toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

RE: UNC and username specification
by Nail, Larry 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

First authenticate using the line below the you can connect to the UNC net use \\servername\ipc$ /user:domain\username password -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Smith [mailto:ajs@dca.net] Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:05 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: UNC and username specification Hello, Is it possible to specify the username and password to connect to the filer's CIFS service in the UNC path? Several years ago when I was running SAMBA on a Linux box, I was able to connect from Windows to a share with this syntax: \\servername\sharename%username:password The ":password" was optional, if it was not specified then Lan Manager would come back and prompt for the password specified in "%username". Thanks! -Andrew Smith DCANet

1 0

Cifs Auditing
by Robert Lobban 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

1 0

Windows XP
by Matt Reynolds 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

We just installed our first windows xp pro client - and can't authenticate to our 720. We keep getting a password error. We can authenticate to Totalnet and samba - so plain text passwords appear to be working from XP. Does anybody else have this working ? We are running 6.0.1R3 on our Filer. Thanks Matt Reynolds -- Matt Reynolds Matt.Reynolds(a)aztek-eng.com IS/Network Manager V:303-415-6166 Aztek Engineering, Inc. F:303-786-9190 2477 55th St. www.aztek-eng.com Boulder, CO 80301

1 0

Converting Netcache C760 to F760.
by Manoj Kolekar 07 Nov '01

07 Nov '01

Hello friends, I have a Netcache C760 which I would like to convert to filer F760. Has any one tired to do this?. I want to do this just for evaluation of snapmirror. I do have a F760 filer & want to convert Cache to filer to do testing of snapmorrir. I need your inputs on how one can do this . Thanks & Regards, Manoj kolekar Apara Enterprise Soln (P) Ltd. Deployment Specialist Tel : 91-022-6527154/55/56

2 1

qtree and quota
by Lane, Debbie 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

6.1R1 /vol/vol_sapdevdata/oracle/D01/ mount on /oracle/D01 /vol/vol_sapdevdata/oracle/D01/sapdata1 mount on /oracle/D01/sapdata1 /vol/vol_sapdevdata/oracle/D01/sapdata2 mount on /oracle/D01/sapdata2 ...... I want to keep track of disk space for each of these mount points. What is the best way to do this? I cannot create a qtree inside a qtree. For example qtree create /vol/vol_sapdevdata/oracle (this works) qtree create /vol/vol_sapdevdata/oracle/D01/sapdata1(does not work) Thanks, Debbie

1 0

RE: gig E on 740
by Francett, Robert D (SAIC) 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

Leonard, We're using gigE cards (X1025B) for dedicated network to Oracle databases/server on 2 F740s & have experienced very good performance from them. Use slots 8, 7 or 6, in that order of preference. If you have those slots populated, with FC or SCSI adapters for instance, move one of the FC adapters to slots 3, 2 or 1, in that preference. Slot 8 will probably be available, though; use it if you can. We've supported this configuration on both DOT 5.xxx & 6.xxx. Best Regards, Bob Francett BP Exploration (Alaska) -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 12:32 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: gig E on 740 does anyone know if gig E cards are supported on 740's and what limitations. i.e. ontap version, f/w, slot dependencies? any luck good or bad with them? thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

gig E on 740
by Leonard, Roger 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

does anyone know if gig E cards are supported on 740's and what limitations. i.e. ontap version, f/w, slot dependencies? any luck good or bad with them? thanks Roger D. Leonard

2 1

syslog forwarding issue
by Drew O'Donnell 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

Our filer has been forwarding its messages file to our syslog server without any issues. We switched the entry in the syslog.conf file to another syslog server, and stopped receiving the logs. I double-checked the format of the syslog.conf file to make sure there were no unwanted spaces. I also verified we were resolving the IP address of the other syslog server, and we also checked the messages file to make sure that syslogd was restarted. Everything looked right, our messages file was still working, but the logs were not forwarding to our syslog host. Now here is the kicker, when we could not figure out what was causing the problem we switched back to our original log-host (which has worked fine) and we still were not getting the logs. About six hours later the log host started to receive the files. I verified that the syslogd was restarted after I edited the syslog.conf file. Has anyone had this problem, or have any ideas on what might be causing it? Thanks Drew

1 0

Problems accesssing cifs share
by Benny Wiström 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

Hi! I have since I upgraded to OnTap 6.1.1R2 problems accessing a cifs share which have everyone - Full Control permission. The accounts which have the problem are restricted to only logon to a certain Windows 2000 Professional client. All other accounts work fine. The share points to a unix qtree and the accounts are mapped in the usermap.cfg file. Any ideas? -- Regards: Benny Wiström CSC Phone: +46 13 4653647 Systemadministrator 581 88 Linköping Fax: +46 13 185771 Benny.Wistrom(a)consultant.saab.se Sweden Mobile: +46 13 4653647 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. -Calvin & Hobbes (Bill Watterson)

1 0

Problem accessing cifs share
by Benny Wiström 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

Hi! I have a problem with accessing a cifs share which has everyone - Full Control permissions. The problem started when I upgraded to OnTap 6.1.1R2. I can't access the share with accounts that have been restricted to only be able to logon to a certain Windows 2000 Professional client. The share lies on a unix filesystem and the user is mapped to a unix account in usermap.cfg. Any ideas? -- Regards: Benny Wiström CSC Phone: +46 13 4653647 Systemadministrator 581 88 Linköping Fax: +46 13 185771 Benny.Wistrom(a)consultant.saab.se Sweden Mobile: +46 13 4653647 Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. -Calvin & Hobbes (Bill Watterson)

1 0

UNC and username specification
by Andrew Smith 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

Hello, Is it possible to specify the username and password to connect to the filer's CIFS service in the UNC path? Several years ago when I was running SAMBA on a Linux box, I was able to connect from Windows to a share with this syntax: \\servername\sharename%username:password The ":password" was optional, if it was not specified then Lan Manager would come back and prompt for the password specified in "%username". Thanks! -Andrew Smith DCANet

1 0

(no subject)
by Admin 06 Nov '01

06 Nov '01

hello how do i find out if a volume is enabled for >2GB for a netapp. thanks

3 2

Re: ONTAP with RedHat linux
by Jim Harm 05 Nov '01

05 Nov '01

Can anyone shed some light on this? I am getting CRC errors only on some of my linux clients. netapp support is trying to find the bug id or trouble call id. It has followed the connection from an F330 to an F760; both on quad ethernet cards(different model cards). It has survived from 5.3.4 to 6.1R1. The clients see hangs on large file reads and "TCP 111" errors even though we mount UDP NFS V3. Clients even report "server not responding". I'd appreciate any help, if someone has researched this problem area. I know it looks like a linux problem, but I have had little success finding reference to the recent nfs v3 problem. >Steve Losen <scl(a)sasha.acc.virginia.edu>@mathworks.com on 10/18/2001 >10:25:54 AM > > >I am running RedHat 7.1 and NFS mounting a netapp F820 running 6.0.1R3. >Things work pretty smoothly, but I have experienced the same >problem as another poster (sorry, lost the message) where NFS writes >occasionally delay and a "NFS server not responding" error >is logged. I have not tried the rsize=1023,wsize=1023 work around. > >I have experienced the same problem with NFS servers other than Netapp, >including a IBM RS6000 running AIX. > >Non Linux NFS clients are having no delay problems with the Netapp filers, >so I'm pretty sure it is on the Linux end. > >For awhile I thought the NIC on my Linux box had botched the speed/duplex >negotiation with the ethernet switch. Our network folks can tell >me what speed the switch port has negotiated, but I don't know how >to check my NIC from Linux. The network folks tell me they see no >errors on my switch port when I experience NFS delays. I don't >seem to have any other network problems, so I doubt this is the >problem. > >I have been able to duplicate the problem on a second Linux box. >However, on a third box, essentially identical to mine and also >running RH 7.1, I could not duplicate it. > >A couple of things to be aware of with RedHat Linux and NFS. > >Prior to RedHat 7.0, only NFS v2 was supported. Furthermore, Linux >only supported 16 bit uids and gids. We have a lot of files on our >Netapp filers with uids greater than 65535. > >RedHat 7.1 supports NFS v3 and 32 bit uids and gids. 32 bit >uids are critical in our environment. I administer our filers >and when I was running RH 6.2, I could not get accurate file >owner information with "ls" and I could not "chown" files to >uids over 65535, so I had to use another unix box for filer >administration. Now I can do it all from my Linux box. > >Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 > >University of Virginia ITC Unix Support > -- }}}===============>> LLNL James E. Harm (Jim); jharm(a)llnl.gov System Administrator Compaq Clusters (925) 422-4018 Page: 423-7705x57152

1 0

FIRST TIME IN PAKISTAN(GET BENIFITS 10000 TO 15000 RUPEES) IN JEWELLERY CD
by MISS KHAN 03 Nov '01

03 Nov '01

Shakir Jeweller.Com The Trusted Name For Dynamic Design & Quality ( We Sale Jewellery Whole Sale & Retail ) " Benefits Upto 10000 To 15000 Rs In Jewellery Making ! " Shakir Jeweller.Com presents first time in Pakistan a CD version which contains approx 350 Jewellery designs valuable for Jewellers , Consumers & Wholesellers. (Copyright & Registered) Price Rs 199/= only (Free Home Delivery In All Over Pakistan) Benefits for consumer : · 12 Lucky draws in whole year · Cash Prizes & Gold Prizes · Plus 100 grams Jewellery making FREE* ( Means 10000/= To 15000/= Rs Saving In Jewellery Making ) " Upto 1 Year Validity " To Place Order Contact Shakir Jeweller.Com (First Web Jeweller In Pakistan) Suit 114, 1st Floor, Sarah Jewellers Center, Near Moosajee, Zaibunnisa Street, Saddar, Karachi Ph: 021-5655655 , 021-5211838 , 0320-4226689 Email: contact(a)shakirjeweller.com Website: http://www.shakirjeweller.com

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Walsh, Warren (MN65) 02 Nov '01

02 Nov '01

The latest version of NetShield, 4.5, with the latest scan engine, 4.1.50. I've not tried it using the VirusScan desktop version. I'll give that a try, and report back. -warren -----Original Message----- From: neil lehrer [mailto:nlehrer@ibb.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 5:42 PM To: Walsh, Warren (MN65) Cc: toasters Subject: Re: mcafee scanning a cifs share what version of macafee "Walsh, Warren (MN65)" wrote: > > I've had problems with the app crashing, with an error about the path > being too long. > > -warren > > -----Original Message----- > From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share > > does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee > scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data > corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious > if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. > > thanks > > Roger D. Leonard -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

2 1

Bus overruns
by Horst.Thaller＠infineon.com 02 Nov '01

02 Nov '01

Does anybody know, what the field "Bus overruns" in the output of the ifstat command means? I see a lot of Bus overrun errors on all filer interfaces (GbE). Our filer works with ONTAP 6.1.1R1 and a Cisco 6500 Switch. Horst Thaller Infineon Technologies Microelectronic Design Centers Austria GmbH Design Center Villach Siemensstrasse 2, A-9500 Villach Tel. ++43 4242 305-6212 Fax ++43 4242 305-6389 email: Horst.Thaller(a)infineon.com internet: www.infineon.com/ezmvi

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Walsh, Warren (MN65) 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

I've had problems with the app crashing, with an error about the path being too long. -warren -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

2 1

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Mike McBride 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

Mcafee has worked well for us - so far. We had to make sure "Domain Admins" had rights to the folders or we would get permission problems. ~mike -----Original Message----- From: Walsh, Warren (MN65) [mailto:warren.walsh@honeywell.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 2:47 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share I've had problems with the app crashing, with an error about the path being too long. -warren -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Maglinger, Paul 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

We use McAfee products here and have run scans against our filer with no problems. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

MacOS X and CIFS on filer
by Steve Losen 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

MacOS X comes with a CIFS client that works with our filers running 6.0.1R3. To use it just get into the "Finder" and go to the "Go" menu and use "Connect to Server". At the "Address:" text entry type smb://filer.host.name/share And you are prompted for your CIFS loginid and password. I've run into two annoyances. 1) MacOS does not appear to reconnect if a session goes idle. Looks like it's still connected, but nothing works. From a Unix window, df indicates that the share is not mounted. So you have to disconnect by dragging and dropping the icon representing the CIFS share into the wastebasket and connect again. 2) If you drag and drop a file into your CIFS share, you get an annoying dialog box that says: Sorry, the operation could not be completed because an unexpected error occurred (Error Code -50). And in /etc/messages on the filer you see this: Thu Nov 1 16:03:03 EST [home1: FastEnet-10/100/e0:CRITICAL]: CIFS t2 request 6 not implemented debuginfo( 1 39 7a D-128-13-59) ^^^^^^^^^^^ hostname of my mac The file copies just fine, so you can just ignore the error. But you can't drag and drop entire folders because of this. Anyone have any idea what's up? Other stuff works fine, such as Unix commands from a Unix window. Looks like a viable solution for Mac users who want to use a filer. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

2 2

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Nail, Larry 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

No, can't say that I've seen that. Are you scanning "compressed" files like zip or tar's? -----Original Message----- From: Mike Sphar [mailto:mike.sphar@peregrine.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:11 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share You haven't run into any problems with the scan "hanging"? The few times I've run scans against very larges shares, every so often the scan would just stop and sit at one file forever, and not the same file each time, it just seemed sort of random. Made automated scans pretty useless for me. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry [mailto:lnail@ti.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:41 PM To: 'Leonard, Roger'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share We use Norton AntiVirus 5 to scan shares without any problems... Just turn the snapshots off ahead scan time. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Mike Sphar 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

You haven't run into any problems with the scan "hanging"? The few times I've run scans against very larges shares, every so often the scan would just stop and sit at one file forever, and not the same file each time, it just seemed sort of random. Made automated scans pretty useless for me. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Nail, Larry [mailto:lnail@ti.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:41 PM To: 'Leonard, Roger'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share We use Norton AntiVirus 5 to scan shares without any problems... Just turn the snapshots off ahead scan time. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

RE: mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Nail, Larry 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

We use Norton AntiVirus 5 to scan shares without any problems... Just turn the snapshots off ahead scan time. -----Original Message----- From: Leonard, Roger [mailto:Roger.Leonard@marconi.com] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:42 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: mcafee scanning a cifs share does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

mcafee scanning a cifs share
by Leonard, Roger 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

does anyone know of any problems or issues with using NT based mcafee scanner to scan a filers cifs shares from a PC? anything like data corruption or incorrect id'ing of virus infected files? just curious if this is a valid way to scan a filer for viri. thanks Roger D. Leonard

1 0

Snapmirror
by Neil Stichbury 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

Folks, I have a requirement to Snapmirror from a Filer using BCS disks to a Filer using ZCS disks. I understand that checksum reversion will take place during the initial sync and that with around 400GB to mirror this will add around two hours to the process. Question: Will the incremental mirroring that occurs, occur as per normal ?. Ie no issues other than the initial reversion ? After a few weeks the Snapmirror will be set in the other direction (ZCS to BCS). Will the reversion process occur again ?. Ontap is 6.01.R3 in both Filers. Regards, Neil Stichbury Client Services gen-i Limited Ph: +64-9-306-4717 FaX: +64-9-306-4543 Email:nhs@gen-i.co.nz This e-mail message has been scanned and cleared by MailMarshal http://www.gen-i.co.nz

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters