toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

RE: Non-NDMP backup solutions?
by Benn, Paul 22 Jul '99

22 Jul '99

> Anyone know if the two DLT4000's in a Breece Hill Q7 can be replaced > with two DLT7000's? That would speed things up even further for me. I > suppose I'll have to give Breece Hill a call ... In a past life, I was able to upgrade two of our Q2-15's to DLT-7000. The drives came complete with drive trays making for a painless upgrade. Your reseller should be able to get the drives for you. You may have to get the part numbers form Breece Hill, though. Good Luck Paul Benn Network Appliance

1 0

RE: Clustered Takeover Time
by Watanabe, Steven 21 Jul '99

21 Jul '99

The amount of time can be broken down into two components. First is the failure detection time, currently 60 seconds, which is the amount of time before one node declares the other one down. Secondly is the resource takeover time, the amount of time that it takes to bring the partner's resources online. These include disks, networking, replaying the logs, starting the services for the partner (e.g. cifs). This amount of time is variable based on the load of the node doing the takeover and the configurations/resources of the down node. We are working actively to decrease both of these times in a future release. Steve Watanabe NetApp Cluster Group > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey Skelton [mailto:jss@NET2PHONE.COM] > Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 1:07 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Clustered Takeover Time > > > > If I have a clustered pair of 760s, how long does > it take for one to take over in the event of a > failure of the other? > > Thanks. > --jeff >

1 0

RE: Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3
by Mohler, Jeff 21 Jul '99

21 Jul '99

Youre right David. I suppose that my experience with another software vendor that's wasted a year attempting development for a freeware *NIX..at the expense of fixing the current release software bled over. Ive NOT seen anything like that with NA or NC appliances -----Original Message----- From: Dave Hitz [mailto:hitz@netapp.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 1999 10:27 AM To: Michael Salmon Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3 > > > While/after playing around (setting) with the security features on the > > > just defined files and directories the netapp server will hang. > > > Only reboot of the sever will revive it. ... > > I would not expect NetApp to spend more than a _few_ man hours on this > > problem, while they continue to hammer out solid released for solid software > > platforms. > > > > While I agree it should not hang, theres no way to tell what NT2000 feature > > is not working properly. ... > I think that you missed the point Jeff, the W2K machine can halt and > catch fire for all I care but the filer should at worst have degraded > performance, regardless of the provocation. That's why we pay more for > filers than for an Alpha PC. There is an old saying in networking: Be conservative in what you send. Be liberal in what you receive. It is absolutely unacceptable for a filer to hang simply because someone sends it garbage data. It's true that W2K is till in Beta (alpha?), but we believe that we have done everything necessary to support W2K (if you are running a recent enough release), and we are very interested in hearing about problems that people have. Dave

1 0

None
by Kinney, Roger 21 Jul '99

21 Jul '99

unsubscribe toasters

1 0

F520 configure & upgrade questions
by Gordon Keegan 21 Jul '99

21 Jul '99

We've got a 520 with 2 shelves of 9GB drives that we'd like to add more drives to. I need to find out things like "do I have to add more shelves in pairs?" and "can 18GB drives and 9GB drives coexist in harmony" and some other related questions. Can someone point me to where on the NOW site I can find this out? Thanks in advance! -- Gordon Keegan, M10-10 Phone: (508) 261-4696 Motorola ING Fax: (508) 261-5757 20 Cabot Boulevard Mansfield, MA 02048 email: lgk011(a)dma.isg.mot.com

2 1

Jumbo Frames
by Richard L. Rhodes 21 Jul '99

21 Jul '99

<color><param>0100,0100,0100</param>Hi Y'all, I just received my NetApp systems and started playing with them. So far so good. I did have one disappointment, the gigabit ethernet driver doesn't support jumbo frames. I had assumed from some of my reading in a NetApp press release that it did (my fault, I didn't ask and should have). I'm wondering if anyone might know if/when jumbo frame support might be comming. Thanks Rick <FontFamily><param>Times New Roman</param><bigger><bigger>I<FontFamily><param>Courier New</param><smaller><smaller> <nofill> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard L. Rhodes e: rhodesr(a)firstenergycorp.com Ohio Edison Co. p: 330-384-4904 f: 330-384-2514

1 0

Re: Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3
by Michael Salmon 21 Jul '99

21 Jul '99

+----- On Mon, 19 Jul 1999 14:20:21 CDT, "Mohler, Jeff" writes: | One of our customers is doing some evaluations of netapp. | While evaluating the new server he was using Windows(NT)2000. | He has defined some directories and files on the server from the NT. | While/after playing around (setting) with the security features on the | just defined files and directories the netapp server will hang. | Only reboot of the sever will revive it. | The customer claims he can recreate the problem at will. | Has anyone encountered such problems. | Do any of you have any words of wisdom? | The customer dos not like to accept the fact that win2000 is not yet | formally supported. he claims that win2000 talks CIFS, and even if MS is | doing wrong things at most the filer should complain but for sure not | hang... | --- | | Geesh..talk about a loose-loose situation. | | I would not expect NetApp to spend more than a _few_ man hours on this | problem, while they continue to hammer out solid released for solid software | platforms. | | While I agree it should not hang, theres no way to tell what NT2000 feature | is not working properly. | I think that you missed the point Jeff, the W2K machine can halt and catch fire for all I care but the filer should at worst have degraded performance, regardless of the provocation. That's why we pay more for filers than for an Alpha PC. /Michael

3 2

Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3
by Itzik (Itzhak) Meirson DSc 20 Jul '99

20 Jul '99

One of our customers is doing some evaluations of netapp. While evaluating the new server he was using Windows(NT)2000. He has defined some directories and files on the server from the NT. While/after playing around (setting) with the security features on the just defined files and directories the netapp server will hang. Only reboot of the sever will revive it. The customer claims he can recreate the problem at will. Has anyone encountered such problems. Do any of you have any words of wisdom? The customer dos not like to accept the fact that win2000 is not yet formally supported. he claims that win2000 talks CIFS, and even if MS is doing wrong things at most the filer should complain but for sure not hang... Thanks Itzik

1 1

Upgrading F330 from 3.14 to 5.2.2P1
by Mike Ball 20 Jul '99

20 Jul '99

I am going to be upgrading a F330 filer from Data Ontap version 3.14 to 5.2.2P1. I know the firmware needs to be upgraded to version 1.9_i, memory to 128mg, and the NVRAM to 2mg. From talking to Network Appliance technical support, they stated it should not be a problem as long as the system is booted from the 5.2.2P1 boot disks and "booted without rc". Once I am booted up with 5.2.2P1 and exported the proper permissions to mount the filer as root, I will then be able to untar the 5.2.2P1 image over to the F330 and run download. What I am trying to find out is if anyone else has done a big a jump from a 3.x version of Ontap to a 5.x version of Ontap and if there where any problems you encountered. Thank you, Mike Ball

1 0

RE: Backup alternatives (again)
by Yu, David 20 Jul '99

20 Jul '99

Lewis: Please see below. David > -----Original Message----- > From: Sherbak, Tim > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 8:10 AM > To: Yu, David > Subject: FW: Backup alternatives (again) > > > Hi David, > I don't know as you monitor this dl- so thought I would pass it along. > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lewis [mailto:lsa@netline.net.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 1999 7:40 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Backup alternatives (again) > > > Hi everyone, > > This is a first time posting from someone new to NatApps, so > please bare with > me. I hve been subscribed to the list for a while and read > the archive to get > up to speed on passed discussions. > > I would appreciate it if list members could make suggestions > about what > alternative backup solutions are available and what kind of > (un)recommendations this group puts on these alternatives. > > This is a follow on from from previous discussions regarding > the use of > Budtool. I have taken over responsability for the backups as > Shiona Mceill > (former list contributer is on maternity leave). > > Due to our lack of success with the implementation of Budtool > and their recent > demise from the UK market, we have decided not to pursue this > solution. > > We have looked at Netbackup from Veritas. Any comments? Veritas introduced NDMP support for NetApp last year with 3.1.1 of NetBackup. NetBackup 3.2 is out now and adds support for NT, HP-UX, and AIX in addition to the Solaris support introduced with 3.1.1. Backups are to tape drives attached to the NetApp filer, and with 3.2, support for backup from Filer 1 to Filer 2's tape drive was implemented. Certification is done by Veritas, so support for some functionality may be staged. > > We are currently looking at Quick Restore from Workstation > Solutions. Any > comments? Workstation Solutions has been a very aggressive vendor and delivered a backup solution for NetApp very quickly. Backup to local tape drives, filer to filer backup (described above), and backup of Unix and NT server data to a filer's tape drive are all supported. Support is for DataONTAP 5.2 currently. A lot of different operating systems platforms are supported. For more details, please see: http://www.worksta.com/ > > As for platforms and configuration: We have 3+ F720 on 2 sites (ONTAP > 5.1.2R3). 3 suns running SunOS 5.7, ATL L500 Library (DTL > 7000 drive) and > potentially in the future a large number of linux boxes. > > NDMP has up until now been the preferred option as it seems > to be the way > forward with the NetApps. However, all that I have seen so > far indicates that > NDMP support in existing backup tools is a bit of a bolt > inclusion that does > not sit well with existing products or product architecture. Most of the NDMP solutions for NetApp utilize the dump/restore functionality in DataONTAP and the SCSI passthrough facility in NDMP for robotics control. While it's true that this fits in better with certain backup software architectures than others, remember that NDMP itself will still evolve. Over time, the standard will change and be extended to provide more flexibility and better support for various architectures. > > In order to configure the multiplatform network, dubious (built in) > workarounds have to be made to get the system to work. These > vary from > additional links being wired into the library (locally > attached to a NetApp), > so that the unix data can be backed-up, to dummy library > configuration for not > local (library) attachments to NetApps. > > All in all, any comments? Hopefully you will be able to tell > me that I don't > have a clue what I am on about and that it is all > straightforward. Somehow I > doubt this to be entirely the case, seeing the hoops we jumps > through with > budtool. > > here's hoping, > Lewis > > > > >

5 5

RE: Non-NDMP backup solutions?
by Benn, Paul 20 Jul '99

20 Jul '99

> So, having switched away from NDMP, for the above reasons, I have no > burning desire to switch back, and am looking for backup solutions that > do not require it. Although not the scope of this list, I need to back > up Sun Solaris, IRIX & NT systems, as well. > > What is there available? If you want to back up a CIFS enabled filer and maintain UNIX- as well as NT-style file permissions, you'll need to use an NT backup solution. A UNIX backup solution will not retain the NT-style file permissions. If you use Legato NetWorker (supports the above mentioned OS's) with a UNIX based NetWorker server, you'll need to "front end" the filer with an NT server loaded with the NetWorker client (detailed in the below mentioned document). It's rumored that UNC paths can be used with NetWorker v5.5 (instead of mapped drive letters as documented in the below mentioned white paper). This white paper might be somewhat helpful: http://www.netapp.com/technology/level3/3052.html Regards, Paul Benn Network Appliance

1 0

Scaling
by chris＠cecil.muscat.com 20 Jul '99

20 Jul '99

I've been doing some benchmarking on our filer (f540, dot4.3r4 256+8, 26 4g discs) and I'm trying to work out how things will scale on more recent filers. For our workload the filer pegs out doing around 1k nfs ops. This is slightly under half the sfs1 results. Is it fair to assume that given that data point that we can just scale the current models sfs2 results down by 1.25 to get the right sort of numbers? I know that sfs1/2 results are different but they do seem to be in the same ballpark. Workload is lots of small random reads which to me says number of spindles is going to be the critical factor which probably won't scale. Chris -- Chris Good - Muscat Ltd. The Westbrook Centre, Milton Rd, Cambridge UK Phone: 01223 715006 Mobile: 07801 788997 http://www.muscat.com

1 0

RE: Backup alternatives (again)
by Mohler, Jeff 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

1 0

FW: Backup alternatives (again)
by Yu, David 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

Jeff: We are aware that this is a widespread customer need. We have had some preliminary contact with ADSM, but discussions are still in the exploratory stage. Customers are the most effective catalyst in accelerating a joint solution. Please let your ADSM sales reps know of your need. This will reinforce the message that NetApp and ADSM have heard from the field. David -----Original Message----- From: Mohler, Jeff [mailto:jeff.mohler@wilcom.com] Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 5:39 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Backup alternatives (again) Ok..it's been a number of months..so it's time to ask my favorite question. ADSM support. Ive lost a truckload of potential Filer placements in our company (other than the four heads I have in clusters now) due to this missing backup ability, and Id like to know if theres an update on this.

1 0

RE: Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3
by Mohler, Jeff 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

1 0

RE: Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3
by Muhlestein, Mark 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

We have fixed a number of issues with Windows 2000 clients. Microsoft completely rewrote the client network redirector for Windows 2000, and it is quite different over the wire. Make sure the customer is running at least Windows 2000 beta 3 as a client, and you should make sure they are using the correct ONTAP version. Contact Netapp customer support to get information on what to use. Mark Muhlestein -- mmm(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Itzik (Itzhak) Meirson DSc [mailto:imeirson@xpert.com] Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 10:43 AM To: $netapp Subject: Netapp hang and Security on NT2000b3 One of our customers is doing some evaluations of netapp. While evaluating the new server he was using Windows(NT)2000. He has defined some directories and files on the server from the NT. While/after playing around (setting) with the security features on the just defined files and directories the netapp server will hang. Only reboot of the sever will revive it. The customer claims he can recreate the problem at will. Has anyone encountered such problems. Do any of you have any words of wisdom? The customer dos not like to accept the fact that win2000 is not yet formally supported. he claims that win2000 talks CIFS, and even if MS is doing wrong things at most the filer should complain but for sure not hang... Thanks Itzik

1 0

RE: Backup alternatives (again)
by Mohler, Jeff 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

Jeff, do you have NT servers running ADSM? I think last time I looked at this it seemed like you should be able to use ADSM on NT to backup your filers using a CIFS connection to a filer share. See this IBM ADSM FAQ section: --- No, for better or for worse (each to their own..) we are an NT-Free environment. 100% UNIX. And although I can use ADSM via NFS, Id like to keep my application servers running apps, and the filer doing filer things (like backups).

1 0

RE: Backup alternatives (again)
by Muhlestein, Mark 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

Jeff, do you have NT servers running ADSM? I think last time I looked at this it seemed like you should be able to use ADSM on NT to backup your filers using a CIFS connection to a filer share. See this IBM ADSM FAQ section: http://www.storage.ibm.com/software/adsm/adfaq.htm#backupnt Note that backing up the UNIX metadata under NT fully captures all filer UNIX metadata, including symbolic links, hard links, block and char devices, etc. And of course it also captures any NT-specific metadata like ACLs. We haven't explicitly tested ADSM on NT from the filer, but all the NT backup programs we have tested have worked fine, so I don't expect any problems. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Mohler, Jeff [mailto:jeff.mohler@wilcom.com] Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 5:39 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Backup alternatives (again) Ok..it's been a number of months..so it's time to ask my favorite question. ADSM support. Ive lost a truckload of potential Filer placements in our company (other than the four heads I have in clusters now) due to this missing backup ability, and Id like to know if theres an update on this.

1 0

Another Backup Question
by Jay Orr 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

I have another backup question -- we're using our toasters with budtool and currently have a 4700 DLT drive (i.e. dlt 4000 with 7 carts). The support cost on the hardware is ungodly ($2700/yr vs buy a new one for $4-5K) and the vendor (PDC solutions) states that it's because that particular jukebox is costly to repair. So my questions are: 1) Anyone know a good jukebox dealer that I can get a trade in on for something with more slots? 2)Anyone know a good model that's affordable? The only one I see is the ADT L500 (14 slot 1 drive), but I don't know how much more Budtool will charge for more slots... 3) Anyone have an idea which jukeboxes are more costy to have hardware support (and which aren't) ? It seemed like a simple idea, just upgrade the jukebox.... ;) ----------- Fujitsu - Nexion, St. Louis, MO Jay Orr (314) 579-6517

1 0

Allocation of PCI slots for ATM
by Michael Salmon 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

We have what will be a cluster that we want to connect to ATM but with a direct fast ethernet connection to a Sun using a QFE card. When the time came to install the ATM cards we noticed that there was a problem with the allocation of slots. If we follow netapp's recommendation then we don't have room for 2 ATM cards and a QFE card as the last FC-AL card is inserted in a 32 bit card slot. We would prefer to use the 3 32 bit slots for QFE and ATM and use one of the slots reserved for Giga bit ethernet for the last FC-AL card but I suspect that we have missed something. We also tried using slot 5 (a 64 bit slot) for an ATM card with no problems so I wonder why they are restricted to slots 1-3, all that I can think of is that slots 4-9 are 66 MHz slots but I can't find anything in the manual. Any comments? /Michael

1 0

RE: Backup alternatives (again)
by Mohler, Jeff 19 Jul '99

19 Jul '99

Ok..it's been a number of months..so it's time to ask my favorite question. ADSM support. Ive lost a truckload of potential Filer placements in our company (other than the four heads I have in clusters now) due to this missing backup ability, and Id like to know if theres an update on this.

1 0

HELP WITH BUDTOOL URGENTLY !!!
by Alexandre Gomes (r7043c) 16 Jul '99

16 Jul '99

Hello, I have bought the cable to convert the 68 pins to 50 pins to connect the Network appliance F230 with a jukebox robotics Q2.15 ( with two tape drives - DLT 4000) that you told me. I have connect the Cable on the SCSI 0 of my Network Appliance and into the jukebox. The configuration that I receive executing the probe-scsi command is this : root@araras[112]<bin>: probe-scsi -h paje Copyright (c) 1990-1999 by PDC probe-scsi BudTool 4.5 SCSI Bus 0 Target 3 Unit 0 Removable Tape Quantum DLT4000 CD5A Target 4 Unit 0 Removable Tape Quantum DLT4000 CD5A Target 6 Unit 0 Removable Jukebox Device BHTi Q2 1.50 SCSI Bus 1 SCSI Bus 2 root@araras[113]<bin>: Like you see I'm installing budtool to do backup though one Solaris host where I'm installing the budtool software and using the NDMP with the Network Appliance where my jukebox is connected. When I finish to install budtool he say me that the daemon is not running, and this is the REMINDERS file where it put the errors : 1 Failed to add the sjb device driver to the system. 2 An sjb device may already be loaded, or the file 3 /kernel/drv/sjb.conf may be missing or incorrect. This is the configuration that I choice when I installed the budtool( There is some problem in install budtool and delete it ( rm -rf budtool), and the install it again to try install it correct). What is the process to me delete and install again ??? Here is the configuration ( jbmgr_config.araras.1) : 1 ROBOT_DEV_HOST paje 2 ROBOT_DEV_NAME /dev/spt0 3 ROBOT_SCSI_ID 6 4 ROBOT_SCSI_BUS 0 5 DATA_DEV_NAME0 nrst0a 6 DATA_DEV_HOST0 paje 7 DATA_DEV_NAME1 nrst1a 8 DATA_DEV_HOST1 paje 9 CLEANING_TAPE_SLOT -1,-2 10 PASSWORD XXXXXXXX (I change the password) 11 USEBARCODE Y Could you help me, please ??. How I resolve the problems above. The problem I think that is with the drivers name or drivers path. Here is the /kernel/drv/ directory : root@araras[44]<drv>: ls arp* ip.conf pem.conf sp* arp.conf isp* pln* sp.conf atapicd* iwscn* pln.conf spcic* atapicd.conf iwscn.conf profile* ssd* be* le* pseudo* ssd.conf bpp* lebuffer* pseudo.conf ssd.conf.11239853 clone* llc1* ptc* st* clone.conf llc1.conf ptc.conf st.conf cn* log* ptsl* stp4020* cn.conf log.conf ptsl.conf sy* conskbd* mm* qe* sy.conf conskbd.conf mm.conf qec* tcp* consms* openeepr* rtvc* tcp.conf consms.conf openeepr.conf sad* tl* dad* options* sad.conf tl.conf dad.conf options.conf sd* uata* ecpp* pci_pci* sd.conf udp* esp* pcmcia* se* udp.conf fas* pcmcia.conf ses* wc* glm* pcmem* ses.conf wc.conf hme* pcram* sjb xbox* icmp* pcram.conf* sjb.conf icmp.conf pcser* soc* ip* pem* socal* root@araras[45]<drv>: And here is the sjb.conf : 1 # Configuration file for PDC's sjb driver. 2 3 name="sjb" class="scsi" 4 target=0 lun=0; 5 6 name="sjb" class="scsi" 7 target=1 lun=0; 8 9 name="sjb" class="scsi" 10 target=2 lun=0; 11 12 name="sjb" class="scsi" 13 target=3 lun=0; 14 15 name="sjb" class="scsi" 16 target=4 lun=0; 17 18 name="sjb" class="scsi" 19 target=5 lun=0; 20 21 name="sjb" class="scsi" 22 target=6 lun=0; What will be the correct names to my tape drives and robotic ???. Remember that my budtool host are running Solaris. TANK YOU VERY MUCH !!!!!!!!!! Alexandre Gomes

4 3

A internal department is splitting off from our group. Our filer is part of a VLAN. Is there anywa
by b e kiefer 15 Jul '99

15 Jul '99

A internal department is splitting off from our group. Our filer is part of a VLAN. Is there anyway to associate a particular network interface with a volume? I would like to create a new volume for the "defectors" and maintain our vlan configuration. I would like the new volume to be accessible by only the interface that will connect their group. BTW, we are using VLANs because the infrastructure here is flat and is all switched. I was hoping to do it through VLANs and interfaces rather than ACLs and permissions. ____________________________ b e kiefer holland & hart, llp bkiefer(a)hollandhart.com www.hollandhart.com ph 303.295.5100 pg 303.528.9884 send text pages to: pagebruce(a)hollandhart.com

1 0

Help with bubtool and Network Appliance !!
by Alexandre Gomes (r7043c) 15 Jul '99

15 Jul '99

Good afternoon, Sorry, I Think that some times I'm being repetitive, but I need Install my jukebox urgently, I paid for support, but it will take two or three weeks yet, so if some one could help me I will stay very glad !! I'm installing budtool 4.5 here in my department and I'm with some problems to recognize the drivers. I'm installing budtool in a Solaris 2.5.1 host to be my Budtool host, because my server is a Network Appliance F230 and I connected on it a jukebox robotics Q2.15 with DLT 4000. I will use the NDMP protocol to send the information like said the manual. I connect my robotics on the Network Appliance with a cable of 68 pins ( because the jukebox is SE 68 pins) to 50 pins ( because in the Network Appliance is 50 pins - SCSI 0 ). Then I active NDMP protocol ( ndmpd on ) im my Media Server. The problem is that I'm installing the budtool to manager the backup and I'm putting this information on the installation : ROBOT_DEV_HOST paje ( paje is the name of my Network Appliance Server) ROBOT_DEV_NAME sjb ( sjb is the name that I give to my jukebox, I m using solaris in my Budtool host, but in the installation of the software said if I'm using NDMP protocol I have to put the name of the machine where the jukebox is connect and to use the spt to my device name ( I tried but give problem too. Can you help me define the correct name to my drivers ????. Remember that my jukebox has two drive ( A and B) that I want to connect both to the Network Appliance Server, which all my data are stored ) ROBOT_SCSI_ID 6 ( It is the SCSI ID that I set in the front panel of the jukebox robotics, you can see it bellow where I will shown the result of the probe-scsi command !!) ROBOT_SCSI_BUS 0 ( It is the SCSI Bus where my jukebox is connected on my Server) DATA_DEV_NAME0 nrst0a ( It is the name that him suggest to my first drive) DATA_DEV_HOST0 paje ( It is the name of the machine that it is associated) DATA_DEV_NAME1 nrst1a ( It is the name of the second drive) DATA_DEV_HOST1 paje ( machine associated) CLEANING_TAPE_SLOT -1,-2 PASSWORD xxxxxxxx ( It is my hexadecimal password generated from my my system - I put xxxxxx to not say the true password, sorry ). USEBARCODE Y ( I choose use bar-code reader) Here is the probe-scsi command result : SCSI Bus 0 Target 3 Unit 0 Removable Tape Quantum DLT4000 CD5A Target 4 Unit 0 Removable Tape Quantum DLT4000 CD5A Target 6 Unit 0 Removable Jukebox Device BHTi Q2 1.50 SCSI Bus 1 SCSI Bus 2 Here is the error that is given in the verify_install command of budtool ( the REMINDER file): 1 Failed to add the sjb device driver to the system. 2 An sjb device may already be loaded, or the file 3 /kernel/drv/sjb.conf may be missing or incorrect. ~ ~ But I see the kernel and into the Kernel directory has the file above : root@araras[432]<drv>: ls arp* glm* options* ptsl.conf ssd.conf arp.conf hme* options.conf qe* ssd.conf.11239853 atapicd* icmp* pci_pci* qec* st* atapicd.conf icmp.conf pcmcia* rtvc* st.conf be* ip* pcmcia.conf sad* stp4020* bpp* ip.conf pcmem* sad.conf sy* clone* isp* pcram* sd* sy.conf clone.conf iwscn* pcram.conf* sd.conf tcp* cn* iwscn.conf pcser* se* tcp.conf cn.conf le* pem* ses* tl* conskbd* lebuffer* pem.conf ses.conf tl.conf conskbd.conf llc1* pln* sjb uata* consms* llc1.conf pln.conf sjb.conf udp* consms.conf log* profile* soc* udp.conf dad* log.conf pseudo* socal* wc* dad.conf mm* pseudo.conf sp* wc.conf ecpp* mm.conf ptc* sp.conf xbox* esp* openeepr* ptc.conf spcic* fas* openeepr.conf ptsl* ssd* root@araras[433]<drv>: and into the file sjb.conf has : 1 # Configuration file for PDC's sjb driver. 2 3 name="sjb" class="scsi" 4 target=0 lun=0; 5 6 name="sjb" class="scsi" 7 target=1 lun=0; 8 9 name="sjb" class="scsi" 10 target=2 lun=0; 11 12 name="sjb" class="scsi" 13 target=3 lun=0; 14 15 name="sjb" class="scsi" 16 target=4 lun=0; 17 18 name="sjb" class="scsi" 19 target=5 lun=0; 20 21 name="sjb" class="scsi" 22 target=6 lun=0; ~ ~ Could you help me resolve this problem of the jukebox and budtool installation. What is the name of the drivers that I have to use ????. How to resolve this problems bellow ????. Remember that my host is running Solaris 2.5.1 and My Server is a Network Appliance F230 and I have to use the NDMP protocol to control it. My jukebox Q2.15 DLT 400 has two drivers !!. Please, help me !!! Thank you very much ! Alexandre G. Gomes

1 0

RE: SNMP with netapp?
by jrg＠acm.org 15 Jul '99

15 Jul '99

On Tue 13 Jul, 1999, "Thompson, Tim" <tim.thompson(a)netapp.com> wrote: >The package contains both MRTG and a Makefile-driven configuration >process that will construct the MRTG files needed to monitor >your Netapp Filers. It works on Solaris and Linux. Anyone playing around with MRTG and variants please do go take a look at 'Cricket'. You could consider it the version 3 that will never actually appear, it uses the rrd-tool storage mechanism written by the author of MRTG, and has a nice clean (imho) configuration mechanism. http://www.munitions.com/~jra/cricket/ James.

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters