toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

ndmpcopy - java version
by Jeff Kennedy 04 Dec '01

04 Dec '01

I need the "i" capability in jndmpcopy but cannot find it. A search on google found messages contining jndmpcopy discussions but no link to binary. Also not on ndmp.org. Thanks. -- ===================== Jeff Kennedy Unix Administrator AMCC jlkennedy(a)amcc.com

1 0

Re: autologout.telnet.enable not working
by Andrew Yee 04 Dec '01

04 Dec '01

Hey Hannes, I actually didn't look up the referenced Bug ID (until now) but I guess it may have affected earlier versions of OnTap too (e.g., 6.0.1)? Anyway, it's nice to know that 6.1.1 customers are affected too. -Andrew http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=43768 Bug ID 43768 Title: telnet and console sessions might not automatically logout Product: Data ONTAP & NetCache Description: The telnet and console sessions might not always be logged out, even if autologout said they were. Workaround: None. Notes: Upgrade to 5.1R1D1 or later. Related Solutions Fixed-In Version: Data ONTAP 6.1.1R2P1 (First Fixed) - Fixed NetCache Appliance 5.0.1R2D10 () - Fixed NetCache Appliance 5.1R2 (GA) - Fixed NetCache Appliance 5.2.1 (FCS) - Fixed >>> Hannes Herret - Bacher Systems EDV GmbH <hh(a)bacher.at> Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:52:50 AM >>> thx fti andrew. but i think its a problem of 6.1.1, cause on 2 customer-filers running 6.1.1 there's also this malfunction. ciao hannes Andrew Yee wrote: > I opened an eCase with NetApp about this. It is a known bug with OnTap 6.1.1R2. > > I brought this issue up with our on-site NetApp Systems Engineer and his suggestion was to wait for the release of OnTap 6.1.2, which allegedly, is extremely imminent! > > (Otherwise, you may opt for 6.1.1R2 D10.) > > -Andrew > > >>> "Bekkay, Hasni" <hbekkay(a)netapp.com> Sunday, November 18, 2001 4:21:36 AM >>> > Hi Andrew, > My name is Hasni TSE from Hoofddorp(Netherlands). > I am writing regarding the case # 279444 with telnet session problem. this is most likely bug # 43768, which is fixed in the releases > 6.1.1R2 D10.. > > >>> Hannes Herret - Bacher Systems EDV GmbH <hh(a)bacher.at> Monday, December 03, 2001 9:25:39 AM >>> > hi, > > has someone mentioned that autologout.telnet.enable since 6.1.1 ist not > working properly? > > the message 'autologout: session idle for too long' is shown every > minute on the console, if i set 'autologout.telnet.timeout 1', but > it's no really logout. > i just press enter once again, and i'm just reconnecting to the console, > without being prompted for a password. > > workaround or fix available?? > > regards > hannes > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage > phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH > fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B > mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria > www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe

1 0

netapp, NT domains, unix security
by Walt Zapor 04 Dec '01

04 Dec '01

We are having trouble accessing a cifs share (with ntfs security style) from a Sun box. An F720, (6.0.1R3) exists in an NT "resource" domain that is trustING. The trustED master domain (with all user account information) is called "dwkcb". There is a One-way trust between domains ie. we don't trust the resource domain. (Don't ask why its a long story.) A cifs share is called "test_ntfs" with ntfs security style. From a Sun box as walt a cd into it gets permission denied. Here is an overview: nas01> qtree Volume Tree Style Oplocks -------- -------- ----- -------- sys unix enabled sys jobs unix enabled sys projects unix enabled sys scans ntfs enabled sys software unix enabled sys test_mixed mixed enabled sys test_ntfs ntfs enabled sys test_unix unix enabled Account "walt" exists identically in both the NT domain "dwkcb" and a NIS domain. However here is the error we get (NetApp support has never seen this): nas01> wcc -u walt Thu Nov 29 10:08:01 EST [rc:info]: Located account "DWKCB\walt" in domain "DWKCB". Thu Nov 29 10:08:01 EST [rc:error]: SamrConnect2: Exception rpc_s_call_id_not_found caught. Error 0xc002001b mapping UNIX name walt nas01> Thu Nov 29 10:08:01 EST [rc:info]: Error c002001b looking up domain groups nas01> wcc -s walt Thu Nov 29 10:08:07 EST [rc:error]: SamrConnect2: Exception rpc_s_call_id_not_found caught. Error 0xc002001b mapping SID S-1-5-21-234058047-1151164854-1844936127-1008 nas01> Thu Nov 29 10:08:07 EST [rc:info]: Error c002001b looking up domain groups Has anyone seen this or anything similar? We won't consider a two-way trust nor can we change the domain of the filer. Any thoughts appreciated.

2 1

NDMP software ?
by Frank Bonnet 04 Dec '01

04 Dec '01

Hi I'm trying to use two NDMP software to backup our filer ( 85 ) on a HP DLT8000 autoloader the dump and restore commands are working fine the two softwares are Netbackup and HP omniback 4.0 I'm a little bit confuse with the Netbackup software documentation and the omniback software seems not working ( first NDMP release ) It would be gread to have some help from the list to have some infos about it ( reply directly to me ) thanks for any answer. -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

NDMP fast access restore / direct access restore
by FPS France 04 Dec '01

04 Dec '01

Hi toaster, We are looking for the Ontapp version which would well support the "fast access restore" functionnality. By this, I mean, a way to restore files without being obliged to read the end of the tape where ACL usually remain. Do someone is awarded of this functionality ? Is it the same than Direct Access Restore ? Which version wouldyou advise me to use on a F740 machine ? In looking at now.netapp.com search & bugs, and I noted as relevent 537R3 and 611R2 but the costumer would like a 'real' stable version like 537R3; as the 611R2 will be soon replace by the 612, I can't advise him this version. What's your opinion on that ? What is the first version supporting at 100% the DAR functionnality (if it is the same as "fast access restore"). Fanku much by advance -

1 0

Re: autologout.telnet.enable not working
by Hannes Herret - Bacher Systems EDV GmbH 04 Dec '01

04 Dec '01

thx fti andrew. but i think its a problem of 6.1.1, cause on 2 customer-filers running 6.1.1 there's also this malfunction. ciao hannes Andrew Yee wrote: > I opened an eCase with NetApp about this. It is a known bug with OnTap 6.1.1R2. > > I brought this issue up with our on-site NetApp Systems Engineer and his suggestion was to wait for the release of OnTap 6.1.2, which allegedly, is extremely imminent! > > (Otherwise, you may opt for 6.1.1R2 D10.) > > -Andrew > > >>> "Bekkay, Hasni" <hbekkay(a)netapp.com> Sunday, November 18, 2001 4:21:36 AM >>> > Hi Andrew, > My name is Hasni TSE from Hoofddorp(Netherlands). > I am writing regarding the case # 279444 with telnet session problem. this is most likely bug # 43768, which is fixed in the releases > 6.1.1R2 D10.. > > >>> Hannes Herret - Bacher Systems EDV GmbH <hh(a)bacher.at> Monday, December 03, 2001 9:25:39 AM >>> > hi, > > has someone mentioned that autologout.telnet.enable since 6.1.1 ist not > working properly? > > the message 'autologout: session idle for too long' is shown every > minute on the console, if i set 'autologout.telnet.timeout 1', but > it's no really logout. > i just press enter once again, and i'm just reconnecting to the console, > without being prompted for a password. > > workaround or fix available?? > > regards > hannes > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage > phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH > fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B > mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria > www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe

1 0

RE: NDMP DAR issues
by Chitre, Amol 03 Dec '01

03 Dec '01

Hi Neil, This particular issue is related to Legato Networker 6.1. They do not set the EXTRACT_ACL ndmp environement variable to T. The default value for that variable is F. That was causing the restore for ACLs to fail. The fix for *this* issue requires the customer to set this variable in the legato GUI configuration. If you need any more information on how to set this, please let me know. Thanks, Amol. >-----Original Message----- >From: neil lehrer [mailto:nlehrer@ibb.gov] >Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 8:06 AM >To: toasters >Subject: NDMP DAR issues > > >from netapp buglist >i am f760 ontap 6.1.1r2 > >does anyone know anything about this: > >"there are two issues with restoring ACLs via the filer's NDMP >Local Direct >Access Restore capability. First, you need to set the NDMP >Client Environment >Variable "EXTRACT_ACL" to TRUE. The variable currently >defaults to FALSE. >If you cannot see a listing of this variable in your client, >it is set to FALSE. >Contact your client's support to assist you in setting this >variable..... >" >-- > > >regards >

2 1

Re: autologout.telnet.enable not working
by Andrew Yee 03 Dec '01

03 Dec '01

I opened an eCase with NetApp about this. It is a known bug with OnTap 6.1.1R2. I brought this issue up with our on-site NetApp Systems Engineer and his suggestion was to wait for the release of OnTap 6.1.2, which allegedly, is extremely imminent! (Otherwise, you may opt for 6.1.1R2 D10.) -Andrew >>> "Bekkay, Hasni" <hbekkay(a)netapp.com> Sunday, November 18, 2001 4:21:36 AM >>> Hi Andrew, My name is Hasni TSE from Hoofddorp(Netherlands). I am writing regarding the case # 279444 with telnet session problem. this is most likely bug # 43768, which is fixed in the releases 6.1.1R2 D10.. >>> Hannes Herret - Bacher Systems EDV GmbH <hh(a)bacher.at> Monday, December 03, 2001 9:25:39 AM >>> hi, has someone mentioned that autologout.telnet.enable since 6.1.1 ist not working properly? the message 'autologout: session idle for too long' is shown every minute on the console, if i set 'autologout.telnet.timeout 1', but it's no really logout. i just press enter once again, and i'm just reconnecting to the console, without being prompted for a password. workaround or fix available?? regards hannes -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe

1 0

autologout.telnet.enable not working
by Hannes Herret - Bacher Systems EDV GmbH 03 Dec '01

03 Dec '01

hi, has someone mentioned that autologout.telnet.enable since 6.1.1 ist not working properly? the message 'autologout: session idle for too long' is shown every minute on the console, if i set 'autologout.telnet.timeout 1', but it's no really logout. i just press enter once again, and i'm just reconnecting to the console, without being prompted for a password. workaround or fix available?? regards hannes -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hannes Herret IT-Service / Storage phone : +43 (1) 60 126-34 Bacher Systems EDV GmbH fax : +43 (1) 60 126-555 Wienerbergstr. 11B mailto:hh@bacher.at A-1101 Wien, Austria www : http://www.bacher.at/ Europe

1 0

FWD: RE: snapmirror transfer rate
by Steven Boyer 03 Dec '01

03 Dec '01

---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Steven Boyer" <Steven.Boyer(a)gd-wts-centcom.com> Reply-To: <Steven.Boyer(a)gd-wts-centcom.com> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 23:20:44 -0600 T1 is a 1M pipe? looking for close to that ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Mohler, Jeff" <jeff.mohler(a)netapp.com> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 21:18:01 -0800 >160Kb/sec is pretty much a full-up T1. > >What were you expecting? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steven Boyer [mailto:Steven.Boyer@gd-wts-centcom.com] >Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 8:45 PM >To: toasters >Subject: > > >I am using snapmirror over a T1 to transfer to volumes between a 760 and an 840 both running 6.1.1.r2. The 760 is GigE and the 840 is 10/100, when I look at sysstat I am only getting about 160kbs. Is any else seeing these type of results with snapmirror over a T1. If not any ideas on increasing transfer rate of the snapmirror. > >Thanks > >-- >Steven N. Boyer >UNIX/NT/NetApp Support >HQUSCENTCOM >General Dynamics >-- > -- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics -- -- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics --

4 3

NDMP DAR issues
by neil lehrer 03 Dec '01

03 Dec '01

from netapp buglist i am f760 ontap 6.1.1r2 does anyone know anything about this: "there are two issues with restoring ACLs via the filer's NDMP Local Direct Access Restore capability. First, you need to set the NDMP Client Environment Variable "EXTRACT_ACL" to TRUE. The variable currently defaults to FALSE. If you cannot see a listing of this variable in your client, it is set to FALSE. Contact your client's support to assist you in setting this variable..... " -- regards

1 0

Admin CIFS with Windoze XP Professional
by Larry Nail 03 Dec '01

03 Dec '01

Anyone run into problems trying to admin a filer (CIFS) with Windoze XP Professional? Larry ______________________________________ Lawrence D. Nail Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer for Windows® 2000 Design Systems Strategic Development Team Information Technology Services Texas Instruments Incorporated

1 0

None
by Steven Boyer 02 Dec '01

02 Dec '01

I am using snapmirror over a T1 to transfer to volumes between a 760 and an 840 both running 6.1.1.r2. The 760 is GigE and the 840 is 10/100, when I look at sysstat I am only getting about 160kbs. Is any else seeing these type of results with snapmirror over a T1. If not any ideas on increasing transfer rate of the snapmirror. Thanks -- Steven N. Boyer UNIX/NT/NetApp Support HQUSCENTCOM General Dynamics --

2 1

rsh and uid
by Jeff Kennedy 30 Nov '01

30 Nov '01

Does rsh to a filer require that the real uid be root or just the euid? I am scripting a little snapmirror update for some developers and can't get it to work when it's suid. But if I put a c program in front that sets the uid it works. However, it only seems to work when the real uid is 0, not just euid. Thanks. -- ===================== Jeff Kennedy Unix Administrator AMCC jlkennedy(a)amcc.com

2 2

Slow CIFS Write Performance
by Lim, Weng Kiam 30 Nov '01

30 Nov '01

Hi All, I am in the process for migrating user home directories from the current PDC to the filer. Copying 4GB of data took 4 hours to complete. Both the filer and the server running on Gigabit interface. Search the archive and there was suggestion on the smb block negotiation. Any other hints to troubleshoot would be greatly appreciated. Filer - F740 with 1000sx interface PDC Server - Compaq ML530, 2 Xeon 1GHz Processor, 1128 MB of RAM, Gigabit Network Card TIA Weng-Kiam Lim

2 1

Re: Performance issue
by Don.Hickey＠alcatel.com 30 Nov '01

30 Nov '01

I spent most of October with netapp on this one. For me, it was fixed in 6.1.1R2. I suggest you upgrade. See bug id 54265. Don "Haber, David J." <David.Haber(a)vtmednet.org> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 2001-11-27 07:11 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com cc: Subject: Performance issue Has anyone seen intermittent problems when users try to save Excel or Powerpoint files to a share on the filer? Also, what are some of the strategies for dealing with oplock break timeout issues? I've been working with NetApp support on these issues but I'd like other opinions. I'm running an 820 filer, DATAOntap 6.1.1r1, and I have a 4-port, 10/100 full duplex vif.

1 0

RE: [Bigbackup] Welcome back
by Schepers, Jan 30 Nov '01

30 Nov '01

> On 26 Nov 2001, David N. Blank-Edelman wrote: > > > > So here's my question: since this list has been dormant for a very > > long time, should it be killed? Is this still a relevant topic and > > forum for this topic? > > Backing up big datasets will always be a relevant topic > for some. ;-) > Is there an already established list that addresses the topic in the > manner of this list (vendor neutral, OS neutral, platform neutral)? > If not, I think there is a need for one, and this can be it. > -- > Brian Tao (BT300, taob(a)risc.org) > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" From my perspective there is definitely need for a vendor/product, platform/os independent list that tackles big backup problems. I do not know any other list than this (mailto:bigbackup@lists.cc.neu.edu) one, but as said above it's quiet here. rgds, Yann

1 0

Best place to buy NetApp HW?
by Wollermann, Brian 29 Nov '01

29 Nov '01

My company is looking to buy more NetApp hardware and our local vendor (the only one) does not seem to be giving us very good pricing. My boss wants me to see if there are other vendors that can get us the same thing cheaper. If anyone has a particular vendor that they feel gives good prices can you send me their name and number (US only please)? I would appreciate it. Thank you.

1 0

Test lab configs
by Joe Luchtenberg 29 Nov '01

29 Nov '01

I apologize in advance for such an open-ended question. Also, I recognize that this subject is probably as much art as it is science. Nonetheless, I would appreciate any insight that can be offered. I am looking for guidance on the subject of test lab requirements. Specifically, if an organization has multiple filer models in production, is it sufficient to maintain a single filer model in the lab for testing? More generally, can anyone point me to resources on the general subject of designing a data center test lab? A cursory search of the web was not helpful (probably because I am having some difficulty adequately refining my searches). Jeff Browning's paper (TR3055 Creating a UNIX-based Database Software Testing Environment Using a NetApp Filer, http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3055.html) is instructive from a software testing perspective. I'm interested not only in that, but also h/w and s/w compatibility/interoperability testing, as well as performance testing. Thanks in advance. Again I apologize for the lack of detail in my request. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 757-285-1223 (mobile) 757-858-0606 (fax) joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com www.data-line.com

2 1

Great post on WAFL
by Tom Yergeau 29 Nov '01

29 Nov '01

Just noticed a great post on WAFL on The Motley Fool's discussion boards: http://boards.fool.com/Message.asp?mid=16158813 For a financial discussion board, this is pretty technical. Great read. Tom

1 0

subst cmd problem - more
by neil lehrer 28 Nov '01

28 Nov '01

toaster folk, mark muhlestein was gracious enough to read my pktt traces. it seems eventhough i am pointing directly to a dir with subst: subst h: \\filer\users\a\adam the command tries to get attribs from \\filer\users\a. so eventhough i had cifs.bypass_traverse_checking on and even an X perm on \\filer\users\a subst got mad. putting some level of read on \\filer\users\a seems to correct it. subst h: \\filer\users\a\adam then works. right now i have R,X on it. any comments? thanks -- regards

1 0

nt subst cmd
by neil lehrer 28 Nov '01

28 Nov '01

hi, our homedir structure is /vol/vol0/users/a/adam we want to use the subst cmd instead of 'net use' because we go below the share. and since we have the first letter of the userid in there we can't use the ontap homedir option. however, we can't get subst to work as a user. C:\WINNTSRV>subst q: \\filer\u7\k\kusr1 Path not found - \\filer\u7\k\kusr1 subst works fine as admin. u7 is an ntfs qtree. kusr1 has full control over its dir. cifs.bypass_traverse_checking on is set. i also gave kusr X rights on u7 and u7\k. no diff. filer is 760 with ontap 6.1.1r2. volume is unix style. anybody ever get this to work? any suggestions? thanks. -- regards

2 1

RE: Purging classified files from F840
by McCarthy, Tim 28 Nov '01

28 Nov '01

Gentlemen, I suggest you look at the following: http://www.dss.mil/isec/nispom.htm This is the DOD standard for disk clearing. This is DOD, and other agencies may have guidlines in addition to these when sanitizing disks.... --tmac Timothy A. McCarthy System Engineer Network Appliance Federal Systems INC. http://www.netapp.com <http://www.netapp.com> 410-290-1581 Office Page Me at: 877-5-NETAPP --> -----Original Message----- --> From: Joe Luchtenberg [mailto:joe.luchtenberg@data-line.com] --> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 9:15 AM --> To: 'pkeim(contr-ird)'; toasters(a)mathworks.com --> Subject: RE: Purging classified files from F840 --> --> --> Not a direct answer, but a related subject... If your --> environment is --> subject to DoD restrictions related to data classification, --> then you may --> wish to ensure you have the warranty uplift for --> non-returnable disks. --> NetApp cannot accept returned disks under warranty that --> have been degaused --> or otherwise modified to purge data to satisfy --> classification requirements, --> as this will nullify their warranty with the OEM --> manufacturer (it is well --> known that NetApp is a software company and their disks are --> - or at least --> were - all Seagate or IBM). You will be charged for --> replacement disks, if --> you do not purchase this uplift. --> --> Hope this is useful, even if it does not directly address --> your question. --> --> Joe --> --> Joe Luchtenberg --> Dataline, Inc. --> 757-858-0600 --> joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com --> --> -----Original Message----- --> From: pkeim(contr-ird) [mailto:pkeim@snap.org] --> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:23 AM --> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com --> Subject: Purging classified files from F840 --> --> --> I need some assistance in tracking down a specific question --> concerning our new F840 with release 6.1.1R2. When it's --> introduced into our --> production environment next month, it will operate in an --> unclassified (but --> sensitive) environment. If a user inadvertently saved a --> document classified --> "secret" to the filer, what is the DoD-approved method to --> completely wipe --> the file from the volume? --> --> Thanks in advance for the help! -->

1 0

Purging classified files from F840
by pkeim(contr-ird) 28 Nov '01

28 Nov '01

I need some assistance in tracking down a specific question concerning our new F840 with release 6.1.1R2. When it's introduced into our production environment next month, it will operate in an unclassified (but sensitive) environment. If a user inadvertently saved a document classified "secret" to the filer, what is the DoD-approved method to completely wipe the file from the volume? Thanks in advance for the help!

2 1

RE: Purging classified files from F840
by Joe Luchtenberg 28 Nov '01

28 Nov '01

Not a direct answer, but a related subject... If your environment is subject to DoD restrictions related to data classification, then you may wish to ensure you have the warranty uplift for non-returnable disks. NetApp cannot accept returned disks under warranty that have been degaused or otherwise modified to purge data to satisfy classification requirements, as this will nullify their warranty with the OEM manufacturer (it is well known that NetApp is a software company and their disks are - or at least were - all Seagate or IBM). You will be charged for replacement disks, if you do not purchase this uplift. Hope this is useful, even if it does not directly address your question. Joe Joe Luchtenberg Dataline, Inc. 757-858-0600 joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com -----Original Message----- From: pkeim(contr-ird) [mailto:pkeim@snap.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:23 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Purging classified files from F840 I need some assistance in tracking down a specific question concerning our new F840 with release 6.1.1R2. When it's introduced into our production environment next month, it will operate in an unclassified (but sensitive) environment. If a user inadvertently saved a document classified "secret" to the filer, what is the DoD-approved method to completely wipe the file from the volume? Thanks in advance for the help!

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters