toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: Whos got that file?
by Clawson, Simon 25 Jan '02

25 Jan '02

Many thanks Simon > -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Schorr [mailto:sschorr@homestead-inc.com] > Sent: Friday January 2002 15:41 > To: Clawson, Simon; toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: RE: Whos got that file? > > > Yes. The command "CIFS sessions" returns the list of clients and the > number of files they have open. The command "CIFS sessions > clientname" > returns the full file path on the filer that clientname has > open and the > kind of open. > > --sam > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Clawson, Simon [mailto:simon_clawson@mentorg.com] > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:35 AM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Whos got that file? > > > Hi! > > With CIFS Sessions I can see who's got a CIFS seesion open, > but is there > a way of seeing what file or path they are using? > > Simon > > Simon Clawson > HDS Team Systems Administrator > Mentor Graphics Uk > Rivergate > London Road > Newbury > Berkshire > RG14 2QB > <<Clawson, Simon.vcf>> >

1 0

RE: Whos got that file?
by Sam Schorr 25 Jan '02

25 Jan '02

Yes. The command "CIFS sessions" returns the list of clients and the number of files they have open. The command "CIFS sessions clientname" returns the full file path on the filer that clientname has open and the kind of open. --sam -----Original Message----- From: Clawson, Simon [mailto:simon_clawson@mentorg.com] Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 6:35 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Whos got that file? Hi! With CIFS Sessions I can see who's got a CIFS seesion open, but is there a way of seeing what file or path they are using? Simon Simon Clawson HDS Team Systems Administrator Mentor Graphics Uk Rivergate London Road Newbury Berkshire RG14 2QB <<Clawson, Simon.vcf>>

1 0

Whos got that file?
by Clawson, Simon 25 Jan '02

25 Jan '02

Hi! With CIFS Sessions I can see who's got a CIFS seesion open, but is there a way of seeing what file or path they are using? Simon Simon Clawson HDS Team Systems Administrator Mentor Graphics Uk Rivergate London Road Newbury Berkshire RG14 2QB <<Clawson, Simon.vcf>>

1 0

NetShield scanner can't register
by Paul Autore 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

VSCAN Gurus, My F720 filer (6.1.1R2) is showing the following message: "Virus scanner "IP-address" attempted to register but had insufficient privilege." Since I don't have any registered scanners, I still have left vscan off. My scanner is a Dell box running 2000 Advanced Server. I have McAFee NetShield 4.5 for NT and 2000 installed, along with Service Pack 1 that comes on the NetShield 4.5 for NetApps demo CD. On top of this, I have NetShield for NetApps installed. My scanner is on the same NT resource domain as the filer. The scanning account has membership in both the Domain Admins and Backup Operators groups on this domain's PDC. The Properties window of the NetShield for NetApps console confirms that the AV is running, and that the filer that I'm trying to connect to displays "filer error" (confirming the filer's error message). The results of a "wcc -s mesascan" on the filer confirm that my scanning account "mesascan" has the following memberships: (NT - UNIX) account name(s): (AZ34STITG\mesascan - root) *************** UNIX uid = 0 user is a member of group sys (3) user is a member of group http (77) user is a member of group smos (165) user is a member of group hp4156 (142) user is a member of group cnagrp (160) NT membership AZ34STITG\mesascan AZ34STITG\Domain Users AZ34STITG\Domain Admins BUILTIN\Users BUILTIN\Administrators User is also a member of Everyone, Network Users, Authenticated Users *************** What is preventing my scanner from getting registered on my filer? The McAFee support people and NetApps have been unable to solve this. My current NetApps case is #298355. Paul Autore Systems Engineer Motorola

1 0

Not superstitious, but fun !
by Kate 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

1 0

Gigabit ethernet performance
by Hsueh-Mei Tsai(May Tsai) 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

Does anybody knows what kind of performance I can expect from using the Gigabit ethernet on Solaris/NetApp? For example, if mkfile 1024m 1gbfile on a NFS mounted netapp volume thru the gbit interface, how many seconds of response time is considered to be reasonable? I'm getting about 30secs, while I'm hoping within 12secs, am I dreaming? Thanks, -May --

3 2

unix style to ntfs and back
by neil lehrer 24 Jan '02

24 Jan '02

hi, i have a question about security style reversion. we converted a unix qtree to ntfs and applied acls. there was a problem and i had to revert back to the unix style almost immediately after creating the acls. now i want to convert the same qtree to ntfs again. the question is will the acls that i originally put in place still be there after i convert to ntfs? the unix perms were there when i went ntfs back to unix, but it may not be the same going from unix to ntfs. anybody ever seen or done this? ontap 6.1.1r2 thanks. -- regards

1 0

"Open files" in NetApp shapshots
by Joseph Foy 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

I am running a Network Appliance Filer and using CA ARCserve to backup files on a Windows 2000 network. All file access is working fine, and ARCserve seems to be backing up files on all other Windows systems OK. My problem is that ARCserve keeps reporting skipping (some)open or locked files even though I am backing up a snapshot (usually the last hourly.0 snapshot). Any thoughts on why ~snapshot\hourly.0 isn't acting as a read-only filesystem? Joseph Foy/Sys Admin/World Wide Packets/Beaverton Oregon

1 0

RE: Gigabit ethernet performance
by Surlow, Jim 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

May, One course I took at USENIX over a year ago, there was a comment from the system & network tuning course that said that it would take 3 CPUs (Sparc 300MHz) to saturate a GBIC. This was an unverified rule of thumb at the time. (I went back to my notes to dig this up). These days, you would have faster buses and faster CPUs, so adjust the number downward accordingly. In the case of the mkfile that process is going to be designated to a single CPU. Just for fun, you might want to fire up 4 simultaneous 256m (both to tmp & to your filer) to see if you see performance differences. That way, you would be able to isolate some of the time to the limitations of your NFS client. The back-to-back CPs are going to be in your sysstat output (use 1 sec updates for longer that 10 seconds). And that will identify time that the filer is spending on disk I/O. If you are getting back-to-back CPs, then your filer's NVRAM cache is filling faster than it can flush to disk. So, the filer makes the data stream wait. If you were to run the same single processor mkfile test with less data, you should see time to tmp would be proportional and if your time to filer is less than the earlier filer ratio (time/disk), then that might also show that it is a lack of NVRAM cache. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Hsueh-Mei Tsai(May Tsai) [mailto:may-tsai@ti.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 12:38 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Gigabit ethernet performance Thanks for all the replies. Some background info: Sun client is a 420R running Solaris7, NetApp is F820 running 6.1.1R2. Both are PCI cards. I've checked the NOW sites and tried to change various Sun parameters with no significant differences. Local disk creation takes 35 secs(single drive) vs. NetApp's 7 data/1 parity volume, which produces ~30secs results. Direct tmpfs writes takes 8 secs. Aggregated results in 27.5 seconds, still not much better though. The NetApp support engineer I worked with mentioned it's back-to-back CP bottleneck, that's not on the network side, correct? Does that mean the Netapp F820 can't handle consistent huge data flows? As to Jumbo frame, I haven't tried it yet, the Gbit switch I use probably won't support it, well. Does it adds a lot to the performance? May

1 0

RE: Repost: wafl scan question
by jwitham＠takedapharm.com 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

In our case, it's an exploding M$ Exchange Information store... It started out on 2 36G disks, now it's up to 4. Mailbox quotas must be nice... I was turned on to the wafl commands by one of our local PSE's last week, we were having horrible performance reported while our Exchange snapshot verifications were running. A statit showed 1 disk at 100% activity, and the next one at 66%. I ran a 'wafl scan measure_layout', and got: wafl_filesystem_sca:info]: WAFL layout ratio for volume vol7 is 4.87. (A ratio of 1 is optimal). So, I run a 'wafl scan reallocate vol7', let it chug for an hour, then run another 'wafl scan measure_layout', and it's still 4.87 :( I've done this twice now, with no change in waffling. We're running 6.1.2. At the advice of my PSE, I'm opening a ticket with NOW. John Witham Sr. Data Networking Engineer Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. e://jwitham@takedapharm.com V://847.383.3304 F://847.383.3205 A computer lets you make more mistakes faster than any invention in human history, with the possible exceptions of handguns and tequila. -Mitch Ratcliffe -----Original Message----- From: barry(a)lustig.com [mailto:barry@lustig.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 12:15 PM To: Matt Musgrove Cc: Jeff Kennedy; NDMP List Subject: Re: Repost: wafl scan question This sounds like it would be useful for volumes that started out with low performance needs with a small number of disks in the array that ended up with large raid sizes. I imagine that files would get striped across the larger number of drives after the reallocate. barry On Wednesday, January 23, 2002, at 02:00 AM, Matt Musgrove wrote: >> From my ONTAP course notes: > > wafl scan reallocate takes a volume or file and reallocates it on the > disk to > increase its layout efficiency (ie. defrags). However, you should only > run > this command on the advice of NetApp. It should only be run if volume > capacity is <80% and during a non-peak period (filer impact similar to > a vol > copy command). > > hope that helps > > Matt Musgrove > > Jeff Kennedy wrote: > >> Don't know if this didn't get through or what so I'm reposting. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Jeff Kennedy wrote: >>> >>> What exactly does 'wafl scan reallocate' do? Does it actually >>> re-write >>> data in a more efficient manner/layout? Or does it redo inodes and >>> pointers in a more efficient layout without moving data? >>> >>> I know that a reallocate is unnecessary if the measure_layout is low >>> (most of mine are under 2) but on occassion I get higher numbers and >>> wonder what it does to fix this. >>> >>> Thanks. >> -- >> ===================== >> Jeff Kennedy >> Unix Administrator >> AMCC >> jlkennedy(a)amcc.com > This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

1 0

wafl scan question
by Jeff Kennedy 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

What exactly does 'wafl scan reallocate' do? Does it actually re-write data in a more efficient manner/layout? Or does it redo inodes and pointers in a more efficient layout without moving data? I know that a reallocate is unnecessary if the measure_layout is low (most of mine are under 2) but on occassion I get higher numbers and wonder what it does to fix this. Thanks. -- ===================== Jeff Kennedy Unix Administrator AMCC jlkennedy(a)amcc.com

4 5

RE: Veritas Netbackup mailing list
by Melvin, Grant 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

Hi Jan, Check out: Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu(a)mailman.eng.auburn.edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-bu Cheers, Grant For information on NetApp's Data Protection Solutions view http://www.netapp.com/solutions/data_protection.html. -----Original Message----- From: Schepers, Jan [mailto:Jan.Schepers@atosorigin.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:15 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Veritas Netbackup mailing list Hello list, is there a Veritas Netbackup mailing list as there is a Legato Networker list on http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html regards, Jan

1 0

F230 6.1.1R2 upgrade ?
by Frank Bonnet 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

Hi We have a F230 running Ontap 5.3.2 Should I safely upgrade it to 6.1.1R2 ? Thanks -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

Refurbish Filers
by Ali Maula Ali Mauli Ali DamDam 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

Hi guyz, I'm just wondering,is there any way to get refurbished filers.Becoz,we thinking of purchasing old filers e.g. f720,f740 for our own internal trainings. thx, rgds, tiger ===== "Forgiveness is the fragrance that the flower leaves on the heel of the one that crushed it."--->Ali Maula Ali Mauli Ali DamDam __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail! http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/

1 0

RE: Veritas Netbackup mailing list
by Traitel, Eyal 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

Enjoy those: <http://www.backupcentral.com/faqs.html> Eyal. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eyal Traitel CNA, MCSE, Solaris CA, Legato CA, SNIA FC SAN L2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- eTraitel - I'm the new eBuzzword around !!! ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Get answers NOW! - NetApp On the Web - http://now.netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Schepers, Jan [mailto:Jan.Schepers@atosorigin.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 11:15 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Veritas Netbackup mailing list Hello list, is there a Veritas Netbackup mailing list as there is a Legato Networker list on http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html regards, Jan

1 0

Veritas Netbackup mailing list
by Schepers, Jan 23 Jan '02

23 Jan '02

Hello list, is there a Veritas Netbackup mailing list as there is a Legato Networker list on http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html regards, Jan

1 0

2001 Excess IT Inventory at prices below Wholesale!
by sr＠r2rcentral.com 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

1 0

RE: ascii files convertion UNIX <--> windows ?
by Stout, Noelette 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

On the UNIX side, you can also use the dos2unix and unix2dos commands. I have also found Sun's StarOffice to be very useful for manipulating UNIX text files on Windows systems and vice versa. Noelette Stout Unix System Administrator IKON Office Solutions, Inc Digital Express tel. (770)326-4140 fax (770)326-4139 email: nstout(a)ikon.com -----Original Message----- From: Steve Losen [mailto:scl@sasha.acc.virginia.edu] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 8:28 AM To: Frank Bonnet Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: ascii files convertion UNIX <--> windows ? > Hi > > After success in accessing UNIX homedir from windows > ( thanks to all that respond ) I am facing a problem > with ascii file conversion > > An ascii file created under UNIX cannot be viewded > correctly under windows ( CR LF conversion ) is there an > option with Ontap to convert ascii files when opening > them under windows and vice-versa ? > > Thanks a lot. The filer does not do any data conversion that I am aware of. In our experience we have found that folks who use both Windows and Unix do not often manipulate the same file on both systems. Usually Windows files are only manipulated from Windows and Unix files only from Unix. However, we do recommend installing NoteTab Light on Windows and using that instead of standard Windows NotePad. NoteTab accepts all three text file line terminators: LF (unix) CRLF (dos) CR (Apple) and will generate output using any of these. So you can keep a file in its original format or convert it. http://www.notetab.com On the Unix side, Solaris has the "flip" command that converts a text file from LF to CRLF and vice versa. This utility may be available on other flavors of Unix, too. If you don't have flip, here is a trivial awk command to convert unix to dos by adding CR to each line: awk '{print $0 "\r"}' unixfile > dosfile Here is a trivial sed command to convert dos to unix by stripping the CR at the end of the line. sed 's/.$//' dosfile > unixfile On Linux, vi (vim) detects the line terminator style and preserves it. And you can also force dos line terminators with the vi command :set fileformat=dos or :set ff=dos To force unix use :set fileformat=unix or :set ff=unix Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

3 2

FW: Gigabit ethernet performance
by Hudson, Jim 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

Taking Sun/Solaris out of the equasion: My snapmirror between a F760 and F840 with gigabit interfaces is running at about 300Mb/s with MTU size 9000 and flowcontrol set to none. Without jumbo frames I was seeing throughput of about 200Mb/s. James S. Hudson UNIX Systems Administrator Pfizer Global Research and Development, La Jolla Laboratories 11095 Torreyana Road San Diego CA 92121 858.622.7665 -----Original Message----- From: Hsueh-Mei Tsai(May Tsai) [mailto:may-tsai@ti.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 11:38 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Gigabit ethernet performance Thanks for all the replies. Some background info: Sun client is a 420R running Solaris7, NetApp is F820 running 6.1.1R2. Both are PCI cards. I've checked the NOW sites and tried to change various Sun parameters with no significant differences. Local disk creation takes 35 secs(single drive) vs. NetApp's 7 data/1 parity volume, which produces ~30secs results. Direct tmpfs writes takes 8 secs. Aggregated results in 27.5 seconds, still not much better though. The NetApp support engineer I worked with mentioned it's back-to-back CP bottleneck, that's not on the network side, correct? Does that mean the Netapp F820 can't handle consistent huge data flows? As to Jumbo frame, I haven't tried it yet, the Gbit switch I use probably won't support it, well. Does it adds a lot to the performance? May

1 0

RE: Gigabit ethernet performance
by Link, Bill (OTS-EDH) 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

That's about what I see on an unloaded gbit interface from an ibm s7a to an 840, but it is still nearly twice as fast as the local ssa disks. Bill -----Original Message----- From: Hsueh-Mei Tsai(May Tsai) [mailto:may-tsai@ti.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:43 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Gigabit ethernet performance Does anybody knows what kind of performance I can expect from using the Gigabit ethernet on Solaris/NetApp? For example, if mkfile 1024m 1gbfile on a NFS mounted netapp volume thru the gbit interface, how many seconds of response time is considered to be reasonable? I'm getting about 30secs, while I'm hoping within 12secs, am I dreaming? Thanks, -May -- Notice: This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the individual or company to which it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged, confidential and prohibited from disclosure or unauthorized use under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, or copying of this e-mail or the information contained in this e-mail is strictly prohibited by the sender. If you have received this transmission in error, please return the material received to the sender and delete all copies from your system. Thank you.

2 1

Re: Gigabit ethernet performance
by MCope＠isisph.com 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

Check out the NOW site for information on improving the performance of Sun GigE cards. Are you NICs SBUS or PCI cards? My SBUS systems have less than stellar performance using SUN cards. All of my PCI bus systems use a third party card (Alteon) which is definately faster but being from a different vendor makes it hard to do a fair comparison.

1 0

Changing file ownership in NT
by Gifford, Josh 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

Hello everyone, Here's the story: Months ago I moved all my user directories to our filer. I wrote (or borrowed) a neat little script to change the permissions in each user directory using the cacls command. Of course, the files are still owned by the administrators group of the filer. The question of user quotas is now coming up and I know that at some point I'm going to need to change the ownership of each user directory so that I can enable these quotas. Is there a command line utility for changing the ownership of files (similar to chown in UNIX)? Best Regards, Josh J Gifford MCP NT Systems Engineer Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution 7000 Siemens Rd Wendell, NC 27591 Phone: (919) 365-2806; Fax: (919) 365-1080

3 2

Summary: Overland Data LXS jukebox and NetApp
by Darragh, Stephen J 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

I had a problem getting the LXS7115 library recognized by the filer. I had to go into the jukebox and set the defaults to COMPAQ instead of overland I then set the library id back to 6, and set it to scsi-2 instead of scsi3 (don't know if that was required). This fixed the problem. If I have to go back, I must use the front panel display to manually tell the jukebox that its not a compaq. Stephen Darragh

1 0

Re: Netapp alternatives
by ScottUCE＠aol.com 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

Hello, Art: NetApp's standard Software License Agreement permanently ties their software to both 1) the machine's serial number and 2) the end user. Thus, if the machine is ever sold, the new end user must purchase new software licenses from NetApp (very expensive!). However, some companies -- prior to purchase -- have negotiated agreements with NetApp that allow them to freely transfer the software user licenses on their purchased machines to a new end user. When Union Computer receives a purchase order for one of these used machines, we arrange for the original owner of the system to provide Network Appliance with information on the new end user: 1) company name and address, 2) where the machine is to be located, and 3) contact names and phone numbers. Network Appliance then processes the license transfers, free of charge. Our buyers usually confirm the transfer of the licenses with Network Appliance before we even ship the machine. We advise all buyers of new NetApp machines -- or any other computer hardware and software, for that matter -- to insist on transferable software licenses for the protection of their investments. All of us --- dealers, users and the manufacturer --- benefit greatly from an active secondary market. Regards, Scott Fischmann Union Computer Exchange, Inc. 6233 Idylwood Lane Minneapolis, MN 55436 Phone: 952 935 7282 FAX: 952 935 5056 scott(a)unioncomputer.com ************************************ In a message dated 1/21/2002 5:38:20 PM Central Standard Time, art(a)arzoon.com writes: > Scott -- please explain how some are transferable and some aren't? Do you > set this up before you buy the gear? Is it additional money? > > thanks > > art > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: ScottUCE(a)aol.com [mailto:ScottUCE@aol.com] >> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:05 AM >> To: SRoche(a)datalink.com; joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com; pdg(a)uow.edu.au; >> toasters(a)mathworks.com >> Subject: Re: Netapp alternatives >> >> >> There ARE used NetApp systems with "used software" that CAN be re-sold, >> and NetApp itself will process the license transfer, free of charge, to >> the new owner. We have sold many of them ourselves, and NetApp has always >> cooperated fully. >> >> Yes, it is true that many NetApp systems do not have transferable licenses >> -- but many do. >> >> Scott Fischmann >> Union Computer Exchange, Inc. >> 6233 Idylwood Lane >> Minneapolis, MN 55436 >> Phone: 952 935 7282 >> FAX: 952 935 5056 >> scott(a)unioncomputer.com >> >> *************************************************** >> >> In a message dated 1/21/2002 11:14:30 AM Central Standard Time, >> SRoche(a)datalink.com writes: >> >> >> >>> This was taken off of Netapps web page regarding transferring licences. >>> I think it speaks for itself as far a Netapps legal position. >>> >>> All Network Appliance software license terms and conditions specify a >>> "license to use," therefore software cannot legally transfer from one >>> owner to another. Anyone purchasing used hardware equipment must also >>> purchase new software licenses directly either from Network Appliance or >>> from an authorized Network Appliance reseller. Software includes all >>> protocols as well as streaming licenses, Snap products, and other >>> software. Anyone trying to sell you "used software" would be violating >>> the terms of the license. Support contracts such as warranty and >>> maintenance agreements are also non-transferable. >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: ScottUCE(a)aol.com [mailto:ScottUCE@aol.com] >>>> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 10:09 AM >>>> To: joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com; pdg(a)uow.edu.au; >>>> toasters(a)mathworks.com >>>> Subject: Re: Netapp alternatives >>>> >>>> >>>> In a message dated 1/18/2002 4:06:48 PM Central Standard Time, >>>> joe.luchtenberg(a)data-line.com writes: >>>> >>>> >>>> but if you're just looking >>>> to save a few $, then I would suggest considering stepping down to an >>>> F810 >>>> or even F87 before ruling out NetApp on price (I may be reading too much >>>> into your post here). >>>> >>> >>> Hello, Joe: >>> >>> You don't necessarily have to "step down" to an F810 or F87 -- let alone >>> abandon NetApp altogether for Sun or Procom or Compaq -- to save money. >>> >>> There are great buys on a limited number of used NetApp filers available >>> today -- F720s, F740s and F760s with transferable NFS, CIFS and even >>> CLUSTER licenses. As such, I don't believe there is any reason a NAS >>> user has to settle for a "non-NetApp" solution because of price. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Scott >>> >>> Scott Fischmann >>> Union Computer Exchange, Inc. >>> 6233 Idylwood Lane >>> Minneapolis, MN 55436 >>> Phone: 952 935 7282 >>> FAX: 952 935 5056 >>> scott(a)unioncomputer.com >> >

1 0

Virus Alert
by postmaster＠mathworks.com 22 Jan '02

22 Jan '02

The MathWorks' scanner detected a virus called "PE_NIMDA.E" from lois(a)deas.harvard.edu in your mail traffic on 01/21/2002 21:45:34. We quarantined it.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters