transmeta.com> To: Keith Brown <keith(a)netapp.com> Cc: quinlan(a)transmeta.com <quinlan(a)transmeta.com>; toasters(a)mathworks.com <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Date: Thursday, January 28, 1999 12:10 AM Subject: Re: Samba 2.0 as Windows PDC ? >Keith Brown <keith(a)netapp.com> writes: > >>> Does anyone have any experience using Samba 2.0 as a PDC? > >> We don't officially support the use of non-Microsoft domain >> controllers at this time. Sorry... > >Ahem, you didn't actually answer my question. > >>> Also, what products (like Samba 2.0), if any, are people using to >>> synchronize logins between Unix (NIS) and Windows (NT PDC), >>> especially in a mixed environment using NetApp filers. > >> We have one of our own, and it's free! :-) >> [...] the "SecureShare Account Migrator" tool. > >It looks like that tool only lets you go from NT to Unix, which >unfortunately is not useful for us. I was hoping for a program that >allows NT to stay synchronized with an NIS domain (or just /etc/passwd >and /etc/group). > >- Dan >

2 1

RE: Tape Robots and "autoloading".
by Genrich, James R 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

Steve & Others, There are a few questions to be answered from the previous information. What is the OS being run on the F630? Is the Q2/15 an Autoloader of Robot version. Based upon a few assumptions there are three options. 1. If cost is the major consideration for using the Dump command as opposed to Backup Software there are a couple of options. First, you can use the control panel on a 9730 to mount drives to certain drives ( I am not sure if this is available in the Q2/15). This is not very automated since an individual will have to be present to use the control panel for mounts and unmounts. Secondly, you could write a script to do this, however this will be time consuming and it is reinventing the wheel (ie backup software is already written and tested) 2. To be able to perform simultaneous backup of 2 or more servers a backup software can be used along with STK ACSLS software (This software simply controls the robot and shares it between multiple servers or multiple backup packages). ACSLS needs a stand alone SUN or IBM box to run on (Sparc 10 or Small AIX server) for UNIX and needs Libattach software from STK if NT is involved. 3. Backup software can be installed on one of the server and the additional servers can be backed up over the network simultaneously using multiplexing capabilities common in most backup software. Based upon the current information these are the possible solutions. Jim Genrich MPSE Storage Technology, Inc. ---------- From: grdodson(a)lexmark.com [SMTP:grdodson@lexmark.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 8:29 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Tape Robots and "autoloading". We are purchasing a F760 and are faced with the usual backup dilemma. To backup our F630 we have a single drive DLT robot (Breece Hill Q2.15) and use local dumps. This takes 15+ hours a day (3 tapes) and obviously doesn't scale well. So we are investigating larger robots with multiple tape drives. Currently the StorageTek 9730 is looking interesting. The problem we have is by using local dumps we need the tape robot to autoload the drives. Moreover with a multi drive robot the autoload function needs to be able to control which slots are loaded into which drives. Anyone know of the StorageTek supports this? Any other recommendations multi drive 28+ slot tape robots are also welcome. FYI. The reason we aren't just stacking two Breece Hill Q2.15's is that we have been underwhelmed with the usability and quality of these boxes. We find the documentation and user interface to be quite poor. (And they never delivered the S/W upgrade they promised) The reason we aren't using an NDMP backup S/W package is that the nature of the data on this box requires a "level 0" backup every night. Most of the features of the NDMP S/W would never be needed (indexing, etc.) and therefore be an unnecessary expense. Graydon Dodson (606) 232-6483 grdodson(a)lexmark.com Lexmark International Inc.

1 0

Re: multiple CIFS HOME directories?
by Mark Muhlestein 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

Graham writes: >> % cd /filer/vol0/home >> % ln -s /vol/vol5/home/joe ./joe >> % ln -s /vol/vol5/home/bill ./bill > >We do this and it works very well. One thing that has always confused me >though - the cifs.homedir works - but if i set up /filer/vol0/home as a share and >browse to it all i see are the unresolved links. How come it >can do one and not the other? It'd be nice to be able to browse >to one spot on the filer and see all the home dirs.... For now that won't work because a symlink can't be followed out of a share (for security reasons). We're working on a way to get around that restriction. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com

1 0

quotas not working on clients
by George Kahler 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

Quota (quota [ -v ] [ username ] on all of our client machines stopped reporting user's disk quota. The problem was reported to NetApp but the answer I got back was that they were able to reproduce the 'problem' and that it works as designed. :-( Here is the background. At our university we have two toasters. A F520 and a F330 (Data ONTAP 4.3.3) that are part of a complex of machines used for providing electronic mail for staff and students (nfs). There are about 40,000+ accounts. The F330 used to contain the spool and the F520 contained two home directories (quota trees), one for staff and the other for students. Quota for spool (F330) were none. Quota for the individual home directories were set. The /etc/quotas file looked something like this /home_sta tree 39G /home_stu tree 20G # /home_sta/j/joe user 40M .. /home_stu/a/stud1 user 5M /home_stu/z/stud99 user 6M .. For performance reasons the spool was migrated from the F330 to the F520 and the /home_stu directory was migrated from the F520 to the F330. The F330 has only the one quota tree, /home_stu, where quotas are still defined as shown above. The F520 has two quota trees, /spool and /home_sta, where we don't want any individual quotas for the spool, however, we do need individual quotas on the /home_sta directories. The new /etc/quotas file looks like this /spool tree 25G /home_sta tree 39G # /home_sta/j/joe user@home_sta 45M /home_sta/x/fred user@home_sta 90M ... Now, all of the client machines (SunOS, Solaris 2.6) stopped reporting any user quotas. The quotas ARE still being enforced by the toaster, however, when a user queries his/her quota they get back just the headings, % id uid=101(dummy) gid=277(employee) % pwd /home/sta/x/dummy % quota -v Disk quotas for dummy (uid 101): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft % If, on the other hand, your home directory is on the F330 which contains only the one quota tree, the quotas do get reported correctly. % id uid=195(dummy1) gid=202(mailuser) % pwd /home/stu/t/dummy1 % quota -v Disk quotas for dummy1 (uid 195): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft /home/stu 72 5120 5120 32 10240 10240 % Any help would be greatly appreciated and I apologize for the long and winded description of the problem. George ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- George Kahler e-mail: george(a)yorku.ca UNIX Systems Administrator humans: (416) 736-5257 x.22699 Computing Services, York University machines: (416) 736-5830 Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3J-1P3

2 1

RE: Samba 2.0 as Windows PDC ?
by Allison, Bridget 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

>Does anyone have any experience using Samba 2.0 as a PDC? I don't know of any filer customer using Samba's PDC functionality successfully with the filer. I do know that based on my periodic checks with the Samba team on just when it makes sense for us to sink our engineering time into making sure we work with a Samba PDC, it's too early to start that work right now. The PDC support is not production quality - that's the word from the Samba team rather than mine. So, we do intend to work with a Samba PDC, it's part of our plan and we're trying to make sure the Samba side is fully cooked before we start our integration work. In the meantime, if there are customers using it successfully they haven't told me. They certainly couldn't use it with the NTFS style security today - Samba 2.0 doesn't have any SIDS to return to the filer. Since that's the case today, I'm presuming your question is more around the user authentication per se - just one aspect of PDC functionality but the primary one Samba does right now. >Also, what products (like Samba 2.0), if any, are people using to >synchronize logins between Unix (NIS) and Windows (NT PDC), especially >in a mixed environment using NetApp filers. Keith suggested our one-way tool, the MS Services for Unix is another one-way tool. I've seen some discussion on this topic on one of the Samba mailing lists - I think it was the samba-ntdom list - just this past week or so. You might want to check out the archives http://us1.samba.org/samba/archives.html If you find something you'd recommend then please let me know - we'd be interested in finding something to recommend to customers. Bridget ----------------------- Network Appliance Inc. 408 367 3419

1 0

multiple CIFS HOME directories?
by Daniel Quinlan 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

Is it possible to have multiple default shares for CIFS homes? I am running 5.1.2P2. For example, let's say I have two quota trees on a NetApp. One is /vol/vol0/home_eng and the other is /vol/vol0/home_finance. Let's say home_eng is exported via NFS (for engineers) and home_finance is not (because it contains sensitive information such as employee salaries). I want to allow people to access both via CIFS. It is assumed that there will not be any username collisions between the two hierarchies. So if there is a /home_eng/bob directory, there won't be a /home_finance/bob directory (and vice versa). Can what I am trying to accomplish be done? (People like being able to map \\filer\myname to a drive letter. They don't like having to do stuff like \\filer\something -> W:\ and then having to go to W:\myname.) Thanks. - Dan

2 1

Re: Samba 2.0 as Windows PDC ?
by Keith Brown 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

>Does anyone have any experience using Samba 2.0 as a PDC? We don't officially support the use of non-Microsoft domain controllers at this time. Sorry... >Also, what products (like Samba 2.0), if any, are people using to >synchronize logins between Unix (NIS) and Windows (NT PDC), especially >in a mixed environment using NetApp filers. We have one of our own, and it's free! :-) Check out... http://now.netapp.com/tools/ and select the "SecureShare Account Migrator" tool. Keith

3 2

Re: multiple CIFS HOME directories?
by Keith Brown 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

>Is it possible to have multiple default shares for CIFS homes? Not at the moment, although some enhancements are currently being made in this area. For people who have UNIX though, there is a workaround. Here's the gig... The idea is that you create a single home directories directory and populate it with symbolic links to the real home directories which can be anywhere on the filer. So, if: options cifs.home_dir {/vol/vol0}/home and joe and bill have home directories in /vol/vol5/home, then from a UNIX client you can: % cd /filer/vol0/home % ln -s /vol/vol5/home/joe ./joe % ln -s /vol/vol5/home/bill ./bill and bill and joe will get to play on the autoshare world even though their home directories are not in the cifs.home_dir directory. You might be forgiven for thinking "What about the not-following-symlinks-out-of-a-share rule?". Well, this doesn't apply here because the symlink *is* the share. Also beware: % cd /filer/vol0/home % ln -s /filer/vol5/home/joe ./joe % ln -s /filer/vol5/home/bill ./bill won't do the job, because if you do this, you set the symlinks to match the NFS *clients* view of where the directories are, not the filer's view. You would then have to engage the /etc/symlink.translations mechanism to translate the symlinks betwixt views, and you probably don't want to get into that. Keith

2 1

Samba 2.0 as Windows PDC ?
by Daniel Quinlan 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

Does anyone have any experience using Samba 2.0 as a PDC? Also, what products (like Samba 2.0), if any, are people using to synchronize logins between Unix (NIS) and Windows (NT PDC), especially in a mixed environment using NetApp filers. Thanks for any info or suggestions. - Dan

1 0

Tape Robots and "autoloading".
by grdodson＠lexmark.com 28 Jan '99

28 Jan '99

We are purchasing a F760 and are faced with the usual backup dilemma. To backup our F630 we have a single drive DLT robot (Breece Hill Q2.15) and use local dumps. This takes 15+ hours a day (3 tapes) and obviously doesn't scale well. So we are investigating larger robots with multiple tape drives. Currently the StorageTek 9730 is looking interesting. The problem we have is by using local dumps we need the tape robot to autoload the drives. Moreover with a multi drive robot the autoload function needs to be able to control which slots are loaded into which drives. Anyone know of the StorageTek supports this? Any other recommendations multi drive 28+ slot tape robots are also welcome. FYI. The reason we aren't just stacking two Breece Hill Q2.15's is that we have been underwhelmed with the usability and quality of these boxes. We find the documentation and user interface to be quite poor. (And they never delivered the S/W upgrade they promised) The reason we aren't using an NDMP backup S/W package is that the nature of the data on this box requires a "level 0" backup every night. Most of the features of the NDMP S/W would never be needed (indexing, etc.) and therefore be an unnecessary expense. Graydon Dodson (606) 232-6483 grdodson(a)lexmark.com Lexmark International Inc.

1 0

DEC TZ887 tape drive
by Nigel Metheringham 27 Jan '99

27 Jan '99

Anyone got one of these going on a NetApp (a 630 running 5.2.1)?? Its supposed to be just the same as a Quantum 4700, but initial tests are failing to write on it. The same drive was previously in use successfully on some other system (not NetApp). Do I need to hack the drive type ID - I thought all that was not needed with the latest releases. However 5.2.1 does not appear to be looking at the cloned_tapes in the same way as 5.1 (it didn't work right then either). Using the diag stuff on the mt command, a dump gives the following output:- DUMP: creating "/vol/web/.snapshot/snapshot_for_backup.2" snapshot. DUMP: Using Full Volume Dump DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Wed Jan 27 17:54:18 1999. DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch. DUMP: Dumping /vol/web/ to rst0a DUMP: mapping (Pass I)[regular files] DUMP: mapping (Pass II)[directories] Wed Jan 27 17:55:30 GMT [netapp2: isp_main]: Tape (4.5):cmdblk 0xfffffc0000ae2ef0 op 0xa block 0 illegal request (5 30, 0) DUMP: Tape write failed. Wed Jan 27 17:55:30 GMT [netapp2: isp_main]: Tape (4.5) unrecognized error 0x5. DUMP: DUMP IS ABORTED DUMP: Deleting "/vol/web/.snapshot/snapshot_for_backup.2" snapshot. All clues gratefully received :-) Nigel. -- [ Nigel.Metheringham(a)theplanet.net - Systems Software Engineer ] [ Tel : +44 113 207 6112 Fax : +44 113 234 6065 ] [ Real life is but a pale imitation of a Dilbert strip ] [ We're recruiting http://www.theplanet.net/profile/recruit.htm ]

1 0

DRP documents...
by eyal traitel 27 Jan '99

27 Jan '99

Has anyone wrote a Disaster Recovery Plan documents for a filer? Can someone share his documents (or at least the technical parts...) ? Yours, Eyal Traitel

1 0

DATA OnTap and WINS...
by eyal traitel 27 Jan '99

27 Jan '99

Hi! Does anyone has experience with NetApp's WINS support and Samba's WINS? I get all the time "No WINS servers are responding; still trying"... Yours, Eyal Traitel

1 0

list tweak
by fubar＠mathworks.com 26 Jan '99

26 Jan '99

I've just tweaked the toasters list, making it a bona fide majordomo list. Hopefully (if I've got it right ;-), we'll stop seeing those darned "sub-scribe" messages to the list... The change may effect any filtering you have. From now on, list mail should appear to be from "owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com", rather than me. If it breaks your setup, sorry. If there are any real problems, feel free to shout at me. ;-) K.

1 0

Fwd: Re: duplicate inode numbers - correct URL
by Andrew Bond 25 Jan '99

25 Jan '99

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters