toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

New to Filers
by Andrew Webster 10 Feb '00

10 Feb '00

I have a couple of basic questions:- 1) I cannot see the ~SNAPSHOT directory at the root of each share. The directory is certainly there, but it doesn't appear in the list. I'm using NT 4, IE5, SP6 and the "Show all Hidden Files" turned on. The manual says I should see it, but it isn't there. Am I missing something? 2) When a create shares I sometimes get the "Device or Directory cannot be found" but the directory exists. Should I be using the C:\stuff name or c:\vol\vol0\stuff? Filer F760 Version: 5.3.4R2P2 Regards -- Andrew Webster Windows NT Consultant Sanno Move Project Deutsche Real Estate Consulting Ltd. - Tokyo Tel. +81-3-5408-4787 Fax. +81-3-5401-6998 Andrew-M.Webster(a)db.com

2 1

RE: Backing up a filer
by Steve Kappel 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

>Do you know what the impact on the filer is? Does the "media server filer" need to have extra CPU capacity or disk capacity? I asked the following of Grant Melvin of Network Appliance: > >This is one thing we are considering: > >Another plan is to have a storagetek with NDMP media servers... say we have the L700 with 20 tape drives, with OnTap 5.3 I can have 5 filers driving those 20 tape drives (two tape adapters per filer, two drives per tape adapter). These are now my "NDMP" media servers. The backups would go across a dedicated GB network. > >So, with NBU 3.2 I can do the filer to filer backups through these filer media servers, right? Yes. A 3-way backup is automatic when you refer to a storage unit on a different NDMP host than the data host. >My question is: what impact is this operation on the filer -- both CPU/disk space needs, etc? What is the minimum filer I could use as these media servers -- little 720's with one shelf/minimal disk? or would this require a beefier filer? There isn't any disk space impact on the tape agent host (at least as far as I am aware). The NDMP server is just moving data from the network to the tape drive. Someone from NetApp would be a better source for what CPU resources would be needed. Note that even if NetBackup supported backup to NBU media servers you would still have the impact - its just moved from a filer to the NetBackup media server. __________________________________________________________________________ Steve Kappel steve.kappel(a)veritas.com VERITAS Software steve.kappel(a)iname.com (Personal)

1 0

FW: Backing up a filer
by [ISS] Veritas-Users 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

-----Original Message----- From: Kelly Wyatt Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 1:35 PM To: 'Steve Kappel' Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Backing up a filer Do you know what the impact on the filer is? Does the "media server filer" need to have extra CPU capacity or disk capacity? I asked the following of Grant Melvin of Network Appliance: This is one thing we are considering: Another plan is to have a storagetek with NDMP media servers... say we have the L700 with 20 tape drives, with OnTap 5.3 I can have 5 filers driving those 20 tape drives (two tape adapters per filer, two drives per tape adapter). These are now my "NDMP" media servers. The backups would go across a dedicated GB network. So, with NBU 3.2 I can do the filer to filer backups through these filer media servers, right? My question is: what impact is this operation on the filer -- both CPU/disk space needs, etc? What is the minimum filer I could use as these media servers -- little 720's with one shelf/minimal disk? or would this require a beefier filer? ------ Is anyone actually doing 3-way NDMP backups w/ NetBackup. We have been pleased with using NBU with NDMP and directly attached drives for our filers for about 18 months... but, we are about out of capacity in our two tape libraries. Most filers have two tape drives (which we prefer), so when we install the three filers we just received, we have hit our limit... and we have three more filers on order... So, we need to either get another tape library or come up with a solution that doesn't require an entire tape library for every 5 filers. Thanks for any input -- Kelly -- Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com Systems Programmer Integrated Solutions Consulting SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 http://www.sas.com

1 0

RE: Backing up a filer
by Kelly Wyatt 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

Do you know what the impact on the filer is? Does the "media server filer" need to have extra CPU capacity or disk capacity? I asked the following of Grant Melvin of Network Appliance: This is one thing we are considering: Another plan is to have a storagetek with NDMP media servers... say we have the L700 with 20 tape drives, with OnTap 5.3 I can have 5 filers driving those 20 tape drives (two tape adapters per filer, two drives per tape adapter). These are now my "NDMP" media servers. The backups would go across a dedicated GB network. So, with NBU 3.2 I can do the filer to filer backups through these filer media servers, right? My question is: what impact is this operation on the filer -- both CPU/disk space needs, etc? What is the minimum filer I could use as these media servers -- little 720's with one shelf/minimal disk? or would this require a beefier filer? ------ Is anyone actually doing 3-way NDMP backups w/ NetBackup. We have been pleased with using NBU with NDMP and directly attached drives for our filers for about 18 months... but, we are about out of capacity in our two tape libraries. Most filers have two tape drives (which we prefer), so when we install the three filers we just received, we have hit our limit... and we have three more filers on order... So, we need to either get another tape library or come up with a solution that doesn't require an entire tape library for every 5 filers. Thanks for any input -- Kelly -- Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com Systems Programmer Integrated Solutions Consulting SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 http://www.sas.com

1 0

RE: Backing up a filer
by [ISS] Veritas-Users 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

I understand that you can do NDMP dump across the network to a media server... it is even mentioned in technote 3066, section 4.3 (# 4 below): ---- The NDMP protocol specification allows the following backup configurations: 1. Local backup from a filer to a SCSI-attached tape device 2. Three-way backup from a filer via the network to another filer with a local tape device 3. Backup from a UNIX or Windows NT server via the network to a NetApp filer with a local tape device 4. Backup from a NetApp filer via the network to a UNIX or Windows NT backup server with a local tape device ---- We currently backup filers via dedicated directly attached tape drives (using Veritas NetBackup)... but, this is a costly solution because the tape drives are idle probably 75% of the time. We will be testing NDMP across a dedicated GB ethernet network in the near future. Even if we see some decrease in backup throughput, it will good if we can get those 20 dedicated DLT7000 tape drives in S'Tek 9710's doing more work for us... Is anyone already using a private network and NDMP to backup a filer? Kelly -- Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com Systems Programmer Integrated Solutions Consulting SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 http://www.sas.com -----Original Message----- From: Roth, William [mailto:William.Roth@netapp.com] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 11:21 AM To: 'gwong(a)futureshop.com' Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Backing up a filer Greg, If you want to use NetBackup with NDMP to back up the filer, you need to have at least one direct attached tape drive connected to the filer(not considering a three way NDMP backup using two filers with a tape device direct connected to the remote filer). You can dedicate one or more drives from an existing library controlled by NetBackup, or you can attach a new/different library to the filer(yes, the filer does support a locally attached library). Either the NetBackup host (NDMP client) or the filer can be direct connected to the robotic portion of the library(assuming the library has individual scsi ports for the connection). In the end, NetBackup ends up controlling the library either way. If the robot is direct connected to the NetBackup host via scsi, NetBackup controls it. If the robot is connected to the filer via scsi, the NetBackup host sends scsi cdb's via NDMP to the robot through the filer, thus the robot is still controller by NetBackup. What other information or assistance do you require? Bill Roth Technical Marketing Engineer Network Appliance, Inc. 495 East Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Telephone 408-822-3308 -----Original Message----- From: Greg Wong [mailto:gwong@futureshop.com] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 11:45 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Backing up a filer Hi all, I'm kind of new to the this filer business and I have a question about backing it up. We have an F720 on site that isn't doing much since we aren't backing it up. I need some options on how to do this. We currently back up our other systems vith Veritas Netbackup and a tape library. Now, my question(s) is if I want to use Veritas to back up the filer using NDMP, do I have to dedicate a drive on the remote tape library to the filer? Will the filer support a locally attached library, and if it does, does Veritas control the library or does the filer? Thanks for your help Greg

2 1

FC SAN Tape Solution for Filers
by Alvarado, Michael 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

http://www.netapp.com/news/press/news_rel_20000202.html -----Original Message----- From: Mark D Fowle [mailto:Fowle_Mark_D@CAT.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 1:22 PM To: toasters Subject: Tape Drives Does anyone have Spectralogic 4000 (dat) with 4 drives, or Spectralogic 10000 (ait-2) with 2 drives or a Breece Hill (DLT 7000) with 2 drives .... attached to your filers ? Mark Fowle

1 0

I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-nfsv4-05.txt (fwd)
by beepy＠netapp.com 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

Not really NetApp related - just NFS related. I meant to send this note out a long time ago. One thing the IETF would like is "user" review of Internet drafts. The working group is moving towards a Proposed Standard over the next few months, which includes review by a wider audience of the standard. You don't have to be an "IETF member" or attend "IETF mtgs" to review. If you're interested, take a look at the latest draft. It is the culmination of a lot of work originally by Sun in the form of a strawman proposal, and later one of our engineers, an engineer from HCL, Sun engineers to form the current specification. This one has been reviewed extensively by the far flung working group - mostly through the e-mail alias. Comments to the working group alias are best. Clarifications and questions to me if you like. beepy P.S. Hi everyone - I've been quiet a long time. ----- Forwarded message from Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org ----- >From Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org Wed Feb 9 08:45:42 2000 Message-Id: <200002091641.LAA09977(a)ietf.org> To: IETF-Announce: ; Cc: nfsv4-wg(a)sunroof.eng.sun.com From: Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org Reply-to: Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org Subject: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-nfsv4-05.txt Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:41:38 -0500 Sender: owner-dl-nfsv4-engr(a)netapp.com Precedence: bulk A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 Working Group of the IETF. Title : NFS version 4 Protocol Author(s) : S. Shepler, C. Beame, B. Callaghan, M. Eisler, D. Noveck, D. Robinson, R. Thurlow Filename : draft-ietf-nfsv4-05.txt Pages : 249 Date : 08-Feb-00 NFS version 4 is a distributed file system protocol which owes heritage to NFS protocol versions 2 [RFC1094] and 3 [RFC1813]. Unlike earlier versions, the NFS version 4 protocol supports traditional file access while integrating support for file locking and the mount protocol. In addition, support for strong security (and its negotiation), compound operations, client caching, and internationalization have been added. Of course, attention has been applied to making NFS version 4 operate well in an Internet environment. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-05.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP. Login with the username "anonymous" and a password of your e-mail address. After logging in, type "cd internet-drafts" and then "get draft-ietf-nfsv4-05.txt". A list of Internet-Drafts directories can be found in http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt Internet-Drafts can also be obtained by e-mail. Send a message to: mailserv(a)ietf.org. In the body type: "FILE /internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-05.txt". NOTE: The mail server at ietf.org can return the document in MIME-encoded form by using the "mpack" utility. To use this feature, insert the command "ENCODING mime" before the "FILE" command. To decode the response(s), you will need "munpack" or a MIME-compliant mail reader. Different MIME-compliant mail readers exhibit different behavior, especially when dealing with "multipart" MIME messages (i.e. documents which have been split up into multiple messages), so check your local documentation on how to manipulate these messages. Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. [message/External-body is not supported, skipping...] ----- End of forwarded message from Internet-Drafts(a)ietf.org -----

1 0

RE: Backing up a filer
by Steve Kappel 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

NetBackup does not support backing up NDMP hosts to NetBackup media server tape drives. Since you have more than one filer, I would recommend selecting a subset to have locally attached drives (possibly part of a shared library). Then use 3-way NDMP to backup filers without drives. Note that 3-way is new in NBU 3.2. >From: Kelly Wyatt <Kelly.Wyatt(a)sas.com> >To: "'Roth, William'" <William.Roth(a)netapp.com>, "'gwong(a)futureshop.com'" <gwong(a)futureshop.com> >Cc: "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> >Subject: RE: Backing up a filer >Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:16:10 -0500 > >Bummer... I just tried a backup from a filer to the master's locally attached drive and got an errro 154 -- storage unit characteristics mismatched to request. This is w/ NetBackup 3.1.1, and from reading my NBU 3.2 manuals, it does not look like this will work (because the sun is not an "NDMP host" and I have not seen in the doc how to make it one). > >Kelly > > >-- > >Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com >Systems Programmer >Integrated Solutions Consulting >SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 >http://www.sas.com __________________________________________________________________________ Steve Kappel steve.kappel(a)veritas.com VERITAS Software steve.kappel(a)iname.com (Personal)

1 0

RE: Backing up a filer
by Roth, William 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

Greg, The comments in my earlier email with regards to VERITAS NetBackup, NDMP and filers remains correct. Technote 3066 (#4 below) works as long as the NDMP compliant third party backup software supports it. VERITAS NetBackup does not currently (to the best of my knowledge) support performing an NDMP backup from a filer with data going to the Solaris or NT backup server with locally attached tape devices. Call me on 408-822-3308 if there are any questions, or you want to discuss this further. A recent Network Appliance press release details plans to address the idle tape drive issue. It is well understood that direct attached, dedicated tape devices sit idle most of the time. The release can be found at: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/000202/ca_multive_1.html I'm interested in the proposed NDMP backup testing with a dedicated GB ethernet network. What are the configuration details, when is testing scheduled to start? Thanks, Bill Roth -----Original Message----- From: [ISS] Veritas-Users [mailto:Veritas-Users@wnt.sas.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 6:54 AM To: 'Roth, William'; 'gwong(a)futureshop.com' Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Backing up a filer I understand that you can do NDMP dump across the network to a media server... it is even mentioned in technote 3066, section 4.3 (# 4 below): ---- The NDMP protocol specification allows the following backup configurations: 1. Local backup from a filer to a SCSI-attached tape device 2. Three-way backup from a filer via the network to another filer with a local tape device 3. Backup from a UNIX or Windows NT server via the network to a NetApp filer with a local tape device 4. Backup from a NetApp filer via the network to a UNIX or Windows NT backup server with a local tape device ---- We currently backup filers via dedicated directly attached tape drives (using Veritas NetBackup)... but, this is a costly solution because the tape drives are idle probably 75% of the time. We will be testing NDMP across a dedicated GB ethernet network in the near future. Even if we see some decrease in backup throughput, it will good if we can get those 20 dedicated DLT7000 tape drives in S'Tek 9710's doing more work for us... Is anyone already using a private network and NDMP to backup a filer? Kelly -- Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com Systems Programmer Integrated Solutions Consulting SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 http://www.sas.com -----Original Message----- From: Roth, William [mailto:William.Roth@netapp.com] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2000 11:21 AM To: 'gwong(a)futureshop.com' Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Backing up a filer Greg, If you want to use NetBackup with NDMP to back up the filer, you need to have at least one direct attached tape drive connected to the filer(not considering a three way NDMP backup using two filers with a tape device direct connected to the remote filer). You can dedicate one or more drives from an existing library controlled by NetBackup, or you can attach a new/different library to the filer(yes, the filer does support a locally attached library). Either the NetBackup host (NDMP client) or the filer can be direct connected to the robotic portion of the library(assuming the library has individual scsi ports for the connection). In the end, NetBackup ends up controlling the library either way. If the robot is direct connected to the NetBackup host via scsi, NetBackup controls it. If the robot is connected to the filer via scsi, the NetBackup host sends scsi cdb's via NDMP to the robot through the filer, thus the robot is still controller by NetBackup. What other information or assistance do you require? Bill Roth Technical Marketing Engineer Network Appliance, Inc. 495 East Java Drive Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Telephone 408-822-3308 -----Original Message----- From: Greg Wong [mailto:gwong@futureshop.com] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2000 11:45 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Backing up a filer Hi all, I'm kind of new to the this filer business and I have a question about backing it up. We have an F720 on site that isn't doing much since we aren't backing it up. I need some options on how to do this. We currently back up our other systems vith Veritas Netbackup and a tape library. Now, my question(s) is if I want to use Veritas to back up the filer using NDMP, do I have to dedicate a drive on the remote tape library to the filer? Will the filer support a locally attached library, and if it does, does Veritas control the library or does the filer? Thanks for your help Greg

1 0

RE: Backing up a filer
by Kelly Wyatt 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

Bummer... I just tried a backup from a filer to the master's locally attached drive and got an errro 154 -- storage unit characteristics mismatched to request. This is w/ NetBackup 3.1.1, and from reading my NBU 3.2 manuals, it does not look like this will work (because the sun is not an "NDMP host" and I have not seen in the doc how to make it one). Kelly -- Kelly Wyatt, Kelly.Wyatt(a)SAS.com Systems Programmer Integrated Solutions Consulting SAS Institute Inc. / SAS Campus Drive / Cary, NC 27513 http://www.sas.com

1 0

Problems dumping onto 2 tapes using F500 and Adic DLT4000
by Simon Butcher 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

I have recently begun to require 2 tapes for my backups. However, if I load the tapes into the slots in my DLT4000 (which sysconfig tells me is a FastStor DLT & mt -f rst0a status gives me Digial DLT4000) and do a "dump 0uf urst0a,urst0a /vol/vol0" it appears to work (dumping tape 1 then dumping tape 2) but when i try to restore (with the t option) i find it hasn't touched the second tape at all, but has overwritten the tape 1 with tape 2 data. Any ideas? sysconfig -t doesn't give me the option for rst1a Also the tapes never physically eject, they just go 'offline' Cheers, SB ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

2 1

Re: Tape Drives
by Steve Armijo 09 Feb '00

09 Feb '00

On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 03:22:17PM -0600, Mark D Fowle wrote: > Does anyone have Spectralogic 4000 (dat) with 4 drives, or Spectralogic 10000 > (ait-2) with 2 drives or > a Breece Hill (DLT 7000) with 2 drives .... attached to your filers ? did the breece hill dance. they are very flaky, but they mostly work once you understand how they want you to function. -s -- Cue the music, fade to black, no such thing as no payback. -PWEI [ armijo(a)cs.unm.edu ]

1 0

Re: RMA reminder calls ( a new wrinkle )
by Bruce Sterling Woodcock 08 Feb '00

08 Feb '00

Yeah, the disks are understandable, and many of the rest are not really broken parts but rather attempts by NTAP to troubleshoot a particular problem (hardware, software, or external). I find the power supply and fan assembly problems to be very bizarre, and guess you are either cursed or don't have the controlled enviornment you think you have. As to the EOL issues, I agree; NTAP should not EOL products as quickly as they do. I would like to see 4+ years going forward. Of course, as a shareholder, I realize this will cut into earnings. Bruce

2 2

Pipe trouble
by Ronan Mullally 08 Feb '00

08 Feb '00

I'm having trouble creating a named pipe on a filesystem mounted from a 760 to a Linux system. The 760 is running 5.3.4R3. 'mknod <name> p' gives me a zero-length file rather than a named pipe: # mknod initctl p # ls -la initctl -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Feb 8 15:58 initctl ^ I'm sure this *used* to work (way back when I had a 540). It works fine if I try it on a filesystem mounted from a Linux server... Any ideas? -Ronan

4 5

Tape Drives
by Mark D Fowle 08 Feb '00

08 Feb '00

Does anyone have Spectralogic 4000 (dat) with 4 drives, or Spectralogic 10000 (ait-2) with 2 drives or a Breece Hill (DLT 7000) with 2 drives .... attached to your filers ? Mark Fowle

1 0

RMA stuff
by Jay Orr 08 Feb '00

08 Feb '00

Humm.. I'm still kinda new to netapps. Just had to get replacement SIMMS since we had faulty ones on one of our F330's. I like how they send 2 boxes, each with 2 sticks of SIMMS in them. The boxes are 8"x14"x2" or so. A little overkill, but they're not the only ones guilty of that. My question is - when I have had problems with SUN equipment, they send a packet that has tons of info for returning the defective product including a UPS shipping sticker packed with a replacement part. With these 2 boxes of SIMMS, there was absolutely no paperwork - just an RMA tag on each box. So, now I gotta call them up and hassle with them to figure out how to return this stuff?? ----------- Jay Orr Systems Administrator Fujitsu Nexion Inc. St. Louis, MO

1 1

AIT-2 anyone?
by mgx＠spruce.lsd.ornl.gov 07 Feb '00

07 Feb '00

good day all ... is anyone using AIT-2 to backup their filer's yet? i don't recall hearing about netapp support for AIT yet, but they have been available for awhile now. -- -- michael galloway

2 1

snapshot behavior
by Greg Kitch 07 Feb '00

07 Feb '00

I am using rsync to synchronize directories and have noticed (I think) the following behavior..... I created a snapshot on my filer and ran rsync from the snapshot directory to copy the files to a remote directory. The following day I mistakenly ran rsync from the same snapshot directory without taking a new snapshot. On almost all directories rsynced in this fashion there were no differences between the source and destination directories, as expected. However, in one directory rsync deleted the directory ".nfs18C041/" and all files and subdirectories of this directory from the destination file system, indicating that it had disappeared from the snapshot directory. A check of the two directories using find that was run between the execution of the two rsync commands showed that this directory was the only difference between the two directories other than symbolic link dates and directory sizes which we expected. Given the nature of the .nfs directory it occurs to me that removing this type of directory from snapshots when they disappear from the regular file system might be intentional. Does this seem reasonable or have I done something dumb and possibly misinterpreted what occurred? That couldn't be, could it? Thanks. Greg Kitch UCLA SEASnet Computing Facility

3 4

RE: Any clue to why I'm getting errors below?
by Paquette, Trevor 07 Feb '00

07 Feb '00

On Solaris an 'underflow' is an error due to a busy bus. How loaded is your system? What type of network are you on? Shared or Switched? The numbers of error that you are seeing are not condusive to having different duplex speeds at either end of your connection. If you are running a shared network, then you might be seeing 'backoff' errors. Errors when the shared segment is too busy. (Even though your number of collisions is showing as 0) If you are running a switched network.. then I don't know what the problem might be. What type of switch are you connected to? -- Two rights do not make a wrong. They make an airplane. Trevor Paquette | AT&T Canada |Work:(403)705-6390 TrevorPaquette(a)metronet.ca |600, 205 5th Ave SW | Fax:(403)705-9601 http://www.metronet.ca |Calgary, AB, Canada |ICBM:51'03"N/114'05"W Senior Unix Network Architect| T2P 2V7 |Mind:In the Rockies > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Johannes [SMTP:rjohanne@damango.net] > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 2:51 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Any clue to why I'm getting errors below? > > Below is the out put from ifstat. I'm wondering what could be causing > the errors in both the TRANSMIT and RECEIVE sections, and why the > Underflow in the TRANSMIT section. > > Could(are) the errors and Underflows in the TRANSMIT section be related? > > > OUTPUT FROM IFSTAT > ================== > > daspace1> ifstat e3a > e3a: MAC address 00:c0:95:e0:fc:7c > > RECEIVE > ======== > Packets: 116m | Bytes: 2762m | Errors: 19 > No buffers: 0 | Length err: 0 | Runt frames: > 0 > Long frames: 0 | Collisions: 0 | CRC error: 19 > > H/w overflow: 0 | Process stop: 2239k | List overflow: > 0 > Process reset: 2239k | Rst frame drops: 585 > > TRANSMIT > ======== > Packets: 132m | Bytes: 1196m | Errors: 8376 > > Collisions: 0 | Late collisions: 0 | Excess coll: > 0 > Queue full: 0 | List full: 0 | No carrier: > 0 > Underflow: 8321 | Defer: 0 | Time out: > 0 > Stopped: 0 | List underflow: 2164 | Loss of carrier: > 0 > No buffers: 0 | Requeue: 1396 | Threshold up: 1396 > > Threshold dn: 1396 | Threshold lvl: 0 > > DEVICE > ======= > Interrupts: 224m | Resets: 9 > > LINK INFO > ========= > Auto: Enabled | Mediatype: 100tx-fd| > > Link Partner: Auto | Link State: Up > > > > Any help will be appreciated. Thanks > > robert > -- > Robert Johannes > Systems Administrator > Kairos-Damango Internet Services Inc. > 1300 Godward Street suite 3200 > Minneapolis, MN 55413

1 0

RE: Removing old volume to create spare
by Mohler, Jeff 04 Feb '00

04 Feb '00

You need to boot from floppies, and in maintenance mode you can perform volume operations against the root volume..etc. -----Original Message----- From: Justin Acklin [mailto:Justin.Acklin@sv.sc.philips.com] Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 9:07 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Removing old volume to create spare I have some old filers which aren't worth putting on maintanence which I use for old reference data. They are 330s with 4 gig disks. I have a shelf of old 4 gig disks which has a volume on it. I'd like to make all 7 of those disks spares for the 330s. This shelf is on a 220. I brought it up and tried to destroy the volume but am unable to destroy the root volume, since it can't be brought offline. Anyone know the correct procedure to do this, and is destroying the volume adequate for making these disks spares? Or alternately, as disks fail in the 330s I can put single 4 gigs in to replace them. When I've done this in the past, though, the volume on the single disk was seen and brought online in a broken state, if I remember correctly. What would the correct procedure to take a single disk like this with data on it and make it into a hot spare on? Thanks, Justin Acklin Unix Systems Administrator Philips STB

1 0

Removing old volume to create spare
by Justin Acklin 04 Feb '00

04 Feb '00

I have some old filers which aren't worth putting on maintanence which I use for old reference data. They are 330s with 4 gig disks. I have a shelf of old 4 gig disks which has a volume on it. I'd like to make all 7 of those disks spares for the 330s. This shelf is on a 220. I brought it up and tried to destroy the volume but am unable to destroy the root volume, since it can't be brought offline. Anyone know the correct procedure to do this, and is destroying the volume adequate for making these disks spares? Or alternately, as disks fail in the 330s I can put single 4 gigs in to replace them. When I've done this in the past, though, the volume on the single disk was seen and brought online in a broken state, if I remember correctly. What would the correct procedure to take a single disk like this with data on it and make it into a hot spare on? Thanks, Justin Acklin Unix Systems Administrator Philips STB

1 0

RE: RMA reminder calls
by Mejia, Ruben 03 Feb '00

03 Feb '00

Greetings from NetApp Logistics. I would like to hear your comments regarding the retrieval process we have in place. I will pass on all your suggestions to management. Maybe we can change something. Thanks in advance for your input. -rube -----Original Message----- From: Graham C. Knight [mailto:grahamk@ast.lmco.com] Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 12:49 PM To: Jim Harm Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: RMA reminder calls Jim Harm wrote: > > sometimes I'll get a call with a list of RMAs from the last 6 months > and they expect me to respond with the whereabouts of every RMA > when the fact is they have all been shipped back to NetApp. I used to get these too. The last one i got i was blatantly rude to the person who called, which is very much against my character (i hope). But man, why should i have to go through 50 RMA's with these people once a month?? They haven't called me back since. :-) Funny thing was, they were asking me about RMA's for hardware that I *know* i would never RMA, because i don't own it. I think they just lost a lot of stuff and are trying to track it down. Graham

1 0

RE: Any clue to why I'm getting errors below?
by Sims, Aaron 03 Feb '00

03 Feb '00

Looks like your switch is in auto negotiate mode. Hard code the switch port to 100Mbs, full duplex. Run 'ifstat -z e3a' to reset your interface counters and look at it again. BTW, what kind of switch are you hooked up to? -- Aaron Sims Professional Services Engineer Network Appliance aaron.sims(a)netapp.com 404-226-7382 (cell) 408-822-8947 (voice mail) > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Johannes [mailto:rjohanne@damango.net] > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 4:51 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Any clue to why I'm getting errors below? > > > Below is the out put from ifstat. I'm wondering what could be causing > the errors in both the TRANSMIT and RECEIVE sections, and why the > Underflow in the TRANSMIT section. > > Could(are) the errors and Underflows in the TRANSMIT section > be related? > > > OUTPUT FROM IFSTAT > ================== > > daspace1> ifstat e3a > e3a: MAC address 00:c0:95:e0:fc:7c > > RECEIVE > ======== > Packets: 116m | Bytes: 2762m | Errors: > > 19 > No buffers: 0 | Length err: 0 | Runt > frames: 0 > Long frames: 0 | Collisions: 0 | CRC > error: > 19 > H/w overflow: 0 | Process stop: 2239k | List > overflow: 0 > Process reset: 2239k | Rst frame drops: 585 > TRANSMIT > ======== > Packets: 132m | Bytes: 1196m | Errors: > 8376 > Collisions: 0 | Late collisions: 0 | Excess > coll: 0 > Queue full: 0 | List full: 0 | No > carrier: 0 > Underflow: 8321 | Defer: 0 | Time > out: 0 > Stopped: 0 | List underflow: 2164 | Loss of > carrier: 0 > No buffers: 0 | Requeue: 1396 | Threshold up: > 1396 > Threshold dn: 1396 | Threshold lvl: 0 > DEVICE > ======= > Interrupts: 224m | Resets: 9 > LINK INFO > ========= > Auto: Enabled | Mediatype: 100tx-fd > | > Link Partner: Auto | Link State: Up > > > > Any help will be appreciated. Thanks > > robert > -- > Robert Johannes > Systems Administrator > Kairos-Damango Internet Services Inc. > 1300 Godward Street suite 3200 > Minneapolis, MN 55413 >

1 0

Any clue to why I'm getting errors below?
by Robert Johannes 03 Feb '00

03 Feb '00

Below is the out put from ifstat. I'm wondering what could be causing the errors in both the TRANSMIT and RECEIVE sections, and why the Underflow in the TRANSMIT section. Could(are) the errors and Underflows in the TRANSMIT section be related? OUTPUT FROM IFSTAT ================== daspace1> ifstat e3a e3a: MAC address 00:c0:95:e0:fc:7c RECEIVE ======== Packets: 116m | Bytes: 2762m | Errors: 19 No buffers: 0 | Length err: 0 | Runt frames: 0 Long frames: 0 | Collisions: 0 | CRC error: 19 H/w overflow: 0 | Process stop: 2239k | List overflow: 0 Process reset: 2239k | Rst frame drops: 585 TRANSMIT ======== Packets: 132m | Bytes: 1196m | Errors: 8376 Collisions: 0 | Late collisions: 0 | Excess coll: 0 Queue full: 0 | List full: 0 | No carrier: 0 Underflow: 8321 | Defer: 0 | Time out: 0 Stopped: 0 | List underflow: 2164 | Loss of carrier: 0 No buffers: 0 | Requeue: 1396 | Threshold up: 1396 Threshold dn: 1396 | Threshold lvl: 0 DEVICE ======= Interrupts: 224m | Resets: 9 LINK INFO ========= Auto: Enabled | Mediatype: 100tx-fd | Link Partner: Auto | Link State: Up Any help will be appreciated. Thanks robert -- Robert Johannes Systems Administrator Kairos-Damango Internet Services Inc. 1300 Godward Street suite 3200 Minneapolis, MN 55413

1 0

RE: console cable pinout
by Bond, Andrew 02 Feb '00

02 Feb '00

The hardware guide for your filer (downloadable from NOW) defines the pins on the console port, and the required terminal settings. The minimal required pins are: Pin 2 RxD Pin 3 TxD pin 5 Ground You need to set your emulator to 9600, 8 bits, no parity, XON/XOFF (or no flow control). Regards, Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-dl-toasters(a)netapp.com > [mailto:owner-dl-toasters@netapp.com]On Behalf Of Erik Ahlstrom > Sent: 02 February 2000 14:34 > To: Ronan Mullally > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: console cable pinout > > > You should use an null-modem kable or X-tp cable trough RJ45 > - DB-9, and > make sure that you are using Software hand-shake, ie, xon-xoff. > > I'm using this config and it works fine for me. > > /erik > > > \/// > (o o) > -------------ooO(_)Ooo----------------------------------------- > Erik Ahlström, ProAct Datasystem > eah(a)proact.se, Systems Engineer > Vx: +46 8 6236660 Ph: +46 8 6236577 > Fx: +46 8 6231856 Mob:+46 709 844102 > =============================================================== > > On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Ronan Mullally wrote: > > > After almost two years without a toaster I've finally come out > > of the wilderness and am once again the proud "owner" (ok, admin) > > of a nice shiny new toaster. Pity they're not as shiny as they > > used to be in the Good Ol' Days :( > > > > I'm trying to connect this beastie to a console server. > Specifically > > a Linux box with a Cyclades Ze multiport serial card. The Cyclades > > presents its ports using an expansion box with RJ45 female ports. > > > > I haven't been able to get this to talk to the toaster's > console port :( > > I've tried various combinations of straight-through and null-modem > > adaptors with standard ethernet and roll-over drop cables > with no joy. > > > > Can anybody point me in the direction of the pinouts I need in a > > RJ45 - DB-9 adaptor that will work with a roll-over drop cable? > > > > For reference, I've got the Cyclades ports talking to cisco > kit (3600s) > > using a roll-over cable. I've also got them talking to > Foundry switches > > using the same roll-over cable with an adaptor using the > pinout below. > > > > > > RJ45 DB-9 > > Signal Pinout Pinout Signal > > TxD 3 --------------------- 2 RxD > > RxD 6 --------------------- 3 TxD > > Gnd 4 --------------------- 5 Gnd > > > > RTS 1 ----+ +----- 7 RTS > > CTS 5 ----+ +----- 8 CTS > > > > DTR 2 ----+ +----- 4 DTR > > DCD 7 ----| |----- 1 DCD > > DSR 8 ----+ +----- 6 DSR > > > > > > -Ronan > > > >

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters