toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: snapmirror quarry...
by Berry, Grant 27 Dec '00

27 Dec '00

Hi Brian and all. Snapmirror does xfer the source volume's snapshots over to the target volume, so that space has to be considered as well. In general you need as much or more space available on the snapmirror target. Have a look at section 4. in this white paper, it explains it well: http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3043.html Another good doc on snapmirror is here: http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/olio/guides/TR3073.shtml Please keep in mind that these docs are due for updating when it come to performance details when considering snap create and blockmap xfer times and their (huge) improvements in ONTAP 6.x. Regards, Grant -----Original Message----- From: Brian Tao [mailto:taob@risc.org] Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 1:54 PM To: Lance R. Bailey Cc: 'Traitel Eyal'; toasters Subject: Re: snapmirror quarry... On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Lance R. Bailey wrote: > > snap mirror is a front to vol copy. think of vol copy as "dd" ie: > block level. Does this include or exclude snap reserve space? Vol copy does not require that you duplicate snapshots of a volume, so I assume SnapMirror is the same? -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"

1 0

Solaris persistently trying to write to a snapshot
by Chris Thompson 26 Dec '00

26 Dec '00

I wonder whether anyone else has seen the following effect? I made a casual reference to the problem back in May, but it's just jumped up and bit us rather hard. [Actually, it was before Christmas, but I didn't get round to writing it up then!] NFS server: F740 running ONTAP 5.3.7R1 NFS client: UltraSPARC (E220R) running Solaris 8 (well patched) [but the problem has been around since 5.3.5 & Solaris 2.6, at least: probably much longer] In some circumstances, the Solaris kernel can acquire the notion that it has pending NFS writes (apparently in the "buffer cache") to be performed on a file in a snapshot. When such a write is rejected by the filer with EROFS, Solaris logs the error... and tries it again after 30 seconds. And again. And again ... On one recent occurrence of this, as the result of a genuine user "error", the messages came so thick and fast that we had to reboot the client machine. The following, by contrast, was a controlled experiment! Test file: $ ls -li test/test 3715488 -rw-r--r-- 1 cet1 cet1 21167 Dec 23 15:50 test/test A snapshot was taken at 16:00. Then the command echo x >>test/.snapshot/hourly.0/test which one might reasonably expect to fail, completed quietly. But then the kernel messages started: Dec 23 18:00:43 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 808668 kern.notice] NFS write error on host puppis-intracus: Read-only file system. Dec 23 18:00:43 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 702911 kern.notice] (file handle: e1b43900 13b1f03 20000b00 38b1a0 a8268f00 fb380000 40000000 c7741500) Dec 23 18:00:43 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 808668 kern.notice] NFS write error on host puppis-intracus: Read-only file system. Dec 23 18:00:43 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 702911 kern.notice] (file handle: e1b43900 13b1f03 20000b00 38b1a0 a8268f00 fb380000 40000000 c7741500) Dec 23 18:01:07 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 808668 kern.notice] NFS write error on host puppis-intracus: Read-only file system. Dec 23 18:01:07 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 702911 kern.notice] (file handle: e1b43900 13b1f03 20000b00 38b1a0 a8268f00 fb380000 40000000 c7741500) Dec 23 18:01:37 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 808668 kern.notice] NFS write error on host puppis-intracus: Read-only file system. Dec 23 18:01:37 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 702911 kern.notice] (file handle: e1b43900 13b1f03 20000b00 38b1a0 a8268f00 fb380000 40000000 c7741500) ... continuing apparently indefinitely. I was quite expecting to have to reboot this client machine as well, but coming back after Christmas I find they eventually terminated: ... Dec 25 15:59:37 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 808668 kern.notice] NFS write error on host puppis-intracus: Read-only file system. Dec 25 15:59:37 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 702911 kern.notice] (file handle: e1b43900 13b1f03 20000b00 38b1a0 a8268f00 fb380000 40000000 c7741500) Dec 25 16:00:07 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 626546 kern.notice] NFS write error on host puppis-intracus: Stale NFS file handle. Dec 25 16:00:07 draco.cus.cam.ac.uk nfs: [ID 702911 kern.notice] (file handle: e1b43900 13b1f03 20000b00 38b1a0 a8268f00 fb380000 40000000 c7741500) The snapshot had been deleted, and the change from an EROFS to an ESTALE seems to have finally persuaded the Solaris kernel to stop retrying! [The file handle contents agree perfectly with the expected value for the snapshot of test/test, by the way, based on the description that Guy Harris gave last May.] I suppose this has to be seen primarily as a Solaris problem, but I wonder what attributes of the NetApp filer are confusing it. Q1. Why doesn't the open for writing of "test/.snapshot/hourly.0/test" fail? Is Solaris being confused by parts of a single NFS filing system being read-only, but not all of it? Or by the duplicate inode numbers of "test/test" (which would certainly have been cached) and "test/.snapshot/hourly.0/test"? Q2. Why does Solaris go on trying the write for so long? [And why keep on logging it so persistently? :-( ] I'll have to open a call with Sun about this in the new year, and would like to understand the problem better myself by then. Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1(a)ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.

1 0

RE: Bouncing autosupport?
by Brar, Suman 24 Dec '00

24 Dec '00

Our production systems is functioning properly and all autosupports are being processed. These bounces were caused by one of our development systems for stress testing the capabilities of email system for autosupport. The developer forgot to throttle the outgoing bounces. Sorry for the inconvenience. I am responsible for the Autosupport program and welcome your feedback. Regards Suman Brar Program Manager Autosupport 408-822-3492 > -----Original Message----- > From: Tuc [mailto:ttsg@ttsg.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 24, 2000 6:18 AM > To: chris(a)webtop.com > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: Bouncing autosupport? > > > > > > In article <200012240531.AAA01495(a)heimdall.ttsg.com>, Tuc wrote: > > > Anyone just rudely woken by : > > > > Oh yes [Grumbles at people who break their mail systems] > > > I normally don't get upset when people break their mail systems. > However, this time, I'm upset for 2 reasons : > > 1) What if my machine needed to log an autosupport > problem that it > threw a disk, or something else. > 2) I don't like getting woken up at : > > 00:18:04 > 00:26:33 > 02:09:01 > 02:36:28 > 04:17:12 > 04:17:30 > 04:18:01 > 04:18:02 > 05:35:06 > and then finally the one at > 05:35:07 > > which only set off 1 monitoring device, not the > other. So > I had to get up and work for a 1/2 hour to get it running. > Its bad enough > when its my own stuff that has a problem keeping me awake... > BUT A VENDOR! > > Tuc/TTSG >

2 1

Bouncing autosupport?
by Tuc 24 Dec '00

24 Dec '00

Hi, Anyone just rudely woken by : >The original message was received at Sat, 23 Dec 2000 21:00:05 -0800 (PST) >from mx02.dmz.netapp.com [10.254.252.22] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- >asupprodtest > (reason: service unavailable) > (expanded from: autosupport-private@herra) >asuparch > (reason: service unavailable) > (expanded from: autosupport-private@herra) > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >mail.local: unknown name: >554 5.0.0 asupprodtest,asuparch... Service unavailable When the autosupport emails bounced...? Tuc/TTSG

3 3

snapmirror quarry...
by Premanshu Jain 23 Dec '00

23 Dec '00

I have a volume of 400 gb total will 230 gb data on it. Can I snapmirror this on a smaller 300 gb volume..? thanks, prem

5 4

SCSI over IP available now
by Alvarado, Michael 22 Dec '00

22 Dec '00

It is called NDMP. www.ndmp.org

1 0

Re: Using Network Appliance F7xx's in a WAN environment.
by Paul Wiltsey 22 Dec '00

22 Dec '00

You can use UDP or TCP and you can use Vers 2 or 3. You are going to find most of the performance affecting tuning is done via the NFS client options. Use smaller Rsize and Wsize (ie wsize=2048,rsize=2048) and try increasing your client UDP Buffer if you choose to use NFS over UDP. Also increase your NFS retries to between 3 and 5 and timeout to 10. Remember, over a possibly already fully WAN link... TCP does have slightly more overhead in total packet count transmitted ( provided UDP does not have too many retrans). Have fun with the tuning... and keep track of performance ( copy time ) with all Rsize and Wsize between 512 and 32k . Try small files and larger files. Test on both a read from server and a write to server. ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthew Stier <Matthew.Stier(a)fnc.fujitsu.com> Date: Thursday, December 21, 2000 3:24 pm Subject: Using Network Appliance F7xx's in a WAN environment. > Any known filer tweaks to improve perfomance of NFS across a Wide Area > Network? > > -- > Matthew Lee Stier * Fujitsu Network Communications > Unix Systems Administrator | Two Blue Hill Plaza > Ph: 914-731-2097 Fx: 914-731-2011 | Sixth Floor > Matthew.Stier(a)fnc.fujitsu.com * Pearl River, NY 10965 > > > >

1 0

RE: ndmpcoy maxes the CPU on 840
by Traitel, Eyal 22 Dec '00

22 Dec '00

Which versions are the filers running ? Eyal. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- eTraitel - I'm the new eBuzzword around !!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Eyal Traitel - Filer Escalation Engineer CNA, MCSE, CSA, NetApp CA Network Appliance BV Holland Office Center Kruisweg 799b 2132 NG, Hoofddorp The Netherlands Office: +31 23 567 9685 Cellular: +31 6 5497 2568 Email: eyal(a)netapp.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web - http://now.netapp.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Premanshu Jain [mailto:PrJain@shastanets.com] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 3:38 AM To: toasters Subject: ndmpcoy maxes the CPU on 840 Whenever I fire an ndmpcopy from a 740 to 840, it immedietly maxes cpu (100%) on the 840. Only a reboot brings CPU activity down then.. Any clues....???? Here is the final error message thrown... bot: LOG: RESTORE: bot: LOG: Thu Dec 21 17:33:12 2000: Restoring NT ACLs. filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: dumping (Pass V) [ACLs] filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: 87029 KB filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: DUMP IS DONE filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: Deleting "/vol/sw/../snapshot_for_backup.150" snapshot. bot: HALT: The operation was successful! Waiting for filebot to halt too. The transfer was successful, but the source filer hasn't halted yet. filebot: HALT: The operation was successful! Broken Pipe mtshasta% Data server never halted, closing connection. Broken Pipe

1 0

ndmpcoy maxes the CPU on 840
by Premanshu Jain 22 Dec '00

22 Dec '00

Whenever I fire an ndmpcopy from a 740 to 840, it immedietly maxes cpu (100%) on the 840. Only a reboot brings CPU activity down then.. Any clues....???? Here is the final error message thrown... bot: LOG: RESTORE: bot: LOG: Thu Dec 21 17:33:12 2000: Restoring NT ACLs. filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: dumping (Pass V) [ACLs] filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: 87029 KB filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: DUMP IS DONE filebot: LOG: DUMP: filebot: LOG: Deleting "/vol/sw/../snapshot_for_backup.150" snapshot. bot: HALT: The operation was successful! Waiting for filebot to halt too. The transfer was successful, but the source filer hasn't halted yet. filebot: HALT: The operation was successful! Broken Pipe mtshasta% Data server never halted, closing connection. Broken Pipe

1 0

Using Network Appliance F7xx's in a WAN environment.
by Matthew Stier 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

Any known filer tweaks to improve perfomance of NFS across a Wide Area Network? -- Matthew Lee Stier * Fujitsu Network Communications Unix Systems Administrator | Two Blue Hill Plaza Ph: 914-731-2097 Fx: 914-731-2011 | Sixth Floor Matthew.Stier(a)fnc.fujitsu.com * Pearl River, NY 10965

2 1

Re: Toaster newbie questions
by Paul Wiltsey 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

I agree with the preference of Jamey ----- Original Message ----- From: Jamey Maze <jmaze(a)netapp.com> Date: Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:00 pm Subject: Re: Toaster newbie questions > Qtrees are the preferred way to organize things for any application > where > you can't justify a separate volume. With one shelf, I'd recommend > you have > a single 6-drive volume and one hot spare. You can delete qtrees > like any > other folder/directory. > > > At 11:44 AM 12/21/00 -0500, lgkloft(a)usgs.gov wrote: > >I am setting up my first toaster - an F720 with one shelf (seven 36GB > >drives). I'm seeking some "real-life" experiences and > recommendations based > >on what I am trying to do. > > > >I work in a small office with approximately 50 employees and > utilize UNIX > >and NT operating systems. I currently have several $HOME, > $PROJECT, and > >GIS-related filesystems residing on my UNIX system. I plan to move > these>filesystems to the filer, but will be unable to create a > separate volume > >for each filesystem. I considered creating two raid-groups, one > for $HOME > >and one for $PROJECT, but I think there will be a performance hit > (only 1-2 > >data disks per volume) and it will cost me two drives for parity, > not to > >mention the spare disk drive. I am now looking at employing one large > >volume (the root volume) and establishing Qtrees to establish and > manage>HOME, PROJECT, and GIS areas within this volume, which would > require NFS > >and CIFS access. I am also considering the idea of creating an > additional>Qtree to maintain user's roaming profiles for the NT > environment - which > >would require CIFs access only. I don't like the idea of doing > this all in > >one volume (especially /vol/vol0), but it looks as if this is the > route I > >will be taking unless someone has a better recommendation. > Finally, how > >difficult, or is it even possible, to remove a Qtree? I didn't find > >anything in the SA Guide to do this. > > > >Thanks, > >Loren > > > -- > James N. (Jamey) Maze Phone: 615-496-4799 > Network Appliance SE www.netapp.com > >

1 0

RE: Toaster newbie questions
by Sam Schorr 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

I would highly recommend going with 1 volume and 1 RAID group given your initial buy. With one shelf, you are going to get 1 parity and 6 data without leaving any disks as a spare - not a good idea. So, if use 1 disk for spare, then you have 5 data and 1 parity. Even with only one volume, you can easily setup NFS mount points and CIFS shares that either mix or do not by creating sub-directories or folders that reside on the 1 volume. Remember that you also give up space to NTAP, the O/S, and to snapshots which are volume specific (default is 20% of total volume size). That will leave you with about 4 drives of live file space. So, 4*32gig=128 gig size of volume. -----Original Message----- From: lgkloft(a)usgs.gov [mailto:lgkloft@usgs.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 8:44 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: lgkloft(a)usgs.gov Subject: Toaster newbie questions I am setting up my first toaster - an F720 with one shelf (seven 36GB drives). I'm seeking some "real-life" experiences and recommendations based on what I am trying to do. I work in a small office with approximately 50 employees and utilize UNIX and NT operating systems. I currently have several $HOME, $PROJECT, and GIS-related filesystems residing on my UNIX system. I plan to move these filesystems to the filer, but will be unable to create a separate volume for each filesystem. I considered creating two raid-groups, one for $HOME and one for $PROJECT, but I think there will be a performance hit (only 1-2 data disks per volume) and it will cost me two drives for parity, not to mention the spare disk drive. I am now looking at employing one large volume (the root volume) and establishing Qtrees to establish and manage HOME, PROJECT, and GIS areas within this volume, which would require NFS and CIFS access. I am also considering the idea of creating an additional Qtree to maintain user's roaming profiles for the NT environment - which would require CIFs access only. I don't like the idea of doing this all in one volume (especially /vol/vol0), but it looks as if this is the route I will be taking unless someone has a better recommendation. Finally, how difficult, or is it even possible, to remove a Qtree? I didn't find anything in the SA Guide to do this. Thanks, Loren

1 0

Re: Filers and Extreme switches
by Paul Wiltsey 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

We have had excellent results with Filers and Extreme switches, specifically Black Diamonds, Summit 48s, 7is. Can you be more specific about what you are trying to do? ----- Original Message ----- From: Peter Ellett <p_ellett(a)yahoo.com> Date: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 9:22 pm Subject: Filers and Extreme switches > Hi all > > Has anyone experienced poor performance with Filers and Extreme > Alpine or Black Diamond switches? > If yes, any fixes or workarounds known? > > Pete Ellett > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. > http://shopping.yahoo.com/ >

1 0

RE: Toaster newbie questions
by Mike Sphar 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

We run several hundred gigs on each of our filers all as one volume. There's a downside in terms of restoring data in case of a failure, but since we paid a lot of money for these netapps in the first place so as to not *have* failures, we consider that an acceptable risk. Our disk space requirements change constantly, so for us trying to maintain separate volumes would be a nightmare and would inevitably create more downtime in the long run. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Services, BOFH, GWP, MCP, MCP+I, MCSE, BFD -----Original Message----- From: lgkloft(a)usgs.gov [mailto:lgkloft@usgs.gov] Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 8:44 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: lgkloft(a)usgs.gov Subject: Toaster newbie questions I am setting up my first toaster - an F720 with one shelf (seven 36GB drives). I'm seeking some "real-life" experiences and recommendations based on what I am trying to do. I work in a small office with approximately 50 employees and utilize UNIX and NT operating systems. I currently have several $HOME, $PROJECT, and GIS-related filesystems residing on my UNIX system. I plan to move these filesystems to the filer, but will be unable to create a separate volume for each filesystem. I considered creating two raid-groups, one for $HOME and one for $PROJECT, but I think there will be a performance hit (only 1-2 data disks per volume) and it will cost me two drives for parity, not to mention the spare disk drive. I am now looking at employing one large volume (the root volume) and establishing Qtrees to establish and manage HOME, PROJECT, and GIS areas within this volume, which would require NFS and CIFS access. I am also considering the idea of creating an additional Qtree to maintain user's roaming profiles for the NT environment - which would require CIFs access only. I don't like the idea of doing this all in one volume (especially /vol/vol0), but it looks as if this is the route I will be taking unless someone has a better recommendation. Finally, how difficult, or is it even possible, to remove a Qtree? I didn't find anything in the SA Guide to do this. Thanks, Loren

1 0

RE: Qualstar AIT-2 and Veritas
by Joe Luchtenberg 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

Apologize for the delayed reply to this. Am a strong supporter of AIT-2 and Spectra Logic, but aren't you getting ahead of yourself? According to SL's web page, GbE interfaces are currently under development, but not yet available. If you want to implement GbE with Spectra Logic and NetApp today, you still require a backup server to which you would SCSI- or Fibre-attach your Spectra Logic tape library (I would recommend setting up a private network to take the traffic off your production network, though). Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. New number and email, please update: 757.858.0600 858.0606 fax joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Alvarado, Michael [SMTP:michael.alvarado@netapp.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 8:52 PM > To: 'Moshe Linzer'; toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: Qualstar AIT-2 and Veritas > > Have you considered the GbE AIT 2 library from SpectraLogic? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Moshe Linzer [mailto:Moshe.Linzer@nsc.com] > Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 4:00 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Qualstar AIT-2 and Veritas > > > In our quest for a Budtool + tape library replacement, we are currently > looking at Veritas NetBackup and a Qualstar AIT-2 tape library for our 2 > NetApp F760's. Does anyone have experience with this combination? > Qualstar makes a good argument for AIT technology. Is AIT-2 fully > supported on the 760? From looking on NOW, I noticed a few things: > > 1. The F760 SCSI port is HVD, Qualstar library is LVD-SE, so I need a > converter. Can the Filer port be changed to LVD-SE? > 2. Tape drive matrix on > NOW > (http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/olio/cert_matrices/tape_drives.s > ht > ml) > says that versions below OnTap 6.0 require a PVR. What exactly is a > PVR? Will I still get full performance from the drive? > > Is anyone using Veritas with a Qualstar library? > > Thanks, > > Moshe > > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > - > Moshe Linzer | On the Internet, > Unix Systems Manager | > National Semiconductor, Israel | nobody knows you're a moron. > Phone: 972-9-970-2247 | > Fax: 972-9-970-2001 | - Network Magazine > Email: moshel(a)nsc.com | > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > - >

1 0

Toaster newbie questions
by lgkloft＠usgs.gov 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

I am setting up my first toaster - an F720 with one shelf (seven 36GB drives). I'm seeking some "real-life" experiences and recommendations based on what I am trying to do. I work in a small office with approximately 50 employees and utilize UNIX and NT operating systems. I currently have several $HOME, $PROJECT, and GIS-related filesystems residing on my UNIX system. I plan to move these filesystems to the filer, but will be unable to create a separate volume for each filesystem. I considered creating two raid-groups, one for $HOME and one for $PROJECT, but I think there will be a performance hit (only 1-2 data disks per volume) and it will cost me two drives for parity, not to mention the spare disk drive. I am now looking at employing one large volume (the root volume) and establishing Qtrees to establish and manage HOME, PROJECT, and GIS areas within this volume, which would require NFS and CIFS access. I am also considering the idea of creating an additional Qtree to maintain user's roaming profiles for the NT environment - which would require CIFs access only. I don't like the idea of doing this all in one volume (especially /vol/vol0), but it looks as if this is the route I will be taking unless someone has a better recommendation. Finally, how difficult, or is it even possible, to remove a Qtree? I didn't find anything in the SA Guide to do this. Thanks, Loren

3 2

Filers and Extreme switches
by Peter Ellett 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

Hi all Has anyone experienced poor performance with Filers and Extreme Alpine or Black Diamond switches? If yes, any fixes or workarounds known? Pete Ellett __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. http://shopping.yahoo.com/

2 1

inodes vs. snapshots
by DANIEL CHANEY 21 Dec '00

21 Dec '00

Hi, long time reader, first time poster, love your list, etc etc etc. Do max inode counts follow snapshots? That is, if I do a snapshot on Monday, increase the inode counts on Tuesday, wipe my files on Wednesday and bring things back from the snapshot on Thursday, do I still need to increase the inode count as I did on Tuesday? -dan

2 3

RE: Problem on 840 Cluster..
by Fox, Adam 20 Dec '00

20 Dec '00

You'll need to floppy boot to the 1-5 menu (either using actual floppies or the PROM trick). Enter 5 to go into Maint. mode. Then from maint. mode you can rc_toggle_basic and use the vol rewrite_fsid command. toaster*> vol rewrite_fsid <vol_name> You only need to do this on 1 of the filers, but the cluster will have to be disabled while you do it. You can re-enable cf once both filers are up in normal mode. As stated before, feel free to call NetApp Support and have them walk you through the process. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Bravo13S(a)netscape.net [mailto:Bravo13S@netscape.net] > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:25 PM > To: PrJain(a)shastanets.com > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: Problem on 840 Cluster.. > > > According to the /etc/messages.. your root volume has the same > FSID as another volume. This is why it could not do a takeover. > > > There is an rc_toggle_basic command that will give you a new > FSID.. BUT it is the a good ideal to open a case with Network > Appliance Tech Support. They can tell the complete step by step > process you need to do inorder to fix your problem. > If I remember correctly I think you will need to do a reboot..so > you might want to look at when your next downtime is available. > > Rgds > > > > Premanshu Jain <PrJain(a)shastanets.com> wrote: > > > > Feel toasters will be faster to help... > > Here is the description of my problem> > > > > > > I have an 840 cluster running 5.3.5H1 R2. When I initiate a > manual takeover > > from A, it successfully takes over B. However, the reverse > is not true. If I > > initiate a manual takeover from B (cf takeover) it fails > and tends to hang A > > in rebooting stage..Here are the typical error messages.. > > ___________________________________________ > > Here is the o/p when I initiate a manual takeover.. > > ___________________ > > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [rc]: Cluster monitor: takeover > initiated by operat > > or > > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: > takeover attempted after > > cf > > takeover command > > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: UP --> TAKEOVER > > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: > takeover started > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:04 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices > on ISP2100 in > > slot 9 > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:12 PST [raid_disk_admin]: Root volume vol0 > has the same > > FSID as > > another volume on this system. > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST last message repeated 5 times > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [raid_disk_admin]: RAID takeover > failed: Partner > > disk la > > bel processing failed! > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: > takeover during raid > > fai > > led; takeover cancelled > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: > takeover failed > > 'unable > > to start partner' > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_giveback]: Cluster monitor: > giveback started > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices > on ISP2100 in > > slot 8 > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices > on ISP2100 in > > slot 9 > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:14 PST [asup_main]: Cluster Notification mail sent > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_giveback]: Cluster monitor: > giveback completed > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: TAKEOVER --> UP > > Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: partner > not responding > > bot> cf status > > Waiting for store to recover. > > bot has disabled takeover by store (unsynchronized log) > > ________________________ > > > > Other Question : > > I can't use the Windows Hyperterminal keyboard, when > console is pluged > > directly to com port of a windows PC. I was able to do it > earlier..but not > > now.. > > > > > > prem > > Premanshu Jain > > Nortel Networks, Content Networks(Shasta) > > 2305, Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 95054 > > Direct: (408) 565-3573 ESN: 655-3573 > > eMail: prjain(a)shastanets.com Web: > > http://www.nortelnetworks.com/ipservices > > > > > __________________________________________________________________ > Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at > http://webmail.netscape.com/ >

1 0

Problem on 840 Cluster..
by Premanshu Jain 20 Dec '00

20 Dec '00

Feel toasters will be faster to help... Here is the description of my problem> I have an 840 cluster running 5.3.5H1 R2. When I initiate a manual takeover from A, it successfully takes over B. However, the reverse is not true. If I initiate a manual takeover from B (cf takeover) it fails and tends to hang A in rebooting stage..Here are the typical error messages.. ___________________________________________ Here is the o/p when I initiate a manual takeover.. ___________________ Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [rc]: Cluster monitor: takeover initiated by operat or Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: takeover attempted after cf takeover command Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: UP --> TAKEOVER Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: takeover started Tue Dec 19 16:32:04 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices on ISP2100 in slot 9 Tue Dec 19 16:32:12 PST [raid_disk_admin]: Root volume vol0 has the same FSID as another volume on this system. Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST last message repeated 5 times Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [raid_disk_admin]: RAID takeover failed: Partner disk la bel processing failed! Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: takeover during raid fai led; takeover cancelled Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: takeover failed 'unable to start partner' Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_giveback]: Cluster monitor: giveback started Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices on ISP2100 in slot 8 Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices on ISP2100 in slot 9 Tue Dec 19 16:32:14 PST [asup_main]: Cluster Notification mail sent Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_giveback]: Cluster monitor: giveback completed Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: TAKEOVER --> UP Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: partner not responding bot> cf status Waiting for store to recover. bot has disabled takeover by store (unsynchronized log) ________________________ Other Question : I can't use the Windows Hyperterminal keyboard, when console is pluged directly to com port of a windows PC. I was able to do it earlier..but not now.. prem Premanshu Jain Nortel Networks, Content Networks(Shasta) 2305, Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 95054 Direct: (408) 565-3573 ESN: 655-3573 eMail: prjain(a)shastanets.com Web: http://www.nortelnetworks.com/ipservices

3 2

RE: 2 questions for f760
by Sam Schorr 20 Dec '00

20 Dec '00

Is this really, possibly, wonderfully true??!! Which version of ONTAP fixed this? The reason I ask is that on all our filers (mostly F760 and some F840's), the total number of folders at any one directory level was a function of the inode limit of a 2 bit, unsigned pointer - thus limited it to just under 65k directories at any one level. Since we have 9.5 million user directories spread across those filers, we had to write scripts to check when that threshold was being reached to create a new one. We would just LOVE to hear that this limit has been removed! -----Original Message----- From: Bruce Sterling Woodcock [mailto:sirbruce@ix.netcom.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:41 AM To: neil lehrer; toasters Subject: Re: 2 questions for f760 ----- Original Message ----- From: "neil lehrer" <nlehrer(a)ibb.gov> To: "toasters" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 9:25 AM Subject: 2 questions for f760 > hi, > > 1. we will be moving our home and share dirs from old sun boxes to > f760. the home dirs on the suns were set up like: > > \home > \home\a > \home\a\abe > \home\a\allen > \home\b > > etc. in other words, user homedirs under the first letter of the id. i > was told this was done for performance reasons, inode searching, on the > sun boxes. > > do i need to use this structure on the 760? is there a similar issue on > filers? or can it just be \home\userid? Unless you're talking 100,000 entries or so, it can be \home\userid. NTAP implemented a large directory performance enhancement a long time ago that could handle 10s of thousands of entries, and the 760 is many, many times faster than that. If you want to read the old paper, though: http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3006.html Given the filesystem enhancements since then they may even have gone to b-trees by now. Bruce

4 4

RE: Problem on 840 Cluster..
by Watanabe, Steve 20 Dec '00

20 Dec '00

Premanshu, I assume you meant 5.3.6H1R2, not that it really matters. As for the failed takeovers it should fail in both directions as you have a volume on each node with the same fsid. The fsid is set when the volume is created and is based on the system id of the filer which is extracted from the nvram card. The likely way that this occurred was that vol0 was created on one node and then moved to the other node. Then another vol0 was then created on the first node. Note that when I say "moved" it could have happened if someone was playing with the cabling and switched shelves around. As for getting out of this, the easiest way is to redo the filesystems assuming you haven't populated the volumes with data yet. Otherwise I'd call netapp support and they should walk you through rewriting the fsids on one of the volumes; the one that doesn't match the system id of the host node. -Steve > -----Original Message----- > From: Premanshu Jain [mailto:PrJain@shastanets.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 5:34 PM > To: toasters > Subject: Problem on 840 Cluster.. > > > Feel toasters will be faster to help... > Here is the description of my problem> > > > I have an 840 cluster running 5.3.5H1 R2. When I initiate a > manual takeover > from A, it successfully takes over B. However, the reverse is > not true. If I > initiate a manual takeover from B (cf takeover) it fails and > tends to hang A > in rebooting stage..Here are the typical error messages.. > ___________________________________________ > Here is the o/p when I initiate a manual takeover.. > ___________________ > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [rc]: Cluster monitor: takeover > initiated by operat > or > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: takeover > attempted after > cf > takeover command > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: UP --> TAKEOVER > Tue Dec 19 16:31:52 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: > takeover started > Tue Dec 19 16:32:04 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices > on ISP2100 in > slot 9 > Tue Dec 19 16:32:12 PST [raid_disk_admin]: Root volume vol0 > has the same > FSID as > another volume on this system. > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST last message repeated 5 times > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [raid_disk_admin]: RAID takeover > failed: Partner > disk la > bel processing failed! > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: > takeover during raid > fai > led; takeover cancelled > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_takeover]: Cluster monitor: > takeover failed > 'unable > to start partner' > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [cf_giveback]: Cluster monitor: > giveback started > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices > on ISP2100 in > slot 8 > Tue Dec 19 16:32:13 PST [disk_admin]: Resetting all devices > on ISP2100 in > slot 9 > Tue Dec 19 16:32:14 PST [asup_main]: Cluster Notification mail sent > Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_giveback]: Cluster monitor: > giveback completed > Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: TAKEOVER --> UP > Tue Dec 19 16:32:20 PST [cf_main]: Cluster monitor: partner > not responding > bot> cf status > Waiting for store to recover. > bot has disabled takeover by store (unsynchronized log) > ________________________ > > Other Question : > I can't use the Windows Hyperterminal keyboard, when console is pluged > directly to com port of a windows PC. I was able to do it > earlier..but not > now.. > > > prem > Premanshu Jain > Nortel Networks, Content Networks(Shasta) > 2305, Mission College Blvd, Santa Clara, CA 95054 > Direct: (408) 565-3573 ESN: 655-3573 > eMail: prjain(a)shastanets.com Web: > http://www.nortelnetworks.com/ipservices >

1 0

SQL Server problem
by Tom "Mad Dog" Yergeau 19 Dec '00

19 Dec '00

One of our DBAs recently posed this question to Microsoft and the only response we got was some badmouthing of NetApp. If anyone has any insight and could help, please let me know. We don't know for certain if it's related to being network attached, or if the database is corrupt, or something else. Thanks, MD > Here is the problem: > We are using a NetApp to store large ~26 GB data warehouse database files > and recently one database went suspect. > One of the dba's that work for me tried to detach and reattach the database. > > This is the error that they received > > Server: Msg 3624, Level 20, State 1, Line 1 > > Location: pageref.cpp:4278 > Expression: rowLog.RowCount () == 1 || pPage->IsEmpty () > SPID: 53 > Process ID: 1528 > > Connection Broken > > There is nothing on MSDN or Technet about this > Do you have any suggestions?

1 0

NetApp and Oracle
by Schiel, John 19 Dec '00

19 Dec '00

I'd like to pose this question here and see where it leads. If this is not the appropriate forum, please let me know what is. I'm in a group where we need to implement a data warehouse. Our design so far is to purchase two 840 filers each with one terabyte of storage using the 36gb drives. On top of that we are going to use either a 420R or Netra 1405 sun server as the database server (solaris 8, Oracle 8.1.6). What we need to do is grab files off of a 760 filer that is in CDR (comma delimited record) format and load that data into an instance of Oracle. Our goal then is to use some method of getting the data off of the 'load' server to another server that will be essentially 'read only' for reporting purposes. These so far are separate servers and I'd like to stay away from Oracle Parallel Server (OPS) at this point because of the extra maintenance and design work that would need to be done to handle this. What I would like to know is what methods of data movement some of you have used. In our quote for the filers we have asked for SnapMirror but I have some reservations on how that might work with Oracle because of the SCN's that are in each separate instance of Oracle. John

2 1

RE: NetApp and Oracle
by Liu, Jerry 19 Dec '00

19 Dec '00

First, Use Oracle SQLloader to load that data into the Oracle database. Second, Update the read-only-reporting Oracle database from the other database at desired interval. There are several methods to accomplish the second task. Method one: Run Oracle database in archive mode, after the first time load "that data" into the Oracle database, take a cold backup of the DB; use the cold backup to restore on the second server system (sun+F840) to create the reporting database. Then, use Snapmirror to ship archive logs to the reporting database system. Apply archive logs to update the reporting database at desired interval that can be done in scripts via cron job. This method is straight forward. Method two: Use Oracle Standby Database (replication) that provide you the ability to ship archive logs via net8, apply archive logs at desired interval to update/sync with the other database; and the standby database can be in read-only mode as reporting database. You will need to follow Oracle Standby Database documentation for configuration and operation of Oracle Standby Database. Please do not hesitate to contact me if I can provide any assistance. Regards. Jerry Liu Database Engineer Network Appliance, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Schiel, John [mailto:John.Schiel@qwest.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:02 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: NetApp and Oracle I'd like to pose this question here and see where it leads. If this is not the appropriate forum, please let me know what is. I'm in a group where we need to implement a data warehouse. Our design so far is to purchase two 840 filers each with one terabyte of storage using the 36gb drives. On top of that we are going to use either a 420R or Netra 1405 sun server as the database server (solaris 8, Oracle 8.1.6). What we need to do is grab files off of a 760 filer that is in CDR (comma delimited record) format and load that data into an instance of Oracle. Our goal then is to use some method of getting the data off of the 'load' server to another server that will be essentially 'read only' for reporting purposes. These so far are separate servers and I'd like to stay away from Oracle Parallel Server (OPS) at this point because of the extra maintenance and design work that would need to be done to handle this. What I would like to know is what methods of data movement some of you have used. In our quote for the filers we have asked for SnapMirror but I have some reservations on how that might work with Oracle because of the SCN's that are in each separate instance of Oracle. John

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters