toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

RE: multiple nic's, seperate subnets, PDC communication prob
by Mike Sphar 27 Sep '01

27 Sep '01

If you're so inclined, you can also do this in the filerview GUI if you have (I believe) version 6.x. When modifying the settings of an individual interface in filerview, there's a checkbox for whether that interface should register with WINS. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: jwitham(a)takedapharm.com [mailto:jwitham@takedapharm.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:38 PM To: mgraham(a)resgen.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: multiple nic's, seperate subnets, PDC communication prob You can do an 'ifconfig eX -wins' to either de-register the new NIC and/or not register it at all. Just do it before you bring the interface back up and you should be fine. Make sure to modify /etc/rc so you don't hork on a reboot. -john John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com <mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com> Confucius say he who play as root eventually kill tree. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Graham [ mailto:mgraham@resgen.com <mailto:mgraham@resgen.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:54 PM To: toasters Subject: multiple nic's, seperate subnets, PDC communication prob I'm having a problem with my filer. I'm sure this has been answered before, but I couldn't find the answer. The filer is working great with existing network, using e0. When I try to bring up another network card on a seperate network, the filer tries to register the new ip with the WINS server on the first network. That operation barfs, then it looses communication with the DC (you can ping the DC, but "cifs testdc" fails) If I shutdown the new interface, communications with the DC resume. Everything seems to work fine during the period in which it is out of communication with the DC. I don't want it to register the new IP with the WINS server or DC (Can I stop that?). In fact, only NFS operations will be used on the new network. any advice? thx, Matt -- __________________________________________________________ If you can remain calm, you just don't have all the facts¿

1 0

Anyone out there do backups via a share?
by Jordan Share 27 Sep '01

27 Sep '01

So, does anyone out there do backups via a share? What I've been doing is mapping a drive to the appropriate place, then backing up from the ~snapshot/nightly.0/ directory. Then I found out that this is quite a pain to restore, since my backup software (Backup Exec) insists on either using an identical tree structure (which fails, because ~snapshot is read-only) or no tree structure at all (as far as I can tell). Is there a better way? It'd be sweet to be able to restore directly to the filer. :) The resources I have are: Treefrog tape library attached to Win2k box with Backup Exec 8.6 (with remote-server-backup license whatnot). Any ideas? I definitely can't use NDMP, or attach directly to the filer, because then we'd need another filer to restore to (which is not a viable option for us at this time. :( ) Thanks, Jordan

1 0

multiple nic's, seperate subnets, PDC communication prob
by Matt Graham 27 Sep '01

27 Sep '01

I'm having a problem with my filer. I'm sure this has been answered before, but I couldn't find the answer. The filer is working great with existing network, using e0. When I try to bring up another network card on a seperate network, the filer tries to register the new ip with the WINS server on the first network. That operation barfs, then it looses communication with the DC (you can ping the DC, but "cifs testdc" fails) If I shutdown the new interface, communications with the DC resume. Everything seems to work fine during the period in which it is out of communication with the DC. I don't want it to register the new IP with the WINS server or DC (Can I stop that?). In fact, only NFS operations will be used on the new network. any advice? thx, Matt -- __________________________________________________________ If you can remain calm, you just don't have all the facts¿

2 1

RE: multiple nic's, seperate subnets, PDC communication prob
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 27 Sep '01

27 Sep '01

You can do an 'ifconfig eX -wins' to either de-register the new NIC and/or not register it at all. Just do it before you bring the interface back up and you should be fine. Make sure to modify /etc/rc so you don't hork on a reboot. -john John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com Confucius say he who play as root eventually kill tree. -----Original Message----- From: Matt Graham [mailto:mgraham@resgen.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 6:54 PM To: toasters Subject: multiple nic's, seperate subnets, PDC communication prob I'm having a problem with my filer. I'm sure this has been answered before, but I couldn't find the answer. The filer is working great with existing network, using e0. When I try to bring up another network card on a seperate network, the filer tries to register the new ip with the WINS server on the first network. That operation barfs, then it looses communication with the DC (you can ping the DC, but "cifs testdc" fails) If I shutdown the new interface, communications with the DC resume. Everything seems to work fine during the period in which it is out of communication with the DC. I don't want it to register the new IP with the WINS server or DC (Can I stop that?). In fact, only NFS operations will be used on the new network. any advice? thx, Matt -- __________________________________________________________ If you can remain calm, you just don't have all the facts¿

1 0

Solaris ACLs on NetApps
by Jeff Bryer 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

About 2 years ago, we had a discussion about whether or not Solaris ACLs were supported by NetApp. They weren't but there was an RFE in for it. Does anyone know what the current state is? Are we waiting on nfs v4 support? Thanks -- Jeff Bryer bryer(a)sfu.ca Systems Administrator (604) 291-4935 Academic Computing, Simon Fraser University

1 0

RE: Ack! I can't take it anymore!
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Should have my 880 in the data center on Friday. I'll let you know what the general consensus is... Yeah, the faceplate will be nice, but I'm looking more forward to the flawless Outhouse-like crate the racks ship in. I'm planning on bringing in my sawzall to cut a half-moon in the door. Oh yeah, it should perform well too. Almost forgot about that. John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com Confucius say he who play as root eventually kill tree. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Lamb [mailto:skeezics@measurecast.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 4:19 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Ack! I can't take it anymore! Time for a diversion. :-) It's been two weeks since the F880 was announced. And nobody here has any comments whatsoever? How can that be? Yeah, SMP, new benchmarks, tech specs, blah blah blah - that's not even relevant (yet). What's *really* at issue here is the new Jetsons-inspired faceplate. I can't believe that nobody has anything to say about that! It's the new fall fashion lineup in geek gear, and nary a peep! I vote for "skinnable" filers. I think it'd be _cool_ to have a selection of colors and styles. I loved the gleam of the F630 - I think most folks would agree that was one of the coolest designs ever. The elegant, understated blue of the F700's is nice. Fits in elegantly with the purple (er, "periwinkle") of the Sun gear. I think next we ought to have a gleaming black, or maybe a rich charcoal... or better yet, just have a custom grille color selection and paint 'em to order. :-) Right. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming. Cheers, -- Chris -- Chris Lamb, Unix Guy MeasureCast, Inc. 503-241-1469 x247 <skeezics(a)measurecast.com>

1 0

RE: Ack! I can't take it anymore!
by Sam Schorr 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Hey, go high tech! Have an color LCD or current tech that displays the summary filer view in multi-color- cpu %, OPS, Network Bars - configurable as to color, and graphing style. -----Original Message----- From: Chris Lamb [mailto:skeezics@measurecast.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:19 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Ack! I can't take it anymore! Time for a diversion. :-) It's been two weeks since the F880 was announced. And nobody here has any comments whatsoever? How can that be? Yeah, SMP, new benchmarks, tech specs, blah blah blah - that's not even relevant (yet). What's *really* at issue here is the new Jetsons-inspired faceplate. I can't believe that nobody has anything to say about that! It's the new fall fashion lineup in geek gear, and nary a peep! I vote for "skinnable" filers. I think it'd be _cool_ to have a selection of colors and styles. I loved the gleam of the F630 - I think most folks would agree that was one of the coolest designs ever. The elegant, understated blue of the F700's is nice. Fits in elegantly with the purple (er, "periwinkle") of the Sun gear. I think next we ought to have a gleaming black, or maybe a rich charcoal... or better yet, just have a custom grille color selection and paint 'em to order. :-) Right. Now back to our regularly scheduled programming. Cheers, -- Chris -- Chris Lamb, Unix Guy MeasureCast, Inc. 503-241-1469 x247 <skeezics(a)measurecast.com>

1 0

RE: CarrierScan
by Benn, Paul 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

A couple of quick thoughts: When installing CarrierScan, make sure to select CarrierScan RPC during the install process. If you just accept all of the defaults, it is NOT selected and the AV scan machine won't be able to "see" the filer. And, as has already been mentioned, make sure that the service account is a member of the filer's local Backup Operators group. Regards, Paul Benn Network Appliance > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly McQuarrie [mailto:kellym@sd.us.am.ericsson.se] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 7:36 AM > To: Edward Lee > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: CarrierScan > > > I'm having the exact same problem. If anybody has any input > I'd like to > hear it as well. > > Thx > > Kelly McQuarrie > Unix System Administrator > Ericsson CDMA Systems > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Edward Lee wrote: > > > I have just installed the eval copy of CarrierScan on one > of my win2000 > > servers, it installs successfully but fails to register > with the Filer. Has > > anyone running CarrierScan encountered a problem like this? > > > > -Eddie > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >

4 3

RE: CarrierScan
by Seth Moskowitz 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

I have set up CarrierScan and it has been running since April. I have it running on NT 4 not 2000 but I have never put the CSS servers IP address in my Host or Equiv file. What I did was create an account in my domain, placed that account in the Backup Operators group locally. I enabled VSCAN on the Filer then during the install of CSS it asked for the Filer (host) and I entered the Filer. I needed to tweek some setting within CSS for what I wanted but other then that there was no real major changes to files (host, equive or usermap.cfg). Syamantec and NetApp are still working on some open issues I have but overall I think it is a good product. One suggestion for anyone implementing CSS would be to set the following hidden option. vscan options mandatory_scan off If you do not set this and lose the scanning functionality it will lock all the files (doing SCANREPAIR). Everyone coming into the Filer via CIFS (volume, tree, etc) will get a message to the affect that there is a network error when trying to access files. Of course this is an erroneous error which I have also spoken to Symantec and NetApp engineering about. If anyone has any questions I can help with feel free to contact me. Seth _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

1 0

RE: FTP don't work!
by Bond, Andrew 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Hi Dave, For anonymous ftp access, then you only need one entry in the filers' /etc/passwd file, namely the "ftp::65534:65534::/path:" entry. You should use a Unix qtree, since the files accessed must not have ACL's on them. However, you do not need an NFS license. You will also need to enable ftpd: 'options ftpd.enable on' Regards, Andrew > -----Original Message----- > From: Kennard, Dave M SITI-ISEL-31 > [mailto:Dave.M.Kennard@is.shell.com] > Sent: 25 September 2001 11:37 > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: FTP don't work! > > > List, > > I have a CIFS only filer (NO NFS installed) does anyone know > how to get FTP > working? I have looked at the archives and added a user to > the filer but > still cant get in via FTP. > > Dave Kennard - SITI - NT Administration. >

2 1

RE: CarrierScan
by Honeycutt, Michael 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

You must make sure that the ip of the carrier scan server is listed as trusted. -----Original Message----- From: Kelly McQuarrie [mailto:kellym@sd.us.am.ericsson.se] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:36 AM To: Edward Lee Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: CarrierScan I'm having the exact same problem. If anybody has any input I'd like to hear it as well. Thx Kelly McQuarrie Unix System Administrator Ericsson CDMA Systems On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Edward Lee wrote: > I have just installed the eval copy of CarrierScan on one of my win2000 > servers, it installs successfully but fails to register with the Filer. Has > anyone running CarrierScan encountered a problem like this? > > -Eddie > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >

2 1

RE: CarrierScan
by Uren, Jim 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

when CS is configured/installed, you will be asked to enter a username/password which is used to establish a connection with the filer. that username must be in the filer\backup-operators group (note--NOT domain\backup-operators). the filer's builtin\admins also are automatically given this capability. domain admin is added to filer's admin group by default when CIFS is set up on the filer, so unless you have done something, a domain admin is a user that will work. the concept behind this is that a backup-operator has the power to access files despite file security, can crash through locks held by other openers, etc. these are the sorts of capabilities that an AV scanner needs. > -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Lee [mailto:edwardlee60@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:41 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: CarrierScan > > > I have just installed the eval copy of CarrierScan on one of > my win2000 > servers, it installs successfully but fails to register with > the Filer. Has > anyone running CarrierScan encountered a problem like this? > > -Eddie > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp >

1 0

CarrierScan
by Edward Lee 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

I have just installed the eval copy of CarrierScan on one of my win2000 servers, it installs successfully but fails to register with the Filer. Has anyone running CarrierScan encountered a problem like this? -Eddie _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

2 1

RE: CarrierScan
by Traitel, Eyal 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Did you check that your user is part of the Backup Operators group on the filer or the domain Admins. group is member of local filer's Admins. group? ------------------------------------------------------------------ eTraitel - I'm the new eBuzzword around !!! ------------------------------------------------------------------ Filer Escalation Engineer CNA, MCSE, CSA, LCA, NetApp CA Network Appliance BV Hoofddorp, The Netherlands Office: +31 23 567 9685 Cellular: +31 6 5497 2568 ------------------------------------------------------------------ Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web - http://now.netapp.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ -----Original Message----- From: Edward Lee [mailto:edwardlee60@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:41 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: CarrierScan I have just installed the eval copy of CarrierScan on one of my win2000 servers, it installs successfully but fails to register with the Filer. Has anyone running CarrierScan encountered a problem like this? -Eddie _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

1 0

RE: CIFS and NFS permisions over NFS
by Traitel, Eyal 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Rahul, If you backup a filer over NFS - you will lose CIFS ACLs. If you backup a filer over CIFS - you will NOT lose NFS permissions, since we have a patented (or patent pending, excuse me but I'm not sure) to include NFS permissions in the CIFS traffic itself transparently, and restore it transparently. Thus, if you have a qtree with both filer with NFS permissions AND files with CIFS ACLs you can backup using: 1. NDMP - Since it's filer native format of dump, it backups all special attributes 2. CIFS - Like I explained above 3. NFS - With the notion that you will lose ACL information There are historic threads on this issue by the way. Eyal. ----------------------------------------------------------------- eTraitel - I'm the new eBuzzword around !!! Filer Escalation Engineer CNA, MCSE, CSA, LCA, NetApp CA Network Appliance BV Hoofddorp, The Netherlands Office: +31 23 567 9685 Cellular: +31 6 5497 2568 Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web - http://now.netapp.com <http://now.netapp.com/> ----------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Rahul Kumar [mailto:Rahul.Kumar@sdrc.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 11:08 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: CIFS and NFS permisions over NFS Importance: High Hi All What effects does backing up filer's mixed qtree data (filer permissions) over NFS using NetBackup 3.4. Can we restore the files from the tape library over NFS with nfs as well as cifs permissions Help will be really appreciated. Rahul

1 0

RE: Netware on a Filer???
by Benn, Paul 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Hello Todd, NetWare can not be run on a filer nor does the filer support NCP. You can, however, integrate the filer into a NetWare environment by configuring the client machines with dual redirectors (NetWare and CIFS). Read more here: http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3053.html <http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3053.html> Cheers, Paul Benn Network Appliance -----Original Message----- From: Todd Phillips [mailto:toddp@iarchive.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 7:46 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Netware on a Filer??? Who's done it? How'd you do it? How's it work?? Thanks. Todd

2 1

Filer Problem
by Rahul Kumar 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Hi All, I have a little problem here wherin i can use your help.. 1. Solaris systems in the one of the offices office can NFS mount the NetApp Filer filer1 and work properly. No problems are seen. 2. Irix machines cannot. The can mount exports from filer1 and traverse directory trees, i.e: cd unix/tools/local, etc. Thay can do an ls or 'ls -l' or many directories, but cannot do an 'ls' or 'ls -l' in others. The difference is believed to be the the directories posing problems contain symbolic links. This has not been completely demonstrated. This happens both when the Irix clients are forced to use NFSv2 via the mount option "vers=2" and when they are allowed to default to NFSv3. 3. These same Irix machine can mount a Other offices NetApp filer and have no problems. The symptoms descibed above are not seen. In turn, a other offices Irix system (there are about 500 Irix systems who are active and happy NetApp clients in other office) will see the same same probems when mounting filer1 accross the WAN. 4. The problem between Irix and NetApp centers account the filer1. There are two observed differences betwenn the filer1 and a other filer3, 4.1 Other office is runnig NetApp Release 5.3.5R2P2 while here the filer1 is running NetApp Release 6.0.3 4.2 Other office has "nfs.tcp.enable off" while here filer1 has it set to "nfs.tcp.enable on". 5. We set "nfs.tcp.enable off" in Munich and the Solaris clients hung (they evidently preferred to use TCP over UDP). A reboot of Filer1 and the Solaris systems did not fix them. We turned NFS over TCP back on. 6. We then forced a single Irix NFS mount to use NFSv3 and use TCP via the client mount option "proto=tcp". It worked. 7. Does this symtom of "UDP not working" match a common NetApp misconfiguation? 8. Are there any know issues with UPD under NetApp Release 6.0.3?

1 0

Netware on a Filer???
by Todd Phillips 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

Who's done it? How'd you do it? How's it work?? Thanks. Todd

1 0

benchmarking
by Mark Bentley 26 Sep '01

26 Sep '01

I'm evaluating a NetApp F840C and an EMC Celerra. I'm using a benchmark program called Iozone (http://www.iozone.org/) to test NFS throughput. Are there any other benchmark programs out there anyone would suggest I try? I'm using iozone like this: iozone -a -e -f /emc/foo -U /emc or iozone -a -e -f /netapp/foo -U /netapp on a Sun E4500, and the numbers I'm getting are about 30 MB/sec read/write for the F840 and 20 MB/sec write and 25 MB/sec read on the Celerra. Both are connected with Gigabit Ethernet. The -e option does an fsync/fsflush after every write, and the -U does an unmount/mount of the filesystem between every test. This seems to eliminate the huge throughput numbers I was seeing before, due to filesystem cache. (The E4500 has 4 GB of memory.) Any suggestions would be appreciated! Mark -- Mark A Bentley Technology Development Group AT&T Wireless Services Phone: (425) 580-1667

3 4

RE: Sun Stordge L1000, Veritas Netbackup
by Fayek, Ahmed 25 Sep '01

25 Sep '01

Hi, thanks a lot for all the responses i received. About using the TapeAlert in NetBackup, i have thought about it, but the problem is that the cleaning status report contains info about only one of the 2 tape drives while both are used. DRIVE INFO: Drv Type Mount Time Frequency Last Cleaned Comment *** **** ********** ********* **************** ******* 0 dlt* 0.0 0 N/A 1 dlt* 134.2 0 N/A Ever seen such problem ? How can i make it sense and report info about drive 0 ? Best Regards -----Original Message----- From: Fayek, Ahmed [mailto:ahmed_fayek] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:41 PM To: Veritas mailing list (E-mail); toasters (NetApp) mailing list (E-mail); NDMP mailing list (E-mail) Subject: Sun Stordge L1000, Veritas Netbackup Hi All Is anybody here using Sun Storedge L1000 library? I'm using it with Veritas Netbackup 3.4 What i'm asking about is the cleaning of the tape drives in the library. there is a note about automatic drive cleaning enabeling in the L1000. Did anyone use it? And if so, How to get a notice that cleaning has been done ? Best Regards Ahmed

1 0

FW: FTP don't work!
by Maglinger, Paul 25 Sep '01

25 Sep '01

If you're an NT shop, you can set up an IIS server (with all the patches) and point your folders to your filer shares. -----Original Message----- From: Kennard, Dave M SITI-ISEL-31 [mailto:Dave.M.Kennard@is.shell.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 05:37 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: FTP don't work! List, I have a CIFS only filer (NO NFS installed) does anyone know how to get FTP working? I have looked at the archives and added a user to the filer but still cant get in via FTP. Dave Kennard - SITI - NT Administration.

1 0

FTP don't work!
by Kennard, Dave M SITI-ISEL-31 25 Sep '01

25 Sep '01

List, I have a CIFS only filer (NO NFS installed) does anyone know how to get FTP working? I have looked at the archives and added a user to the filer but still cant get in via FTP. Dave Kennard - SITI - NT Administration.

1 0

RE: port 80 answers tcp
by Mike Sphar 24 Sep '01

24 Sep '01

Presuming you have your filers connected to the network via good-quality switches, you could enable ACLs on the switch to block port 80. We did some of that with other servers on our network during the nimda outbreak. I'm increasingly becoming of the opinion that the best defense against new viruses is a network where everything is fully switched, and every switch supports ACLS and stateful packet inspection. Speaking of which, I know there was some discussion of this a while back, but has anyone else had some real-world experience with the virus-scanning support in 6.x? We're looking into it now and still need to make the decision between Symantec and Trend Micro, and I'm wondering what other's recent experiences have been. (My gut instinct is to go with Trend Micro, only because they seem to have definitions up for new viruses long before Symantec does during these sudden outbreak situations.) -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Engineering Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Klinkner, Steve [mailto:Steve.Klinkner@netapp.com] Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 1:24 AM To: 'leigh(a)ai.mit.edu'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: port 80 answers tcp Short answer is: No, there isn't currently a way to prevent the filer from listening and accepting socket connections on port 80. Some additional details might be helpful. The httpd.enable option toggles HTTP access to the web hierarchy on the filer, in the case that HTTP is licensed on the filer. Port 80 is left open for purposes of administrative access - for example FilerView and SecureShare Quota Manager, even if HTTP is not licensed on the filer. Access to administrative areas can be toggled using the httpd.admin.enable option. If httpd.enable and httpd.admin.enable are both off, and HTTP is not licensed, then the server will immediately close incoming connections without reading any HTTP headers (this feature appears in 6.0 and higher). We are not currently aware of any flaws in the HTTP server which allow exploitation in the manner of the worms mentioned. Hope that helps, Steve Klinkner > -----Original Message----- > From: Leigh David Heyman [mailto:leigh@ai.mit.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 8:34 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: port 80 answers tcp > > > Hi, > I've noticed that in DoT, the filer still has tcp port 80 > open and listening > even with "options httpd.enable off." > > Since the nimda and code red worms send attack traffic to any > hosts which > respond on port 80, regardless of whether it's a vulnerable > windows webserver, > is there any way to actually prevent the filer from having > tcp port 80 open > and listening? > > Thanks, > > -Leigh > > > ===================================================================== > Leigh Heyman,GCIA Artificial Intelligence Lab > Systems Administrator Massachusetts Institute of Technology > leigh(a)ai.mit.edu 617-253-1729 > > >

1 0

RE: Net boot Linux SUSE 7.2 from a filer F840 or F230
by Buchmann, Manfred 24 Sep '01

24 Sep '01

Hi to all we set up SUSE Linux automated Installation , using , PXE , ETHERBOOT , Bootprom for SAP Aplication Servers the only thing that you must do is make the entry at the DHCP Server a detailed Technical Report is comming soon , if somebody needs more information , please send me a mail . You can use this installation method for other Aplications Regards Manfred Buchmann Network Appliance SAP Competence Center -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Adam [mailto:Adam.Fox@netapp.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 19. September 2001 20:38 To: 'Oye'; McCarthy, Tim Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Net boot Linux SUSE 7.2 from a filer F840 or F230 >From my 6.1.1 machine: f880-rtp> options tftpd tftpd.enable off tftpd.logging off tftpd.rootdir /etc/tftpboot So set the tftpd.enable options to on. Set the tftpd.rootdir option to where ever you like and turn on logging if you want to log all of the gets. That's about it. Just be aware..at this time it only goes gets, no puts. You'll have to write data to that area via an NFS/CIFS client. -- Adam Fox NetApp Professional Services, NC adamfox(a)netapp.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Oye [mailto:Oyegbemi.Akintan@oracle.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 1:48 PM > To: McCarthy, Tim > Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: Net boot Linux SUSE 7.2 from a filer F840 or F230 > > > This is definitely helpful. I'm going to resolve to using > this solution but > I need more info on setting u p the tftp server. Also I fond > a documentation > on how to do it at > http://cui.unige.ch/info/pc/remote-boot/howto.html . > Thanks > > -Oye > > "McCarthy, Tim" wrote: > > > Well, with the F230 you are almost out of luck. > > The F820, which can run 6.0.3 or later or 6.1.1 or later > > has a tftp server on it! > > > > Enable it, point your clients to use tftp to boot from > > and it may just work!!! > > > > The F230, cannot run 6.0 or higher software. So you could > > take one of your linux boxes, make a dir on the F230, mount it > > and then use said linux box as the tftp server to boot from. > > > > Does this help? > > > > --tmac > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oye [mailto:Oyegbemi.Akintan@oracle.com] > > Sent: Monday, September 17, 2001 12:40 PM > > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > > Subject: Net boot Linux SUSE 7.2 from a filer F840 or F230 > > > > Does anyone have any idea on how to set up net boot of Suse > Linux 7.2 or > > RedHat on a filer F840 or F230? > > > > Thanks, > > Oye >

1 0

(no subject)
by Jordan Share 21 Sep '01

21 Sep '01

We have gotten several messages of the following type: Mon Sep 17 10:25:59 PDT [raid_xor_server:CRITICAL]: 206 CORR SYS ERR 201 eia:1146dc058b20000 fs:254f400 eis:0 isr:80000001 SYS ECC error on DIMM J27 at address=0x1146dc0, bit=31. Mon Sep 17 10:37:28 PDT [idle_thread0:CRITICAL]: 207 CORR SYS ERR 201 eia:f71874058b20000 fs:2b1f400 eis:0 isr:80000001 SYS ECC error on DIMM J27 at address=0xf718740, bit=31.Wed Sep 19 01:03:53 PDT [GbE-II/e8:CRITICAL]: 212 CORR SYS ERR 201 eia:1dc7590058b20000 fs:256f400 eis:0 isr:80000001 SYS ECC error on DIMM J30 at address=0x1dc75900, bit=31. Wed Sep 19 01:25:09 PDT [idle_thread0:CRITICAL]: 213 CORR SYS ERR 201 eia:11149bc058b20000 fs:2b4f400 eis:0 isr:80000001 SYS ECC error on DIMM J30 at address=0x11149bc0, bit=31. Wed Sep 19 01:40:22 PDT [idle_thread0:CRITICAL]: 214 CORR SYS ERR 201 eia:19c54f8058b30000 fs:2b0f400 eis:0 isr:80010001 SYS ECC error on DIMM J30 at address=0x19c54f80, bit=31. Wed Sep 19 07:01:22 PDT [ispfc_main:CRITICAL]: 216 CORR SYS ERR 201 eia:1ecda80058b20000 fs:2d7f400 eis:0 isr:80000001 SYS ECC error on DIMM J30 at address=0x1ecda800, bit=31. As near as I can tell, this indicates that a DIMM (or 2) has gone bad. Is that the case? Or is some level of these errors considered to be normal? Here's the output of "grep -c "CORR SYS ERR" over the last few messages files: messages.5:0 messages.4:3 messages.3:6 messages.2:16 messages.1:160 messages.0:17 messages:14 So, it looks to me like this developed somewhat recently. Should I be worried about this? Thanks, Jordan

2 2

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters