toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

1 participants
13516 discussions

HELLO
by DR.Evans Robert 21 Mar '04

21 Mar '04

This electronic message transmission contains information that is confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. Dear, SIR/MADAM I am DR. EVANS ROBERT , a private financial consultant. I am the personal financial / business consultant to a foreigner who worked and died in U.K.without any will. I have made several enquiries to your Embassy to locate any of my clients relatives immediate and extended, and close business associates this has proved unsuccessful. After several unsuccessful attempts, I decided to trace his relatives over the Internet and locate any member of his family but of no avail. Hence,I am contacting you.I need you to assist in securing the money and property left behind by my client before they get confiscated or declared unserviceable by the bank where his huge deposits were lodged. Particularly, the bank where the deceased had a domicilliary account valued Twenty-six million, five hundred thousand ($26.5m) United States Dollars. The bank has issued a notice to provide the Next of Kin or have the account confiscated within the next one month. Since I have been unsuccesful in locating the relatives for over two years now I seek your consent to present you as the next of kin of the deceased since you have same surname so that the proceeds of this account valued at $26.5 million Dollars can be paid to you and then you and me can share the money. 60% to me and 35% to you,while 5% should be for expenses or tax as your government may reqiure. I have all necessary documents to back up claims as Next of Kin on your behalf. All I require is your honest cooperation to enable us see this deal through. I guarantee that this will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law. Please get back to me through my alternate email { mrvansbert(a)yahoo.com } to enable us discuss further. Best regards, DR. EVANS ROBERT. mrvansbert(a)yahoo.com } ------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE e-mail at GoGoWorld.com!

1 0

CP types
by Todd C. Merrill 19 Mar '04

19 Mar '04

Got a question about the consistency point types as reported by sysstat... Many of the types are pretty clear: B Back to back CPs (CP generated CP) F CP caused by full NVLog S CP caused by snapshot operation T CP caused by timer : continuation of CP from previous interval # continuation of CP from previous interval, and the NVLog for the next CP is now full, so that the next CP will be of type B. but I don't understand what these mean: H CP caused by high water mark L CP caused by low water mark U CP caused by flush Z CP caused by internal sync Until next time... The MathWorks, Inc. 508-647-7000 x7792 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760-2098 508-647-7001 FAX tmerrill(a)mathworks.com http://www.mathworks.com ---

2 1

quota reports
by Jerry 19 Mar '04

19 Mar '04

I could have sworn there used to be a way to run a quota report that would breakdown the usage by user. Has this changed in newer versions? Jerry __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

RE: quota reports
by Brubaker, Paul 18 Mar '04

18 Mar '04

You can produce a report of user quota information through the Data Fabric Manager Interface (DFM). Paul Brubaker, Jr. RIDS - Intel System Support AT&T Wireless Services * office phone: 717-526-5011 * cell phone: 717-578-2254 * e-mail: paul.brubaker(a)attws.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jerry Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:17 PM To: list toasters Subject: quota reports I could have sworn there used to be a way to run a quota report that would breakdown the usage by user. Has this changed in newer versions? Jerry __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam http://mail.yahoo.com

6 7

RE: quota reports
by Perry, Jay 18 Mar '04

18 Mar '04

Hi Jerry, There is a 2 node version of DFM that is available for free (2 node means up to 2 managed appliances). You can get it by talking with your Netapp sales person. It can generate a per user usage report via the GUI or via the CLI. Jay Perry Network Appliance > -----Original Message----- > From: Jerry [mailto:juanino@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:51 AM > To: Brubaker, Paul; list toasters > Subject: RE: quota reports > > > 1. is this a free product? > 2. it looks more involved than i need, is there a > command line. > > --- "Brubaker, Paul" <paul.brubaker(a)attws.com> wrote: > > You can produce a report of user quota information > > through the Data > > Fabric Manager Interface (DFM). > > > > Paul Brubaker, Jr. > > RIDS - Intel System Support > > AT&T Wireless Services > > * office phone: 717-526-5011 > > * cell phone: 717-578-2254 > > * e-mail: paul.brubaker(a)attws.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > > On Behalf Of Jerry > > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 1:17 PM > > To: list toasters > > Subject: quota reports > > > > > > I could have sworn there used to be a way to run a > > quota report that would breakdown the usage by user. > > Has this changed in newer versions? > > > > Jerry > > > > __________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam > http://mail.yahoo.com >

1 0

syslog user quota exceeded messages
by George Kahler 18 Mar '04

18 Mar '04

Hi, does anyone know how I could change logging to get the following accomplished ? I would like not to get the following disk quota exceeded messages for each of my 35K+ users, but ONLY the tree disk quota exceeded message. Right now I get: [enterprise: GbE-III/e4:notice]: uid xxxx tid 1: disk quota exceeded on volume maildir. I would like to only get the: [enterprise: GbE-III/e4:notice]: tid 14: tree quota exceeded on volume vol0. My /etc/syslog.conf is *.info /dev/console *.info /etc/messages NetApp Release 6.4.2P6: Thanks, George

2 2

RE: ndmp doesn't working after 644 - Re: [Netapp Log # 679356] error 3
by di Mauro, Domenico 18 Mar '04

18 Mar '04

Good morning Stephane, are you saying that when you type; "options ndmpd.authtype plaintext" on the filer console, the users finally get access to the files with the long path name? Domenico. -----Original Message----- From: Stephane Bentebba [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: March 17, 2004 5:41 PM To: di Mauro, Domenico; list-nvusers(a)knowhow.vertis.nl Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: ndmp doesn't working after 644 - Re: [Netapp Log # 679356] error 3 btw i want to feedback what could be classed as a bug : beetween the upgrade 631 and 644 : the ndmpd daemon of the Filer used to use only plaintext password to authenticate the ndmp user (from 2nd party buisness : atempo, netvault, veritas...) in 644 the filer can accept plaintext and encrypted (MD5) and by default accept in encrypted mode so after the upgrade, what was running well donesn't work no more you have to type by telnet options ndmpd.authtype plaintext to reenable the plaintext (it is challenge otherwise) ... if using netvault stop and restart the service after this change on the filer

1 0

RE: RAID4 Catch-22
by Strange, Steve 17 Mar '04

17 Mar '04

Chris, This technical article on the NetApp website has a good technical overview: http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3298.html Cheers, Steve -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:41 AM To: Strange, Steve Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: RAID4 Catch-22 Steve Strange writes: [...] > Data ONTAP 6.5 features RAID-DP, or RAID double parity, which makes this > problem disappear. The RAID group would then have double redundancy, > and could handle a media failure during the reconstruct of a single disk > without data loss or downtime. Can anyone elaborate on how this works, in detail? Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

2 2

Netapp Equipment
by peter gauthier 17 Mar '04

17 Mar '04

Hi To All Just to let you all have a chance, I have the responsibility to remove quantities of older Netapp equipment, such as;F230's, F330, F630's F540, C1100's and also SCSI shelves differential and single ended with 9gb drives and FC7's, I even have the storage 1 shelves single ended and differential with that the 4gb drives. F330 spares kit, as well I have power supplies for the storage 2 and FC7 shelves, NVRAM cards, networks cards, scsi cards. This inventory is at give away prices and some I will just give away and that's probably what I will do, donate to our Ottawa University's and Colleges. I also have none Netapp equipment. This is a large list over 350 items. These cover Sparc 5's,10's,20's, Ultra 10's, SUN clones Axil311's 320's, along with these we have scsi single connect, fast narrow and differential disks, video cards 13w3 and svga's. Cycle SUN clone MLB's, tape drives, cdrom drives, power supplies. SCSI bus and PCI adapters Anyway if you are interested give me a call or email would be great. Txs Peter Gauthier 613-721-3300 x6223

1 0

RE: RAID4 Catch-22
by Strange, Steve 17 Mar '04

17 Mar '04

Geoff, You'll need to boot with floppy boot option 29/7, which tells RAID to ignore media read errors. The reconstruct will then complete, but you'll want to run WAFL_check after that, since ignoring media errors means some blocks of data could be lost (user data or metadata). The RAID subsystem in ONTAP was rewritten in version 6.2, and reconstruct (among many other things) is much improved. We keep track of reconstruct progress between reboots, and in even more recent versions, we won't panic when we hit a media error during reconstruct. WAFL iron will allow you do do a sanity check on the volume following this, without having to bring the filer down for WAFL_check. Data ONTAP 6.5 features RAID-DP, or RAID double parity, which makes this problem disappear. The RAID group would then have double redundancy, and could handle a media failure during the reconstruct of a single disk without data loss or downtime. Any RAID-5 or RAID-4 system won't be able to handle this without at least some data loss. Hope this helps. Steve -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Hardin [mailto:geoff.hardin@dalsemi.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:23 AM To: toasters Subject: RAID4 Catch-22 We are stuck in a RAID 4 Catch-22 and we really can't see any way out of it. Here's the situation: I have a clustered pair of F760 filers running ONTAP 6.1R1P1. Early Monday morning, disk 6.20 (72 GB drive in a DS14 shelf) failed. Immediately, the filer began to rebuild on spare disk 6.29 and (because of the large size of the volume, approximately 800 GB), the reconstruction was still running at about 7 pm. It was at 7 pm that disk 6.25 experienced an unrecoverable read error on sector 128273044; however, since there is no parity disk available, the filer was unable to recover this data and the filer panicked and rebooted. Fast forward twelve hours and again we're about 90% done with reconstruction and disk 6.25 has an unrecovered read error on sector 128273044; the filer panics, reboots, and the countdown begins again. Does anyone know of any way out of this dilemma, short of restoring from tape? Many thanks in advance. Geoff Hardin UNIX System Administrator Dallas Semiconductor geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com

2 1

ndmp doesn't working after 644 - Re: [Netapp Log # 679356] error 3
by Stephane Bentebba 17 Mar '04

17 Mar '04

btw i want to feedback what could be classed as a bug : beetween the upgrade 631 and 644 : the ndmpd daemon of the Filer used to use only plaintext password to authenticate the ndmp user (from 2nd party buisness : atempo, netvault, veritas...) in 644 the filer can accept plaintext and encrypted (MD5) and by default accept in encrypted mode so after the upgrade, what was running well donesn't work no more you have to type by telnet options ndmpd.authtype plaintext to reenable the plaintext (it is challenge otherwise) ... if using netvault stop and restart the service after this change on the filer

1 0

RAID4 Catch-22
by Geoff Hardin 16 Mar '04

16 Mar '04

We are stuck in a RAID 4 Catch-22 and we really can't see any way out of it. Here's the situation: I have a clustered pair of F760 filers running ONTAP 6.1R1P1. Early Monday morning, disk 6.20 (72 GB drive in a DS14 shelf) failed. Immediately, the filer began to rebuild on spare disk 6.29 and (because of the large size of the volume, approximately 800 GB), the reconstruction was still running at about 7 pm. It was at 7 pm that disk 6.25 experienced an unrecoverable read error on sector 128273044; however, since there is no parity disk available, the filer was unable to recover this data and the filer panicked and rebooted. Fast forward twelve hours and again we're about 90% done with reconstruction and disk 6.25 has an unrecovered read error on sector 128273044; the filer panics, reboots, and the countdown begins again. Does anyone know of any way out of this dilemma, short of restoring from tape? Many thanks in advance. Geoff Hardin UNIX System Administrator Dallas Semiconductor geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com

1 0

Surplussing drives
by Lance A. Brown 15 Mar '04

15 Mar '04

Greetings, We are in the process of surplussing a couple old Netapps. The head units are going back to NetApp as part of a rebate program, we are keeping some drives/shelves, and surplussing the rest. My boss wants the to-be-surplussed drives wiped before they go out the door. I checked the docs and on NOW but didn't find a good way to do this. The to-be-surplussed drives are all in one filer, and all in vol0. Does anyone know a good way to wipe these drives short of a full re-install of OnTAP? --[Lance] -- Lance A. Brown SysAdmin Task LMIT ITSS Contract for National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 919.361.5444x420

3 2

Low performance on 760c with clients running mail (postfix)
by Magnar Stav Johanssen 12 Mar '04

12 Mar '04

Hi I'm currently running OnTAP 6.4.3 on my 760c. I've got 3 servers (Solaris 9) running postfix with high volum of mail. These 3 machines alone uses all free CPU on one of the nodes in the NetApp-cluster. What kind of measures will reduse the CPU-usage on both the client and the NetApp? Regards, Magnar

3 4

Non-Domain User Account
by Steve Evans 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

I have a user who's laptop won't be part of the Active Directory domain. He can access windows file servers shares by typing in his domain credentials when he trys to access the particular share. But with the NetApp filer (ONTAP 6.3.1R1) he just gets an access denied error message and is never asked for alternate credentials. I've talked to support a couple times but I wasn't thrilled with their answers. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation

1 0

Awful ufsrestore performance reading from DLT7000 on F810
by Chris Thompson 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

I am running ONTAP 6.4.3P2 on an F810. It has a SCSI-attached DLT7000 drive used primarily for its own backups, but we also use the filer's rmt(8) implementation to dump a few Solaris ufs partitions that way. We've been doing a round of checking that we can we restore from our backups. Everything went fine until I tried to restore these Solaris partitions. The problem isn't content, but the appallingly slow transfer rate. This isn't ufsrestore's fault per se, as I've used a program that just does 63KB reads via the rmt interface and disposes of the data [*] and I can still get at best 400 KB/sec out if it. That's at least a factor of 10 less than it should be: dumping the Solaris partitions achieves something like 4000 KB/sec [not quite up to 7000 KB/sec that the ONTAP dumps run at --- there's a 100 MHz network link involved --- but acceptable]. It's not a problem with tape reading as such: ONTAP restores run at essentially the same speed as ONTAP dumps. We certainly didn't have this problem the last time we tried this, about a year ago. What's changed since then? . we were using an F740 that has been replaced by the F810 [the DLT7000 tape drive is the same one] . we were running ONTAP 6.2.2 then, 6.4.3P2 now . we were running Solaris 8 then, Solaris 9 now (well patched, in both cases) - but as mentioned above, it's not ufsrestore per se Anyone got any ideas on this one? or similar experiences? Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk [*] "Disposes of the data" after it's been sucked through a pipe on the Solaris host. I suppose I could write a program to call rcmd(3) directly rather than relying on rsh(1) to do it for me, but I really doubt that this can be where the bottleneck lies.

1 1

FROM CAPT WILLIAMS OKELELE.
by williams_okolele 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

FROM CAPT, WILLIAMS OKELELE.(PROTOCOL OFFICER)INVESTMENT. Good day and how are your business over there.It has been a long time that I have been thinking of contacting you but it is due to the sudden problem encountered by my`Boss´"His Excellency´President Charles Taylor of Liberia which resulted to the collapsed of his government that now resulted our seeking asylum in Nigeria West Africa.Before the collapsed of my`Boss´government. I intercepted a packaged document from europe which I try to open to check the content as an instruction given to me so as to guide against any time bomb parcel which may be directed to the President by his political rivalry that is the opposition party. On seeing the content of the parcel"It was tagged consignment lodgment which involve huge amount of pound sterling deposited with Finance & Security Inc. in europe.Contact and all relevant information regarding the deposit and the method of collection including the deposit payment receipt were enclosed in the parcel. I received this parcel very close to the time that my `Boss´were quitted out of the office.Hence I decided to hold on to the document for my life utilization. Before this, let me reiterate it to you that I have been reliably gathered an information from one of my friend in your high commission that normally visited Presidential Villa that you are trustworthy and somebody that can stand firmly for any financial transaction because he told me that you are capable, With this information,I now decide to seek your able assistance due to your personality for you to front for me in the claiming of this consignment as the American´s are bending on charging my`Boss´for war crime which has even made him to be so disturbed I really need your urgent assistance as I will like to come down to your country for the rest of my life. Please kindly get back to me on this my private contact;williams_okelele(a)fsmail.net and as soon as i hear from you.I am ready to release all the document relating to the consignment for your contact to the Finance company and the bonafide power of attorney will be issued to you and be dully signed and attested to by a reputable court of law for your quick collection of the funds in the financial house in europe. I await your speedy response reply, Best Regards FROM CAPT WILLIAMS OKELELE. Protocol Officer .

1 0

FROM CAPT WILLIAMS OKELELE.
by williams_okolele 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

1 0

I am no longer impotent in bed XJ9 Zp
by Aurelio Baird 11 Mar '04

11 Mar '04

I am writing to tell you something about myself. Something that drove me crazy for a long time. I thought things would never be better for me. My name is Aurelio Baird and this was a part of my life. Ever since I started having sexual relationships, I noticed something about me wasn't 'working properly' if you know what I mean. I was having an extremely difficult time performing in bed with the ladies, and as time went on, my problem didn't cure itself. Although I was sceptic about Cialis, I was desperate and simply had to try something! To my surprise, Cialis finally solved my erectile problem, and worked much better than viagra! I am writing this email to share my great success with you, and hope to help out someone who feels the same way I used to. Here is the URL http://www.savysale.net/84/c/ if you'd like to check this out. If you wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter , please fallow http://modilium.com/4/unsub/ cap codfish doom kinky seminarian castanet fate macrame depository murder downturn annapolis enamel moulton collect compare carp animosity beside hardtack curtis e's diva flutter egan

1 0

Interested in learing of average disk utilization values for others using Netapp Filers for clients hosting web servers
by Errol Casey 10 Mar '04

10 Mar '04

I'm interested in learning of common values for disk utilization across disk in 4,5,8,10 disk volumes on filers that are in use with host clients that server clients that are hosting web servers (that general server traffic such as HTML files, PHP files, JPG files, etc generally small files). Here is a snap shot of some values from my server for comparison. We had some performance problems recently, and our disk utilization was exceeding 50% ; but we have decreased this back to reasonable levels but would like to see what other Netapp users are at. Currently, our levels are averaging 15 for an 8 disk volume and 13 for a 12 disk volume. These values are being obtained from statit statistics.

1 0

CIGARETTE Warehouse - We're Practically Giving Them Away, Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:43:43 -0500
by Robin Galloway 10 Mar '04

10 Mar '04

Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:43:43 -0500 Cigarette Warehouse BIG MONEY off HUNDREDS or even THOUSANDS of dollars over the course of a year when purchasing cigarettes through Cigarette Warehouse. We stock only the freshest cigarettes of the highest quality: Marlboro, Camel, Winston, Benson & Hedges, Salem, Kool, ALL the premium brands including Dunhill, Barclay, Virginia Slims, and so many more. Our products are fresh and genuine. Get your smokes now: http://www.firstclassminds.com/refjw.html No thanks: http://www.firstclassminds.com/pastmark.html rocky berra bumptious aisle breve injunct bostonian criteria oldsmobile consanguineous erskine glisten gpo gladys decline governess skylark configuration pickman backspace seton compatible scops brassiere collect alfred configuration inflammable terrier slung speed detector madrid avon gamin exercise darling scientist defiant swab alterate split woolgather aarhus

1 0

remove
by Vincent, Alex 08 Mar '04

08 Mar '04

LEGAL NOTICE Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not an addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this e-mail or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorised and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the sender immediately. Pfizer Consumer Health Products Company is registered in England under No.2930463 with its registered office at Walton Oaks, Dorking Road, Walton on the Hill, Surrey, KT20 7NS

1 0

Quota logging question
by Matt Phelps 06 Mar '04

06 Mar '04

Sorry if this has been asked before. Is there any way to get quota log messages to use the username info from NIS in the logs insted of just the UID? It's minor, but a pain. Data OnTap 6.4.2P6, NFS with Solaris and Linux clients only. Thanks, -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps(a)cfa.harvard.edu, http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~mphelps

2 1

RE: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question
by Barrette, Paul A PENC:EX 05 Mar '04

05 Mar '04

These are the mount options I use for RHAS 2.1 connecting to an F820 nfs rw,hard,nfsvers=3,intr,suid,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,proto=udp 0 2 Also, I would not consider connecting to an oracle database over 100 meg. We use GigE ourselves. Paul Barrette -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Duncan Greenwood Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 12:58 PM To: Geoff Hardin Cc: toasters Subject: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question Try the tech papers at http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/ e.g. http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3129.html I played with 9iRAC on RHAS 2.1 against NetApp last year and seem to recall we needed to experiment with rsize and wsize to get decent i/o performance, but that was over GbE. See the tips at: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/performance.html hth D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Hardin" <geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com> To: "Haynes, Tom" <thomas(a)netapp.com> Cc: "toasters" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:37 PM Subject: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question > I've had several people ask for more details about the configuration: > > Network: > 100 Mb switched network full duplex > > Filer: > F760C with ONTAP 6.4.1 > > Database Server: > RHEL Kernel 2.4.21-9.EL > 1 GB of RAM; (we're trying to get that increased because we have seen > some swapping going on) 1 Intel 2.4 GHz Xeon processor > Mount options: rw,fg,hard,nointr,retrans=2,tcp,vers=3,timeo=600 > > We are using NFS over TCP by the recommendation of NetApp and because > we saw data corruption when we were using NFS over UDP. I am looking > into some of the mount options for Linux; one document says to turn > noac off, another says to turn it on. I haven't seen any reference to > a forcedirectio option, and I know that asynch I/O is not supported in > NFS for Linux (yet?). > > If you have any other questions, let me know and I'll do my best to > answer them. Thanks to everyone who has responded so far! > > Geoff > > Haynes, Tom wrote: > > >Geoff, > > > >You should have mentioned what type of filer and what version of > >OnTap you were running. > > > >Thanks, > >Tom > > > > > > > >>Hey Toasters, > >> I have a situation that has come up where we are testing Oracle > >>9i on a 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon system with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3.0 > >>as the operating system. The database itself resides on a NetApp > >>filer. We have run through the normal problems, switching to NFS > >>over TCP rather than UDP, no asynch I/O, not as much like Solaris as > >>we expected, but now we're still not seeing the level of performance > >>that we had expected. Our test database run on a Sun 280R takes > >>about 2 hours; the same test run on our Linux system takes about > >>2:40. Definitely not the results we had expected. > >> I was just wondering if anyone out there has done something > >>similar and has any tuning recommendations. Oracle tells us that it > >>should work fine on Linux, and we know our other databases work fine > >>running off filers, so that leaves us with a solution that should > >>work, but doesn't. Any recommendations, white papers, or RTFM (as > >>long as you indicate which manual), would be greatly appreciated. > >> > >>Geoff Hardin > >>UNIX System Administrator > >>Dallas Semiconductor > >>geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com > >> --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release Date: 20/02/2004

1 0

Fwd: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question
by Jerry 05 Mar '04

05 Mar '04

Forgot to cc the list as well.... > > You shouldn't have to mess with rsize and wsize if > you > use TCP, set it to as high as the filer (it should > default as high as the filer 32k in nfsv3). The > reason you have to mess with it using udp appears to > be flow control related and only in mixed speed > networks in my experience (gig-e filer to 100mb > clients). > > What I would do is confirm you are really using TCP, > several implementations of the mount command seem to > ignore bad options, run tcpdump and copy and file, > make sure it's sending tcp packets. On solaris it's > proto=tcp, however on linux I think it's just -o > tcp. > The wierd thing is, if you give it a wrong option > under some implementations it returns a prompt, and > the mount command even shows that option! > > --- Duncan Greenwood > <duncan.greenwood(a)btinternet.com> > wrote: > > Try the tech papers at > > http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/ > > > > e.g. http://www.netapp.com/tech_library/3129.html > > > > I played with 9iRAC on RHAS 2.1 against NetApp > last > > year and seem > > to recall we needed to experiment with rsize and > > wsize to get decent > > i/o performance, but that was over GbE. > > > > See the tips at: > > > http://nfs.sourceforge.net/nfs-howto/performance.html > > > > hth > > > > D > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Geoff Hardin" <geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com> > > To: "Haynes, Tom" <thomas(a)netapp.com> > > Cc: "toasters" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> > > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:37 PM > > Subject: Re: Linux / NetApp / Oracle question > > > > > > > I've had several people ask for more details > about > > the configuration: > > > > > > Network: > > > 100 Mb switched network full duplex > > > > > > Filer: > > > F760C with ONTAP 6.4.1 > > > > > > Database Server: > > > RHEL Kernel 2.4.21-9.EL > > > 1 GB of RAM; (we're trying to get that increased > > because we have seen > > > some swapping going on) > > > 1 Intel 2.4 GHz Xeon processor > > > Mount options: > > rw,fg,hard,nointr,retrans=2,tcp,vers=3,timeo=600 > > > > > > We are using NFS over TCP by the recommendation > of > > NetApp and because we > > > saw data corruption when we were using NFS over > > UDP. I am looking into > > > some of the mount options for Linux; one > document > > says to turn noac off, > > > another says to turn it on. I haven't seen any > > reference to a > > > forcedirectio option, and I know that asynch I/O > > is not supported in NFS > > > for Linux (yet?). > > > > > > If you have any other questions, let me know and > > I'll do my best to > > > answer them. Thanks to everyone who has > responded > > so far! > > > > > > Geoff > > > > > > Haynes, Tom wrote: > > > > > > >Geoff, > > > > > > > >You should have mentioned what type of filer > and > > what version of > > > >OnTap you were running. > > > > > > > >Thanks, > > > >Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hey Toasters, > > > >> I have a situation that has come up where > we > > are testing Oracle 9i > > > >>on a 2.4 GHz Intel Xeon system with Red Hat > > Enterprise Linux 3.0 as the > > > >>operating system. The database itself resides > > on a NetApp filer. We > > > >>have run through the normal problems, > switching > > to NFS over TCP rather > > > >>than UDP, no asynch I/O, not as much like > > Solaris as we expected, but > > > >>now we're still not seeing the level of > > performance that we had > > > >>expected. Our test database run on a Sun 280R > > takes about 2 hours; the > > > >>same test run on our Linux system takes about > > 2:40. Definitely not the > > > >>results we had expected. > > > >> I was just wondering if anyone out there > has > > done something similar > > > >>and has any tuning recommendations. Oracle > > tells us that it should work > > > >>fine on Linux, and we know our other databases > > work fine running off > > > >>filers, so that leaves us with a solution that > > should work, but doesn't. > > > >> Any recommendations, white papers, or RTFM > (as > > long as you indicate > > > >>which manual), would be greatly appreciated. > > > >> > > > >>Geoff Hardin > > > >>UNIX System Administrator > > > >>Dallas Semiconductor > > > >>geoff.hardin(a)dalsemi.com > > > >> > > > > > > --- > > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > > Checked by AVG anti-virus system > > (http://www.grisoft.com). > > Version: 6.0.593 / Virus Database: 376 - Release > > Date: 20/02/2004 > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing > online. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you�re looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters