toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

NIS group trouble
by Leif Nixon 23 Nov '01

23 Nov '01

It seems my filer (F720, ONTAP 5.3.6R2) caches NIS group lookups even if nis.group_update.enable is set to off. This is what happens when I add the user "testuser" to the group "rally": Initially both a Unix NIS client and the filer agree that the user isn't in the group: UNIX: % ypmatch rally group UNIX: rally:*:31042:jfrid,leif FILER: jar> ypgroup testuser FILER: User "testuser" belongs to the following group(s): FILER: name: testproj gid: 31038 FILER: name: testprod gid: 31039 Then I add the user to the group and do a ypmake. The Unix client immediately picks up the change: UNIX: % ypmatch rally group UNIX: rally:*:31042:jfrid,leif,testuser But the filer doesn't: FILER: jar> ypgroup testuser FILER: User "testuser" belongs to the following group(s): FILER: name: testproj gid: 31038 FILER: name: testprod gid: 31039 The filer is supposed to not cache group lookups: FILER: jar> options nis.group_update.enable FILER: nis.group_update.enable off In this state, the user can access the group's files just fine from an NFS Unix client, but gets "permission denied" when attempting the same from a CIFS client. Clearing the WCC cache with "wcc -x" doesn't help. Trying to manually force a group cache update doesn't work: FILER: jar> options nis.group_update_schedule now FILER: Local NIS group update failed now. NIS group caching is not enabled. The only way out of this state I've found is to enable group caching and then disabling it again. This forces a group update. FILER: jar> options nis.group_update.enable on FILER: Fri Nov 23 14:24:21 MET [rc]: NIS: Group Caching has been enabled FILER: Fri Nov 23 14:24:21 MET [nis_grp_updater]: Local NIS group update successful. FILER: jar> options nis.group_update.enable off FILER: Fri Nov 23 14:24:27 MET [rc]: NIS: Group Caching has been disabled Now the ypgroup command stops working: FILER: jar> ypgroup testuser FILER: NIS Group cache not yet updated. But at least the credential mapping is correct: FILER: jar> wcc -u testuser FILER: (NT - UNIX) account name(s): (SOFTLAB.LIN\testuser - testuser) FILER: *************** FILER: UNIX uid = 31028 FILER: user is a member of group softlab (30100) FILER: user is a member of group rally (31042) FILER: user is a member of group testproj (31038) FILER: user is a member of group testprod (31039) FILER: FILER: NT membership FILER: SOFTLAB.LIN\testuser FILER: SOFTLAB.LIN\Domain Users FILER: SOFTLAB.LIN\Gemini FILER: BUILTIN\Users FILER: User is also a member of Everyone, Network Users, FILER: Authenticated Users FILER: *************** Now the user can access the group's files over both NFS and CIFS. Can anyone make head or tail of this? /Leif Nixon

1 0

Upgrading Snapmirror-System 5.3.7R3 to 6.0.3
by Phil Hill 22 Nov '01

22 Nov '01

Hi all, we are planning tomorrow upgrading two snapmirrored F740s from 5.3.7R3 to 6.0.3 . Questions: 1. Which system do we upgrade first? ( destination or source filer ? ) 2. Turn OFF snapmirror prior to upgrade? 3. At what time can I restart the mirror ? -- after "vol status -c" tells me checksums are active ? Note: This could last probably two weeks until there are no 5.x snapshots anymore. -- or directly after both filers are up with the new Ontap 6.x ? -- is it necessary to delete all snapshots - to speed up the WAFL upgrade on both systems -- or is it ok to delete just the snapshots on the destination filer ? 4. And is there something else to consider ? I did not find any doku on this. Thanks for help and advise Phil

1 0

Help with FTP required
by David Lockwood 21 Nov '01

21 Nov '01

Can anyone tell me whether enabling FTP requires a filer reboot. I am running an F720 and would like to make sure that I do not upset any of our users. Thanks in advance David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For further information on Benetton Formula 1 visit our web site at www.benettonf1.com. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please destroy and notify Benetton Formula on +44 1608678000." ----------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

RE: Help with FTP required
by Mike Sphar 21 Nov '01

21 Nov '01

It didn't require a reboot for me. -- Mike Sphar - Iron Chef UNIX - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: David Lockwood [mailto:David.Lockwood@benettonformula.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:14 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Help with FTP required Can anyone tell me whether enabling FTP requires a filer reboot. I am running an F720 and would like to make sure that I do not upset any of our users. Thanks in advance David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For further information on Benetton Formula 1 visit our web site at www.benettonf1.com. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please destroy and notify Benetton Formula on +44 1608678000." ----------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

mailbox disks invaild ?
by Daniel Jung 21 Nov '01

21 Nov '01

Hi fellow toasters, I am seeing "but takeover of partner is disabled due to reason : mailbox disks invalid." error in messages. We have two F630s that are "suppose" to be clustered (Fiber) but failed due to above problem. Also, there are a lot of "Data underrun" errors on root volume disks in the messages as well. According to the NOW site, I could run fctest to find out if there is any hardware problems which I am planning on doing. Just wondering if anyone has seen this problem or has experienced it before. Thanks for your help. Daniel Jung System Administrator GMO inc

1 0

RE: Advanced Revelation on Netapp
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 21 Nov '01

21 Nov '01

Flawless NetBIOS boot disk: http://www.bovistech.com/detect.htm Simply edit the autoexec.bat to reflect your workgroup/domain name and you're golden! Autodetects most NICs, randomizes the netbios name, has generic CDROM drivers, disk utilities, etc... It's a real keeper! I've had problems using it to GHOST files UP to the filer, but GHOST sessions fly down. Someone on the list suggested creating another NetBIOS alias and modifying a buffer, but I forgot about it and never tried it... -john John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com Confucius say he who play as root eventually kill tree -----Original Message----- From: neil lehrer [mailto:nlehrer@ibb.gov] Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:34 PM To: MCope(a)isisph.com Cc: Zekeriya Eskiocak; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Advanced Revelation on Netapp if you are running from a dos machine you should be able to use the dos smb drivers from microsoft - the ones that came from lanmanager. if you are using any windows based machine the drivers should be there. MCope(a)isisph.com wrote: > > Zekeriya, > > I would definately be interested in hearing if you get this to work. My > company has a few DOS based lab workstations that I would like to connect > to our Filers. The problem is that there is no utility/driver to provide > the SMB protocol to DOS. You can get the IPX protocol for DOS but the > Filers do not support IPX. We have not tried to build a NetWare server to > act as a gateway though. In theory the DOS system could connect to the > NetWare server using IPX. The NetWare server would have the NFS.nlm > running to connect it to a Filer. I do something similar for our Macintosh > users. I have a Linux box that uses NFS to connect to the Filers and then > it runs the AppleShare protocol as a gateway for the Macs. I do not know > if IPX restricts sharing a share like SMB and NFS do (e.g., an SMB/NFS > client - server or workstation - can not then make that share available to > clients of its own) > > Michael Cope > Unix Systems Administrator > Isis Pharmaceuticals > > > "Zekeriya > Eskiocak" To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > <zeskiocak@pro-lin cc: > k.net> Subject: Advanced Revelation on Netapp > Sent by: > owner-toasters@mat > hworks.com > > > 11/19/01 12:49 PM > > > > Hi All, > > I tried to run on my Netapp F820 an old DOS based 16 bit application called > "advanced revelation" uses a flat file database. Unfortunately I am not > successful. The application does not recognize the mapped network drive. Is > there any way/trick to make it working on the filer? > Has anybody tried such applications on Netapp Filers or remote drives? > > Thanks in advance > > Zekeriya Eskiocak > System Engineer > > Prolink Services > > Istanbul/TURKEY -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

2 1

RE: Advanced Revelation on Netapp
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 20 Nov '01

20 Nov '01

How did you map the drive? Did you use the AutoExNT service as described at http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3054.html ? We've had very good luck with it. Another thing you might want to check is that there are no "Advanced Revelation" NT services running as the 'System' account. System has full control of the local filesystem of the server, but has NO RIGHTS outside of the box (network drives, etc...) -john John Witham Senior Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 mailto://jwitham@takedapharm.com Confucius say he who play as root eventually kill tree -----Original Message----- From: Zekeriya Eskiocak [mailto:zeskiocak@pro-link.net] Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 2:14 AM To: neil lehrer Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Advanced Revelation on Netapp Hi, Thanks to all friends who responded to my question. I think I could not explain my problem exactly. The application which is called "advanced revelation" is working on winnt 4.0 server and uses its resources-that is a service running on the server. what I have tried is that I mapped the filer volume to the server as F drive and copied all files regarding the application, then tried to run it. It gave a message that it could not find the data files even thet was there on the F drive. This is my problem. Thanks Zek -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of neil lehrer Sent: 19 Kasym 2001 Pazartesi 23:34 To: MCope(a)isisph.com Cc: Zekeriya Eskiocak; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Advanced Revelation on Netapp if you are running from a dos machine you should be able to use the dos smb drivers from microsoft - the ones that came from lanmanager. if you are using any windows based machine the drivers should be there. MCope(a)isisph.com wrote: > > Zekeriya, > > I would definately be interested in hearing if you get this to work. My > company has a few DOS based lab workstations that I would like to connect > to our Filers. The problem is that there is no utility/driver to provide > the SMB protocol to DOS. You can get the IPX protocol for DOS but the > Filers do not support IPX. We have not tried to build a NetWare server to > act as a gateway though. In theory the DOS system could connect to the > NetWare server using IPX. The NetWare server would have the NFS.nlm > running to connect it to a Filer. I do something similar for our Macintosh > users. I have a Linux box that uses NFS to connect to the Filers and then > it runs the AppleShare protocol as a gateway for the Macs. I do not know > if IPX restricts sharing a share like SMB and NFS do (e.g., an SMB/NFS > client - server or workstation - can not then make that share available to > clients of its own) > > Michael Cope > Unix Systems Administrator > Isis Pharmaceuticals > > > "Zekeriya > Eskiocak" To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > <zeskiocak@pro-lin cc: > k.net> Subject: Advanced Revelation on Netapp > Sent by: > owner-toasters@mat > hworks.com > > > 11/19/01 12:49 PM > > > > Hi All, > > I tried to run on my Netapp F820 an old DOS based 16 bit application called > "advanced revelation" uses a flat file database. Unfortunately I am not > successful. The application does not recognize the mapped network drive. Is > there any way/trick to make it working on the filer? > Has anybody tried such applications on Netapp Filers or remote drives? > > Thanks in advance > > Zekeriya Eskiocak > System Engineer > > Prolink Services > > Istanbul/TURKEY -- regards +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + Neil Lehrer + + United States International Broadcasting Bureau + System Development Division + + voice 202 619-2524 + fax 202 619-3576 + nlehrer(a)ibb.gov + + " is this crisis an opportunity or just + another grab the fire extinguisher moment?" + +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

1 0

Re: Advanced Revelation on Netapp
by MCope＠isisph.com 20 Nov '01

20 Nov '01

Zekeriya, I would definately be interested in hearing if you get this to work. My company has a few DOS based lab workstations that I would like to connect to our Filers. The problem is that there is no utility/driver to provide the SMB protocol to DOS. You can get the IPX protocol for DOS but the Filers do not support IPX. We have not tried to build a NetWare server to act as a gateway though. In theory the DOS system could connect to the NetWare server using IPX. The NetWare server would have the NFS.nlm running to connect it to a Filer. I do something similar for our Macintosh users. I have a Linux box that uses NFS to connect to the Filers and then it runs the AppleShare protocol as a gateway for the Macs. I do not know if IPX restricts sharing a share like SMB and NFS do (e.g., an SMB/NFS client - server or workstation - can not then make that share available to clients of its own) Michael Cope Unix Systems Administrator Isis Pharmaceuticals "Zekeriya Eskiocak" To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> <zeskiocak@pro-lin cc: k.net> Subject: Advanced Revelation on Netapp Sent by: owner-toasters@mat hworks.com 11/19/01 12:49 PM Hi All, I tried to run on my Netapp F820 an old DOS based 16 bit application called "advanced revelation" uses a flat file database. Unfortunately I am not successful. The application does not recognize the mapped network drive. Is there any way/trick to make it working on the filer? Has anybody tried such applications on Netapp Filers or remote drives? Thanks in advance Zekeriya Eskiocak System Engineer Prolink Services Istanbul/TURKEY

3 2

Re: snapmirror technologie for oracle-datafiles
by mds＠gbnet.net 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

On Mon 19 Nov, 2001, "Richard L. Rhodes" <rhodesr(a)firstenergycorp.com> wrote: > On 19 Nov 2001, at 13:24, kevin graham wrote: > > I thought this was supported with the a resync - you can break the > mirror, use it, then resync it, all without a full sync. This is certainly possible with VxVM 3.2 for Unix, where you have additional objects to maintain metadata about where an off-split mirror differs from the on-line mirror. This represents yet another license to buy. Without such a fast resync option, the whole mirror does need to be resilvered, and that does get painful. I'd imagine other volume managers may have similar functionality. > > Rick >-- End of excerpt from "Richard L. Rhodes" -- -Mark ... an Englishman in London ...

1 0

Advanced Revelation on Netapp
by Zekeriya Eskiocak 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

Hi All, I tried to run on my Netapp F820 an old DOS based 16 bit application called "advanced revelation" uses a flat file database. Unfortunately I am not successful. The application does not recognize the mapped network drive. Is there any way/trick to make it working on the filer? Has anybody tried such applications on Netapp Filers or remote drives? Thanks in advance Zekeriya Eskiocak System Engineer Prolink Services Istanbul/TURKEY

1 0

snapmirror technologie for oracle-datafiles
by Claus.Zimmermann＠genorz.de 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

Hi, we use operating system Solaris 8 on arbitrary SUN-hardware and Oracle 8.1.5 or higher and NetApp-ONTAB 5.3 (or higher) and want to use the snapmirror & cluster-technologie for Oracle-datafiles exactly as described in the technical documents TR3046 & TR3057 of Network Appliance. Network Appliance states that the fully support this! Has anyone positiv or negativ experience concerning this subject??!! with kind regards Claus Zimmermann/db-administrator/GENO RZ Frankfurt am Main email: claus.zimmermann(a)genorz.de

3 3

Filer, NT, Informix...
by Uros Lampret 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

Have any body tried this combination. I'm going to try it out and I'm interested in some backup strategies in this combination. Best regards, Uros _____________________________ Uros Lampret Our Space Appliances d.o.o.

1 0

RE: snapmirror technologie for oracle-datafiles
by Noll, Kevin 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

Hi With loads of doubt from our oracle department, we tested and tried snapmirror with 4 versions of oracle all running on solaris 2.6 All with great success. Recommend adding a snap shot done at one time during the night, when the database is in backup mode to have a definite backup. Also, if you want protection from user intervention, make the schedule on snap mirror to run once an hour so you have some time difference (async mirror) which is sometimes quite handy. KEVIN -----Original Message----- From: Claus.Zimmermann(a)genorz.de [mailto:Claus.Zimmermann@genorz.de] Sent: 19 November 2001 16:10 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Cc: Ulrich.Jehle(a)genorz.de Subject: snapmirror technologie for oracle-datafiles Hi, we use operating system Solaris 8 on arbitrary SUN-hardware and Oracle 8.1.5 or higher and NetApp-ONTAB 5.3 (or higher) and want to use the snapmirror & cluster-technologie for Oracle-datafiles exactly as described in the technical documents TR3046 & TR3057 of Network Appliance. Network Appliance states that the fully support this! Has anyone positiv or negativ experience concerning this subject??!! with kind regards Claus Zimmermann/db-administrator/GENO RZ Frankfurt am Main email: claus.zimmermann(a)genorz.de ******************************************************************************************** " This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is the property of the Cap Gemini Ernst & Young Group. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of this message ". ********************************************************************************************

1 0

mrtg temperature question
by Greg Wilson 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

Hello There is a warning email sent when the temperature gets too hot. It spits out a message like <snip> System Notification from orc (OVER_TEMPERATURE_WARNING!!!) EMERGENCY Tue Sep 25 12:20:00 EST [monitor.temp.ok:notice]: Temp Unit A within normal operating temperature range Current temperature 45 Celsius Normal low 5 Celsius Normal high 45 Celsius Tue Sep 25 12:20:29 EST [monitor.temp.warning:warning]: System high temperature warning!! Current temperature 46 Celsius Normal low 5 Celsius Normal high 45 Celsius Critical low 0 Celsius Critical high 50 Celsius <snip> does anyone know if you can get this value by SNMP Is anyone graphing the temperature of their filers with MRTG.. thanks gw -- Greg Wilson System Administrator gwilson(a)connect.com.au

2 1

Looking to purchase older Filer SCSI tape, disk drives, shelf
by Scott Chellis 19 Nov '01

19 Nov '01

Scott B. Chellis Consulting I/T Architect - Network Integration - MCNE, CCNA, CCNP, CIFI South Outsourcing Network Design Office : 919.852.4080 Tieline: 223.9629 Fax : 919.485.1912 Cellular: 919.244.7050 Pager: 800.252.5972 Email: schellis(a)us.ibm.com Notes: Scott Chellis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS ----- Forwarded by Scott Chellis/Raleigh/IBM on 11/19/01 09:20 AM ----- Scott Chellis/Raleigh/IB To: toasters(a)mathworks.com M@IBMUS cc: Sent by: Subject: Looking to purchase older Filer SCSI tape, disk drives, owner-toasters@mat shelf hworks.com 08/03/01 08:41 PM Hi, I am looking to purchase our would appreciate source information for purchase of: qty(3) (or more) 4GB ST15230N disk drives with/in canisters. qty(1) StorageShelf1 with or without drives Exabyte 8505 tape drive with proper mounting bracket, cable, etc for internal F520 install. Any information on any part of the above would be greatly appreciated -- replies to me directly. Thanks Scott B. Chellis Consulting I/T Architect - Network Integration - MCNE, CCNA, CCNP, CIFI South Outsourcing Network Design Office : 919.852.4080 Tieline: 223.9629 Fax : 919.852.4020 Cellular: 919.244.7050 Pager: 800.252.5972 Email: schellis(a)us.ibm.com Notes: Scott Chellis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS

1 0

Moving ClearCase to Netapp
by Lewis M. Church 17 Nov '01

17 Nov '01

We currently run ClearCase 4.0 using local disk for our vob and view storage. We're interested in moving the entirety of our ClearCase storage to NetApp. Ideally, we'd like to simply shutdown ClearCase, copy the vobstore and viewstore data to the NetApp filesystems, remount the NetApp filesystems at the same mount-point as the local filesystems had been and restart ClearCase. I've never been given a clear explanation from Rational on whether this would work or not, but the general feeling has been that it won't. When I've pressed for a reason why not, I've been told "because it's not the method that's documented" My question for netapp folks out there is if anyone's attempted what I've described above and if it worked or not. Also if you know it won't work and could explain to me why, I'd appreciate it. Note, our ClearCase is running on HPUX 10.20, the NetApp is configured only for NFS, no CIFS. Thanks, Lew Church Telcordia Technologies, Inc. lchurch(a)telcordia.com

2 1

FS: NetApp 7x18gb Disk Shelves - $3,695.00
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

We are eager to reduce our 18gb drive inventory before year-end and are thus offering the following: Fully populated 7x18gb NetApp rack -- $3,695.00 - FC8 Shelf with dual power supplies (FC9 option available) - SEVEN 18gb FC-AL disk drives (125gb raw total) - FC cable and a/c power cords - ONE YEAR advance exchange warranty Complete used systems, including F720s, 740s and 760s -- with or without software licenses -- are also available, configured to suit. (Unlicensed heads are a superb alternative for backup machines and/or spare parts kits.) Regards, Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 Phone: 952 935 7282 FAX: 952 935 5056 scott(a)unioncomputer.com

1 0

UWIN/chmod problem
by Mike Sphar 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

Has anyone ever heard of a problem like this? I couldn't find anything at NOW. Some build engineers are reporting that they're unable to change file permissions with the UWIN chmod command on my filers. (UWIN is a set of UNIX utilities for windows.) They're able to chmod files on another filer, and on samba shares, but when they try to chmod files on my filer they get permissions denied. Permissions and ownerships look right. They can create, edit, and delete the files via CIFS. They can do the chmod from a UNIX client and it works fine. The only difference I'm aware of with my filer is that all my qtrees are in UNIX mode, whereas the other filer in question is in mixed mode. My gut instinct is to consider this a UWIN problem, but I'd be curious to know if anyone else has had experience with this. -- Mike Sphar - Iron Chef UNIX - R&D Support Peregrine Systems, Inc.

1 0

Hyperion Enterprise on a NetApp
by Gifford, Josh 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

Hello Everyone, This might be a long shot, but I'm curious to know if anyone is running Hyperion Enterprise on a NetApp filer. I'm having a ton of issues with Hyperion running on a Windows 2000 box and I'm looking for alternatives. Thanks in advance! Best Regards, Josh J Gifford MCP NT Systems Engineer Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution 7000 Siemens Rd Wendell, NC 27591 Phone: (919) 365-2806; Fax: (919) 365-1080

1 0

Re: quota problem ?
by Rune Bakken 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

daniel <daniel(a)interq.or.jp> writes: > I have a user who can not upload any files to his home dir using ftp and > the error message he gets is "disk quota exceeded". > I checked his users quota from the filer and noticed that he is indeed > over the limit of his quota. Then you may need to increase his users quota as the filer counts all files owned by each user in each of the quota type, and hence a simple df -s will not work. From my own quotas file: #Quota Target type disk files rb user@/vol/users/home 8G 300K Any files I own on or below /vol/users/home will be counted in the quota. Even if they exists outside my designated $HOME. quota -v <user> on Solaris gives you the this output: kavringen(root) local 501# quota -v rb Disk quotas for rb (uid 392): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft /home/nfs/users 2522412 8388608 8388608 50844 307200 307200 I would suspect that other OS' has similar tools. >>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken "I feel sorry for people who don't drink. System Administrator When they wake up in the morning, that's as Nextra, good as they're going to feel all day." - Telenor Company - Frank Sinatra

5 4

Re: quota problem ?
by Andrew Curry 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

On Fri 16 Nov 2001 at 16:39, daniel wrote: > I have a user who can not upload any files to his home dir using ftp and > the error message he gets is "disk quota exceeded". > > When I did du -sk on his home dir as root , I find that it is not even > close to his maximum quota limit. Quota is set as follows for this volume, > qtree, X disk limit and no limit on # of files. > > I checked his users quota from the filer and noticed that he is indeed > over the limit of his quota. > > Filer is F840 and Ontap version is 6.0.1R3. > > Any ideas? I imagine he must own some files which are not in his home directory. Do 'find <home dir> -user <uname>| wc -l' to count the number of files that he owns in his directory and compare that with the number of files that quota reports. Do 'find <disk> -user <uname>' to find all the files on the disk that he owns. Andrew Curry Faculty of Computing Sciences and Engineering De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

1 0

quota problem ?
by daniel 16 Nov '01

16 Nov '01

Hi all, I have a user who can not upload any files to his home dir using ftp and the error message he gets is "disk quota exceeded". When I did du -sk on his home dir as root , I find that it is not even close to his maximum quota limit. Quota is set as follows for this volume, qtree, X disk limit and no limit on # of files. I checked his users quota from the filer and noticed that he is indeed over the limit of his quota. Filer is F840 and Ontap version is 6.0.1R3. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. Daniel Jung System Administrator GMO inc

1 0

F840 or F880
by Jennifer Armenta 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

3 2

RE: F840 or F880
by Joe Luchtenberg 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

Yes, it dies. That's what I was referring to (earlier reply that you may not have seen posted yet) when I indicated that the 2nd CPU is for performance, not availability (see http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2897 <http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2897> ). I think one CPU is dedicated to indexing and other such processes. Joe -----Original Message----- From: Honeycutt, Michael [mailto:MichaelHoneycutt@NC.SLR.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:15 PM To: 'Jennifer Armenta'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: F840 or F880 Good quesiton. Does anyone know if the filer dies if a CPU fails? It would be nice if it paniced and came back up on 1 CPU while support was working to get it replaced. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Armenta [mailto:ArmentaJ@mascorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:25 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F840 or F880 Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

1 0

RE: F840 or F880
by Honeycutt, Michael 14 Nov '01

14 Nov '01

Good quesiton. Does anyone know if the filer dies if a CPU fails? It would be nice if it paniced and came back up on 1 CPU while support was working to get it replaced. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Armenta [mailto:ArmentaJ@mascorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 2:25 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F840 or F880 Do you see any point in upgrading from a F840 to a F880 or F880c, besides the clustering factor? Does anyone have any good advantage point to this type of upgrade that would justify the cost. Jennifer )

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters