toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13515 discussions

RE: One more netbackup question...
by Breniser, Larry 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

The disadvantage (if you use CIFS) is tht the Windows security information is not backed up. LB -----Original Message----- From: Coder, James (STP) [mailto:James.Coder@guidant.com] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 2:48 PM To: 'Stephen Manley'; Surlow, Jim Cc: 'Alfred Lim'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: One more netbackup question... Another solution while waiting for netbackup and dar to come about- if you are using the filer in an nfs environment, you can nfs mount the directories / volumes. We've been doing this for the past 2 years and have good performance - we also run the backups over a separate backup lan running gig. The advantage is you don't have to dedicate the drives to the filer(s), you can break up the volumes to little more manageable sizes (use bpstart / bpend scripts - downside is you don't have the speed you get from ndmp. did some testing when we put our 760 into place 2 years ago and made the decision then to use nfs. also don't know if DAR will allow you to not dedicate drives to the filer(s). cheers - jc James C. Coder Sr. UNIX Administrator Guidant Corporation 4100 Hamline Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55112 Tel: 651-582-4797 Fax 651-582-4285 email: james.coder(a)guidant.com -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Manley [mailto:stephen@netapp.com] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:49 AM To: Surlow, Jim Cc: 'Alfred Lim'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: One more netbackup question... Most of what you say is correct, but Ontap 6.0 and greater supports DAR, due to NDMP allowing for cooperation between NDMP client and NDMP server. When you run the backup, the filer sends "file history" information to the NDMP client. This information allows the NDMP client (Legato, Veritas, WorkStation Solutions, ArcServe, etc) to create the index of files in the backup _and_ their location in the backup stream (byte offset). Meanwhile, the NDMP clients also track the amount of data written to each tape. So, when you do a DAR, the NDMP client tells the NDMP server (e.g. the filer) the list of files it wants restored and the offsets of those files. The filer and the NDMP client cooperate to load and position the tape to those offsets. At each offset, the filer will extract the data and restore the requested file. Which means: A) If you run an NDMP backup without file history (i.e. indexing) you can't run a direct access restore. B) To run a DAR, you need the functionality from the client and server. C) DAR is _possible_ using NDMP V2, V3, and V4 (all these versions support file history and the other commands necessary for DAR) D) Data Ontap 6.0 and greater supports DAR. Hopefully this helps, Stephen Manley Member of the NDMP version of the Osmond family On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Surlow, Jim wrote: > Even though Networker might support DAR, does OnTap? > > I did some research on this a while back (so my info may be dated), but my > understanding is this: > > The backup server initiates the NDMP command to the Filer (or other NDMP > device), the OS on that device then begins to send data to tape by using > means that it is aware of. In the case of OnTap, it uses the typical Unix > dump command. > > With dump/restore, there is no index created, thus, to recover, one has to > scan from the beginning of tape of the first tape in the dump set until the > data is found (on whatever tape). And the user waiting for the file will > likely hope that their file is closer to the first part of the first tape > rather than the last part of the last tape. > > Netbackup & Networker will have an index knowing which NDMP tape set that a > file is on, but I would guess that they would have no idea as to which tape > in the set it is - or where on that tape (set: being number of tapes for > that night's incremental, full, whatever). > > If I'm off base, please clarify. > > Thanks, > > Jim Surlow > CSG Systems > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alfred Lim [mailto:alfred@ptc.net] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:23 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... > > > Well one thing for Legato Networker, > it support NDMP V3 and have this DAR feature. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Jeff Kennedy" <jlkennedy(a)amcc.com> > To: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com > Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 08:56:46 -0800 > Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... > > > Get a new backup software? The problem is that some vendors do not > > support Direct Access Restore, meaning it will search through every tape > > starting at the first and scan the whole thing. If no DAR, you're > > basically bummed. > > > > Do you use snapshots? If you have the space it is a life-saver at > > times. > > > > ~JK > > > > Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote: > > > > > > I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home > > > directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have > > > several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file > > > from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It > > > appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there > > > anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this > > > process? > > > > > > thanks again > > > > > > Don > > > > -- > > ===================== > > Jeff Kennedy > > Unix Administrator > > AMCC > > jlkennedy(a)amcc.com > >

1 0

RE: Can I watch/check progress of reconstructs?
by Drew O'Donnell 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

sysconfig -r -----Original Message----- From: Ben Rockwood [mailto:BRockwood@homestead-inc.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:47 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Can I watch/check progress of reconstructs? Hello Toasters. I've got a volume that is reconstructing, but I would really like to be able to make estimate on it's time of completion. Generally just a "blah blocks out of blah done" works, since I can do the math to make a logical rough estimate as to the completion time. All I know to do for status during a reconstruct is to use vol status. Is there a better more verbose way that can be issued at will? I suppose you can just watch syslog too, but I'd prefer a command. Btw, I'm open to using a SNMP OID to get the info too, if I knew which IOD is was, and I don't recall any IODs that would tell me. Thanks! brockwood(a)homestead-inc.com

1 0

secureshare access 3.1 and cmdntapperm not getting perms
by neil lehrer 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

hi, has anyone ever seen secureshare access not be able to get permissions for a dir or file? it works thru a cifs drive mapping, but if i use it against a drive mapping created with sun's pc nfs client it comes back with: "Couldn't get permissions for file \\filer\...." or Z:\xxx\europe>cmdntapperm . ---------- 1 4096 04/08/2002 12:10 PM with cmdntapperm. perms are visible from a unix host that has the filer mounted. i suspect it is a problem with the sun client, but it's all we have so i wanted to know if anyone had similar problem. ontap 6.1r1, qtree is unix style. -- thanks.

1 0

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by pkeim(contr-ird) 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

We've had much success using robocopy version 1.95 available in the Windows 2000 Resource Kit. From the console of the source NT 4 or W2K server, map the Z:\ drive to the appropriate destination volume on the filer. To avoid fragmentation, move the data in two steps -- The /CREATE switch creates a directory tree structure containing zero-length files only. The second pass actually copies the data to the destination. The /SEC switch preserves NTFS permissions. Here's an example . . . PASS ONE robocopy "F:\folderA" "Z:\Accounting_TOP\folderA" /E /SEC /CREATE /R:3 /W:1 /V /LOG:folderA1.TXT PASS TWO robocopy "F:\folderA" "Z:\Accounting_TOP\folderA" /E /SEC /R:3 /W:1 /V /LOG:folderA2.TXT -----Original Message----- From: Wurster, Richard M DSTI [mailto:rick.wurster@SBCCOM.APGEA.ARMY.MIL] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:48 AM To: 'Kitch, David'; 'Pucky, Todd M.'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout Definitely Secure Copy (Small Wonders Software) does the job. We migrated a Tb of data successfully last weekend using the product. --Rick Wurster -----Original Message----- From: Kitch, David [ mailto:dkitch@ti.com <mailto:dkitch@ti.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:21 AM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout We haven't had much success copying permissions with ROBOCOPY, even on NT and Win2K. You might try a third party application like SECURECOPY. You might also compare your revision of OnTap to the bug list. Regards, David ----------------------------------------------------- David Kitch Strategic Development Team ITS Design Systems - Texas Instruments Dallas, TX 214-480-1242 dkitch(a)ti.com ----------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [ mailto:Puckyt@timken.com <mailto:Puckyt@timken.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:49 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be maintained. I then went back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything appeared to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Todd M. Pucky The Timken Company Global Information Systems Programmer/Analyst 330.471.4583 puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

6.2 ?
by Frank Bonnet 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

Hi I'm planning to upgrade our F85 to 6.2 we are running 6.1.1R2 for now. The filer is mostly used for NFS services but we are planning to progressively use also CIFS Do I have to expect "bad" surprises with 6.2 ? Does it carry significant progress for CIFS use ? Any infos welcome. Thanks a lot. -- Frank Bonnet

3 2

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by Wurster, Richard M DSTI 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

Definitely Secure Copy (Small Wonders Software) does the job. We migrated a Tb of data successfully last weekend using the product. --Rick Wurster -----Original Message----- From: Kitch, David [mailto:dkitch@ti.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 11:21 AM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout We haven't had much success copying permissions with ROBOCOPY, even on NT and Win2K. You might try a third party application like SECURECOPY. You might also compare your revision of OnTap to the bug list. Regards, David ----------------------------------------------------- David Kitch Strategic Development Team ITS Design Systems - Texas Instruments Dallas, TX 214-480-1242 dkitch(a)ti.com ----------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:49 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be maintained. I then went back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything appeared to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Todd M. Pucky The Timken Company Global Information Systems Programmer/Analyst 330.471.4583 puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

Firmware via TFTP?
by Brian Long 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

Hello, I've searched the mailing list archives for similar threads and never saw a fix. Has anyone gotten a F700-series filer to load the firmware from a TFTP server? I understand the F800-series machines can be coerced into loading firmware via TFTP (although this is unsupported by Netapp). I'm interested in doing this for remote filers instead of inserting a diskette for firmware updates. Any info would be appreciated. /Brian/ -- Brian Long | | | Engineering Computer Services | .|||. .|||. Sr. Unix System Administrator | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s

1 0

RE: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by Kitch, David 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

We haven't had much success copying permissions with ROBOCOPY, even on NT and Win2K. You might try a third party application like SECURECOPY. You might also compare your revision of OnTap to the bug list. Regards, David ----------------------------------------------------- David Kitch Strategic Development Team ITS Design Systems - Texas Instruments Dallas, TX 214-480-1242 dkitch(a)ti.com ----------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 9:49 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: NT file permissions lost on shares after logout I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be maintained. I then went back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything appeared to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Todd M. Pucky The Timken Company Global Information Systems Programmer/Analyst 330.471.4583 puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

Exhange 5.5 - 2k
by Peter Gauthier 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

To All Toasters I'm trying to upgrade our exchange 5.5 to e2k. The problem seems to be the NetAppDrive. E2k upgrade is not able to detect the Netapp exchange drives and fails. Is there anybody who has completed a successful upgrade? I could use some help. Regards Peter

1 0

NT file permissions lost on shares after logout
by Pucky, Todd M. 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

I am a rookie on NetApp filers so this may be an easy one for some. I have an F840 filer with mapped NT 4 drives. I used ROBOCOPY.EXE to copy the data to the NetApp box so that file permissions would be maintained. I then went back to my NT box and mapped a drive to the NetApp box. Everything appeared to be fine. I then logged out of the NT box and logged in under a new user ID and all of the NT file permissions were lost. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to maintain these permissions when admins log out. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. Todd M. Pucky The Timken Company Global Information Systems Programmer/Analyst 330.471.4583 puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: 6.2 ?
by Wurster, Richard M DSTI 09 Apr '02

09 Apr '02

We just did a conversion on two f760s (clustered), this weekend, adding a ds-14 shelf full of 72G drives while we were at it, as well as reconfiguring existing shelves and volumes. So far it works (for us) as advertised, including larger volume size. The only big surprise? The new volumes we created were initially reported as FAT!!!! My coworkers may have more to add. --Rick Wurster -----Original Message----- From: Frank Bonnet [mailto:bonnetf@bart.esiee.fr] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 4:37 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: 6.2 ? Hi I'm planning to upgrade our F85 to 6.2 we are running 6.1.1R2 for now. The filer is mostly used for NFS services but we are planning to progressively use also CIFS Do I have to expect "bad" surprises with 6.2 ? Does it carry significant progress for CIFS use ? Any infos welcome. Thanks a lot. -- Frank Bonnet

1 0

RE: One more netbackup question...
by Coder, James (STP) 08 Apr '02

08 Apr '02

Another solution while waiting for netbackup and dar to come about- if you are using the filer in an nfs environment, you can nfs mount the directories / volumes. We've been doing this for the past 2 years and have good performance - we also run the backups over a separate backup lan running gig. The advantage is you don't have to dedicate the drives to the filer(s), you can break up the volumes to little more manageable sizes (use bpstart / bpend scripts - downside is you don't have the speed you get from ndmp. did some testing when we put our 760 into place 2 years ago and made the decision then to use nfs. also don't know if DAR will allow you to not dedicate drives to the filer(s). cheers - jc James C. Coder Sr. UNIX Administrator Guidant Corporation 4100 Hamline Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55112 Tel: 651-582-4797 Fax 651-582-4285 email: james.coder(a)guidant.com -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Manley [mailto:stephen@netapp.com] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 5:49 AM To: Surlow, Jim Cc: 'Alfred Lim'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: One more netbackup question... Most of what you say is correct, but Ontap 6.0 and greater supports DAR, due to NDMP allowing for cooperation between NDMP client and NDMP server. When you run the backup, the filer sends "file history" information to the NDMP client. This information allows the NDMP client (Legato, Veritas, WorkStation Solutions, ArcServe, etc) to create the index of files in the backup _and_ their location in the backup stream (byte offset). Meanwhile, the NDMP clients also track the amount of data written to each tape. So, when you do a DAR, the NDMP client tells the NDMP server (e.g. the filer) the list of files it wants restored and the offsets of those files. The filer and the NDMP client cooperate to load and position the tape to those offsets. At each offset, the filer will extract the data and restore the requested file. Which means: A) If you run an NDMP backup without file history (i.e. indexing) you can't run a direct access restore. B) To run a DAR, you need the functionality from the client and server. C) DAR is _possible_ using NDMP V2, V3, and V4 (all these versions support file history and the other commands necessary for DAR) D) Data Ontap 6.0 and greater supports DAR. Hopefully this helps, Stephen Manley Member of the NDMP version of the Osmond family On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Surlow, Jim wrote: > Even though Networker might support DAR, does OnTap? > > I did some research on this a while back (so my info may be dated), but my > understanding is this: > > The backup server initiates the NDMP command to the Filer (or other NDMP > device), the OS on that device then begins to send data to tape by using > means that it is aware of. In the case of OnTap, it uses the typical Unix > dump command. > > With dump/restore, there is no index created, thus, to recover, one has to > scan from the beginning of tape of the first tape in the dump set until the > data is found (on whatever tape). And the user waiting for the file will > likely hope that their file is closer to the first part of the first tape > rather than the last part of the last tape. > > Netbackup & Networker will have an index knowing which NDMP tape set that a > file is on, but I would guess that they would have no idea as to which tape > in the set it is - or where on that tape (set: being number of tapes for > that night's incremental, full, whatever). > > If I'm off base, please clarify. > > Thanks, > > Jim Surlow > CSG Systems > > -----Original Message----- > From: Alfred Lim [mailto:alfred@ptc.net] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:23 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... > > > Well one thing for Legato Networker, > it support NDMP V3 and have this DAR feature. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "Jeff Kennedy" <jlkennedy(a)amcc.com> > To: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com > Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 08:56:46 -0800 > Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... > > > Get a new backup software? The problem is that some vendors do not > > support Direct Access Restore, meaning it will search through every tape > > starting at the first and scan the whole thing. If no DAR, you're > > basically bummed. > > > > Do you use snapshots? If you have the space it is a life-saver at > > times. > > > > ~JK > > > > Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote: > > > > > > I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home > > > directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have > > > several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file > > > from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It > > > appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there > > > anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this > > > process? > > > > > > thanks again > > > > > > Don > > > > -- > > ===================== > > Jeff Kennedy > > Unix Administrator > > AMCC > > jlkennedy(a)amcc.com > >

1 0

Using Cricket to Monitor Filers
by Ben Rockwood 08 Apr '02

08 Apr '02

Hello Toasterites, I've been playing (fighting with) Cricket on and off for awhile now. It strikes me as a tool that could be alot of help *if* you understand how it thinks. This is were I fall short. I've never gotten Cricket to work like it ought to, and it seems, IMHO, to be a poorly documented app. Most instructures and howto's simply tell you to "edit file blah and your done!". This just isn't enough juice for me. So, has anyone documented the setup of Cricket for the express purposes of monitoring various aspects of filers? The only "docs" I've found specific to filers were the comments in the netapp module for Cricket, which isn't much help. A complete "Howto Setup Cricket for NetApp Filers" would be really really helpful. It looks really easy, but I just can't seem to get my fingers around it. Any help/ideas? brockwood(a)homstead-inc.com

1 0

Japanese Language Support
by Chuah, Nicholas 08 Apr '02

08 Apr '02

Hi, I have been requested to provide storage from the filer to a department running Japanese environment (Caelum application on HP-UX Japanese Locale). As far as I know, I need to create a separate volume and set the vol lang to ja. Is there anything else I need to be aware of before I go ahead? Your comments and experience would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Nic

1 0

Offer to sell footwear stock --- coming from one of the biggest shoe-making bases
by Offer to sell footwear stock 06 Apr '02

06 Apr '02

Offer to sell footwear stock --- coming from one of the biggest shoe-making bases Kinds of different shoes: ¡ñPU INJECTION SHOES¡ñFASHION SHOES¡ñSOLES¡ñFLYING SHOES¡ñCANVAS VACANIZED SHOES¡ñINDOOR SHOES¡ñMOUNTAIN SHOES¡ñANTHLIC SHOES¡ñSAFETY SHOES¡ñWOOD FASHION SHOES¡ñJOGGING SHOES¡óSLIPPERS¡óSOCCER SHOES¡óPVC INJECTION SHOES¡ñBRAND SHOES¡óBOOTS¡ñMOCCASIN¡ñLEISURE SHOES¡ñBABY SHOES¡óSANDALS¡ñSPORTING SHOES¡ñWORK SHOES¡ñMOLDED SHOES Offer very favorable : U. Price US$0.50 ~~ US$15.00 Quantity 200 ~~ 8,000 PRS Should you are shoes importers, welcome to contact us to get clear pictures & more details! ¹©¿âŽæÐ¬--------¹©ž÷ÖÖ¿âŽæÐ¬£ºÀŽ×ÔÖÆÐ¬»ùµØµÄ¿âŽæÐ¬ Æ·ÖÖÆëÈ«£º¡óPU×¢ËÜÐ¬ ¡óÊ±×°Ð¬ ¡óÐ¬µ× ¡ó·ÉÐÐÐ¬ ¡ó²ŒœºÐ¬ ¡óÊÒÄÚÐ¬ ¡óµÇÉœÐ¬¡óÌåÓýÓÃÐ¬¡óÀÍ±£ÓÃÐ¬¡óÄŸÖÆ¹€ÒÕÐ¬¡óÂýÅÜÐ¬¡óÍÏÐ¬¡ó×ãÇòÐ¬ ¡óPVC ×¢ËÜÐ¬ ¡óÃûÅÆÐ¬¡óÑ¥×Ó¡ó°ü×ÓÐ¬¡óÐÝÏÐÐ¬¡óÓ€¶ùÐ¬¡óÁ¹Ð¬¡óÔË¶¯Ð¬¡ó¹€×÷Ð¬¡ó³ÉÐÍÐ¬¡£ ŒÛžñµÍ£ºŒÛžñŽÓUSD0¡£50~~USD15£¬ ÊýÁ¿ŽÓ200Ë«~~~8000Ë«²»µÈ¡£ »¶Ó¶Ô¿âŽæÐ¬žÐÐËÈ€µÄÅóÓÑºÍÎÒÃÇÁªÏµÒÔ»ñµÃžüÏêÏžµÄ×ÊÁÏ£¡ Fujian Shengyi Shoes Co., Ltd. Add.: Gaoxia Industry Avenue, Qingyang Town, Jinjiang City, Fujian Province, China Tel: 86 595 5626511 / 5626512 Fax: 86 595 5626513 E-mail: r-start(a)163.com Contact person: Ms. Sally (ENGLISH SPEAKER) MR.MIKE (CHINESE SPEAKER)

1 0

Can someone tell me how to unsubscribe to this email? I am inund ated.
by Tim McGraw 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

Tim McGraw email:timm@computech.com 1-800-882-0201 ext. 1133 Local: 425-820-6500 Fax: 425-820-6565 COMPUTECH SYSTEMS CORPORATION Worldwide IT solutions provider since 1985. Featuring Sun, HP, Cisco and Compaq. A veteran owned, small business. 11421 NE 120th Street Kirkland, WA, USA 98034 Fax: +1-425-820-6565 - http://www.computech.com To be removed from any further messages, reply to this e-mail with a subject line of "remove".

2 1

Remove
by Tim McGraw 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

1 0

Question on gig slot assignments and fiber card assignments
by Art Hebert 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

I have a netapp f760 clustered running 6.01R3 with the following slot assignments: slot 9 nvram slot 8 cluster interconnect slot 7 redundant fiber loop slot 6 intel fiber gig card slot 5 intel 100mb card slot 4 primary fiber loop One 7 x 18gb fiber shelf, one volume. I can't seem to get more than 10MB througput a little worse than on the 100mb card. The cpu numbers drop but so far the gig card isn't a big win. I've tested from a sun 420 with a syskonnect fiber gig card in the fast pci slot. I've played with about every combo of negotiation, etc. Tested with a cisco 6408 gig card in a cisco 6509 switch and also tested card to card with just a fiber cable. Here is sysstat: time dd if=/dev/zero of=./100m.1 count=100000 bs=1024 2% 0 0 0 0 0 32 16 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 32 16 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 88% 1620 0 0 13874 327 496 260 0 0 38 87% 1216 0 0 10429 246 1016 10288 0 0 38 84% 983 0 0 8490 199 741 14470 0 0 38 77% 955 0 0 8190 193 668 13712 0 0 38 73% 956 0 0 8198 193 1121 8725 0 0 38 73% 955 0 0 8190 193 1380 10912 0 0 38 77% 956 0 0 8198 193 1586 10282 0 0 38 81% 1123 0 0 9570 227 488 9646 0 0 38 83% 1133 0 0 9718 229 1049 9810 0 0 38 85% 1224 0 0 10499 247 384 9954 0 0 38 CPU NFS CIFS HTTP Net kB/s Disk kB/s Tape kB/s Cache in out read write read write age 75% 855 0 0 7331 173 1522 12376 0 0 38 74% 534 0 0 4571 108 4268 13680 0 0 38 7% 0 0 0 0 0 116 3844 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 32 16 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 2% 0 0 0 0 0 32 16 0 0 38 Questions: 1) is it better to have the primary loop in slot 8 and move the cluster interconnect? 2) how is everybody elses netapps laid out? 3) do i need more disk to get better performance?

2 1

RE: One more netbackup question...
by Surlow, Jim 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

Even though Networker might support DAR, does OnTap? I did some research on this a while back (so my info may be dated), but my understanding is this: The backup server initiates the NDMP command to the Filer (or other NDMP device), the OS on that device then begins to send data to tape by using means that it is aware of. In the case of OnTap, it uses the typical Unix dump command. With dump/restore, there is no index created, thus, to recover, one has to scan from the beginning of tape of the first tape in the dump set until the data is found (on whatever tape). And the user waiting for the file will likely hope that their file is closer to the first part of the first tape rather than the last part of the last tape. Netbackup & Networker will have an index knowing which NDMP tape set that a file is on, but I would guess that they would have no idea as to which tape in the set it is - or where on that tape (set: being number of tapes for that night's incremental, full, whatever). If I'm off base, please clarify. Thanks, Jim Surlow CSG Systems -----Original Message----- From: Alfred Lim [mailto:alfred@ptc.net] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:23 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... Well one thing for Legato Networker, it support NDMP V3 and have this DAR feature. -----Original Message----- From: "Jeff Kennedy" <jlkennedy(a)amcc.com> To: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 08:56:46 -0800 Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... > Get a new backup software? The problem is that some vendors do not > support Direct Access Restore, meaning it will search through every tape > starting at the first and scan the whole thing. If no DAR, you're > basically bummed. > > Do you use snapshots? If you have the space it is a life-saver at > times. > > ~JK > > Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote: > > > > I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home > > directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have > > several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file > > from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It > > appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there > > anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this > > process? > > > > thanks again > > > > Don > > -- > ===================== > Jeff Kennedy > Unix Administrator > AMCC > jlkennedy(a)amcc.com

3 2

RE: Backing up to netapp controlled drivers...
by Penelope Carr 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

You cannot uses Netbackup to backup other systems when the drives are directly attached to the NetApp Filer. You can only backup NetApp servers with it period with Netbackup 3.4. I am not sure if it is planned for 4.5 or 5.0 release to change this. Also Netbackup and Legato do not play well together when sharing tape devices. It sounds as though you have some drives specifically set for Legato but are trying to use them with Netbackup too??. Netbackup wants control of the drives and will not be able to know when Legato is done using the drives and vice versa with Legato not knowing about Netbackup. Penelope Penelope Carr Veritas Software RTSE. Enterprise Support Services (cell) 914-439-4911 (ofc) 914-934-2404 (fax) 914-934-2685 -----Original Message----- From: Toal, Dave [mailto:dave.toal@t-t.com] Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 6:26 PM To: MCope(a)isisph.com Cc: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Backing up to netapp controlled drivers... Michael, Ok, I didn't think of that, thanks. Seems like no matter how long I wait when unloading manually, it still fails, time to open another case with veritas I suppose. Amusement factor of the debug goes up as number-of-products-involved squared. MCope(a)isisph.com wrote: > > Concerning the failure to unload tapes on a DLT7000. I have a number of DLT7000 and DLT8000 libraries connected to Filers. I use Legato Networker and it requires setting high timeouts for eject sleep, unload sleep, mount sleep, etc., to work properly. The total for timeouts can be up to 5 minutes > > Michael > > "Toal, Dave" <dave.toal(a)t-t.com> UIRED class CDATA #FIXED "0" number CDATA #FIXED "1"> <!ELEMENT security EMPTY> Kennedy Informational [Page 9] > Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > om*§h > 04/03/02 01:17 PM > > Don, > > Netbackup 3.4 on solaris says not. > > 04/03/2002 16:14:17 netback dtoal1 backup of client dtoal1 exited with status 154 (storage > unit characteristics mismatched to request) > > Speaking of netapp backups with netbackup, > I've been trying to figure out why a dlt7000 fails > to unload a tape, occasionally. Anyone else seen > this? No symptoms, no errors logged, but the next > backup of the netapp fails because "storage unit is > unavailable". > > Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote: > > > > With netbackup, is it possible to backup a unix system (eg: solaris) to a tape device which is direct connected to the netapp? > > > > What I'm trying to do is to connect a DLT7000 to a netapp F740. Using netbackup I want to backup the netapp but also backup sun machines that reside elsewhere on the network. > > > > Thanks in advance for any tips. > > > > don

1 0

"Semaphore timeout period" error on Win2K server connecting to CI FS filer
by Adrian Phillips 05 Apr '02

05 Apr '02

Hello; Am experiencing this strange, intermittent problem from one of our Windows 2000 (SP2) servers that has adapter teaming on it (2 x 10/100MB NICs) where when trying to access a F760 CIFS filer (ONTAP 6.1R1P1D9). It will time out when trying to access the filer by NetBIOS name (i.e. Start/Run... \\<filername>) or IP Address and when trying to map a drive to it via a command prompt the error message "System Error 121 Occurred. The semaphore timeout period has expired.". Trying to access by IP address of the filer also times out (so it isn't WINS - one of my favorite things to whip - that would be the culprit...), though the filer responds to pings. Access to all other NT 4.0 and Win2K servers is unaffected, and runs quickly. After a period of about 5 minutes or so, the slowness goes away and things return to normal for a few weeks or a month when accessing the filer. I've scowered the Microsoft and NOW site to little avail, but did find some similarities in some newsgroups about others having problems with a Win2K server with adapter teaming, with the slight difference that they were having trouble accessing a Samba share. It may be that there is an IRQ conflict on the Win2K server, which I am verifying with the vendor (HP). That's about all I have to go on at the moment, unfortunately. Please let me know if this is familiar to anyone. Thanks for your time. Cheers, -Adrian Phillips PMC-Sierra, Inc.

1 0

Re: Backing up to netapp controlled drivers...
by MCope＠isisph.com 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

Concerning the failure to unload tapes on a DLT7000. I have a number of DLT7000 and DLT8000 libraries connected to Filers. I use Legato Networker and it requires setting high timeouts for eject sleep, unload sleep, mount sleep, etc., to work properly. The total for timeouts can be up to 5 minutes Michael "Toal, Dave" <dave.toal(a)t-t.com> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 04/03/02 01:17 PM To: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Backing up to netapp controlled drivers... Don, Netbackup 3.4 on solaris says not. 04/03/2002 16:14:17 netback dtoal1 backup of client dtoal1 exited with status 154 (storage unit characteristics mismatched to request) Speaking of netapp backups with netbackup, I've been trying to figure out why a dlt7000 fails to unload a tape, occasionally. Anyone else seen this? No symptoms, no errors logged, but the next backup of the netapp fails because "storage unit is unavailable". Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote: > > With netbackup, is it possible to backup a unix system (eg: solaris) to a tape device which is direct connected to the netapp? > > What I'm trying to do is to connect a DLT7000 to a netapp F740. Using netbackup I want to backup the netapp but also backup sun machines that reside elsewhere on the network. > > Thanks in advance for any tips. > > don

2 1

Re: One more netbackup question...
by Don.Hickey＠alcatel.com 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

Thanks for all the feedback. It looks like I either need to switch software or wait for veritas to implement DAR. A quick look shows that almost every other NDMP player already has it. I have 300gb volumes and several hundred users on each volume.... it takes many hours to find a 500k word document :-( . Snapshots reduce the requirement to go to tape to a minimum but I've had to do it a couple of times over the last week or two. Thanks again, Don Don HICKEY/CA/ALCATEL@ALCATEL Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 2002-04-04 11:24 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com cc: Subject: One more netbackup question... I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this process? thanks again Don

1 0

Re: One more netbackup question...
by Steve Kappel 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

DAR does not require V3+. NetBackup 4.5, shipping this month, supports NDMP V2, V3, V4. Support for DAR is coming. >X-SMTP-TO: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> >Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2002 01:23:07 +0800 >From: "Alfred Lim" <alfred(a)ptc.net> >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... >X-Return-Path: alfred(a)ptc.net >X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > >Well one thing for Legato Networker, >it support NDMP V3 and have this DAR feature. > > >-----Original Message----- >From: "Jeff Kennedy" <jlkennedy(a)amcc.com> >To: Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com >Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 08:56:46 -0800 >Subject: Re: One more netbackup question... > >> Get a new backup software? The problem is that some vendors do not >> support Direct Access Restore, meaning it will search through every tape >> starting at the first and scan the whole thing. If no DAR, you're >> basically bummed. >> >> Do you use snapshots? If you have the space it is a life-saver at >> times. >> >> ~JK >> >> Don.Hickey(a)alcatel.com wrote: >> > >> > I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home >> > directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have >> > several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file >> > from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It >> > appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there >> > anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this >> > process? >> > >> > thanks again >> > >> > Don >> >> -- >> ===================== >> Jeff Kennedy >> Unix Administrator >> AMCC >> jlkennedy(a)amcc.com __________________________________________________________________________ Steve Kappel steve.kappel(a)veritas.com VERITAS Software (Engineering) steve(a)stevekappel.com (Personal)

1 0

One more netbackup question...
by Don.Hickey＠alcatel.com 04 Apr '02

04 Apr '02

I find restoring from a tape extraordinarly slowwwww. I have home directories on a clustered pair of F840 running 6.1.1r2. I have several volumes at about 300gb usable. When I need to restore a file from a users directory it can take up to 6+ hours (DLT 8000). It appears most of the time is taken searching for the files... is there anything you can suggest (including any white papers) to speed up this process? thanks again Don

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters