toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

Lotus Notes DB on the Netapp and Hot Backups?
by Mike Ball 31 Jul '02

31 Jul '02

Has anyone been able to do hot backups of a Lotus Notes database residing on the Netapp via Netbackup Lotus Notes backup agent? If so was there any special configuration which needed to be done to get it to work. I have been told it can not be done and that the DB must be backed up cold if it resides on the Netapp. Thank you, Mike

2 1

Group quotas on shares
by Pucky, Todd M. 31 Jul '02

31 Jul '02

Does anyone have experience using group quotas on NT shares? Do I have to include the group name in the /etc/group file? If so, how is this done? Currently I have a local group of 20 users who have permission to access a share. I want to place a 500MB quota on this share without using an individual line in the /etc/quotas file for each user. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Todd Pucky The Timken Company Global Information Systems Programmer/Analyst Phone: 330.471.4583 E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

3 2

Multi mode trunk on different switch
by BK LIM 28 Jul '02

28 Jul '02

Hi Everyone, Have anyone ever tried to configure multi mode vif on two different cisco switch using Ontap 6.2? Instead of one passive, one active trunk, is there a way to configure the vif to have a load balancing on different switch? Cheer, BK _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx

1 0

question on exportfs on ONTAP
by Tobaei, Bob 25 Jul '02

25 Jul '02

HI: Is there a way to split the entry line in /etc/exportfs om netapp filer? The client is getting panic errors because the exportfs entry is too big! Thanks Bob

3 2

RE: Unrecognized NVRAM signature...
by Timothy Naple 25 Jul '02

25 Jul '02

Chris, This is a common error on the F760 motherboards. This error means that the NVRAM of your onboard FC controller is bad. If you are using a PCI card at this point, you can ignore the error. We always fix these errors by replacing the motherboard, but you really don't have to if you aren't using the onboard FC controller. Hope this helps, Timothy Naple tnaple(a)berkcom.com 510-644-1599 VOICE 510-644-1598 FAX 888-812-9040 TOLL-FREE Berkeley Communications Corporation 2990 San Pablo Avenue Berkeley, CA 94702 http://www.berkcom.com -----Original Message----- From: Chris Miles [mailto:chris@psychofx.com] Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 7:33 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Unrecognized NVRAM signature... One of my F760 filers spits this out on bootup: Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 GMT [ispfc_init_0:error]: Unrecognized NVRAM signature on Fibre Channel adapter 0a. Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 GMT [ispfc_init_0:error]: Invalid WWN of Fibre Channel adapter 0a. Assigning temporary default 0:000:0a0000:081c0e. Although everything still works fine. Should I worry? Regards, CM -- Chris Miles chris(a)psychofx.com http://www.psychofx.com/chris/

1 0

rampant disk failure
by Geoff Hardin 25 Jul '02

25 Jul '02

I have recently seen surge in the number of disk failures on an F760 cluster in our datacenter. We have four F760's purchased a few months apart; one cluster has seen 12 disks fail in the past three months while the other cluster has seen two disks fail (I can only actually remember one, but I'm allowing for my failing memory as well). The clusters sit only a few feet apart so I am discounting environmental problems. Both clusters are running NetApp Release 6.1R1P1. The "bad" cluster is using mostly Seagate ST318203FC 18 GB disks, while the "good" cluster is mostly the Seagate ST118202FC drives (the infamous spin-up problem disks). The good cluster is unbalanced; one head has 52 disks and the other has 32. The bad cluster is evenly balanced (or it was before we started losing disks en masse) with 42 on each side. Both clusters are running disk firmware NA10 for the ST318203FC disks (I know, I just discovered that it's one rev out of date) and NA27 for the ST118202FC disks. The strangest part of this whole situation is that the disks rarely fail; they disappear and the partner complains that there is a cluster mismatch, breaks clustering, and sends out an email. The filer with the missing disk starts to rebuild (if it was a data disk) or merrily goes on its way (if it was a spare), but nothing ever shows up as broken. The disk just disappears. Short of going through and replacing every piece of hardware in the "bad" filers, I am at a loss of how to proceed. I've spent the morning searching NOW without luck. [Someone just pointed out to me that we have a few X221_ST318304FC disks with NA06 firmware in several of our filers, not just the good and bad clusters I've been describing, opening us up to bug 27068 (we're trying to schedule downtime to upgrade the firmware on all our filers now).] I am going to try upgrading the disk firmware on the filers as a first step, but if anyone else has seen this problem, or something similar, I would appreciate any input. Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com If it's glowing, don't eat it...

2 1

Unrecognized NVRAM signature...
by Chris Miles 25 Jul '02

25 Jul '02

One of my F760 filers spits this out on bootup: Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 GMT [ispfc_init_0:error]: Unrecognized NVRAM signature on Fibre Channel adapter 0a. Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 GMT [ispfc_init_0:error]: Invalid WWN of Fibre Channel adapter 0a. Assigning temporary default 0:000:0a0000:081c0e. Although everything still works fine. Should I worry? Regards, CM -- Chris Miles chris(a)psychofx.com http://www.psychofx.com/chris/

1 0

disable boot menu
by Chris Miles 25 Jul '02

25 Jul '02

One of my F760s pauses at the boot menu (1-5 prompt, usually accessed by CTRL-C I believe) every time it reboots, which is rather annoying as I have to hit 1 to continue the boot. How can I disable this? Cheers, CM -- Chris Miles chris(a)psychofx.com http://www.psychofx.com/chris/

4 4

RE: moving files between filers
by Chan, Paul 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

For more information on how to go about doing it using ndmp see: http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs2471 Paul Chan NOW KB team -----Original Message----- From: Igor Schein [mailto:igor@txc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 9:56 AM To: Caven, Marilyn Cc: 'Geoff Hardin'; toasters Subject: Re: moving files between filers On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 08:19:40AM -0700, Caven, Marilyn wrote: > If the development data is on a separate volume from the production data you > can do a volcopy which works quite well. There is an option to turn up the > throttle of the volcopy to 10 (max) on source filer. The destination volume > must be offline when the data is being copied and it will write over > anything on the destination volume. > > If the dev and prod data is on the same volume, I've always used tar and > directed the output to a nfs mounted filesystem from another filer. If, like in my situation, you need to constantly move data between 2 production filers over GB pipe, ndmpcopy is a clear winner speed-wise. Igor

1 0

RE: moving files between filers
by Caven, Marilyn 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

If the development data is on a separate volume from the production data you can do a volcopy which works quite well. There is an option to turn up the throttle of the volcopy to 10 (max) on source filer. The destination volume must be offline when the data is being copied and it will write over anything on the destination volume. If the dev and prod data is on the same volume, I've always used tar and directed the output to a nfs mounted filesystem from another filer. Marilyn Next Level Communications -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Hardin [mailto:geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:35 AM To: toasters Subject: moving files between filers What is the preferred method of moving directories between filers? I was wondering what method the toaster community in general preferred. In the past I have used tar from my UNIX admin host, rsync, dump/restore, ndmpcopy, and cp. I have about given up on ndmpcopy because even across GbE, I see better thruput using tar or dump/restore. A couple of the admins I've spoken to swear by rsync, but I have only used it sparingly. I have a clustered pair of F760s, one filer for a production database and the second for a development database. Originally, both the production and development work was on the first filer, but space for production work began to run low. We are now moving development data off the production filer onto the development filer and we want to minimize the impact to the production filer while moving the data in a timely manner to the development system. The filers are on the same backup GbE LAN, so the network connection between the two is stable and fast. Any thoughts, opinions, or war stories greatly appreciated. Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com Difficulty is the excuse history never accepts.

2 1

RE: moving files between filers
by Flaherty, Michael 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

volcopy does work well, the destination volume blocks are copied identically to the source volume. One benefit of using ndmpcopy is that the data is written contiguously which will eliminate any fragmentation. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Caven, Marilyn [mailto:mcaven@nlc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 8:20 AM To: 'Geoff Hardin'; toasters Subject: RE: moving files between filers If the development data is on a separate volume from the production data you can do a volcopy which works quite well. There is an option to turn up the throttle of the volcopy to 10 (max) on source filer. The destination volume must be offline when the data is being copied and it will write over anything on the destination volume. If the dev and prod data is on the same volume, I've always used tar and directed the output to a nfs mounted filesystem from another filer. Marilyn Next Level Communications -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Hardin [mailto:geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 7:35 AM To: toasters Subject: moving files between filers What is the preferred method of moving directories between filers? I was wondering what method the toaster community in general preferred. In the past I have used tar from my UNIX admin host, rsync, dump/restore, ndmpcopy, and cp. I have about given up on ndmpcopy because even across GbE, I see better thruput using tar or dump/restore. A couple of the admins I've spoken to swear by rsync, but I have only used it sparingly. I have a clustered pair of F760s, one filer for a production database and the second for a development database. Originally, both the production and development work was on the first filer, but space for production work began to run low. We are now moving development data off the production filer onto the development filer and we want to minimize the impact to the production filer while moving the data in a timely manner to the development system. The filers are on the same backup GbE LAN, so the network connection between the two is stable and fast. Any thoughts, opinions, or war stories greatly appreciated. Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com Difficulty is the excuse history never accepts.

1 0

moving files between filers
by Geoff Hardin 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

What is the preferred method of moving directories between filers? I was wondering what method the toaster community in general preferred. In the past I have used tar from my UNIX admin host, rsync, dump/restore, ndmpcopy, and cp. I have about given up on ndmpcopy because even across GbE, I see better thruput using tar or dump/restore. A couple of the admins I've spoken to swear by rsync, but I have only used it sparingly. I have a clustered pair of F760s, one filer for a production database and the second for a development database. Originally, both the production and development work was on the first filer, but space for production work began to run low. We are now moving development data off the production filer onto the development filer and we want to minimize the impact to the production filer while moving the data in a timely manner to the development system. The filers are on the same backup GbE LAN, so the network connection between the two is stable and fast. Any thoughts, opinions, or war stories greatly appreciated. Geoff Hardin geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com Difficulty is the excuse history never accepts.

1 0

Anybody using a F740 for clearcase vobs
by Kumar, Rahul 24 Jul '02

24 Jul '02

Hi all, Is anybody using a toater for clearcase 4.2. Why I am putting it here is because I need to the real life scenarios of it implementation. If anybody could help me that'll be really great. I have gone though the netapp site wherein they mention about the same. Rahul Rahul Kumar Infrastructure Analyst Rahul.Kumar(a)eds.com 91-20-2930812 -----Original Message----- From: Chris Miles [mailto:chris@psychofx.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 11:07 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: disable boot menu One of my F760s pauses at the boot menu (1-5 prompt, usually accessed by CTRL-C I believe) every time it reboots, which is rather annoying as I have to hit 1 to continue the boot. How can I disable this? Cheers, CM -- Chris Miles chris(a)psychofx.com http://www.psychofx.com/chris/

2 1

RE: disable boot menu
by Kiernan, Michael 23 Jul '02

23 Jul '02

Great minds think alike ;). This is an RFE internally 75510 for reading and writing OBP vars from the running OS. I've added your comments to the bug to add some momentum to it. Regards, Mike Kiernan -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2002 9:23 PM To: scl(a)sasha.acc.virginia.edu Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: disable boot menu scl(a)sasha.acc.virginia.edu (Steve Losen) writes: > > > One of my F760s pauses at the boot menu (1-5 prompt, usually accessed by > > CTRL-C I believe) every time it reboots, which is rather annoying as I > > have to hit 1 to continue the boot. > > > > How can I disable this? > > Shut down to the OK prompt and type this > > printenv floppy-boot? > > If it is set to "true", then that is your problem. > Set it to false like this: > > setenv floppy-boot? false This reminds me to ask a question that's been at the back of my mind for a while: is there any way of interrogating the filer boot prom settings *without* shutting down first? I am thinking of something like the eeprom(1m) command in Solaris, which can be used while the system is running. Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

ONTAP 6.2.1 vs 6.2R2D6 vs ???
by Chris Thompson 22 Jul '02

22 Jul '02

I am wondering which release of ONTAP I should be running on a leading-edge (but production) server here... We are currently running 6.2R2D2 --- the D2 part because we wanted the fix for 70674. We usually run the FCS release, but not a Dx one, so this makes me somewhat uneasy. Now 6.2.1 is out and FCS, and has 70674 in its fix list, so it would be natural to change to that. But meanwhile we've got the question of 75012 (the CA-2002-19 bug-in- -most-known-DNS-resolvers thing) outstanding. We think we're pretty well protected against it being exploited, but will be a lot happier with a fix. This *isn't* listed as fixed in 6.2.1. The Bugs Online entry for 75012 names a number of Dx releases in which it is fixed, including 6.2R2D6, but there's no mention of a 6.2.1D<anything>. So I need to decide between 6.2.1, 6.2R2D6, or waiting for something else. Maybe toasters isn't the best place to ask about this ... can NetApp people even post to the list again yet? Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

2 4

Ownership of "/etc"
by David Lee 22 Jul '02

22 Jul '02

On both our new filers, running 6.1.2R1, I have just noticed that the ownership of its "/vol/vol0/etc" belongs, not to the expected "root", but to an apparently arbitrary uid "20041" (gid "30"). Fortunately: (a) we have not allocated that uid to anyone; (b) I think the only machine to which "/etc" would be user-accessible (a Solaris UNIX box fro our user admin.) can have access restrictions to prevent telnet/ssh-like user-access. Nevertheless, it does seem a little worrying (correction, potentially very worrying) that this critical "/etc" directory is owned by an ordinary user. (Just suppose this October's student intake allocates that uid to someone who likes exploring...) All the contents of "/etc" are root-owned, except for a subdirectory called "java" and within that some (not all) of its contents: drwxr-xr-x 3 20041 30 4096 Jun 11 08:11 . drwxr-xr-x 20 20041 30 65536 Jul 22 14:53 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root other 1912820 Jan 9 2002 .jitcache.db -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1912820 May 14 14:05 .jitcache.db.saved -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 8844945 Jan 8 2002 classes.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 8844945 Jan 8 2002 classes.zip-inuse -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 238737 Oct 13 2000 crysec.zip -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 139895 Jun 14 00:35 jit.log -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 505097 Oct 13 2000 jsafe.zip drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 May 14 14:05 lib -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1422554 Jan 8 2002 netapp.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1422554 Jan 8 2002 netapp.zip-inuse -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 217093 Oct 13 2000 phaos.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1942824 Jan 8 2002 redshift.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 1942824 Jan 8 2002 redshift.zip-inuse -rw-r--r-- 1 20041 30 113216 Oct 13 2000 secureadmin.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 139753 Jan 8 2002 servlet.zip -rwxr-xr-x 2 root other 139753 Jan 8 2002 servlet.zip-inuse Is this general, affecting other sites, or does it suggest that something peculiar happened at our installation? I understand that, since site installation, we have had something added: from memory, I think it was "Secure FilerView", but I may be wrong, and the local person who oversaw this is currently away. Any comments, anyone? -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :

3 2

quotas over limit: determination thereof
by David Lee 20 Jul '02

20 Jul '02

If what follows is in the manual or is a FAQ, then just point me in the direction... Executive summary: Is there an easy way (variant of "quota report" perhaps?) to discover which users are over-quota? Detail: We are beginning to migrate our home directories (15K-20K of them) from Solaris to NetApp. Quotas are a vital part of the control of these directories. Under Solaris (trad. UNIX), each user has an explicit quota. While this is possible under NetApp, it seems far more sensible to use default quotas where possible (and the documentation encourages this). We have set up some reasonable default quotas, and are using rsync (thanks, folk!) to get the user files prepared in the future NetApp location: transferred (from 20+ volumes across three Solaris fileservers) and kept in sync. Naturally a few of our users have more data than our NetApp default quotas. What we simply want to do is identify these exceptions so we can apply explicit quotas. We will, if possible, adjust the defaults so that the number of exceptions, from our 20K user-base, is reasonably small. Under Solaris etc., the output from its "repquota" command was easily eyeball-able (I know, no such word!) for such exceptions: "+" and expiry times. Is there a variant of NetApp's "quota report" that either restricts output to over-quota users, or has a field indicating over-quota, or similar? Or is the NetApp convention simply to cobble together a bit of awk/perl to extract those lines (from the total 20K) in which "Used" exceeds "Limit"? Thanks in advance. -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :

2 1

RE: arp spoof, 840 with 6.2.1
by Toal, Dave 19 Jul '02

19 Jul '02

Brian, Snapmirror and vol copy turned out not to be an option, because the 760 is at 5.3.1; we're getting the 'volume is in transitional state, aborting' error even though the destination is offline. NDMP copy looks like the remaining method, the 760 is being upgraded to 6.2.1 and I want to duplicate the data before starting that. Piotr, Yes, disks and data too. %-{)# What I saw from the first attempt was no response to ping, on either side, even after doing ifconfig down/up of the e9b nic. Maybe the magic arp has leaked out the switch I was using? After connecting the original filer I had to do arp -d and ping again, before it would respond to the unix host mount request. -----Original Message----- From: Brian Long To: Toal, Dave Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Sent: 7/19/02 10:37 AM Subject: Re: arp spoof, 840 with 6.2.1 Dave, Are you replicating the data to the F840 or just moving shelves? If you're replicating data with something like Snapmirror, you might consider the Ontap 6.X snapmirror migrate command. This alters the disk labels on the destination so you don't end up with stale NFS filehandles on all the clients (if you're using NFS). For CIFS, you don't need to worry about this. /Brian/ > Good morning. I've got a question about substituting > one netapp for another, by setting the ip addresses the same > and changing the ethernet cable going to the switch from one > to the other. > > The netapp I'm trying to bring online is the 840. The > ether (mac) addresses are showing different from inconfig, and > I'm wondering if there's a way to set that explicitly; I don't > see it from the options listed. > > > > the 840: > > netapp-demo*> ifconfig e9b > e9b: flags=48043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 > inet 206.33.27.85 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 206.33.27.127 > ether 00:20:fc:1e:3a:75 (100tx-fd-down) > netapp-demo*> > > > > > > the other netapp, a 760 running 5.3.6R1: > > wesson> ifconfig e0 > e0: flags=200043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING> mtu 1500 > inet 206.33.27.85 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 206.33.27.127 > partner inet 206.33.27.86 (not in use) > ether 00:a0:98:00:78:c5 (100tx-fd-up) > wesson> > > > > > > -- > Dave Toal > Thomson & Thomson > North Quincy, MA > > > -- Brian Long | | | Americas IT Hosting Sys Admin | .|||. .|||. Phone: (919) 392-7363 | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. Pager: (888) 651-2015 | C i s c o S y s t e m s

2 1

arp spoof, 840 with 6.2.1
by Toal, Dave 19 Jul '02

19 Jul '02

All, Good morning. I've got a question about substituting one netapp for another, by setting the ip addresses the same and changing the ethernet cable going to the switch from one to the other. The netapp I'm trying to bring online is the 840. The ether (mac) addresses are showing different from inconfig, and I'm wondering if there's a way to set that explicitly; I don't see it from the options listed. the 840: netapp-demo*> ifconfig e9b e9b: flags=48043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 206.33.27.85 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 206.33.27.127 ether 00:20:fc:1e:3a:75 (100tx-fd-down) netapp-demo*> the other netapp, a 760 running 5.3.6R1: wesson> ifconfig e0 e0: flags=200043<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING> mtu 1500 inet 206.33.27.85 netmask 0xffffffc0 broadcast 206.33.27.127 partner inet 206.33.27.86 (not in use) ether 00:a0:98:00:78:c5 (100tx-fd-up) wesson> -- Dave Toal Thomson & Thomson North Quincy, MA

3 2

RE: NT Domain Authentication and Filer Access
by Chuck Tomasi 18 Jul '02

18 Jul '02

It sounds like there is an inconsistency between the UNIX login name and the Windows domain\login name for that user. If they are the same, then odds are that the user and the filer aren't in the same domain. The joys of multi-protocol environments. Some of us learned this the hard way... There are two ways to approach this. The first is to do your best to keep the UNIX login name (e.g. ctomasi) the same as the domain login (TGI\CTomasi). Note, case doesn't matter - most of the time. If, however, the filer is in another domain (assuming full NT trusts are setup between the domains) you'll need to start tweaking the /etc/usermap.cfg file on the filer. This is a handy file. Often times it is used to map "Domain\Administrator" to "root" so you get all your admin priviledges from either world. It can also be used for other things (see the docs and/or the comments in the file.) In our case, we have lots of domains which we will hopefully be consolidating in to fewer with Win2K Active Directory, but that's beside the point. We use an entry *\* == * in the usermap.cfg file to help the filer look in other domains to authenticate the user. In my case, the filer is part of the Win2K domain "NA", but I'm "TGI\CTomasi" and my UNIX account is "ctomasi". That entry starts a search for various PDCs (see CIFS PREFDC for some other helpful info.) Note, this could take a while to authenticate a user if you have to search a bunch of domains. The user may perceive this delay when they open a connection to a CIFS share for the first time on that filer. The filer is just trying to match the Windows name (credentials) with a corresponding UNIX account. You may need to help it along if you're dealing with multiple domains or if the login name doesn't correspond between Windows and UNIX. I hope that helps. --Chuck -----Original Message----- From: Jessica Fernandez To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: 7/18/2002 12:21 PM Subject: NT Domain Authentication and Filer Access I am new to administering a filer via NT. Our filers have always been administered from a UNIX host. We are migrating users from a UNIX environment to an Windows NT/2000 environment. I have a user that has a domain account and needs access to the filer. Without having to create an account on the UNIX, where do I indicate validation via NT domain? I have a people share on my filer with a folder with his employee number as the folder name. After logging into the domain, he can see the filer listed in the domain. When he double clicks it, it prompts him for a username and password. He has tried what he uses to authenticate on the domain and it does not work. For our UNIX users they have accounts on our UNIX server and are authenticated that way. Your help is appreciated. Thanks. JESSICA A. S. FERNANDEZ ESA-FM-ESH E-mail: jessicaf(a)lanl.gov TA-16-661-101, MS-C933 Voice: 505-665-8051 FAX: 505-665-9490 Pager: 104-6707

1 0

NT Domain Authentication and Filer Access
by Jessica Fernandez 18 Jul '02

18 Jul '02

I am new to administering a filer via NT. Our filers have always been administered from a UNIX host. We are migrating users from a UNIX environment to an Windows NT/2000 environment. I have a user that has a domain account and needs access to the filer. Without having to create an account on the UNIX, where do I indicate validation via NT domain? I have a people share on my filer with a folder with his employee number as the folder name. After logging into the domain, he can see the filer listed in the domain. When he double clicks it, it prompts him for a username and password. He has tried what he uses to authenticate on the domain and it does not work. For our UNIX users they have accounts on our UNIX server and are authenticated that way. Your help is appreciated. Thanks. JESSICA A. S. FERNANDEZ ESA-FM-ESH E-mail: jessicaf(a)lanl.gov TA-16-661-101, MS-C933 Voice: 505-665-8051 FAX: 505-665-9490 Pager: 104-6707

1 0

18cent long distance conference calls
by Service Center 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

1 0

Re: Upgrade
by Bryan_West＠shamrockfoods.com 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

Sounds to me like your problem lies in the fact that your filer is not in a true Windows 2000 Mode. I believe that 6.1 adds full support for Windows 2000 Domains, but don't quote me on that. To solve you problem do the following: In your windows 2000 DNS server add a new alias or CNAME: MESIROWFINANCIA CNAME MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET This is for backwards compatibility for your old clients and servers. After the upgrade of the filer re-run CIFS SETUP Make sure you delete the computer account for the filer in your domain and have it re-created. Once completed you should be able to run CIFS DOMAININFO and get the following: DNS Domain Name: MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET Type: Windows 2000 You are also having a problem because your Domain name is longer than 15 Characters: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q226144 Windows 9x machines and any other Netbios based systems will not be able to access it using the full name. Good luck. Bryan. |---------+-----------------------------> | | "Sayla, Mustafa" | | | <MSAYLA@mesirowfin| | | ancial.com> | | | Sent by: | | | owner-toasters@mat| | | hworks.com | | | | | | | | | 07/16/2002 10:36 | | | AM | | | | |---------+-----------------------------> >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> | | cc: | | Subject: Upgrade | >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Yesterday we tried to upgrade our F760 filer running 6.0.1r3 to 6.1.2r3. After the upgrade our NFS environment worked fine but cifs environment would not work. I can go to filer view and everything looked fine, I can see my shares, qtree and snapshots fine. All configurations as far as domain, DNS server, WINS and other networking is also fine. Yet when I try to access a share it will ask me for a login name and password. Same behavior when I try to access filer through network neighborhood even though I am logged in as administrator. We have a windows 2000 domain and a Windows NT 4.0 domain and there is a two way trust between them. Filer is in Windows 2000 domain and it was there even before the upgrade and been working fine. Talked to NetApp support and they made me try different things but could not be able to solve the issue. According to them they have never seen this kind of problem before. After the upgrade when it did not work I ran the cifs setup it gave me an error: "DNS does not appear to be configured correctly for proper windows 2000 operation in this domain. The filer could not resolve simple domain name 'MESIROWFINANCIA' to DNS form 'MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET' If I use a filer view setup wizard it would give me an error that domain name is illegal. What is confusing here is filer had been working fine for over two years in the same w2k domain with the same name without any problem. Netapp tech support had me run setup quite a few times and I also came across an error CIFS - Domain name not legal in the root volume language. After trying to fix this problem for 5 hours I finally decided to roll back so that filer is up and functioning. Once I rolled back to 6.0.1r3 cifs started to work but now NFS works fine, access from NT 4.0 domain works fine but if you are logged in to windows 2000 domain you cannot access the filer even though filer is also in windows 2000 domain. When you try to access it will give you an error "The account is not authorized to log in from this station". The case is still open with Netapp and we are trying different things but so far no luck. Any suggestion and help from you guys will be highly appreciated. Mustafa Sayla Sr. Network Administrator Mesirow Financial 312-595-6388

1 0

Upgrade
by Sayla, Mustafa 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

Yesterday we tried to upgrade our F760 filer running 6.0.1r3 to 6.1.2r3. After the upgrade our NFS environment worked fine but cifs environment would not work. I can go to filer view and everything looked fine, I can see my shares, qtree and snapshots fine. All configurations as far as domain, DNS server, WINS and other networking is also fine. Yet when I try to access a share it will ask me for a login name and password. Same behavior when I try to access filer through network neighborhood even though I am logged in as administrator. We have a windows 2000 domain and a Windows NT 4.0 domain and there is a two way trust between them. Filer is in Windows 2000 domain and it was there even before the upgrade and been working fine. Talked to NetApp support and they made me try different things but could not be able to solve the issue. According to them they have never seen this kind of problem before. After the upgrade when it did not work I ran the cifs setup it gave me an error: "DNS does not appear to be configured correctly for proper windows 2000 operation in this domain. The filer could not resolve simple domain name 'MESIROWFINANCIA' to DNS form 'MESIROWFINANCIAL.NET' If I use a filer view setup wizard it would give me an error that domain name is illegal. What is confusing here is filer had been working fine for over two years in the same w2k domain with the same name without any problem. Netapp tech support had me run setup quite a few times and I also came across an error CIFS - Domain name not legal in the root volume language. After trying to fix this problem for 5 hours I finally decided to roll back so that filer is up and functioning. Once I rolled back to 6.0.1r3 cifs started to work but now NFS works fine, access from NT 4.0 domain works fine but if you are logged in to windows 2000 domain you cannot access the filer even though filer is also in windows 2000 domain. When you try to access it will give you an error "The account is not authorized to log in from this station". The case is still open with Netapp and we are trying different things but so far no luck. Any suggestion and help from you guys will be highly appreciated. Mustafa Sayla Sr. Network Administrator Mesirow Financial 312-595-6388

1 0

rename across qtrees?
by David Lee 16 Jul '02

16 Jul '02

Executive summary of question: Is there a fast, efficient way to move a directory tree from one qtree to another? (Can a rename/mv simply relink across qtrees?) Detail: (We are new to NetApp, so this might be a FAQ: if so, just point me in the right direction.) We soon need to move the home directories of a few thousand users from a couple of Sun/Solaris NFS/Samba fileservers onto a NetApp. On the old Sun fileservers, these users are subgrouped using one scheme (into about 100 subgroups); on the new NetApp they'll be redistributed into about five qtrees. Ideally, we would simply pull them across the network (a long evening's work!) dumping them into one qtree on the NetApp. The second step would be to redistribute them into their new qtrees and, for us, conceptually straightforward because the homedirectory names can be pattern-matched into corresponding qtrees. In UNIX-speak, the equivalent of: mv qtree_tmp/<...>/dir_pattern_1 qtree_a mv qtree_tmp/<...>/dir_pattern_2 qtree_b (about five commands, one per qtree). In UNIX-land, a "mv" within a volume is a fast operation, simply relinking from one parent directory into another; whereas an "mv" across volumes is (of necessity, of course) a much larger data-copying operation. On the NetApp/WAFL is such a move across qtrees a simple relink or is it a data-copying operation? Is there a NetApp command to move/rename a directory-tree? If so, what? Not having found a NetApp command, I experimented with an "mv" from a UNIX box which had the volume NFS-mounted. But this took a long time so, I presume, was doing a data-copy, rather than relink. (Hope I explained that reasonably clearly!) -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : University of Durham : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham : : Phone: +44 191 374 2882 U.K. :

3 3

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters