toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

[RE: removing a disk from a volume?]
by Peter D. Gray 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

Thanks you all the people that responded to this. It sounds like there is no real easy solution, although people did have specific suggestions (snapmirror, ndmpcopy etc). Many thanks, pdg

1 0

mixed mode .vs unix mode qtrees on a NFS & CIFS filer
by Colin Eric Johnson 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

Here's the trouble I'm running into and the question that it raises. I'm getting ready to turn on CIFS on our filer (F820) so that our users have one file system to deal with and not two. In my experiments I have seen some strange behavior that goes something like this: If the qtrees are unix mode then my unix host that has root privs can see and manipulate files just fine. If the qtrees are mixed mode then on some files the unix host can manipulate files and on some it cannot. It can even get to the point that a file/directory that a user creates under windows cannot be accessed by that same user from unix (if the filer is in mixed mode). So, my questions are: 1. Has anyone seen this behavior before? 2. If a user disappears from Active Directory and I have to recreate them will the new SID be a problem if the user has the same name? 3. Does anyone have any thoughts on which security mode (unix or mixed) for a filer that is serving NFS to an NIS domain and CIFS to a Windows AD Domain? Thanks Colin J.

2 1

Free Disk Shelves - Non-Profit Organizations
by Allen, Pat 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

I apologize for the improper use of the list and I hope I don't attract too many flames. But I hope that I can be forgiven considering the potential good to be derived from the posting. We have just retired two FC-8 disk shelves which are fully populated with 18GB disks. The shelves and disks are in great shape. As a non-profit organization we are willing to donate these to other non-profit organizations. All we ask is that you supply an account for shipping. Please only reply to this post if you are a non-profit organization and have a need for this storage. --- Pat Allen (pat(a)mbari.org) Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI) 7700 Sandholdt Rd, Moss Landing, CA 95039 (voice) 831-775-1724; (fax) 831-775-1620

1 0

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Nail, Larry 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

vscan off Of vscan options mandatory_scan off -----Original Message----- From: Steve Evans [mailto:sevans@foundation.sdsu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 10:24 AM To: Pramod; Puckyt(a)timken.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV There is a command that allows filer access to continue without a AV server on-line. I can't remember what it is off the top of my head though. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 -----Original Message----- From: Pramod [mailto:pramod@apara.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:36 PM To: Puckyt(a)timken.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com I have setup Trend for F880C. Two servers for Load balancing and Availability. AVailability is critical as if the antivirus server goes down, the access to files on the filer are denied until we do a vscan off or set right the anitivirus server. Works really well except sometimes when users complain of performance problems when accessing huge files.....running it on 100mbps with some 3000 users. Would suggest a Gig link.....if I/O requirements are high.. Pramod > Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares > on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated > Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but > I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. > How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do > you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning > server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real > time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? > > Any input would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > >> Todd Pucky >> The Timken Company >> Global Information Systems >> Phone: 330.471.4583 >> E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com > > > > ********************************************************************** > This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or > entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do > not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to > others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and > then delete it from your system. > > The Timken Company > **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Steve Evans 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

There is a command that allows filer access to continue without a AV server on-line. I can't remember what it is off the top of my head though. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 -----Original Message----- From: Pramod [mailto:pramod@apara.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:36 PM To: Puckyt(a)timken.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com I have setup Trend for F880C. Two servers for Load balancing and Availability. AVailability is critical as if the antivirus server goes down, the access to files on the filer are denied until we do a vscan off or set right the anitivirus server. Works really well except sometimes when users complain of performance problems when accessing huge files.....running it on 100mbps with some 3000 users. Would suggest a Gig link.....if I/O requirements are high.. Pramod > Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares > on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated > Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but > I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. > How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do > you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning > server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real > time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? > > Any input would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > >> Todd Pucky >> The Timken Company >> Global Information Systems >> Phone: 330.471.4583 >> E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com > > > > ********************************************************************** > This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or > entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do > not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to > others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and > then delete it from your system. > > The Timken Company > **********************************************************************

1 0

Kinh moi tham du: Hoi cho thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung - Viet (27-30/3) tai China
by xttm＠china-vn.com 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

Moi chi tiet xin truy cap: http://www.china-vn.net/vn/vn Kinh moi tham du >>>> Hoi cho(Quang Tay) thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung Quoc-Viet Nam lan thu II Thoi gian to chuc : 27/03-30/03/2003 Dia diem: Dai Le Duong Nhan Dan tinh Quang Tay-Trung Quoc Du kien quy mo trien lam: 250 gian hang Don vi to chuc: Phan ban Quang Tay-Uy ban xuc tien thuong mai quoc te Trung Quoc Uy ban nhan dan tinh Quang Tay-Trung Quoc Cong ty co phan thuong mai & xuat nhap khau Quang Tay Cong ty trien lam kinh te thuong mai Hoan Cau Dong to chuc: Phong thuong mai va cong nghiep Viet Nam (VCCI) Cong ty thuong mai & du lich quoc te Kim Lan-Trung Quoc Mang thong tin Trung-Viet: http://www.china-vn.net Uy ban xuc tien thuong mai quoc te Trung Quoc. Giay Moi Hoi cho(Quang Tay) thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung Quoc-Viet Nam lan thu II se to chuc vao ngay 27 - 30 thang 03 nam 2003 tai Dai Hoi Duong Nhan Dan tinh Quang Tay thanh pho Nam Ninh.Tinh Quang Tay TQ la mot hanh lang chinh cho cac doanh nghiep cac tinh noi dia Trung Quoc nhat la cac tinh ven bien Dong Nam Bo va cac tinh mien Bac TQ di vao thi truong cac nuoc ASEAN qua Viet Nam, tinh Quang Tay TQ cung da tro thanh dau cau cua Trung Quoc tien vao thi truong Dong Nam A. Sau khi gia nhap WTO va di doi voi su khoi dong cua mo hinh khu mau dich tu do Trung Quoc - ASEAN(10+1),khien cho vi the uu viet cua Quang Tay cang noi bat len. Cuoc hoi cho lan nay se to chuc voi ton chi la de phat huy day du vi the va uu viet ve tai yen cua Quang Tay, that chat hon nua moi quan he mau dich va hop tac kinh te giua hai nuoc Trung - Viet. Chung toi se het suc phuc vu tot cho cac vi quy khach Trung Quoc va Viet Nam den du Hoi cho nay va chung toi se cung cap day du dich vu nhu Quang cao hang xuat khau Viet Nam, xuc tien hop tac Trung-Viet, tim doi tac TQ cho Doanh nghiep Viet Nam, lap quan he voi Co quan chinh phu TQ cho DN Viet Nam, giup dai ly san pham, gioi thieu du an dau tu, tu van chinh sach kinh te ….Kinh moi ban cung nhau xay dung mot bac thang cho su hop tac va giao luu thuong mai giua hai nuoc Trung Quoc va Viet Nam. Noi dung trien lam: Cong nghiep: Thiet bi in an va dong goi, nguyen lieu va san pham cao su, giay, chat deo…, xe may & phu tung, cong cu gia dung, do dien gia dung…, Cac san pham cong nghe cao…. Nong nghiep: Nong lam dac san, giong cay trong, thiet bi co gioi nong nghiep, che bien & dong goi thuc pham va nong san; thuc an gia suc, phan bon hoa hoc, thuoc tru sau, thuc pham… Y te: Thiet bi y te, duoc pham va hoa chat… Che bien thuy hai san: Cong nghe va thiet bi che bien thuy hai san… Tieu thu cong nghiep: Cac mat hang thu cong my nghe, qua tang, do choi, cac san pham tong hop khac… Gioi thieu cac du an dau tu, giao luu thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung-Viet Lich hoi cho: Ngay 25 - 26/03/2003: Dang ky va bo tri gian hang Ngay 27 - 30/03/2003: Trien lam, hoi thao, khao sat thuc te Ngay 30/03/2003: Ket thuc trien lam Hinh thuc tham gia: 1. Thue gian hang: Chi phi thue gian hang:600USD/mot gian Tieu chuan gian hang: 3m X 2m = 6m2 , bao gom: Dat thue, vach ngan, tham trai san, 01 o cam dien 13A-220V, 01 ban 02 ghe, bieu hieu cong ty bang tieng Viet hoac tieng Trung. Quang cao trong Show Catalogue: 200USD/trang mau trang trong. Phi van chuyen tu Ha Noi den cua khau Huu Nghi Quan:200USD/luot/xe tai 5 tan(chia binh quan cho tat ca cac doanh nghiep tham du co chuyen hang), phi boc hang se tinh rieng theo trung loai va so luong hang hoa. Cuoc phi van chuyen hang hoa tu Huu Nghi Quan - Nam Ninh:150USD/luot/xe tai 5 tan, phi boc hang se tinh rieng theo trung loai va so luong hang hoa. Chuong tirnh danh cho nguoi dai bieu tham gia trung bay tai Hoi cho: 24/03: Ha Noi 15:00, cac dai bieu tap trung va hop doan tai Phong thuong mai va cong nghiep Viet Nam (Dia chi:33 Ba Trieu Ha Noi), pho bien chuong trinh.(Chi phi an nghi, phuong tien di lai do dai bieu tu lo trong ngay nay); 25/03: Ha Noi - Nam Ninh 06h00 tap trung tai Phong Cong nghiep va thuong mai Viet Nam(VCCI) theo dia chi: 33-Ba Trieu-Ha Noi (Nga tu duong Ly Thuong Kiet va Ba Trieu), Ban to chuc don dai bieu xuat phat len Huu Nghi Quan lam thu tuc nhap canh Trung Quoc, len tau hoa di Nam Ninh, an nghi tai Nam Ninh. 26/03: Nam Ninh Ca ngay trang tri, dan dung gian hang. 27/03: Nam Ninh Khai mac Hoi cho, giao dich thuong mai giua doanh nghiep Trung Quoc -Viet Nam. Chieu tham du Hoi nghi giao luu thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung-Viet, toi du tiec chieu dai cua ban to chuc va Uy ban tinh Quang Tay. 28/03: Nam Ninh Trung bay hang hoa tai trien lam hoac du hoi thao theo cac chuyen de: "Trung Quoc-Viet Nam tiem nang va che bien nong san & thuc pham" "Thiet bi va cong nghe moi ve bao quan va che bien nong san & thuc pham", khao sat Vuon nong nghiep hien dai Quang Tay, Tham quan Khu cong nghe cao va moi thanh pho Nam Ninh. 29/03:Nam Ninh Trung bay hang hoa tai trien lam hoac du Hoi thao: "Hinh thuc thanh toan an toan trong thuong mai Trung - Viet", Khao sat va lam viec, tiep xuc tu do voi cac doi tac tiem nang Trung Quoc. 30/03:Nam Ninh - Ha Noi Sau khi an sang, di tau hoa ve Bang Tuong, chieu cac dai bieu xuat canh Trung Quoc ve Viet Nam, den Ha Noi, ket thuc chuong trinh.(Khang tu lo an toi va nghi khach san trong ngay nay). Chi phi: 265USD/Dai bieu Chi phi bao gom: Khach san 3 sao, an nghi, xe dua don theo chuong trinh, phi du trien lam va Hoi thao, phien dich chung ca doan. Chi phi khong gom: Ho chieu va Visa nhap canh TQ. Neu dai bieu di bang giay thong hanh phat sinh them 35USD/dai bieu. 2. Tham gia trien lam nhung khong thue gian hang Chuong trinh danh cho nguoi dai bieu tham gia trien lam nhung khong thue gian hang: 25/03: Ha Noi 15:00, cac dai bieu tap trung va hop doan tai Phong thuong mai va cong nghiep Viet Nam (Dia chi:33 Ba Trieu Ha Noi), pho bien chuong trinh.(Chi phi an nghi, phuong tien di lai do dai bieu tu lo trong ngay nay); 26/03: Ha Noi - Nam Ninh 06h00 tap trung tai Phong cong nghiep va thuong mai Viet Nam (VCCI) theo dia chi: 33-Ba Trieu-Ha Noi (Nga tu duong Ly Thuong Kiet va Ba Trieu), Ban to chuc don dai bieu xuat phat len Huu Nghi Quan lam thu tuc nhap canh Trung Quoc, len tau hoa di Nam Ninh, an nghi tai Nam Ninh. 27/03: Nam Ninh Khai mac Hoi cho, giao dich thuong mai giua doanh nghiep Trung Quoc -Viet Nam. Chieu khai mac Hoi nghi giao luu thuong mai va hop tac kinh te Trung-Viet, toi du tiec chieu dai cua ban to chuc va Uy ban tinh Quang Tay. 28/03: Nam Ninh Tham gia trien lam hoac du hoi thao theo cac chuyen de: "Trung Quoc-Viet Nam tiem nang va che bien nong san & thuc pham" "Thiet bi va cong nghe moi ve bao quan va che bien nong san & thuc pham", khao sat Vuon nong nghiep hien dai Quang Tay, Tham quan Khu cong nghe cao va moi thanh pho Nam Ninh. 29/03: Nam Ninh Tham gia trien lam hoac du Hoi thao: "Hinh thuc thanh toan an toan trong thuong mai Trung - Viet", Khao sat va lam viec, tiep xuc tu do voi cac doi tac tiem nang Trung Quoc. 30/03:Nam Ninh - Ha Noi Sau khi an sang, di tau hoa ve Bang Tuong, chieu cac dai bieu xuat canh Trung Quoc ve Viet Nam, den Ha Noi, ket thuc chuong trinh.(Khang tu lo an toi va nghi khach san trong ngay nay). Chi phi:250USD/Dai bieu Chi phi bao gom: Khach san 3 sao, an nghi, xe dua don theo chuong trinh, phi du trien lam va Hoi thao, phien dich chung ca doan. Chi phi khong gom: Ho chieu va Visa nhap canh TQ. Neu dai bieu di bang giay thong hanh phat sinh them 35USD/dai bieu. Ghi chu: Neu co dai bieu yeu cau di them khao sat tai Que Lam thi chuong trinh se phai them 2 ngay nua so voi cac chuong trinh tren, chi phi phat sinh them 100USD/Dai bieu. Thu tuc dang ky: 1. Doanh nghiep gui ban dang ky fax cung voi 50% tien dat coc bang tien mat hoac dien chuyen tien toi: Cong ty dich vu va thuong mai TSC -Phong thuong mai va cong nghiep Viet Nam Tai khoan tien VND:0021000001059 Tai khoan tien USD:00211370021623 Ngan hang ngoai thuong Ha Noi (VIETCOMBANK HANOI) 2. So tien con lai thanh toan 10 ngay truoc ngay khoi hanh. Quyen loi cua cac don vi tham gia trung bay tai trien lam: - Tham gia vao cac Hoi thao, hoi nghi to chuc trong thoi gian Hoi cho. - Gioi thieu trong cuon Catalogue chinh thuc cua Hoi cho bang tieng Trung, an pham nay se duoc phat mien phi cho khach tham quan Hoi cho va cac moi gioi khac. - Dam bao ve sinh chung trong khu hoi cho. - Ban ve an toan hang hoa trung bay ngoai gio mo cua cua hoi cho trien lam. - Dan dung va thao do gian hang trong truong hop thue gian hang tron goi. Cac dich vu nha to chuc ho tro cac don vi tham gia(co thu phi) - Van tai va tam nhap tai xuat hang trien lam. - In quang cao theo thiet ke rieng trong cuon Catalogue hoi cho. - To chuc cac hoi thao chuyen de, gioi thieu san pham va dich vu rieng. - Cung cap phien dich rieng theo yeu cau:20USD/buoi(4 tieng), 30USD/ngy(8 tieng), ngoai gio 10USD/tieng dong ho. - Thiet ke va dan dung cac gian hang dac biet, cho thue thiet ke gian gang. - Cung cap cac dich vu in an, cac san pham quang cao rieng. Ho tro cua Ban to chuc danh cho cac don vi: - Ban to chuc se ho tro 10% chi phi thue gian hang cho cac don vi cua Viet Nam, 15% phi thue gian hang cho doanh nghiep la hoi vien cua Cty Thang Loi - Hoi dong lien minh hop tac xa Viet Nam. Moi dang ky phai duoc thuc hien truoc ngay 17/02/2003. - Tat ca hang hoa trung bay trien lam se duoc mien thue hai quan Trung Quoc (ngoai ra mot so hang hoa dac biet) voi so luong khong han che nhung phai duoc su dong y cua Ban to chuc. - Doi voi cac doanh nghiep khong thue gian hang, Ban to chuc se bo tri mot phong trung bay chung mien phi Catalongue va mot so hang mau cua doanh nghiep trong thoi gian Hoi cho. - Tat ca cac doanh nghiep Viet nam tham gia Hoi cho deu duoc mien phi thong tin co ban cua doanh nghiep trong vong 1 nam tren trang tieng Trung cua Mang thong tin Trung-Viet: http://ww.china-vn.net de nham tao them co hoi tiep tan lau dai voi thi truong TQ. - Mien phi mot quyen Catalogue chinh thuc cua Hoi cho cho moi donh nghiep Viet Nam co tham gia Hoi cho. - Gioi thieu mien phi doi tac tiem nang tai Trung Quoc khi doanh nghiep Viet Nam co yeu cau va dang ky truoc 15 ngay tro len. Nhung thong tin can biet khi tham gia Hoi cho: - Tat ca hang hoa trung bay trien lam deu phai chuyen toi Ha Noi truoc ngay 10/03/2003 de Ban to chuc nhan hang tai Ha Noi va tap trung lam thu tuc hai quan Trung Quoc, qua han tren, Ban to chuc se khong chiu trach nhiem ve thu tuc hai quan. (Luu y: cac doanh nghiep tu chiu chi phi van chuyen len cua khau, va tu lam cac thu tuc hai quan Viet Nam).Cac don vi cung cap cho BTC danh muc hang hoa(Packing List) trung bay trine lam truoc 28/02/2003 gom co: Ten don vi tham gia trien lam, ten hang , so luong, noi xuat xung, don gia, kich co,trong luong, hinh thuc dong goi, so luong kien, so luong hang can tro ve VN sau hoi cho. - Doi voi cac dai bieu tham gia khao sat Hoi cho (khong thue gian hang), de nghi dang ky va nop ho so, danh sach day du theo yeu cau cua Ban to chuc truoc ngay 28/02/2003. - Cac dai bieu VN co the nhap canh Trung Quoc bang ho chieu + visa (khach tu lo).Trong truong hop hop khong kip xin cap ho chieu hoac Visa thi co the nhap canh TQ bang giay thong hanh do Ban to chuc tap trung xin thu tuc tai Viet Nam va Trung Quoc. Tuy nhien thu tuc nay chi co duoc phep thong hanh trong tinh Quang Tay TQ, ma khong duoc di vuot qua dia phan tinh Quang Tay-TQ voi thoi gian co gia tri trong 8 ngay. Neu co nhu cau can sang cac tinh khac cua TQ trong chuyen di bang giay thong hanh thi phai bao truoc cho Ban to chuc de giup do thu tuc. - Cac dai bieu xuat nhap canh bang giay thong hanh nop cho BTC 04 anh mau 3X4 va 02 chung minh thu Phto it nhat 10 ngay truoc khi xuat canh. - Cac doanh nghiep muon duoc gioi thieu mien phi khach hang tiem nang TQ hoac dang tai thong tin tren Mang thong tin Trung -Viet www.china-vn.net , de nghi gui truoc 10 ngay cac thong tin co noi dung gom: ten doanh nghiep, dia chi thong tin, Tel,Fax,E-mail,Website, so luoc doanh nghiep, thong tin san pham, can mua va can ban, muc dich chuyen di… cho Ban to chuc bang tieng Viet hoac Trung (Khong qua 1000 tu). Moi chi tiet xin lien he: Hoac lien he truc tiep voi chung toi: + Ban to chuc Hoi cho: Dia chi:18 ngo Nam Nhat Ly, duong Tinh Ho, T.P Nam Ninh Tel:0086-771-2615157 Fax:0086-771-2630917 E-mail: xttm(a)china-vn.com Website: www.china-vn.net Nguoi lien he: Mr. Hai , Mr. Luc + Dai dien Ban to chuc tai Viet Nam: Phong thuong mai va cong nghiep Viet Nam Trung tam giao dich quoc te TSC Dia chi:33 - Ba Trieu - Hoan Kiem- Ha Noi- Viet Nam Tel:04.9360134 Fax:04.9360103 E-mail: vcciglobexpo(a)hn.vnn.vn Nguoi lien he: Mr:Hung Mobi:0913367082 Cong ty thuong mai & du lich quoc te Kim Lan-Quang Tay- Trung Quoc Trung tam xuc tien thuong mai Trung - Viet Van phong dai dien tai Ha Noi DC: 204 Pho Duc Chinh-Ba Dinh-Ha Noi Tel: 04-9273335 Fax: 04-9273335 E-mail: kimlanhanoi(a)fpt.vn Nguoi lien he: Mr.Bach - Mobi: 0912118616 Moi chi tiet xin truy cap: http://www.china-vn.net/vn/vn

2 1

High disk reading after upgrade
by Rune Bakken 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

Hi! Two nights ago we upgraded one of our systems from an F880 Ontap 6.2.2 to Ontap 6.3.1 then upgraded the head to a FAS960. The system has 3 FC-Loops with 4 DS14 (36GB Disks) on each After this we are experiencing constant high Disk reads ranging between 20000-40000kB/s, with network traffic less than 9000KB/s out, and 7000kB/s in. Disk writes matches Net in. Disk scrub is not running Suggestions? >>>>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken Senior System Administrator Telenor Business Solutions (Nextra), ManagedServices/*/IP-Services http://ips.telenor.net/

1 0

Moving files from qtree up to a volume
by Steven Boyer GD-Mail 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

We have 5 qtree's within a volume, our help desk did a move of one of the subfolders within a qtree in this volume. We now have 5 qtree's and one shared folder under the volume. When the folder was moved from the qtree up to the volume it inherited the volume permissions. When doing a move within a volume do you not maintain the perms? Are qtree considered partitions so when you move across partitions you inherit permissions of the parent. How does my problem compare to a move or copy on a NT or 2000 system. Example: volume share share qtree1 share qtree2 share qtree3 share qtree4 share qtree5 folder in qtree1 moved under vol\share Thanks Steven

3 3

NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP
by Jay Newton (Email) 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

We are experiencing issues with NDMP backups. I'm hoping other people in this group have seen it as well and may have suggestions for us to try. Here's an explanation of what has happened. On 12-13-2002 we upgraded from 6.1.3r2 to 6.2.1r2 to fix issues with Autosupports not being sent in the event of hardware failure. A couple of things went sour after the upgrade. Our SnapManager for Exchange performance went down more than 30%, NDMP backups would run slow intermittently, and general Filer performance got worse. NetApp discovered a memory leak in 6.2.1r2 in the NDMP daemon about the same time we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. We had to upgrade to 6.2.2d8 to fix that issue. However, a backup or two will invariably run slower than the rest. If the backup is restarted, it usually picks up speed and runs normally. By slow I mean 10 gigs in 10 hours on a DLT8000 drive. I used to get 20-30 gig per hour before we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. This can happen with each of the 4 DLT8000 drives attached to the Filer meaning that I can't pin the problem to a bad piece of hardware. Today we have discovered that snapshots for backup are not deleting correctly. The NDMPD process was holding the snapshot hostage. A volume ran out of space due to this issue. We were able to kill the NDMPD sessions that were holding the snapshot open and the snapshot deleted normally. Has anyone else experienced similar issues? For those of you running SnapManager for Exchange, how big are your databases and how long does it take to verify them? Also, those who run multiple backups, what is your CPU utilization like when running 4 simultaneous backups and what is your tape throughput? DataONTAP 6.2.2d8 Commvault Galaxy 3.7.1 SP4 ATL P2000 library with 4 DLT8000 drives attached to Filer on 2 SCSI HVD controllers (2 drives per controller) Thanks! Jay Newton Systems Engineer Chesapeake Energy Corporation Natural Gas - Natural Advantages Building 6112, Room 114 (405)848-8000 ext. 683 jnewton(a)chkenergy.com

2 1

Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Pucky, Todd M. 12 Feb '03

12 Feb '03

Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

2 1

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Nail, Larry 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Todd, You can not use Norton Corporate Edition for Realtime File Protection on Netapps, you must use specific AV products that talk to OnTap like Symantec Carrier Scan, Trend ServerProtect for Network Appliance, and McAfee (their product name escapes me). You can get a review at http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3107.html. I did extensive testing when this release & went with the Trend product. I'm not dissing the other 2 products, I just believe in the results I found when I tested. Larry -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Mike Sphar 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Agreed. We ran Trend ServerProtect for Netapps for a while with a demo license and we were very happy with it. The only thing that kept us from buying it was the sudden disappearance of all of our budget. (This was some time ago under a previous parent company; we're just about getting this all sorted out now.) As for how to get the virus protection working, if it is similar to how it worked for ServerProtect, you have to install the Netapp anti-virus software on your scan server(s), and then you have to use commands on the filer to register it to one or more scan servers (I believe the "vscan" command on the filer was used for this. Sorry, I don't have access to verify that right now.) We set up a private 100MB/FD network between the filer and the scan server to use for scanning, and we did not see a significant performance hit when the scan server was enabled. If/when we take it into production, I'm hoping we can get a gigabit network in place for it, but even with only the 100mb nobody complained about performance problems. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Remedy, a BMC Software Company -----Original Message----- From: Jay Newton (Email) [mailto:jnewton@chkenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:48 PM To: 'Steve Evans'; Wurster, Richard M DSTI; Pucky, Todd M.; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Can you tell us why? I've had no problems from Trend. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Evans [mailto:sevans@foundation.sdsu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:36 PM To: Wurster, Richard M DSTI; Pucky, Todd M.; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Steer clear of TrendMicro. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 _____ From: Wurster, Richard M DSTI [mailto:rick.wurster2@us.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 < mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> > -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [ mailto:Puckyt@timken.com <mailto:Puckyt@timken.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: using vol0
by Mike Sphar 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

I'm really curious what specific situations cause this, as I've had filers run out of space on vol0 lots of times and have never had a panic from it. The problem we have is that we just can't justify giving up three disks worth of data to hold the very tiny amount of data needed for booting. Our engineers are data hungry monsters, gobbling up as much space as they can, no matter how much space we provide. If it wasn't for occasionally running out of space, I'm not sure we'd ever be able to force them to delete stuff. -- Mike Sphar - Sr Systems Administrator - Remedy, a BMC Software Company -----Original Message----- From: Rune Bakken [mailto:rb@telenor.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:25 PM To: Charles Bartels Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: using vol0 Charles Bartels <cbartels(a)openharbor.com> writes: > Hi, > > I'm configuring an F810 and space is going to be a little tight. How do > people feel about adding disks to vol0 and using that instead of creating a > whole separate volume (and burning a another parity disk) ? Not sure if it is an issue, but I will never have any production data that keeps growing on vol0 again. I had a Filer panic once or twice because vol0 got filled up. I know some admins on this lists put static data that they control on with a qtree with fixed size (tree quota) on vol0. >>>>>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken Senior System Administrator Telenor Business Solutions (Nextra), ManagedServices/*/IP-Services http://ips.telenor.net/

1 0

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Jay Newton (Email) 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Can you tell us why? I've had no problems from Trend. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Evans [mailto:sevans@foundation.sdsu.edu] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 3:36 PM To: Wurster, Richard M DSTI; Pucky, Todd M.; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Steer clear of TrendMicro. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 _____ From: Wurster, Richard M DSTI [mailto:rick.wurster2@us.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 < mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> > -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [ mailto:Puckyt@timken.com <mailto:Puckyt@timken.com> ] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

Re: using vol0
by Rune Bakken 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Charles Bartels <cbartels(a)openharbor.com> writes: > Hi, > > I'm configuring an F810 and space is going to be a little tight. How do > people feel about adding disks to vol0 and using that instead of creating a > whole separate volume (and burning a another parity disk) ? Not sure if it is an issue, but I will never have any production data that keeps growing on vol0 again. I had a Filer panic once or twice because vol0 got filled up. I know some admins on this lists put static data that they control on with a qtree with fixed size (tree quota) on vol0. >>>>>>>>>>.rune -- Rune Bakken Senior System Administrator Telenor Business Solutions (Nextra), ManagedServices/*/IP-Services http://ips.telenor.net/

2 1

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Steve Evans 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Steer clear of TrendMicro. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation (619) 594-0653 _____ From: Wurster, Richard M DSTI [mailto:rick.wurster2@us.army.mil] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:13 PM To: 'Pucky, Todd M.'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

using vol0
by Charles Bartels 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Hi, I'm configuring an F810 and space is going to be a little tight. How do people feel about adding disks to vol0 and using that instead of creating a whole separate volume (and burning a another parity disk) ? -Charles Bartels

2 1

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by Wurster, Richard M DSTI 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

We use Symantec's CarrierScan for the Filer (740). Works well. Rick Wurster SBCCOM / DSTI 410-436-3824 DSN 584-3824 <mailto:rick.wurster@sbccom.apgea.army.mil> -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 2:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV
by tedvanegas 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Right now we are evaluating Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine 4.0, it specifically supports the NetApp filers; and runs in real time. So far our testing of the product has gone well. Ted -----Original Message----- From: Pucky, Todd M. [mailto:Puckyt@timken.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 12:49 PM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Real Time Virus Scanning with F820 and Norton AV Has anyone had success running real time virus scanning on cifs shares on an F820 (Ontap 6.1.2.R1) or any other filer? I have a dedicated Windows 2000 server with Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition 7.xx, but I have not been able to get real time virus scanning to work correctly. How do you register the filer with the virus scanning software? Do you have to use mapped drives on the Windows 2000 virus scanning server that point to volumes on the filer? Are most of you using real time scanning on your filers or do you use scheduled or manual virus scans? Any input would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, > Todd Pucky > The Timken Company > Global Information Systems > Phone: 330.471.4583 > E-Mail: puckyt(a)timken.com ********************************************************************** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company **********************************************************************

1 0

RE: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP
by Jay Newton (Email) 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

It's a special release to fix this bug. The bug number is 85559. You have to do a priv set diag and run rtag -t malloc. Look for JAVA having to do with NDMP. If you see this line, watch it for a day or 2. If the numbers increment, you have the leak. You really should never see the JAVA NDMP tape device line at all. Hope this helps! -----Original Message----- From: Francett, Robert D (SAIC) [mailto:FranceRD@BP.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:44 PM To: 'Jay Newton (Email)'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP Jay, Checking to see if this is affecting us, however I could not find info on DOT 6.2.2d8 on NOW. Do you know the bug number of the NDMP memory problem? Thanks, Bob Francett BP Exploration -----Original Message----- From: Jay Newton (Email) [mailto:jnewton@chkenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:33 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP We are experiencing issues with NDMP backups. I'm hoping other people in this group have seen it as well and may have suggestions for us to try. Here's an explanation of what has happened. On 12-13-2002 we upgraded from 6.1.3r2 to 6.2.1r2 to fix issues with Autosupports not being sent in the event of hardware failure. A couple of things went sour after the upgrade. Our SnapManager for Exchange performance went down more than 30%, NDMP backups would run slow intermittently, and general Filer performance got worse. NetApp discovered a memory leak in 6.2.1r2 in the NDMP daemon about the same time we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. We had to upgrade to 6.2.2d8 to fix that issue. However, a backup or two will invariably run slower than the rest. If the backup is restarted, it usually picks up speed and runs normally. By slow I mean 10 gigs in 10 hours on a DLT8000 drive. I used to get 20-30 gig per hour before we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. This can happen with each of the 4 DLT8000 drives attached to the Filer meaning that I can't pin the problem to a bad piece of hardware. Today we have discovered that snapshots for backup are not deleting correctly. The NDMPD process was holding the snapshot hostage. A volume ran out of space due to this issue. We were able to kill the NDMPD sessions that were holding the snapshot open and the snapshot deleted normally. Has anyone else experienced similar issues? For those of you running SnapManager for Exchange, how big are your databases and how long does it take to verify them? Also, those who run multiple backups, what is your CPU utilization like when running 4 simultaneous backups and what is your tape throughput? DataONTAP 6.2.2d8 Commvault Galaxy 3.7.1 SP4 ATL P2000 library with 4 DLT8000 drives attached to Filer on 2 SCSI HVD controllers (2 drives per controller) Thanks! Jay Newton Systems Engineer Chesapeake Energy Corporation Natural Gas - Natural Advantages Building 6112, Room 114 (405)848-8000 ext. 683 jnewton(a)chkenergy.com

1 0

RE: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP
by Francett, Robert D (SAIC) 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Jay, Checking to see if this is affecting us, however I could not find info on DOT 6.2.2d8 on NOW. Do you know the bug number of the NDMP memory problem? Thanks, Bob Francett BP Exploration -----Original Message----- From: Jay Newton (Email) [mailto:jnewton@chkenergy.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:33 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: NDMP issues with 6.2.x of DataONTAP We are experiencing issues with NDMP backups. I'm hoping other people in this group have seen it as well and may have suggestions for us to try. Here's an explanation of what has happened. On 12-13-2002 we upgraded from 6.1.3r2 to 6.2.1r2 to fix issues with Autosupports not being sent in the event of hardware failure. A couple of things went sour after the upgrade. Our SnapManager for Exchange performance went down more than 30%, NDMP backups would run slow intermittently, and general Filer performance got worse. NetApp discovered a memory leak in 6.2.1r2 in the NDMP daemon about the same time we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. We had to upgrade to 6.2.2d8 to fix that issue. However, a backup or two will invariably run slower than the rest. If the backup is restarted, it usually picks up speed and runs normally. By slow I mean 10 gigs in 10 hours on a DLT8000 drive. I used to get 20-30 gig per hour before we upgraded to 6.2.1r2. This can happen with each of the 4 DLT8000 drives attached to the Filer meaning that I can't pin the problem to a bad piece of hardware. Today we have discovered that snapshots for backup are not deleting correctly. The NDMPD process was holding the snapshot hostage. A volume ran out of space due to this issue. We were able to kill the NDMPD sessions that were holding the snapshot open and the snapshot deleted normally. Has anyone else experienced similar issues? For those of you running SnapManager for Exchange, how big are your databases and how long does it take to verify them? Also, those who run multiple backups, what is your CPU utilization like when running 4 simultaneous backups and what is your tape throughput? DataONTAP 6.2.2d8 Commvault Galaxy 3.7.1 SP4 ATL P2000 library with 4 DLT8000 drives attached to Filer on 2 SCSI HVD controllers (2 drives per controller) Thanks! Jay Newton Systems Engineer Chesapeake Energy Corporation Natural Gas - Natural Advantages Building 6112, Room 114 (405)848-8000 ext. 683 jnewton(a)chkenergy.com

1 0

RE: spam
by Carl R. Friend 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

James Beal writes: >I refer the gentleman to Kevin's message below and point out that >Kevin and the mathworks are doing the community a favour so I am >willing to give him a reasonable amount of time to fix it as his not >paid to fix this problem. We just turned SpamAssassin back on again. The S/N ratio ought to improve some. +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+ | Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | The MathWorks | | Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | Natick, Massachusetts | | mailto:carl_friend@mathworks.com +-----------------------+ | http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum/ | ICBM: 42:18N 71:21W | +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+

1 0

spam
by Charles Bartels 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

It would be nice if the administrator of this list put in some spam control. It's getting a bit ridiculous. What does everyone else think? -Charles Bartels

5 4

RE: spam
by Toal, Dave 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

419 spam, collect the whole set! Maybe forwarding them to each other would be best? Mu, it's a chuckle. vol0, as long as it doesn't fill up from snapshots or data, shouldn't be a problem. Several of the filers I work on have root vols named something else entirely: /images or whatever, the same sizes as the other, data-only, vols on the box. -----Original Message----- From: Charles Bartels To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: 2/11/03 11:15 AM Subject: spam It would be nice if the administrator of this list put in some spam control. It's getting a bit ridiculous. What does everyone else think? -Charles Bartels

1 0

RE: spam
by Joseph Bishop 11 Feb '03

11 Feb '03

Even here at work where people are paid to eliminate Spam...we still get it. At 04:47 PM 2/11/03 +0000, James Beal wrote: > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA1 > >I refer the gentleman to Kevin's message below and point out that >Kevin and the mathworks are doing the community a favour so I am >willing to give him a reasonable amount of time to fix it as his not >paid to fix this problem. > >If you have been a mail admin looking after a large distribution list >you will know that is not a zero effort exercise. > > > >From: Charles Bartels [mailto:cbartels@openharbor.com] >Sent: 11 February 2003 16:16 >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: spam > > > > >It would be nice if the administrator of this list put in some spam >control. It's getting a bit ridiculous. >What does everyone else think? >- -Charles Bartels > > >- -----Original Message----- >From: Kevin Davis [mailto:kdavis@mathworks.com] >Sent: 17 January 2003 15:14 >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Subject: Toasters list is not dead yet! > > >Sorry for the disappearance of the list this past week, all. It >seems a >majordomo error went undetected, and all posts were aborted as they >were being >detected as spam. > >We're working to fix it. In the meantime, some junk _may_ sneak >through. > >- -- > >________________________________________________ > >Kevin Davis The MathWorks >508.647.7660 Natick, MA 01760 > http://www.mathworks.com >UNIX Administrator > >________________________________________________ > >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: PGP 7.1.1 > >iQA/AwUBPkkp0Twjg8ghD/dFEQIPZQCglScXjYZQOtCDK8vvTcj8+A0o6uAAoMWw >iWm8pFOlGf0hsIi2OJ1h3/VF >=hrVj >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Joseph Bishop ICIS Data Access Services (DTA) joseph.bishop(a)jpl.nasa.gov voice (818) 354-9539 pager 8864354(a)skytel.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters