toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

snapmirror error
by Leonard, Roger 18 May '01

18 May '01

I am attempting to snapmirror between a 330 with 5.3.2R1 and a 840 with 6.01R3. i am getting this error in the 330's messages file. [worker_thread]: snapmirror: destination request with incorrect version i am able to snapmirror another 330 with 5.3.6R2 with the 840 using the same format in my snapmirror.conf and snapmirror.allow and hosts and hosts.equiv. network connectivity is fine, etc. NOW had nothing. any ideas? roger rleonard

1 0

6.1R1 & snapmirror
by Francett, Robert D (SAIC) 18 May '01

18 May '01

Hello All, We're planning an upgrade of a pair of F740 filers in snapmirror configuration from DOT 5.3.6R1P1D1 to DOT 6.1R1. The F740s currently support FC8 & FC9 shelves with 18G drives. In addition to the mandatory firmware upgrade to the filers, we are also planning the addition of a new FC9 shelf of 7/72G drives to be served by a dedicated FC adapter on each filer. Network Appliance has indicated we should upgrade the target filer first, then the source machine. Otherwise, we expect no worries. Does anyone have experiences, good or bad, with DOT 6.1R1 and snapmirror that we should be aware of? Thanks, Bob Francett BP Exploration (Alaska)

1 0

Question on OS upgrades when clustered
by Allen, Pat 18 May '01

18 May '01

Hi all, I've just clustered a couple of F740's. I've got about 6 years of experience upgrading the OS on filers but have never done it on a cluster before. Do I need to do anything special to insure that both boxes are on the same version of the operating system? I will be going from 6.0.1R3 to 6.1R1. Thanks! --- Pat Allen (pat(a)mbari.org) Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) 7700 Sandholdt Rd, Moss Landing, CA 95039 (voice) 831-775-1724; (fax) 831-775-1620

2 1

snapmirror status
by Leonard, Roger 18 May '01

18 May '01

is there a way to log what snapmirror is doing? other than snapmirror status there doesn't appear to be any logging going on with my mirrors. i would like to know how long it took, etc. Roger D. Leonard Marconi Communications

1 0

Relabeling drives
by Ed Tien 18 May '01

18 May '01

Does anyone have the documentation for this?

1 0

RE: Novell integration/migration experiences
by Benn, Paul 18 May '01

18 May '01

Having lived through a NetWare to NT migration at a previous employer I can share a few tidbits with you. You're gonna have to bite the bullet because moving the data and shares over is a manual process. If you haven't already done so, you'll need to have your NT or Win2K domain in place and dual redirectors installed (and working) on the client machines (more on this in the white paper referenced below). You can migrate the user home directories over in smaller (perhaps departmental) groups. I don't know how receptive your team is to working weekends but we split up into teams and alternated Saturday shifts so that when the users came in on Monday, everything was migrated. There are some tools, though, to facilitate migrating NDS user accounts over to Active Directory. We've not used them in-house but here are a few names you might want to look into: Netvision: Synchronicity NetIQ: Netware Migrator Microsoft: as I recall they also have an NDS->AD tool available. Check out this article (product recommendations in the side bar): http://www.computerworld.com/cwi/story/0,1199,NAV47_STO52669,00.html Don't know if you've already seen this but perhaps you can glean a few pearls of wisdom by giving a quick scan: http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3053.html Regards, Paul Benn Network Appliance -----Original Message----- From: Ambrose_Earle(a)shamrockfoods.com [mailto:Ambrose_Earle@shamrockfoods.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:46 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Novell integration/migration experiences Anyone out there have any war stories about integrating and then migrating user shares from Netware to a filer and then ultimately to an NT-only environment that they'd like to share?

1 0

RE: Hardware Upgrade
by Fox, Adam 17 May '01

17 May '01

6.1 System Admin Guide page 131. You can get the 6.1 SysAdmin Guide from NOW. Enjoy! -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffrey Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 5:03 PM > To: Fox, Adam > Cc: 'Jeffrey Krueger'; 'Honeycutt, Michael'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Re: Hardware Upgrade > > > Could you point us at the relevent documentation that > describes this? I've > been searching NOW and haven't come up with it yet. > > Thanks! > > -- Jeff > > > On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:06:18PM -0700, Fox, Adam wrote: > > I haven't received an explanation for it and honestly > > thought it sounded reasonable. It may work under another > > config, but I would think for the vast majority of configs, > > it shouldn't be a problem, especially that if you use the > > dual fiber cards, you get a fiber link for the first hop > > anyway. > > > > If at all possible, I would wire it up that way just to > > stay within the known good configs. > > > > -- Adam Fox > > NetApp Professional Services, NC > > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jeffrey Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] > > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:45 PM > > > To: Fox, Adam > > > Cc: 'Honeycutt, Michael'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > > > Subject: Re: Hardware Upgrade > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:49:40PM -0700, Fox, Adam wrote: > > > > It is suggested if you are hooking up a dual path loop that the > > > > B loop start at the opposite end of the loop as the A loop. In > > > > other words, the B loop starts on the last shelf on the A loop > > > > and works it's way back. > > > > > > Why is that loop configuration suggested? > > > > > > -- Jeff > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

Re: NDS for NT
by Thomas.L.White＠chase.com 17 May '01

17 May '01

Has anyone implemented the NDS for NT in their environment for authenticating access to files on the NeApp filers ?? thanks tw

1 0

RE: DLT8000's on 840
by Hu, Chang-Ping 17 May '01

17 May '01

The parameter listed for DLT8000 is incorrect in 6.0.1. This has been fixed in 6.0.2 (burt#35779.) To fully utilize the capacity of DLT8000, you should upgrade your ONTAP. C.P. Hu -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 12:22 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: DLT8000's on 840 I am setting up a new STK library with DLT8000 drives and my 840 with 6.01 mt status gives me this: Tape drive: Quantum DLT8000 Status: ready, write enabled Format: 85937 bpi 70 GB (w/comp) fileno = 0 blockno = 0 resid = 0 does this mean that it won't recognize the additional 5/10GB provided by the DLT8000 versus DLT7000? do i need an Ontap upgrade to see the additional space? roger leonard marconi.com

1 0

Re: Hardware Upgrade
by Jeffrey Krueger 17 May '01

17 May '01

Could you point us at the relevent documentation that describes this? I've been searching NOW and haven't come up with it yet. Thanks! -- Jeff On Thu, May 17, 2001 at 12:06:18PM -0700, Fox, Adam wrote: > I haven't received an explanation for it and honestly > thought it sounded reasonable. It may work under another > config, but I would think for the vast majority of configs, > it shouldn't be a problem, especially that if you use the > dual fiber cards, you get a fiber link for the first hop > anyway. > > If at all possible, I would wire it up that way just to > stay within the known good configs. > > -- Adam Fox > NetApp Professional Services, NC > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeffrey Krueger [mailto:jkrueger@qualcomm.com] > > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 1:45 PM > > To: Fox, Adam > > Cc: 'Honeycutt, Michael'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > > Subject: Re: Hardware Upgrade > > > > > > On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 12:49:40PM -0700, Fox, Adam wrote: > > > It is suggested if you are hooking up a dual path loop that the > > > B loop start at the opposite end of the loop as the A loop. In > > > other words, the B loop starts on the last shelf on the A loop > > > and works it's way back. > > > > Why is that loop configuration suggested? > > > > -- Jeff > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: DLT8000's on 840
by Fox, Adam 17 May '01

17 May '01

This is a known bug 35779. According to NOW, it's fixed in 6.0.2, 6.1, and 6.1R1. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 3:22 PM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: DLT8000's on 840 > > > I am setting up a new STK library with DLT8000 drives and my > 840 with 6.01 > mt status gives me this: > > Tape drive: Quantum DLT8000 > Status: ready, write enabled > Format: 85937 bpi 70 GB (w/comp) > fileno = 0 blockno = 0 resid = 0 > > does this mean that it won't recognize the additional 5/10GB > provided by the > DLT8000 versus DLT7000? do i need an Ontap upgrade to see > the additional > space? > > roger leonard > marconi.com >

1 0

RE: Hardware Upgrade
by Fox, Adam 17 May '01

17 May '01

There is really nothing magical about this, except that you must be running at least 6.1 (I suggest 6.1R1 as it has some really good fixes in it, but that's not really relevent to this topic). Basically, for non-clustered filers, if the filer detects and A and B loop on the same shelf, then it assumes dual path. If you have two A loops on different shelves, it assumes a single path. It is suggested if you are hooking up a dual path loop that the B loop start at the opposite end of the loop as the A loop. In other words, the B loop starts on the last shelf on the A loop and works it's way back. Once the filer is brought up, you can view this with the new 'storage' command in 6.1. filer> storage show disk -p Is a good start. This will show you which disks are on the A loop and which disks are on the B loop. There really isn't much to it. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Honeycutt, Michael [mailto:MichaelHoneycutt@NC.SLR.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 11:00 AM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Hardware Upgrade > > > Anyone upgraded to the new dual port fcal's yet? Looking for > some info on > what options/config changes would have to be made after the cards are > installed. Should the filer just recognize that the cards are > there and > automatically set up the second loop? Anyone at NetApp with > documentation > that could be supplied would be appreciated. Thanks. > > Michael Honeycutt > MCSE/A+ > NT/Exchange Engineer > IBM Global Services >

4 4

RE: A more selective bugwatch on NOW?
by La Londe, Renee 17 May '01

17 May '01

Hi Chris, The ability watch a bug that affects both ONTAP and Netcache and only get alerted about fixes in one of the products does not exist today. However, this is a great suggestion moving forward! Thanks for the feedback. We've added this request to our project list and will work to get that functionality added soon. We'll get back to you when we know the exact date that the changes will be implemented. Thanks again, Renee Get answers NOW (Netapp on the Web) http://now.netapp.com Renee La Londe Direcor, E-Service Network Appliance, Inc renee(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 8:59 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: A more selective bugwatch? Does anoyone know if it is possible to watch a bug that affects both Data ONTAP and NetCache in such a way that one only gets alerted about fixes in one of the products, and not the other? The Netcache alerts tend to overwhelm one if one is interested only in the DOT ones, as they seem to be issued for each patch release - or so I assume from names like "5.0.1R2D8". Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1(a)ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.

1 0

DLT8000's on 840
by Leonard, Roger 17 May '01

17 May '01

I am setting up a new STK library with DLT8000 drives and my 840 with 6.01 mt status gives me this: Tape drive: Quantum DLT8000 Status: ready, write enabled Format: 85937 bpi 70 GB (w/comp) fileno = 0 blockno = 0 resid = 0 does this mean that it won't recognize the additional 5/10GB provided by the DLT8000 versus DLT7000? do i need an Ontap upgrade to see the additional space? roger leonard marconi.com

1 0

Novell integration/migration experiences
by Ambrose_Earle＠shamrockfoods.com 17 May '01

17 May '01

Anyone out there have any war stories about integrating and then migrating user shares from Netware to a filer and then ultimately to an NT-only environment that they'd like to share?

2 1

RE: Novell integration/migration experiences
by Kennard, Dave M SSI-ISEL-31 17 May '01

17 May '01

We run CIFS (NT) only filers here, Migration was straight forward enough for us as we where running NT servers at the time. We used more command files than you could shake a stick at, mainly to do with coping data from our server to the filers, creating users shares, applying permissions and changing user accounts. A couple of things that caught out a little where that we used all local groups in our domain model and had to change them all to global groups that the filer understood and the version of OnTAP we used was a little flaky (5.3.6h1r2d2) that said now we're up to 6.0.1r3 things are a lot more stable. Oh and the NetApp support guys appear to have a Unix bias, we have had only CIFS on both our boxes from the start and still get ask to do NFS stuff to trouble shoot problems! Dave Kennard

1 0

A more selective bugwatch?
by Chris Thompson 17 May '01

17 May '01

Does anoyone know if it is possible to watch a bug that affects both Data ONTAP and NetCache in such a way that one only gets alerted about fixes in one of the products, and not the other? The Netcache alerts tend to overwhelm one if one is interested only in the DOT ones, as they seem to be issued for each patch release - or so I assume from names like "5.0.1R2D8". Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service, Email: cet1(a)ucs.cam.ac.uk New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QG, Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.

1 0

FYI: 220/330 NVRAM
by Bill Bradford 17 May '01

17 May '01

For those needing NVRAM for a 220, 330, etc - Dallas Semiconductor will give out 2 of any of its products as samples merely for filling out a form on their web site. Both myself and a friend did so and requested a DS2229-T (which is the NVRAM a 220/330 users), and got them about a week and a half later - boom, 4meg NVRAM. 8-) The page says that the "2 free" doesent apply to the "DS2229", but I sure have two DS2229-Ts sitting here in front of me.. Now to find some 2G narrow SE storageworks cannisters and disks.. Bill -- Bill Bradford mrbill(a)mrbill.net Austin, TX

1 0

Hardware Upgrade
by Honeycutt, Michael 16 May '01

16 May '01

Anyone upgraded to the new dual port fcal's yet? Looking for some info on what options/config changes would have to be made after the cards are installed. Should the filer just recognize that the cards are there and automatically set up the second loop? Anyone at NetApp with documentation that could be supplied would be appreciated. Thanks. Michael Honeycutt MCSE/A+ NT/Exchange Engineer IBM Global Services

1 0

RE: Migrating user directories from Server to Filer
by Edward Lee 16 May '01

16 May '01

Thanks for all your responses on this guys. -Eddie _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

1 0

F740 cluster takeover question
by brynay_cradle 16 May '01

16 May '01

Hello , now , I have F740 cluster , run dataontap 6.1 ( NFS ) before takeover , filer1 and filer2 access ok , but when filer1 takeover filer2 I try access filer2 , but get permission deny , even access /home via admin host of filer2 anyone have see this problem ? Regards Cradle Technology Corp. Infrastructure Integration Department Bryan Yuan Tel: (886) 2 87682688 Ex: 634 bryany(a)cradle.com.tw

1 0

[Fwd: Archive Help]
by Peter Gauthier 16 May '01

16 May '01

Could any one tell me if the teaparty port 1999 is a TCP or UDP port. Also when our firewall does open it up this port, where does this URL actually live.

2 1

RE: Migrating user directories from Server to Filer
by Nail, Larry 15 May '01

15 May '01

Sorry, my fingers went for the send key too fast... at any rate, we've migrated many servers by changing their names at the time of the swap without any problems. -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 5:31 PM To: Edward Lee Cc: Toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Migrating user directories from Server to Filer Edward Lee wrote: Hello all, My company just got a 740. We want to move the user's home directories off of an NT server and move it to the filer. I was wondering... After migrating the data, is there any way to keep from having to go in and changing the home directory path in the users NT accounts. I was thinking that creating a share on the filer with the same server name should do the trick-so it will just use the same UNC path. But I'm not sure if that will work. Thanks all, -Eddie

1 0

RE: Migrating user directories from Server to Filer
by Nail, Larry 15 May '01

15 May '01

Edward Lee wrote: Hello all, My company just got a 740. We want to move the user's home directories off of an NT server and move it to the filer. I was wondering... After migrating the data, is there any way to keep from having to go in and changing the home directory path in the users NT accounts. I was thinking that creating a share on the filer with the same server name should do the trick-so it will just use the same UNC path. But I'm not sure if that will work. Thanks all, -Eddie

1 0

Migrating user directories from Server to Filer
by Edward Lee 15 May '01

15 May '01

Hello all, My company just got a 740. We want to move the user's home directories off of an NT server and move it to the filer. I was wondering... After migrating the data, is there any way to keep from having to go in and changing the home directory path in the users NT accounts. I was thinking that creating a share on the filer with the same server name should do the trick-so it will just use the same UNC path. But I'm not sure if that will work. Thanks all, -Eddie _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters