toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

Your Email Just Won a Car.
by philipsmith1 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

VINTAGE CARS PROMOTION, 35 WEST FIFTH STREET, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLAND. WE ARE CONTACTING YOU AS A RESULT OF OUR PROMOTION PROGRAMME HELD ON THE 12TH OF JANUARY 2004. Good day, From the desk of the co-coordinator of VINTAGE CARS PROMOTION NETHERLAND, we are delighted to bring to your notice that you are one of our winners. Congratulations, we are pleased to inform you that your email address attached to SECURITY PROCESSING CODE No.: HMCP/50030/0567 won the promo in the first category along with two others. You are therefore approved to claim your price, which is a BMW Z8 with the specifications below; 2003 BMW Z8 General Info Price: $139,000 Miles Per Gallon: 14/23 mpg Curb Weight: 3600 lbs Layout: Front-Engine/RWD Transmission: 6-Speed Manual Engine Type: V8 Displacement: 4941 cc Horsepower: 394 bhp @ 6600 rpm Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 3800 rpm Redline: 7000 rpm Performance 0-60 mph: 4.2 sec 0-100 mph: 10.2 sec Quarter Mile: 12.6 sec @ 112 mph Skidpad: .92g Top Speed: 155 mph Braking, 60-0 mph: 116 ft Slalom Speed: 61.3 mph Please note that our three winners emails were drawn from the entire WWW (World Wide Web) using a quantitative technique of random sampling. As such only three email addresses were collected and awarded our winners, so you should consider yourself a very lucky person. Furthermore, note this promotion is held once every five years, just to give people around the world the opportunity to win and drive the most powerful cars in the world. You are advised to contact the programme co-ordinator with your security processing code number to claim your car; Name: Fredrick Teller Email: fredrickteller(a)indiatimes.com Congratulations once more and please be informed that you have to claim your car within 14 days from the date of receipt of this mail. Yours Sincerely, Mr. Philip Smith. Promotion Manager. ---------------- Powered by telstra.com

1 0

Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera
by Bruce Arden 30 Jan '04

30 Jan '04

I have been asked what the problems would be migrating from NetApp filers to EMC Celerra. Has anyone had any experience of doing this. What features would I loose? - Bruce -- Bruce Arden arden(a)nortelnetworks.com barden2(a)csc.com CSC, Nortel, London Rd, Harlow, England +44 1279 40 2877

9 12

Mac OS X NFS attr caching
by Todd C. Merrill 29 Jan '04

29 Jan '04

If anyone has good experience or knowledge of how Mac OS X (particularly Panther) does NFS attr caching, or how to tweak it, I'd like to hear from you. After a wholesale upgrade of most of our Macs to Panther recently, network traces show subsequent getattr calls go all the way from the client to the toaster if they are separated in time by anything more than a few milliseconds. Needless to say, this is now burying some of our toasters (on one 960 at a rate of 40-70,000 ops/s). Thank goodness NetApp's caching works. Until next time... The MathWorks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

1 0

Sybase and snapshots
by John Hope-Bailie 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

Hi there, Some years ago I recall being told that hosting Sybase on a filer was o.k. but that there were problems with snapshots. Apparently, Sybase 10 did not support being "quiesced" prior to the snapshot, so the integrity of the snapshot could not be assured. At this time, the talk was that Sybase 11 would/could overcome this issue. Can anyone share their experience running Sybase 10 or 11 (on Sun/Solaris) with filers, and using snapshots ? regards, John Hope-Bailie johnhb(a)sourceconsulting.co.za --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.571 / Virus Database: 361 - Release Date: 2004.01.26

1 0

clean repost cifs/nfs backup
by Jeff Burton 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

Sorry for the repost, I'm working out some personal issues with hotmail... We are migrating into a larger NetBackup 4.5 domain and we are needing to change from using a Unix media server to a Windows media server. We also cannot use NDMP at this time. Both restrictions are mostly due to political, management, and budget reasons. So our choices as I see it are: - Use PCNFS to backup/restore the NFS data and CIFS shares to backup CIFS data. - Use CIFS shares to backup/restore both NFS and CIFS data - Any others? We tried both of the above and neither worked perfectly. After opening more security holes than I would have liked, we were able to backup the data successfully both ways. But the restores gave the errors at the end of this message. I'm not necessarily looking for a fix for the problems below, however it would be nice to know why this is happening. What I am looking for is the most reliable and secure method to backup our 12 filers using NetBackup 4.5 without using NDMP or a Unix media server. I think the most convenient would be to use the CIFS shares to backup all, but we have volumes that have both NFS and CIFS data inside. So, I?m a little weary about the recovery of file permission. I know the NFS permissions will still be there, but how would I actually recover the data from the Windows media server? When we recovered the NFS data to a NFS qtree from the Windows media server, it created files that I had to go into the netapp! .jsh cli to delete, and 2 files that I have no idea how to delete since nobody can delete from any platform and netapp.jsh says it cannot delete the file (Does anyone know how I can delete these files? I have the cifs.ignore_acl_for_nfs_root option on). I would rather not use the PCNFS solution because it seems to be a bit insecure?or maybe I?m not setting it up correctly. Thanks in advance, Jeff 1/26/2004 2:45:13 PM mediaServer mediaServer Warning 276 Retrieve from client mediaServer: WRN - error writing file: \\netappRestore\etc\log\ems.4 (err=WIN32 282: The mounted file system does not support extended attributes. ) 1/26/2004 2:45:14 PM mediaServer mediaServer Warning 276 Retrieve from client mediaServer: WRN - error writing byte: 116736 1/26/2004 2:45:15 PM mediaServer mediaServer Warning 276 Retrieve from client mediaServer: WRN - wanted buffer size: 16485 1/26/2004 2:45:20 PM mediaServer mediaServer Warning 276 Retrieve from client mediaServer: WRN - can't create file: \\netappRestore\etc\boot\x86\firmware\rodan (WIN32 5: Access is denied. ) 1/26/2004 2:46:12 PM mediaServer mediaServer Error 276 Retrieve client restore EXIT STATUS 5: the restore failed to recover the requested files 1/26/2004 2:49:33 PM mediaServer medi! aServer Warning 277 Retrieve from client mediaServer: WRN - can't create file: \\netappBackup\C$\etc\zoneinfo\Asia\Makassar (WIN32 6: The handle is invalid. ) 1/26/2004 2:49:52 PM mediaServer mediaServer Error 277 Retrieve client restore EXIT STATUS 1: the requested operation was partially successful _________________________________________________________________ Check out the new MSN 9 Dial-up fast & reliable Internet access with prime features! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=dialup/home&ST=1

1 0

None
by Jeff Burton 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

_________________________________________________________________ Scope out the new MSN Plus Internet Software optimizes dial-up to the max! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/plus&ST=1

1 0

cifs/nfs backup environment
by Jeff Burton 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

1 0

RE: ONTAP simulator http license?
by Meyer, Brad 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

Try these... Brad BKHEXNB is a fcp Simulator site license NAZOMKC is a http Simulator site license -----Original Message----- From: CTG - Bob Weiler [mailto:bweiler@ctgwi.com] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 7:24 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: ONTAP simulator http license? Does anyone know the simulator license for http? When I installed the simulator I noticed the keys for fcp and http are identical. The installation guide has the following: ... license dafs=TBPGWWF license fcp=BKHEXNB <- license http=BKHEXNB <- license nfs=BQOEAZL ... Thanks, Bob -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Dave Hitz Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:29 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: ONTAP Simulator available on NOW Some of you may know that NetApp Engineering uses an ONTAP Simulator as part of our development process. (The simulator runs all of ONTAP as a process under Linux. At a very low level, we spoof the disk drivers, so that disks are simulated by local files. We spoof the network drivers by putting the Linux Ethernet card into promiscuous mode and creating a fake MAC address associated with the simulator.) Enough technical details. The point of this message is that we are now making the simulator available to customers so that they can experiment with ONTAP features and commands without putting production systems at risk. I have had many customers tell me that they wished they had a way to play with new releases and new features, but they didn't have a safe place to do it. Just to be clear: This is not production software. It's ONTAP running on top of Linux, so don't use it for performance testing. We have no formal support program. Don't call NetApp support. This is an "as is" tool. (Some restrictions may apply. :-) On the other hand, I think you will find the simulator to be very useful for experimenting with ONTAP. Hundreds of NetApp engineers use it every day, and we have been using the simulator for over a year in NetApp training classes. Not only can you experiment with the features of a single filer, but you can run multiple simulators and experiment with features like SnapMirror, SnapVault, and Cluster Fail Over. It doesn't support Fibre Channel, because that would take more hardware, but it does support iSCSI and all of the other TCP/IP protocols, including NFS, CIFS, HTTP and FTP, as well as network management protocols like SNMP and NDMP. Here are some details: You can download the simulator from NOW at <http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/simulator>. We have created a category in the NOW community forums called "ONTAP Simulator" that can be accessed at <http://forums.netapp.com/showcategory.asp?cid=172>. And finally, we have created a majordomo mailing list that people can join at xdl-simulator(a)netapp.com. (You know the drill. To join send to majordomo(a)netapp.com, not to the simulator list itself.) And of course, feel free to talk about it here on toasters. As I said above, the simulator is NOT formally supported, but some volunteers at NetApp have agreed to informally answer questions to the xdl-simulator mailing list. Have fun! Dave Hitz Founder and EVP Engineering, Network Appliance

2 1

SNMP values keeps changing after every reboot. any solution to fix this?
by Sto Rage© 28 Jan '04

28 Jan '04

Every time the filer is rebooted. the snmp values for disk changes. This affects our mrtg monitoring. Is there a script that helps overcome this issue? How are others monitoring disk usage using mrtg? TIA After last reboot: NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.1 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.2 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.3 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.4 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.5 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.6 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.7 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.8 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.9 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.10 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.11 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.12 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.13 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.14 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/.snapshot" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.15 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/" NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.16 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/.snapshot" Before the reboot: #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.1 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.2 = STRING: "/vol/vol2/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.3 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.4 = STRING: "/vol/vol1/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.5 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.6 = STRING: "/vol/vol4/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.7 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.8 = STRING: "/vol/vol6/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.9 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.10 = STRING: "/vol/vol0/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.11 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.12 = STRING: "/vol/vol5/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.13 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.14 = STRING: "/vol/vol3/.snapshot" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.15 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/" #NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::dfFileSys.16 = STRING: "/vol/vol7/.snapshot"

3 2

RE: Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera
by Jeff Burton 23 Jan '04

23 Jan '04

I have recently evaluated their NS600, which is basically a small Celerra (same O/S, same FS). The only products that I can think of that NetApp has where EMC does not have a competing product are VLD, MultiStore, VFM, and SnapVault. But EMC has a TON of software that NetApp does not have such as HighRoad (basically will send large NAS requests over the SAN to speed up transfer), OnCourse (in-band multi-platform migration tool), FULLY functional WORM software/hardware, Legato, Documentum, VMware, .... EMC is the closest company, that I can think of, to having a complete Information Life-cycle Management solution. Do most people need all this software, nope, but it's nice to have these options. As G- said there are a lot of, "...piece(s) of 'value-added' crap from EMC." (I love that!). With that said, NetApp is so "open" that you can incorporate their filers into most other vendor's product solutions. EMC hardware is also better supported in more vendor's storage software solutions. As of 6 months ago nobody that I know of except NetApp had software that would adequately manage a NetApp; hence the cool perl scripts that we all create to manage the filers. I was also surprised to see that EMC was about 40% less expensive than NetApp (I got as close to an apples to apples comparison as I could). Now for the bad news, management. There is a reason EMC makes SO much money in professional services. When it comes to building and managing a storage environment, EMC is to NetApp what a Colorado Rocky Mountain double black diamond is to a Illinois glacier flattened mountain's green circle. I was amazed at how much they improved the Celerra O/S and it's management software. But to get to the point were you would know how to take full advantage of everything would take 50x longer than it would with NetApp's filers. Also, there is not just one item to manage. You have to manage the linux workstation, the data mover(s), and the disk controller with different tools. The linux workstation and data movers are somewhat linked, but you need a separate software license for Navisphere (?), which we had to install on a separate Windows workstation. Now you have to manage that workstation as well. So not only is the management of each item more difficult but there are 4 items that need to be managed separately instead of just 1. Since I only evaluated this equipment I have no idea how reliable it is. I can tell you it took 3-5 EMC techs 4 days to set this up to the point were I could copy data to it. The NetApp took me about 40 minutes to install and start copying data to the NetApp. Since this was an eval you know EMC put it's best foot forward. They were very nice about everything but my clients would rather get their space today as opposed to 4 days from now, even if it is accompanied by a warm hug. DART OS updates also took 4 times longer with 3 times as much down-time when compared to DOT. To sum up, IMHO EMC is going in the right direction but they have a long way to go before they can compete with NetApp's NAS solution. As of right now (and discounting reliability which I can not speak to) both EMC and NetApp have great NAS solutions; EMC is better for HUGE environments (100's of TB) and NetApp is better for small to large environments. EMC will be less expensive, but NetApp will have a much lower TCO. EMC is better for they-manage-it tech groups, and NetApp wins in we-manage-it groups (until you learn EMC's solution which could take years, at which point it's a tie). Speed is too difficult to get an even comparison, but it's close enough so that only a few environments would actually see a measurable difference. Reliability, can't say for sure but it would be hard to beat the NetApp uptime in our environment. As for support, their help desk's are both good, SE's are both great, I like powerlink.emc better than now.netapp, but EMC does not have toasters. I like being able to learn from other companies environments. I should also say that about 90% of the people I've met up the EMC chain were very intelligent and dedicated. Same with NetApp, but considering the complexity of the EMC environment I've met 40 people over there from SE's to Directors/VP. As many of you probably know, there are too companies that employ people that don't have a clue what there talking about. And finally to answer the original question: there may not be any problems or features lost, but get ready to spend about 6 months reading manuals. Thanks, -J _________________________________________________________________ Find high-speed net deals comparison-shop your local providers here. https://broadband.msn.com

1 0

Using SyncSort Backup Express NDMP on 740 filer
by Maglinger, Paul 23 Jan '04

23 Jan '04

Greetings to all... Due to problems getting Veritas BackupExec 9.0 to play nicely with our 740 filer (can see the volumes and shares, but they are greyed out... tried using User Defined Selection and would get a pop-up saying it couldn't access the files). So, as we also use SyncSort Backup Express, we are trying to use NDMP, and now we come to the issue. By using NDMP, it doesn't appear that we can redirect our restores so our only choice is to restore over the top of the existing files. This raises another issue in that it appears that we couldn't do a restore to any other type machine than a Network Applicance NAS. We were hoping that in a disaster recovery situation, we could restore to Intel machine but I don't see where that's possible using NDMP. Is there a workaround for this? Can I get some insight here? Our glory is not in never falling, but rising every time we fall. Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com

3 2

RE: Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera
by Garavito, Donald, CTR, OSD-ATL 23 Jan '04

23 Jan '04

Nick, I definitely don't want to trade in my 5 filers (F880, F85, F87, FAS940, R150) for a Celerra, but sometimes decisions are not based on technical merit, but "political". Don -----Original Message----- From: Nick Steel (Lists) [mailto:mrlist@noid.org] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 6:02 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera I can't help but ask, why on earth would you want to go away from a toaster over to a Celerra? I would never use a Celerra for anything other than a boat anchor[1]. I had one. It was horrible, absolutely horrible. It was down 1/3 of the time and that isn't an exageration. I had to endure 16+ hour fsck's, almost half a dozen datamover panics a day. I replaced it with F840's and I've never had an issue since. I'll stop ranting now otherwise I'll start foaming at the mouth again... - Nick [1] And that's being very nice about it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sto Rage(c)" <Net_Backer(a)hotmail.com> To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:32 PM Subject: Re: Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera > Oh Boy! Did I create a storm in here!. I had many of you ask me for > details. I am doing that right now. Will email you individually once I > have compiled my issues. -G > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sto Rage(c)" <Net_Backer(a)hotmail.com> > To: "Bruce Arden" <arden(a)nortelnetworks.com>; <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 8:52 PM > Subject: Re: Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera > > > > I don't work for NetApp. But first ask what features would you GAIN > by > > migrating to a Calera. > > You loose so many features, the first being the simplicity to manage > > them. > > > > We just moved all of our NAS storage off Celeras to NetApps because > of > > the so many issues. > > Email me directly incase you need more info. > > -G > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Bruce Arden" <arden(a)nortelnetworks.com> > > To: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 10:44 AM > > Subject: Migrating from NetApp to EMC Celera > > > > > > > I have been asked what the problems would be migrating from NetApp > > > filers to EMC Celerra. Has anyone had any experience of doing > this. > > > What features would I loose? > > > > > > - Bruce > > > > > > -- > > > Bruce Arden arden(a)nortelnetworks.com barden2(a)csc.com > > > CSC, Nortel, London Rd, Harlow, England +44 1279 40 2877 > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

RE: Using SyncSort Backup Express NDMP on 740 filer
by Garavito, Donald, CTR, OSD-ATL 23 Jan '04

23 Jan '04

Paul, Currently using BEX 5.1.c/NDMP to back up filers. Have been able to redir restores of file systems/folders or individual files, however there are a few gotchas. The restore must go to a destination that has the same file system/security type of the original source. Thus if you back up CIFS shares that use Windows security you must restore to a destination that also has Windows security and it must be a "local" device, ie, you can't restore to a CIFS mounted share on a Windows box. Conversely, you cannot restore to a mounted export on a UNIX box. Supposely this is going to fixed in a later release of BEX, not sure if it will be incorporated in 5.2 coming out late spring/summer this year. Don Garavito Storage Team Lead OUSD(ATL) Pentagon -----Original Message----- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:PMAGLINGER@scvl.com] Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 6:33 PM To: 'NetApps list server' Subject: Using SyncSort Backup Express NDMP on 740 filer Greetings to all... Due to problems getting Veritas BackupExec 9.0 to play nicely with our 740 filer (can see the volumes and shares, but they are greyed out... tried using User Defined Selection and would get a pop-up saying it couldn't access the files). So, as we also use SyncSort Backup Express, we are trying to use NDMP, and now we come to the issue. By using NDMP, it doesn't appear that we can redirect our restores so our only choice is to restore over the top of the existing files. This raises another issue in that it appears that we couldn't do a restore to any other type machine than a Network Applicance NAS. We were hoping that in a disaster recovery situation, we could restore to Intel machine but I don't see where that's possible using NDMP. Is there a workaround for this? Can I get some insight here? Our glory is not in never falling, but rising every time we fall. Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com

1 0

they used to be the only ones.
by Cbose 23 Jan '04

23 Jan '04

The first worth substitute of all existing men`s remedies! Be aware that now the peak of your selxual activity is realy accessible! All you need is to visit http://onlinemanufacturer.com/mx/index.php?pid=genviag Thanks to the proprietary blend of unique herkbs the four wonderful efkfects are achieved: *blood stream to the penlis is restored *stored tesltosterone is unleashed *activation of the body's naltural holrmone production heightens your sensation *the peknis does enklarge, the changes are being permanent! At last you can enljoy your secxual life in full measure without any risk for your healkth! Don`t wakste your time! Get more inkfo straightforwardly at http://onlinemanufacturer.com/mx/index.php?pid=genviag

1 0

greetings from robbinson
by fredrobbinson＠catcha.com 21 Jan '04

21 Jan '04

Dear sir, My Name is Fred Robbinson presently working in foreign banking section of a bank I seek your assistance in helping me transfer the sum of ($8.5million) Eight million five hundred thousand US dollars into your country for investment. These funds are ready in one accounts managed by me for disbursement to you. On our agreement, we shall commence on procedure in other for me to be able to transfer the funds to you. Please if you're trustworthy and you can handle this transaction kindly reply to my email address below for further instruction on how we can proceed. Regards, Fred Robbinson. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- This mail is sent through: Catcha.com Get your FREE Email from Catcha! http://mail.catcha.com

1 0

RE: additional fc9 shelf
by Illa, Randolph 21 Jan '04

21 Jan '04

While all disks are hot-swappable (assuming not active in a filesystem) all shelves are not. I believe the only shelves that are hot-swappable/hot-upgradable are DS14 shelves. On your current platform, power-cycling head (I would power-cycle all shelves as well) is needed to resolve disk addressing. HTH -randy -----Original Message----- From: Magnar Stav Johanssen [mailto:magnar@infostream.no] Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 3:12 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: additional fc9 shelf Hi! On my F630 running OnTAP 5.3.7R3 with one copper Fibre Channel Host Adapter and 3 FC9 shelfs connected (in one single loop). I would like to add a additional fc9 shelf to that loop. Do I need to powercycle the filer or will the filer find the new shelf without powercycle?? Regards, Magnar

1 0

additional fc9 shelf
by Magnar Stav Johanssen 21 Jan '04

21 Jan '04

Hi! On my F630 running OnTAP 5.3.7R3 with one copper Fibre Channel Host Adapter and 3 FC9 shelfs connected (in one single loop). I would like to add a additional fc9 shelf to that loop. Do I need to powercycle the filer or will the filer find the new shelf without powercycle?? Regards, Magnar

1 0

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 21 Jan '04

21 Jan '04

User mailbox exceeds allowed size: gustavo(a)PaginasMoviles.com.ar Original message follows. Received: from pc76 [161.111.140.76] by alsolnet.com (SMTPD32-8.05) id AD63BF90100; Wed, 21 Jan 2004 06:58:59 -0300 Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:03:56 +0100 To: gustavo(a)paginasmoviles.com.ar Subject: Hi From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Message-ID: <dtjsqhfhoftthvitows(a)mathworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--------816548801647847" ----------816548801647847 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Test =) mnqdedkfuqjgomfkggs -- Test, yep. ----------816548801647847 Content-Type: application/x-msdownload; name="leiypgohbve.exe" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="wmtpjyfmn.exe" TVqQAAMAAAAEAAAA//8AALgAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAyAAAAA4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4g RE9TIG1vZGUuDQ0KJAAAAAAAAADchu8bmOeBSJjngUiY54FImOeBSJvngUgW+JJIxeeBSGTH k0iZ54FIX+GHSJnngUhSaWNomOeBSAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABQRQAATAEEAN9uCkAAAAAA AAAAAOAADwELAQUMACQAAABCAAAAAAAAijEAAAAQAAAAQAAAAABAAAAQAAAAAgAABAAAAAAA AAAEAAAAAAAAAACgAAAABAAAOScBAAIAAAAAABAAABAAAAAAEAAAEAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAA AAAAADhBAADIAAAAAJAAAKADAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAOAEAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGJlYWdsZQAAhiMAAAAQAAAAJAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAA AGAucmRhdGEAANQHAAAAQAAAAAgAAAAoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAABALmRhdGEAAABONQAA AFAAAAAKAAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAwC5yc3JjAAAAoAMAAACQAAAABAAAADoAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA [message truncated]

1 0

Congratulations ..
by Your Name 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

FROM: THE DESK OF MANAGING DIRECTOR CLAIM FILE NUMBER: EG/008045160027.DEC /04 BATCH NUMBER:100000488 19-01-04 ATTENTION: RE: AWARD NOTIFICATION FINAL NOTICE This is your final notice of winning results for the EL GORDO super raw held on the 23th of DEC 2003 but later released this jan 4TH 2004 due to a mix up numbers and addresses. In the 3rd series, playing 26 of 66,000 full tickets in a group of 35 participants applying over $50,000,00 (Fifty Million Dollars) in cash.Your numbers have been qualified and cleared for a lump sum payment of $615,810,00 (Six hundred and fifteen thousand,eight hundred and ten dollars) in cash.Congratulations!!! Please be informed that due to all failed efforts to communicate with you,your award was deposited with a security company insured to your name and claim file number EG/008045160027.DEC /03. To avoid any unwarranted taking advantage of the situation by participants,we ask you to keep this notification strictly confidential until the processing of your claim is complete and funds remitted to your designated bank account.Be advised that claim processing will be handled by Mr. FRED EMANUEL manager of Granar Security Company S.A. at tel:+34 609 450 931 FAX +34 606 889 146 Deadline for this notification is 26th of feb 2004. the award will be returned unclaimed. On behalf of all staff and members, I wish to congratulate you on your great achievement and thank you for choosing International Lotto Commission. Sincerely, MR. EDUARDO JUAN MORALES DIRECTOR. CLAIM REF.SERIAL NUMBER :EG/008045160027.DEC/03BATCH100000488 Nº-000166-00123154 _____________________________________ Get your webmail @ drunkandstoned.com Unlike your crack habit... it's free! http://www.drunkandstoned.com

1 0

Congratulations ..
by Your Name 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

1 0

RE: CIFS Domain Access problem
by Kumar, Rahul 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

Going to plain 6.3 or 6.4 or higher would work . Ontap properly recognizes Windows 2000 domain (FQDN) when running cifs setup Regards Rahul ************************ Rahul Kumar Development Operations Group, UGS PLM Solutions Pune, India Email: Rahul.Kumar(a)ugsplm.com Tele: +91 20 22930812 / 900 Fax: +91 20 22933679 Cell: +91 20 33150979 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephane Bentebba Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 2:57 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: CIFS Domain Access problem i heard about cifs buf in 6.1.X ontapp version you could try to upgrade the filer in 633 if possible and make another try Blake Folgner wrote: > Hello, > > One of my customer's filers running 6.1.2 is having problems > connecting to the proper NT domain. When I run CIFS setup and try to > have it logon to his domain TILEANDMARBLE it try's to connect in NT4 > mode and not AD. But if I just use the name LAN it will connect to the > domain with no problem. His domain is named lan.tileandmarble.com so > I'm guessing that the filer is recognizing that and not the NETBIOS > name TILEANDMARBLE. When I join the filer to the LAN domain it is not > viable under my network places since it's joined to the LAN domain and > not TILEANDMARBLE. Is their any way around this problem? > > Thanks for your time and help. > > Blake >

1 0

CIFS Domain Access problem
by Blake Folgner 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

Hello, One of my customer's filers running 6.1.2 is having problems connecting to the proper NT domain. When I run CIFS setup and try to have it logon to his domain TILEANDMARBLE it try's to connect in NT4 mode and not AD. But if I just use the name LAN it will connect to the domain with no problem. His domain is named lan.tileandmarble.com so I'm guessing that the filer is recognizing that and not the NETBIOS name TILEANDMARBLE. When I join the filer to the LAN domain it is not viable under my network places since it's joined to the LAN domain and not TILEANDMARBLE. Is their any way around this problem? Thanks for your time and help. Blake

2 1

please read and get back.
by Dr. Omonigho Omo 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL I am Dr O.Omonigho, We need your help to recieve the sum of Sixteen million Two hundred and Fifty thousand Dollars (US$16.25M) which represent an over invoiced contract that is floating in our system, Department of Minerals & Energy, South Africa. Please contact me For more information on this email, the deal is 100% hitch free. I can only transfer the money with the help of a foreign partner hence I contact you, I look forward to be hearing from you via email (nigho(a)myway.com) Regards, Dr.Omonigho Omo.

1 0

NDMP Backups over private network
by Kumar, Rahul 17 Jan '04

17 Jan '04

Hello, Can anyone suggest the best way for backing up NetApps via Veritas Netbackup (via NDMP) on a private network. Scenario: Four Filers: Each with QFE card with the IP address available. On Board Card on each of the filers is unused as for now. M1800 Stacker connected to one of the filers with SDLT320 drives. Master Media Server is Sun Server. I was curiuos to know if the backups can happen over a private network using onboard card. Should I connect another QFE on the Filer which has the tape library connected to it and assign three private IP addresses (viz. 10.x.x.x, 172.x.x.x or 192.168.x.x) And respectively assign, onboard cards on the other three filers an similar private ip address . As far as cabling is concerned, will a cross-cable connected from each onboard card to the qfe on the filer which has the M1800 library connected a good way to ensure eliminating network traffic generated via NDMP backup ? Is there any other way, in which I can achieve the same ? Regards Rahul

2 1

ATTENTION Jay
by atiku musa 17 Jan '04

17 Jan '04

MR ATIKU & CO. ATTORNEY, SOLICITORS, ADVOCATES, LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ATTENTION Jay RE:TWENTY MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS INHERITANCE CLAIM (US$20, 500, 000, 00) My name is Mr Atiku. I am a Legal representative, an Attorney an private account manager to my late client. In the Year 2002, my client by name Mr. Marshal Jay passed away, leaving behind a cash inheritance of Twenty million Five hundred thousand United States Dollars ($20,500,000,00). My late client and bosom friend grew up in a �Motherless Babies Home�. He had no family, no beneficiary nor next of kin to the inheritance amount left behind at his Bank, The Financial law of inheritance clearly allows for the deceased Bank to use deceased money as deemed fit, should the inheritance money be left unclaimed for a period of thirteen months after the death of the account owner. The reason that you have been contacted now is because you bear the same last name as the deceased, and I can present you as the beneficiary and next of kin to late Mr. Marshal. Jay The Inheritance Law clearly leaves the onus of proof of who is or is not the next of kin, to the deceased Lawyer to prove. As the deceased Lawyer, the Law says l have the final say of who is the beneficiary of the deceased estate. This is 100% percent legal. As a lawyer I know this. If you are interested in this proposition and you are ready to keep this proposition in absolute confidentiality and trust, then contact me at once, and we can work out the details, and the issue of your compensation. If you are not interested, and have found this email offensive or you think this is a scam, please do not reply. Regards Mr Atiku plaese reply me through this E- mail address atikumusa00(a)yahoo.com --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters