toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13516 discussions

restore ndmp tape on solaris
by Carlos A. Alvarez 11 Nov '03

11 Nov '03

Does anyone know how many blocks writes Legato Networker 6.2 on NDMP tape drive, I need to bypass it and make a restore to a SUN Solaris thru mt command ? Has anyone tested this solutions and has any recomendations? Thanks

1 0

Fwd: FW: Pleeeeease read !!!!!! It was on the news
by Vin Ranta 10 Nov '03

10 Nov '03

Note: forwarded message attached. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard

1 0

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL..
by ineconline 06 Nov '03

06 Nov '03

1 0

Raid group and volume...
by Art Hebert 05 Nov '03

05 Nov '03

I have a volume called vol0 which shows 254gb of space. I believe it has 7 data disks (34.5gb) and 1 parity disk in raid group 0. There is also a raid group 1 that contains a 1 data disk and 1 parity disk. I don't think these disks are being used in the volume vol0. How do I tell if they are or aren't? If they aren't being used how can I get them added into vol0 as 2 data disks? Details: sjcf760-04-gig:/vol/vol0/home/oracle/standby01/admin 254210460 230604136 23606324 sjcf760-04> sysconfig -r Volume vol0 (root, zoned checksums) RAID group 0 RAID Disk HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks) --------- ----- ------------ ---- -------------- -------------- parity 7.5 7 0 5 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.6 7 0 6 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.4 7 0 4 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.3 7 0 3 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.2 7 0 2 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.1 7 0 1 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.0 7 0 0 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.10 7 1 2 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 RAID group 1 RAID Disk HA.ID HA SHELF BAY CHAN Used (MB/blks) Phys (MB/blks) --------- ----- ------------ ---- -------------- -------------- parity 7.11 7 1 3 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 data 7.12 7 1 4 FC:A 34500/70656000 35003/71687368 sjcf760-04> df Filesystem kbytes used avail capacity Mounted on /vol/vol0/ 254210460 230604168 23606292 91% /vol/vol0/ /vol/vol0/.snapshot 0 0 0 ---% /vol/vol0/.snapshot thanks art hebert -----Original Message----- From: Todd C. Merrill [mailto:tmerrill@mathworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 12:10 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: widelinks Greetings. If anyone is using the feature of ONTAP called "widelinks," can you speak up, or email me privately? Widelinks are a way to allow CIFS clients to follow UNIX symbolic links between *differnet* filers. It sounds cool, and the config looks straightforward, but I can't seem to get it to work. http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel633/html/ontap/sag/multi8. htm Until next time... The MathWorks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

2 1

RE: SNMP values keeps changing after every reboot. any solution to fix this?
by Carl Friend 05 Nov '03

05 Nov '03

Michel Geldenhuys writes: > I discussed this few weeks ago with a NetApp engineer. > Unfortunately, this is a "by-design" behaviour: MIB values > are loaded during boot and in a random fashion so there is no > way to forecast (or enforce) what MIB index will be for a > particular volume. The interesting thing about this is that the behaviour changed in ONTAP 6.3 and beyond. ONTAP 6.2 had the volumes sorted so they always appeared in the same order for both a "df" and for SNMP. Does anyone know _why_ they changed it? +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+ | Carl Richard Friend (UNIX Sysadmin) | Natick, Massachusetts | | Minicomputer Collector / Enthusiast | 01760-2098 | | mailto:carl_friend@mathworks.com +-----------------------+ | http://users.rcn.com/crfriend/museum | ICBM: 42:18N 71:21W | +----------------------------------------------+-----------------------+

1 0

RE: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM
by DFinn＠studentadvantage.com 05 Nov '03

05 Nov '03

does anyone know what J30s pair is? We removed J30 and tried to boot it up and then it complained about J28. We then removed J28 and it wouldn't even attempt to boot. -----Original Message----- From: McCarthy, Tim [mailto:timothy.mccarthy@netapp.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:50 AM To: DFinn(a)studentadvantage.com Subject: RE: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM As was mentioned, the J30 DIMM is marked on the motherboard. Try reseating the memory module and see if you get past it. If not, remove the memory module. Realize: you are running with half of your memory as the system uses the modules in pairs...removing one effectively removes two. If you have a large capacity system, you may run into problems as well.... --tmac -----Original Message----- From: DFinn(a)studentadvantage.com [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:33 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM here's the error on bootup: Alpha Open Firmware by FirmWorks Copyright 1995-2000 FirmWorks, Network Appliance. All Rights Reserved. Firmware release 2.8_a2 Memory size is 1024 MB Testing SIO Testing LCD Probing devices Testing 1024MB Clearing ECC Stuck-at:283MB,3 Replace DIMM J30 Startup aborted Unfortunately I do not currently have support from Netapp for this filer so I need to find a short term solution to my problem. The error above points out the bad dimm that needs replacement. 1. Can I just remove the bad dimm and run with less memory temporarily? 2. I have a spare F740 that I can rob parts from, can I take a DIMM from there and replace the bad one in this F760? 3. How do I locate DIMM J30? any and all help is really apprecaited. Thanks Dan

2 1

RE: Data ONTAP Upgrade
by Sam Schorr 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

For all the inquiring minds, I found this under the download section: ********************************************************************** DEBUG PATCH RELEASE 6.3.1D8 Based on release 6.3.1 ********************************************************************** This is a DEBUG patch, which means it has fixes that have not been released in a regular software version yet. These fixes, if validated, will be checked in and released in a future release after adequate QA and testing. Fixes contained in this patch release are: 85294 Ineffective nlm GRANTED requested (callback) 78177 Renaming a small number of files repeatedly causes WAFL dir size to grow 83697 CPU at 100% after 6.2.1 upgrade from 6.1.3R1, with low NFS Ops and Disk Ops 80286 Problem accessing ~snapshot directory when using the "nosymlink_strict_security" share option 82176 File access can fail when using a widelink that maps to a share that supports widelinks 78570 Slow FTP performance with clustering enabled. 80332 SNMP may stop responding after accessing miscGlobalStatus on FAS9xx appliances. 81905 kma.c crash in wafl_zombie_growfile_handler 83681 CIFS file owner may be set incorrectly 85651 CIFS SETUP fails with "DSA is unwilling to perform" 85653 can't set file attributes when restoring with Veritas NetBackup 81631 isp2100 not handling port_logged_out status correctly for CT requests 86862 Master filer panic during takeover - memory leak from dup_user_field() 86464 Volume SnapMirror from an F840,F880,F9XX to a platform other than F840,F880 or F9XX on restarting may lead to corruption on destination. -----Original Message----- From: Hill, Aaron [mailto:aaron.hill@navitaire.com] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 2:14 PM To: 'Chris Blackmor' Cc: 'Paul McGuinness (ext. 771)'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: Data ONTAP Upgrade Hey there, I welcome questions. Unfortunately, my answers may not be sufficient to satisfy your mental hunger. To be honest, I don't know exactly what the D8 does. I was informed that it fixes the snapmirror code. The error was found to occur only in our "specific" circumstance. So what was/is our circumstance? 1) F880 source snapmirroring 3 batch area volumes to an F820 target across a 20Mbit Ethernet WAN. 2) The amount of data change per day is high. Approximately 10-40Gb per volume. 3) We were experiencing poor throughput across the WAN link (carrier issue) and had to frequently abort the snapmirror and delete snapshots from the F880 source in order to prevent snapshot space over-running production data space. This throughput has since been addressed (before D8). 4) The F820 target panicked a couple of times and dumped to the ok prompt. One of the target volumes was found to be corrupt. It was difficult to say if the source filer caused it or the target filer developed the corruption independently. We had some cases open and ran wafl checks and scans on both filers as a result. No errors were turned up. 5) The crash dump file was ftp'd to NetApp. This lead to the 6.3.1D8 debug release. When I get some more time, I might read into it a bit further. For now, I am more than happy that they have addressed the issue and fixed it very quickly. We have not had any problems with 6.3.1 or the D8 releases. Thanks, Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Chris Blackmor [mailto:chris.blackmor@amd.com] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 6:48 AM To: Hill, Aaron Cc: 'Paul McGuinness (ext. 771)'; 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: Data ONTAP Upgrade What does the D8 fix for snapmirror? Inquiring minds want to know. ;) C- On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:18:19PM -0600, Hill, Aaron wrote: > We are running 6.3.1 on one filer (F880) and 6.3.1D8 (debug release for a > snapmirror problem we were having) on another (F820). 2 others still running > 6.2.2 I believe. > > As far as I know, all new F960s being shipped have 6.3.1 on them. > > So overall, I have to say I recommend it. If you are snapmirroring, make > sure you put 6.3.1D8 on your destination filer, that is the advice from our > NetApp representative. > > Thanks, > Aaron Hill > Systems Engineer > www.navitaire.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul McGuinness (ext. 771) [mailto:Paul.McGuinness@fineos.com] > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 2:58 AM > To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' > Subject: Data ONTAP Upgrade > > Hi, > I have a F720 currently running on Data ONTAP 6.1.2R2 and everything is > running fine. > My question is to those of you 6.6.2 (the current GA release) and those of > you on 6.3.1. > > I was going to upgrade to 6.2.2, just to keep my system up to date, but > according to the NOW site there are a good few more active systems running > 6.3.1. > > Would 6.3.1 be a better upgrade to go to? I also see that there is now a 6.4 > first customer shipment release (12th Feb) but I think I'll leave that for > those of you who have filers to play with.... > :o) > > So 6.6.2 or 6.3.1? > > > > > > ************************************************************************** > The information contained in this e-mail is confidential, > may be privileged and is intended only for the use of the > recipient named above. If you are not the intended > recipient or a representative of the intended recipient, > you have received this e-mail in error and must not copy, > use or disclose the contents of this email to anybody > else. If you have received this e-mail in error, please > notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and > permanently delete the copy you received. This email has > been swept for computer viruses. However, you should > carry out your own virus checks. > > > Registered in Ireland, No. 205721. http://www.FINEOS.com > ************************************************************************** -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- * Chris Blackmor _______ | * * Advanced Micro Devices \____ | | Toto... I've * * Phone: (512) 602-1608 /| | | | a feeling we're * * Fax: (512) 602-5155 | |___| | | not in Kansas * * Email: chris.blackmor(a)amd.com |____/ \| | anymore. * -------------------------------------------------------------------- * My comments are mine, and mine alone. * --------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

RE: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM
by DFinn＠studentadvantage.com 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

Is it ok to use different size DIMMs? Would it be ok to take 2 128MB ones from my F740 and use them in this F760? Thanks for all the assistance Dan -----Original Message----- From: McCarthy, Tim [mailto:timothy.mccarthy@netapp.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 6:50 AM To: DFinn(a)studentadvantage.com Subject: RE: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM As was mentioned, the J30 DIMM is marked on the motherboard. Try reseating the memory module and see if you get past it. If not, remove the memory module. Realize: you are running with half of your memory as the system uses the modules in pairs...removing one effectively removes two. If you have a large capacity system, you may run into problems as well.... --tmac -----Original Message----- From: DFinn(a)studentadvantage.com [mailto:DFinn@studentadvantage.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 1:33 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM here's the error on bootup: Alpha Open Firmware by FirmWorks Copyright 1995-2000 FirmWorks, Network Appliance. All Rights Reserved. Firmware release 2.8_a2 Memory size is 1024 MB Testing SIO Testing LCD Probing devices Testing 1024MB Clearing ECC Stuck-at:283MB,3 Replace DIMM J30 Startup aborted Unfortunately I do not currently have support from Netapp for this filer so I need to find a short term solution to my problem. The error above points out the bad dimm that needs replacement. 1. Can I just remove the bad dimm and run with less memory temporarily? 2. I have a spare F740 that I can rob parts from, can I take a DIMM from there and replace the bad one in this F760? 3. How do I locate DIMM J30? any and all help is really apprecaited. Thanks Dan

1 0

fund transfer
by elekecr 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

Dear Sir, My name is William Ume, Presently, I am working in an African country. I got your contact via an online network and felt you may be willing to pursue this with me. This proposal may sound strange to you or probably you may even think it is a joke, because of lots of funny mails circulating over the Internet. Well if you do, I really understand, but honestly my friend, I am really handicaped, because this is the only means available to me to communicate to you. Honestly, I think you should give me a trial, I need your assistance and the deal is good. The deal involves the transfer of funds, safely abroad. For your role, you are to receive a percentage of the funds, based on a sharing formula that will be agreed by both parties. If you are interested in pursuing this further please contact me via e-mail so that I can furnish you with the relevant details about the origin of the fund and the modalities for the deal. Please send your response to my private e-mail williamume(a)indiatimes.com William.

1 0

HTTP on Filers
by markallen＠micron.com 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

I'm thinking about testing HTTP on my test filer and was wondering if anyone had any comments on this product. Good or bad. I don't have any experience with running http on filers. Thanks -Mark

2 1

RE: F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM
by Alan McLachlan 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

> here's the error on bootup: . . . > Stuck-at:283MB,3 > Replace DIMM J30 > Startup aborted > Unfortunately I do not currently have support from Netapp for this filer so > I need to find a short term solution to my problem. The error above points > out the bad dimm that needs replacement. > 1. Can I just remove the bad dimm and run with less memory temporarily? Yes, although you will probably notice a performance hit. Also, they work in pairs so you will drop from 1GB straight to 512MB even if you leave it's parner in. > 2. I have a spare F740 that I can rob parts from, can I take a DIMM from > there and replace the bad one in this F760? They are different sizes (740 is 4 x 128, 760 is 4 x 256). Also, they work in pairs. You might yield 768MB, or the system might complain. I haven't tried this - sorry :o) > 3. How do I locate DIMM J30? The DIMM slots are marked on the mainboard. **** ASI Solutions Disclaimer **** The material transmitted may contain confidential and/or privileged material and is intended only for the addressee. If you receive this in error, please notify the sender and destroy any copies of the material immediately. ASI will protect your Privacy according to the 10 Privacy Principles outlined under the new Privacy Act, Dec 2001. This email is also subject to copyright. Any use of or reliance upon this material by persons or entities other than the addressee is prohibited. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments. **** END OF MESSAGE ****

1 0

F760 fails to pass POST, bad DIMM
by DFinn＠studentadvantage.com 04 Nov '03

04 Nov '03

here's the error on bootup: Alpha Open Firmware by FirmWorks Copyright 1995-2000 FirmWorks, Network Appliance. All Rights Reserved. Firmware release 2.8_a2 Memory size is 1024 MB Testing SIO Testing LCD Probing devices Testing 1024MB Clearing ECC Stuck-at:283MB,3 Replace DIMM J30 Startup aborted Unfortunately I do not currently have support from Netapp for this filer so I need to find a short term solution to my problem. The error above points out the bad dimm that needs replacement. 1. Can I just remove the bad dimm and run with less memory temporarily? 2. I have a spare F740 that I can rob parts from, can I take a DIMM from there and replace the bad one in this F760? 3. How do I locate DIMM J30? any and all help is really apprecaited. Thanks Dan

1 0

Single-thread NFS performance
by atticus＠satanic.org 03 Nov '03

03 Nov '03

Does anyone have ballpark numbers to share w/ single-thread nfs performance? Going from a 4500 running solaris 2.8 to a 760 and I'm capping out around 22mbit/s for single copies -- this hold pretty consistent w/ tcp and udp mounts (both w/ rsize=32768). This is across a WAN, but RTT is only ~16ms. Running multiple parallel copies will bump throughput to ~80mb/s.. Is this about right, or are there magic knobs I'm missing? Thanks.

2 3

From the Desk of Atta Ezere.
by dattezereu2＠netzero.com 01 Nov '03

01 Nov '03

Sir/Madam, I want to transfer to overseas (US$35.5m} from a Bank in Africa,I am seeking a reliable and honest person who will be capable and willing to do this transaction with me promise that he/her will never let me down in future or you help to seek an honest and reliable businessman who can assist us. I am Mr Atta Ezere, the Auditor General of a bank in Africa,,during the course of our auditing I discovered a floating fund in a domiciliary account opened in the 1990 and since 1993 nobody has operated on this account, after going through some old files in the record I discovered that the owner of the account who is a foreigner died without any traceable next of kin hence the dormant nature of the account and if i do remit this money out urgently it will be re-channeled into the bank's reserve. I am only contacting you as a foreigner because this money can only be approved to a foreigner or into foregner account.I need your full co- operation to make this work fine as i will use my office to see that the transaction is hitch free and On the conclusion of this business ,you will be given 25%of the total amount ,70%will be for me ,while 5% will be for expenses both parties might have incured during the process of this transaction. Please send your private telephone numbers as a need may arise either to call you in the day or night as occasion warrants. I look forward to your earliest reply through my private email address:ezereatta@yahoo.co.uk Regards, Atta Ezere. {Auditor General} ________________________________________________________________ The best thing to hit the internet in years - NetZero HiSpeed! Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER! Only $14.95/ month -visit www.netzero.com to sign up today!

1 0

RE: SNMP values keeps changing after every reboot. any solution to fix this?
by Hackworth, Brian 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Almost. DataFabric Manager uses the file system name as its key, rather than the SNMP OID index. I'm not aware of any way to trick MRTG into doing it that way. - Brian Hackworth When asked how Data Fabric Manager can handle this, the answer was that since it relies on a database, DFM is clever enough to update the index to check.

2 1

Re: SNMP values keeps changing after every reboot. any solution to fix this?
by Michel GELDENHUYS 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Hi StoRage, I discussed this few weeks ago with a NetApp engineer. Unfortunately, this is a "by-design" behaviour: MIB values are loaded during boot and in a random fashion so there is no way to forecast (or enforce) what MIB index will be for a particular volume. So it seems that there is no other way than manually modifying MRTG configuration file to take the changes into account. When asked how Data Fabric Manager can handle this, the answer was that since it relies on a database, DFM is clever enough to update the index to check. I hope this will help. Kind regards, Michel Geldenhuys Danone Belgium SA/NV +32 2 776 68 23 michel.geldenhuys(a)danone.com Sto Rage© <Net_Backer(a)hotmail.com> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 10/31/2003 03:42 AM To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> cc: Subject: SNMP values keeps changing after every reboot. any solution to fix this? Every time the filer is rebooted. the snmp values for disk changes. This affects our mrtg monitoring. Is there a script that helps overcome this issue? How are others monitoring disk usage using mrtg? TIA After last reboot: NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.1 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.2 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.3 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.4 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.5 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.6 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.7 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.8 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.9 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.10 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.11 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.12 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.13 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.14 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.15 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.16 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/.snapshot" Before the reboot: #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.1 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.2 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.3 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.4 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.5 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.6 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.7 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.8 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.9 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.10 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.11 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.12 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.13 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.14 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.15 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.16 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/.snapshot"

3 2

scsi timeouts
by Bui, Marcus 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

I have an F820, 6.4.2P6, with dual port FC card that's getting a lot of scsi timeout msgs on the 7b port. The scsi timeouts spans all disk shelves on the 7b loop. All other loop is fine. These started when I moved the 18GB FC9 shelves from a F880c to the F820. Working the tech support, I replaced a couple of the LRC, replaced two shelf cable interconect, recheck all the cables, replaced FC card slot 7, remove/reinsert all the drives, and ran fcal check which passed all fcal tests. The core file result indicated to bug #98110 but upgraded to v6.4.2P6 did not resolve these error msgs. The filer panic a few times before running v6.4.1 that's why tech support recommends upgraded to v6.4.2P6. Right now I disconnected the second loop 7b. Any ideas? Slot: 7b Description: Fibre Channel Host Adapter 7b (Dual-channel, QLogic 2200A rev. 5) Firmware Rev: 2.1.32 PCI Bus Width: 64-bit PCI Clock Speed: 33 MHz Error Msg:------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------- Sun Oct 26 09:05:30 CST [scsi.cmd.retrySuccess:info]: Device 7b.20: request successful after retry #1: cdb 0x2f:00182000:0400. Sun Oct 26 09:05:59 CST [ispfc_timeout_4:warning]: 7b.27 (0x0400001b) (0x039a7320,0x2f:00196800:0400,0/0,1157/264/0,19642/0): command timeout, quiescing drive to allow outstanding I/O to complete. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- thanks, Marcus Bui

1 0

unix group in NIS and CIFS
by Stephane Bentebba 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Hi all, i have a Filer running NIS and CIFS and specifically, specifying some Unix group (accessed by NIS) inside the CIFS configuration the problem is the following : the Giga card make some times to be up (as the spanning tree in the cisco switch requires 30 sec to come up) in this laps of time - NIS is unavailable (as the Filer complain at the reboot) - CIFS starts but doesn't correctly you can see the related bug 32129 : http://now.netapp.com/AskNOW/highlight_html.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnow.netapp… my question is : does anyone already encountered and solved this problem in another way that Netapp say (forgetting about Unix group in CIFS config / copy the NIS group definition locally on the Filer) the costumer is thinking about desengage the spanning tree at the switch side , i am not sure it will succeed -- jetez un oeil ici http://www.sensiva.com/ -- -- have a look here http://www.sensiva.com/ --

2 1

msdos 8.3 name and solstice
by Stephane Bentebba 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Hi all, - one of our Filer is running with NFS license and NIS - some Windoz client are using Solstice to connect on the Filer Solstice = a pcnfsd client that connect to a Unix machine with the pcnfsd server - this way, all pcnfsd Windows client can connect on the NFS Filer the problem is really strange not all but some only few of them encounter this problem > when copying files with long names to the Filer (throught Solstice), the filename is changed to a short version : "my document.doc" tunr into "mydocu~1.doc" on the Filer - fro; the Windoz client point of view from a Unix machine, the file remains with a long normal name "my document.doc" when hitting the Up button then going in the directory again, the file appear normally again (long form) this strange behavior implies numerous of problems does anyone already encounter this problem ? the Filer used to be in 537r3, upgrading the Filer in 613r2 doesn't change the problem ps : solstice was a Sun product that is no more supported... -- -- jetez un oeil ici http://www.sensiva.com/ -- -- have a look here http://www.sensiva.com/ --

1 0

ndmpcopy loopback perf
by George Kahler 31 Oct '03

31 Oct '03

Hi, when I ndmpcopy from say, volA to volB on the same head does ndmpcopy use the loopback to do this ? If so, at what speed can the loopback run at ? I can not seem to go faster then about 20 GB/hr (about 50 Mbits/sec). I do have GigE NICs in the filer for regular nfs connections to clients. Thanks, George ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- George Kahler e-mail: george(a)yorku.ca Sr. Systems Administrator humans: (416) 736-2100 x.22699 Computing and Network Services machines: (416) 736-5830 Ontario, Canada, M3J-1P3

5 5

AIX write performance
by bill_link＠dstoutput.com 29 Oct '03

29 Oct '03

Toasters, I am having difficulty with large file writes to an f720 from any of my IBM hosts, if I start a large write with dd then try to do anything on the filer from that host it hangs until the write completes. From a different host access to the filer is near normal. I do not have this problem with linux boxes on the same network so it seems that the problem lies with AIX somehow. IBM has been sympathetic although not very helpful. Any thoughts would be much appreciated. Bill Link System Admin Dstoutput inc.

6 6

REQUEST FROM MBONGO
by mbongo bethizuli savimbi 29 Oct '03

29 Oct '03

DEAR SIR, I HOPE THIS MAIL WILL MEET YOU WELL. MY NAME IS MBONGO SAVIMBI.MY MOTHER IS BETHIZULI UNKWOMU.MY FATHER IS DR JONAS SAVIMBI.MY MOTHER WAS A CONCUBINE OF MY FATHER BEFORE HE DIED.I AM THE ONLY CHILD OF MY MOTHER FOR MY FATHER.AS YOU MAY WELL KNOW FATHER WAS LEADER FOR UNITA WHICH FOUGHT FOR THE TOTAL LIBERATION OF ANGOLA AND HE DIED LAST YEAR FEBRUARY. BEFORE THE DEATH OF MY FATHER HE MADE SOME PROVISION FOR ME AND MOTHER.HE HAD ALREADY DEPOSITED SOME MONEY FOR OUR UPKEEP IN THE EVENT OF HIS UNTIMELY DEATH.I WAS MADE THE NEXT OF KIN IN RESPECT OF THE DEPOSIT. NOW WE HAVE EVIDENCE OF THE MONEY AND WHEN WE TRIED ANY HOW TO GET SOME OF THE MONEY FROM THE COMPANY WHERE THE MONEY WAS DEPOSITED THE COMPANY TOLD US HOW WE COULD COLLECT THE MONEY. BUT THIS WE CANNOT DO BECAUSE OF OUR PRESENT FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT.SO WE ARE WRITING TO YOU,IF YOU WILL BE WILLING AND ABLE TO HELP US TO COLLECT THE MONEY. IF YOU ARE WILLING AND ABLE TO ASSIST US WE SHALL THEN DISCUSS FURTHER ON THE ISSUE.WE SHALL THEN DISCLOSE TO YOU THE AMOUT INVOLVED AND THEN SETTLE WITH YOU WHAT YOU SHALL GET FOR ASSISTING US.WHEN WE ARE ALL AGREED ON EVERYTHING WE SHALL THEN UNFOLD TO YOU THE DETAILS OF THE BANK WHERE THE MONEY IS PRESENTLY LODGED FOR YOU TO CLAIM IT ON OUR BEHALF.SIR NOTE THAT THIS IS FOR PRECAUTIONARY MEASURE AS WE ARE BEING CONTINUALLY HARRASED AND INTIMIDATED FOR MY LATE FATHER'S PERCIEVED SINS. IF YOU INTERESTED PLEASE RESPOND TO ME PROMPTLY. WE THANK YOU IN ADVANCE BELIEVING YOU WILL HELP US. BEST WISHES:MBONGO ------------------------------------------------- Email Enviado utilizando o serviço MegaMail

1 0

FC TapeSAN with IBM 3583 errors
by Carlos A. Alvarez 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

Has anyone working a Filer with a FC tape adapter (X2051A) with a IBM 3583 in SAN Brocade enviroment? I trying without success to connect to Bridge FC/SCSI in IBM 3583 from FC tape adapter in Filer825 which send the following error messages. Any information will be apreciated Fri Oct 24 11:58:53 ART [rc:notice]: Onlining Fibre Channel adapter 1a. Fri Oct 24 11:58:53 ART [ispfc_init_0:error]: Nameserver request GID_FT from Fibre Channel adapter 1a failed: (0x8001, 0x9, 0x7) Server unable to perform operation. FC-4 types not registered. Fri Oct 24 11:58:53 ART [ispfc_init_0:error]: Nameserver request GNN_FT from Fibre Channel adapter 1a failed: (0x8001, 0x9, 0x7) Server unable to perform operation. FC-4 types not registered. Fri Oct 24 11:58:53 ART [ispfc_init_0:error]: Note: Interrogation of SAN visible from Fibre Channel adapter 1a shows no SCSI devices attached to this fabric. Fri Oct 24 11:58:53 ART [ispfc_init_0:notice]: Fibre Channel adapter 1a now online F825 ONTAP 6.4.2P6 (FC card X2051A) IBM 3583 2 - IBM ULT3580-TD1 25D4 1 - IBM ULT3580-TD1 36U3 Brocade Silkworm 3200 (fw 3.0.2c)

3 2

Quarantined spam messages since your last digest
by spambusters＠mathworks.com 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

The following messages were quarantined by PureMessage because they appear to be spam. Please delete the lines from the reply for those messages you DON'T want approved and FORWARD this email to spambusters(a)mathworks.com to release your messages. Please be aware that we run two instances of PureMessage. This digest came from The MathWorks Natick, MA scanner. Please mention this fact if you need any of these messages released. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Id Time Score From Subject ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [#s1g] 22:48 72% Okon Ben [PMX:#] Please kindly help me. << Mr. Ben [#tBo] 01:47 75% send1(a)kawaneba.n [PMX:##] $BL$>5Bz9-9p"(!ZL5?3::$G![%+!<%I [#s0I] 21:43 82% Adams Eze [PMX:##] REPLY << From the desk of Dr. JUD [#s0U] 21:50 91% Tina Van Borsch. [PMX:###] AWARD NOTIFICATION! << LUCKYDAY [#tEg] 04:06 93% Benjamine Madu [PMX:###] URGENT ATTENTION. << FROM: THE D [#tB0] 01:54 93% Chen Hsiu Fei [PMX:###] MEMO FROM HUA NAN COMMERCIAL BAN [#tD0] 03:44 97% Mega Lottery Int [PMX:####] CONGRATULATION << MEGA LOTTERY [#tRM] 06:34 97% Mega Lottery Int [PMX:####] CONGRATULATION << MEGA LOTTERY [#slc] 17:33 97% Van Dyke [PMX:####] WINNING NOTIFICATION/FINAL NOTI [#skA] 16:53 97% elgordodelaprimi [PMX:####] CONGRATULATIONS ! ! ! YOUR LOTT [#szw] 21:28 97% Mike Oti [PMX:####] ATTENTION PLEASE << Dear sir We [#sxw] 20:15 98% Steve Uwa [PMX:####] request << DEAR PARTNER I GUESS [#sjQ] 16:39 98% isiomawilly@tisc [PMX:####] HELLO << From the desk of: DR.I [#s2g] 23:42 98% Paul Mboma [PMX:####] BUSINESS CONCERN << FROM: PAUL [#sm4] 18:26 98% simonlawal@tisca [PMX:####] hello << FROM ; SIMON A. J . LA [#sxY] 20:00 99% Jacob Rothschild [PMX:####] HELLO << YOCUS OIL COMPANY RUSS [#syk] 20:38 99% Jacob Rothschild [PMX:####] HELLO << YOCUS OIL COMPANY RUSS [#sjY] 16:40 99% Otrghbsdfr Hjdeu [PMX:####] URGENT BUSINESS TRANSACTION << [#tEM] 04:01 100% Dr James Ikenna [PMX:####] BUSINESS ASSISTANCE << URGENT P The Management spambusters(a)mathworks.com

1 0

Quarantined spam messages since your last digest
by spambusters＠mathworks.com 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

The following messages were quarantined by PureMessage because they appear to be spam. By FORWARDing this email to spambusters(a)mathworks.com, you can request the quarantine admin to release some or all of the messages. Please delete the lines from the reply for those messages you don't want approved. Please be aware that we run two instances of PureMessage. This digest came from The MathWorks Cambridge, UK scanner. Please mention this fact if you need any of these messages released. Thank you. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Id Time Score From Subject ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [#k2A] 22:58 98% Mariam Abacha [PMX:####] INFORMATION ! << FROM: THE DESK [#k2o] 23:37 100% Hope Olas [PMX:####] LOTTERY AWARD WINNER << INTERNA [#k3A] 00:39 100% Hope Olas [PMX:####] LOTTERY AWARD WINNER << INTERNA [#k3Y] 01:05 100% William Gomez. [PMX:####] STRICTLLY A PRIVATE BUSINESS PR [#lBo] 03:59 100% Smith Okoye [PMX:####] TRUSTED PARTNER << CONTRACT REV The Management spambusters(a)mathworks.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters