toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13517 discussions

HP Omniback/Data Protector with NDMP integration option
by Derek Lai 18 May '04

18 May '04

Anyone else using HP Omniback to backup your filer? I inherited a FAS940 cluster and HP Omniback 4.10 environment. We are currently using a PC as a NTFS gateway to backup CIFS shares on NetApp. The performance is pretty poor and we are having all kinds of problems. I wanted to upgrade to the latest version which HP has renamed DataProtector 5.1. I also wanted to use NDMP to backup the CIFS shares. This is suppose to be free for us. I was told that the previous administrator had tried NDMP integration with Omniback for some time and then abandoned it. No one seems to know the reason though. Just wanted to get a feel for what experience others with similar environment have had. Thanks. Derek

1 0

RE: REQ: Survey: Maildir on Netapp Filers
by moritz.willers＠ubs.com 18 May '04

18 May '04

Has anyone tried running the sendmail *spool* dir on a filer? we tried and failed miserably, but didn't have time to investigate. - mo Visit our website at http://www.ubs.com This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version. This message is provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer to buy or sell any securities or related financial instruments.

6 5

Undeliverable mail: Hi
by MAILER-DAEMON＠fe3.bc.edu 18 May '04

18 May '04

Failed to deliver to '' Virus(es) found. game.zip/DATA.RTF .SCR is infected with W32/Netsky.p@MM Viruses: 1 Trojans: 0 Jokes: 0 Tests: 0

1 0

Undeliverable mail: Re: Test
by MAILER-DAEMON＠fe3.bc.edu 17 May '04

17 May '04

Failed to deliver to '' Virus(es) found. message_mahoneat.scr is infected with W32/Netsky.p@MM Viruses: 1 Trojans: 0 Jokes: 0 Tests: 0

1 0

formula for calculating the max number of disks on a loop without losing performance
by Derek Lai 17 May '04

17 May '04

We currently have a FAS940C cluster. Each of the FAS940 has 2 DS14 shelves of 36 GB drives and 1 DS14 shelf of 72 GB drives (a total of 6 shelves). Each of the FAS940 has only 1 FC dual-channel Host Adapter: slot 4: FC Host Adapter 4a (Dual-channel, QLogic 2312 rev. 2, 64-bit, L-port, <UP>) We are trying to isolate some performance problem we are encourtering. How do we find out if the host adapter is the bottleneck? Does anyone have a formula for calculating how many drives can be put on a single loop without losing performance. Thanks. Derek

3 2

None
by Harbhajan Julka 14 May '04

14 May '04

Hello everyone, I need help with implementing SCSI in NDMP for a NetApp filer. Anyone familiar with SCSI development will know the elements and the address assignnments of to those elements by CDB's sent to the SCSI device. I have used MODE_SENSE and READ_ELEMENT_STATUS in order to do that. But, i believe i am not unpacking the reply correctly to assign addresses to the elements. Its because when i send the POSITION_TO_ELEMENT or MOVE_MEDIUM, i use those elements addresses (Transport element, Data Transfer element and Storage element) and i get sense key indicating that the CDB was incorrect. Need help urgently. I request all the SCSI experts to reply to this. Thanks in advance, Sonia. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! - Internet access at a great low price.

1 0

Data ONTAP 6.1.3 running on an F520
by Joe C Ropar 14 May '04

14 May '04

Greetings Toaster Fans, Has anyone out there successfully run ONTAP 6.1.3 or later on an F520 running both CIFS and NFS? We are planning on migrating the data to an R150 later this year but are doing an AD migration which is not supported under 5.3.7R3 and are looking for a quick fix. We have done some preliminary testing with a spare head and 6.1.3 installed without a hitch. In addition we have created some CIFS share which are working correctly. Regards, Joseph C. Ropar Unix Systems Administrator Raytheon Systems Company cell (214) 869-7901 desk (972) 952-4306 e-mail jropar(a)raytheon.com

2 1

CONGRATULATIONS.
by girobanklotepromotion＠telstra.com 14 May '04

14 May '04

BANK GIRO LOTERIJ. INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION PROGRAM EGGER-STRAAT N° 21 28089 AMSTERDAM NETHERLAND FROM: THE PROMOTION DIRECTOR INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION DEPT. REF: IPL/4249859609/WP1 BATCH: GL/91663/A ATTENTION: AWARD FINAL NOTIFICATION: We are pleased to inform you of the release, of the long awaited results of the BANK GIRO LOTERIJ INTERNATIONAL PROMOTION PROGRAM held on the 30th April 2004.You were entered as dependent clients with: Reference Number:NM/BC921245/KY13, and Batch number NM/207161/KOP. Your email address attached to the ticket number: 46939 that drew the lucky winning number, which consequently won the sweep take in the second category, in four parts. You have been approved for a payment of 500,000.00euros(FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND EUROS.) in cash credited to file reference number:IPL/4249859609/WP1.This is from a total cash prize of (FIVE MILLION EUROS) Shared among the ten international winners in second categories. congratulations!!!!! All participants were selected through a computer ballot system drawn from 91,000 (Ninety One thousand) names of email users around the world, as part of our international promotion program. Due to mixed up of some names and addresses, we ask that you keep this award personal, till your claims has been processed and your funds remitted to you. This is part of our security measures to avoid double claiming or unwarranted taking advantage of the situation by other participants or impersonators. To begin your claim,do file for the release of your winning by contacting your/our accredited agent: Mr.ANTHONY JAHN. BANK GIRO LOTERIJ SECURITY AGENCY. TEL:+31-204-000-498. TEL:+31-203-207-259. TEL:+31-623-475-381. FAX:+31-642-592-906. FAX:+31-206-006-491. Email:girobankloteinfo@netscape.net They are your agent, and responsible for the processing and transfer of your winnings to you. YOUR SECURITY FILE NUMBER IS W-91237-H°67/B4 (keep personal) Remember, your winning must be claimed not later than 24-05-04).failure to claim your winning/ fund will be added to next 10,000.000 euros international lottery program.Furthermore, should there be any change in your address, do inform your claims agent as soon as possible. Once again, Congratulations. Your Sincerely, Mrs.Jennifer Britcar. PROMOTION DIRECTOR.

1 0

PLEASE ADD ME TO YOUR MAILING LIST
by harbhajan julka 14 May '04

14 May '04

THANK YOU. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Buy advance tickets for 'Shrek 2' http://movies.yahoo.com/showtimes/movie?mid=1808405861

2 1

RE: TCP/IP Compression
by Hill, Aaron 13 May '04

13 May '04

The Peribit compression boxes are excellent. We use them extensively. -----Original Message----- From: atticus(a)satanic.org [mailto:atticus@satanic.org] Sent: Thursday, 13 May 2004 5:16 AM To: Holland, William L Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: TCP/IP Compression > We have need to use SnapMirror over a WAN, currently T-1. Any suggestions > on TCP/IP compression products to help minimize the amount of WAN bandwidth > needed? If you own both ends and its Cisco gear, check out AIM-COMPR's -- they'll compress at the PPP/HDLC level minimal impact on latency and without putting another device in-line. The AIM-COMPR2 for the original 2600 series will do 8mb/s and you can pick up a pair for <$500 on ebay. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: www.commbank.com.au **************************************************

1 0

RE: QTree Size limits
by Jack Lyons 12 May '04

12 May '04

Wow another person using Macs! I will have to start looking at DFS more closely. We are stuck at 10.2.8 until we get rid of Outlook 2001:Mac which bombs all the time under 10.3 When you say 10.3 is better...is that the native smb support gets better or is there something else. I know that 10.2.6 and 10.2.8 built-in SMB performance was significantly less than with Dave ...something like 20-30% less. We are run 10.2.8 on Dual G5's with the Dave 5.0 client and we are getting an average of 55MB/s over GigE We will probably be moving to First Class at beginning of the July which will eliminate our last non OSX native application! -----Original Message----- From: jeff.mery(a)ni.com [mailto:jeff.mery@ni.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 3:08 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: QTree Size limits IIRC...Dave and SMB handle DFS just fine. DFS virtualizes the location of the data, but still presents it the same way as a regular share. In fact, if you look at the disk location of the DFS root on your DFS server, you'll see folders in the same organization as the DFS tree itself. A better solution for your Mac guys and gals would be to get them on OS 10.3 if their hardware will support it =) Jeff Mery, MCP National Instruments ------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Allow me to extol the virtues of the Net Fairy, and of all the fantastic dorks that make the nice packets go from here to there. Amen." TB - Penny Arcade ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack Lyons <jack.lyons(a)martinagency.com> Sent by: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com 05/12/2004 12:09 PM To "'Skottie Miller'" <skottie(a)anim.dreamworks.com>, Jack Lyons <jack.lyons(a)martinagency.com> cc "'toasters(a)mathworks.com'" <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Subject RE: QTree Size limits The 14 hours window is from filer to tape - a single LTO1 drive via NDMP which I think equates to about 24 MB/s which I think is pretty good?!? We are not using DFS currently, the big question is regards to how does DAVE and/or OSX native SMB handle DFS - I haven't look at it yet. Jack -----Original Message----- From: Skottie Miller [mailto:skottie@anim.dreamworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 12:51 PM To: Jack Lyons Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: QTree Size limits Jack Lyons wrote: > I have a 1.31 TB volume that is 90% full. There are two solutions I > have available to me. One is to try to reduce the amount of space on > the volume (but meeting resistance by users). The other is to add > space. I am trying to get approval for another TB of disk space, but I > don't think the best solution is to add it to the existing QTree. My > backup window for this volume is 14 -15 hours currently and would only > get bigger if I add space and that is not acceptable. I know I can > another qtree / cifs share but I was hoping I could do it in such a way > that I would still have another Qtree but make it available to the user > via a single CIFS Share. seems you may want to investigate backup system changes; a 14 hour window for a 1.3 TB volume is terrible. what backup product(s) are you using? For reference, we churn 800 - 1.2 TB per night, out of 40 TB online, and the first-phase backup window (filer to stage pools) is 4 - 6 hours long. Then the data moves from staging pool to tape, outside the backup window. We use Tivoli storage manager off three Linux backup servers, doing file-at-a-time differential backups over NFS. > I was hoping I could add another volume, probably /vol/vol2 with a qtree > called /vol/vol2/active clients and some how make it appear to the user > as a subdirectory under \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> Do you use DFS to mount shares ? My windows guys think DFS supports nesting shares as you describe. -skottie -- Scott Miller | Animation Technology work: skottie(a)dreamworks.com | Dreamworks Feature Animation life: skottie(a)pobox.com | http://skottie-di.net This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

2 1

TCP/IP Compression
by Holland, William L 12 May '04

12 May '04

We have need to use SnapMirror over a WAN, currently T-1. Any suggestions on TCP/IP compression products to help minimize the amount of WAN bandwidth needed? Thanks in advance. Bill Holland RM/GFS/GS/ISM US Department of State IT Specialist Voice: (843) 308-5311 IVG: 35311 Fax: (843) 746-0543 IVG: 60543 Network Appliance Storage Associate Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator - Windows 2000

2 1

RE: QTree Size limits
by Jack Lyons 12 May '04

12 May '04

The 14 hours window is from filer to tape - a single LTO1 drive via NDMP which I think equates to about 24 MB/s which I think is pretty good?!? We are not using DFS currently, the big question is regards to how does DAVE and/or OSX native SMB handle DFS - I haven't look at it yet. Jack -----Original Message----- From: Skottie Miller [mailto:skottie@anim.dreamworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 12:51 PM To: Jack Lyons Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: QTree Size limits Jack Lyons wrote: > I have a 1.31 TB volume that is 90% full. There are two solutions I > have available to me. One is to try to reduce the amount of space on > the volume (but meeting resistance by users). The other is to add > space. I am trying to get approval for another TB of disk space, but I > don't think the best solution is to add it to the existing QTree. My > backup window for this volume is 14 -15 hours currently and would only > get bigger if I add space and that is not acceptable. I know I can > another qtree / cifs share but I was hoping I could do it in such a way > that I would still have another Qtree but make it available to the user > via a single CIFS Share. seems you may want to investigate backup system changes; a 14 hour window for a 1.3 TB volume is terrible. what backup product(s) are you using? For reference, we churn 800 - 1.2 TB per night, out of 40 TB online, and the first-phase backup window (filer to stage pools) is 4 - 6 hours long. Then the data moves from staging pool to tape, outside the backup window. We use Tivoli storage manager off three Linux backup servers, doing file-at-a-time differential backups over NFS. > I was hoping I could add another volume, probably /vol/vol2 with a qtree > called /vol/vol2/active clients and some how make it appear to the user > as a subdirectory under \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> Do you use DFS to mount shares ? My windows guys think DFS supports nesting shares as you describe. -skottie -- Scott Miller | Animation Technology work: skottie(a)dreamworks.com | Dreamworks Feature Animation life: skottie(a)pobox.com | http://skottie-di.net This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

2 1

RE: Size calculations
by Timothy Sesow 12 May '04

12 May '04

Disk manufacturers use decimal-based numbers for disk sizes, so that a 146GByte drive is 146*1000*1000*1000 bytes. I have heard that this is due to legal requirements, but I am not a lawyer. Most software, including DataONTAP, uses 1024*1024*1024 to mean a Gigabyte. So a 146Gbyte disk drive (146*1000*1000*1000) is actually 136GBytes of usable disk space. My impression is that NetApp is one of the few vendors who are actually straight forward about this. On their quotes for new systems, they have a field for "usable space", which is based on 1024*1024*1024 calculations AND they deduct for snapshots. Tim Sesow VP Engineering 303-948-3360 cell 303-809-8070 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Jack Lyons Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:26 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Size calculations Can you tell me whether or not a TB = 1000 GB or 1024 GB In my volume properties screen: Used Capacity: 1.18 TB % Used: 90% Total Capacity: 1.31 TB But in my Manage Volumes screen it shows I have 127 GB available. 1.31 - 1.18 = .13 TB = 133.12 GB if 1 TB = 1024 GB 1.31 - 1.18 = .13 TB = 130 GB if 1 TB = 1000 GB 127 GB = .127 TB if TB = 1000 GB 127 GB = .130 TB if TB = 1024 GB so it seems that in one screen they use 1 conversion factor and another screen they use a different one. This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

3 2

NetApp vulnerable to RPC bug?
by "Allendörfer, Carsten" 12 May '04

12 May '04

Hi, We had several core dumps on our filers today. To be exact those were - 1 node a FAS980c - 1 node a FAS270c - R200 - F760 running 6.5.1. All machines crashed within half an hour with the following message: Panic string: PageFault (write invalid page) on address 0xc7d2e000 (errcode 0x2), eip = 0x713cb1 esp = c1afbd7c ebp = 0xc1afbd84 cs = 8 eflags = 10202 in process SMBRPCWor As those filers are used in different windows domains from different clients I can't think of any normal client that could have caused the crash. Then some hours later I found an article from SANS about a new version of the PhatBot worm seems to include an LSASS exploit code. http://www.incidents.org/diary.php?date=2004-04-27&isc=932fe245375de59f9d00… I don't like the idea, but could OnTAP be vulnerable to a windows exploit? Has anyone else seen this problem? Carsten

2 1

None
by Harbhajan Julka 12 May '04

12 May '04

Hi everybody, Has anyone ever been in this situation where an autoloader is connected to a NetApp filer and you are trying to figure out the information like Extended Sense data, etc sent by the filer upon opening the device, targetting it according to the NDMP version 4 documentation. I am going through such a problem where i have sent SCSI CDB's to the filer like SCSI_INQUIRY, SCSI_READ_ELEMENT_STATUS, SCSI_MOVE_MEDIUM, and all you get is something which makes no sense. I am aware quiet roughly about the informaiton i should be getting with each of these requests, but i dont get that. I dont know how to figure out if i can use the only information that is sent back by the filer to find whats wrong and what can be changed. Any suggestions are appreciated, Cheers, Sonia. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs

2 1

RE: QTree Size limits
by Derek Lai 12 May '04

12 May '04

Yes, DFS definitely will let you do this. It's for free too. It is pretty much like NFS for windows. There are quite a few other benefits. But you would need to transition everyone onto that. DFS as Microsoft distribute it is usable but pretty hard to maintain. You might want to look at the VFM product that NeApp has. It adds quite a few number of tools (auto failover, auto migration, reporting) to DFS. Derek -----Original Message----- From: Skottie Miller [mailto:skottie@anim.dreamworks.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 9:51 AM To: Jack Lyons Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: QTree Size limits Jack Lyons wrote: > I have a 1.31 TB volume that is 90% full. There are two solutions I > have available to me. One is to try to reduce the amount of space on > the volume (but meeting resistance by users). The other is to add > space. I am trying to get approval for another TB of disk space, but I > don't think the best solution is to add it to the existing QTree. My > backup window for this volume is 14 -15 hours currently and would only > get bigger if I add space and that is not acceptable. I know I can > another qtree / cifs share but I was hoping I could do it in such a way > that I would still have another Qtree but make it available to the user > via a single CIFS Share. seems you may want to investigate backup system changes; a 14 hour window for a 1.3 TB volume is terrible. what backup product(s) are you using? For reference, we churn 800 - 1.2 TB per night, out of 40 TB online, and the first-phase backup window (filer to stage pools) is 4 - 6 hours long. Then the data moves from staging pool to tape, outside the backup window. We use Tivoli storage manager off three Linux backup servers, doing file-at-a-time differential backups over NFS. > I was hoping I could add another volume, probably /vol/vol2 with a qtree > called /vol/vol2/active clients and some how make it appear to the user > as a subdirectory under \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> Do you use DFS to mount shares ? My windows guys think DFS supports nesting shares as you describe. -skottie -- Scott Miller | Animation Technology work: skottie(a)dreamworks.com | Dreamworks Feature Animation life: skottie(a)pobox.com | http://skottie-di.net

1 0

QTree Size limits
by Jack Lyons 12 May '04

12 May '04

I have a 1.31 TB volume that is 90% full. There are two solutions I have available to me. One is to try to reduce the amount of space on the volume (but meeting resistance by users). The other is to add space. I am trying to get approval for another TB of disk space, but I don't think the best solution is to add it to the existing QTree. My backup window for this volume is 14 -15 hours currently and would only get bigger if I add space and that is not acceptable. I know I can another qtree / cifs share but I was hoping I could do it in such a way that I would still have another Qtree but make it available to the user via a single CIFS Share. Currently /vol/vol1/creative is the qtree and I have a cifs share (called creative) pointing to /vol/vol1/creative, so the users connect to \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> (or for the Macs) smb://server/creative I was hoping I could add another volume, probably /vol/vol2 with a qtree called /vol/vol2/active clients and some how make it appear to the user as a subdirectory under \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> This is probably confusing, so please ask any questions. Jack Lyons Senior Network Engineer The Martin Agency (804) 698-8596 (v) jack.lyons(a)martinagency.com <mailto:jack.lyons@martinagency.com> (e) ----------- Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing --- Redd Foxx This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

2 1

RE: Size calculations
by Hackworth, Brian 12 May '04

12 May '04

: Can you tell me whether or not a TB = 1000 GB or 1024 GB It looks like you're referring to DataFabric Manager, which uniformly uses 1024 as the multiplier for K, M, G, T, P, and E calculations. : In my volume properties screen: : : Used Capacity: 1.18 TB : % Used: 90% : Total Capacity: 1.31 TB : : But in my Manage Volumes screen it shows I have 127 GB available. : 1.31 - 1.18 = .13 TB = 133.12 GB if 1 TB = 1024 GB : 1.31 - 1.18 = .13 TB = 130 GB if 1 TB = 1000 GB : : 127 GB = .127 TB if TB = 1000 GB : 127 GB = .130 TB if TB = 1024 GB 127 GB / 1024 GB/TB = 0.124 TB. 1.18 TB + 0.12 TB = 1.30 TB, which is just about 1.31 TB. All of the values involve roundoff, so the sums will rarely match exactly. - Brian

1 0

RE: TCP/IP Compression
by Peter Furneau 12 May '04

12 May '04

Have a look at the products from Peribit Networks, NetApp use them internally for SnapMirror! -----Original Message----- From: Alan Biren To: Holland, William L; toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent: 5/12/04 3:26 PM Subject: RE: TCP/IP Compression I've used both CNT and RadWare products with great success. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Holland, William L Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:32 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: TCP/IP Compression We have need to use SnapMirror over a WAN, currently T-1. Any suggestions on TCP/IP compression products to help minimize the amount of WAN bandwidth needed? Thanks in advance. Bill Holland RM/GFS/GS/ISM US Department of State IT Specialist Voice: (843) 308-5311 IVG: 35311 Fax: (843) 746-0543 IVG: 60543 Network Appliance Storage Associate Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator - Windows 2000 ************************************************************************ ***************************** If you have received this email in error please notify the the system manager or the sender immediately and do not disclosed the to anyone or make copies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals or malicious content ** ** To find out eSafe(TM) and other Aladdin Security Products, contact AMC Corporation at (212) 620-0700 ************************************************************************ *****************************

1 0

Size calculations
by Jack Lyons 12 May '04

12 May '04

Can you tell me whether or not a TB = 1000 GB or 1024 GB In my volume properties screen: Used Capacity: 1.18 TB % Used: 90% Total Capacity: 1.31 TB But in my Manage Volumes screen it shows I have 127 GB available. 1.31 - 1.18 = .13 TB = 133.12 GB if 1 TB = 1024 GB 1.31 - 1.18 = .13 TB = 130 GB if 1 TB = 1000 GB 127 GB = .127 TB if TB = 1000 GB 127 GB = .130 TB if TB = 1024 GB so it seems that in one screen they use 1 conversion factor and another screen they use a different one. This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

2 1

RE: QTree Size limits
by Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues 12 May '04

12 May '04

Use can use widelinks (please see in the manual) Hope this helps -----Original Message----- From: Jack Lyons [mailto:jack.lyons@martinagency.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 11:36 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: QTree Size limits I have a 1.31 TB volume that is 90% full. There are two solutions I have available to me. One is to try to reduce the amount of space on the volume (but meeting resistance by users). The other is to add space. I am trying to get approval for another TB of disk space, but I don't think the best solution is to add it to the existing QTree. My backup window for this volume is 14 -15 hours currently and would only get bigger if I add space and that is not acceptable. I know I can another qtree / cifs share but I was hoping I could do it in such a way that I would still have another Qtree but make it available to the user via a single CIFS Share. Currently /vol/vol1/creative is the qtree and I have a cifs share (called creative) pointing to /vol/vol1/creative, so the users connect to \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> (or for the Macs) smb://server/creative I was hoping I could add another volume, probably /vol/vol2 with a qtree called /vol/vol2/active clients and some how make it appear to the user as a subdirectory under \\server\creative <file:///\\server\creative> This is probably confusing, so please ask any questions. Jack Lyons Senior Network Engineer The Martin Agency (804) 698-8596 (v) jack.lyons(a)martinagency.com (e) ----------- Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing --- Redd Foxx This email and its contents may be confidential. If it is and you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you.

1 0

RE: TCP/IP Compression
by Kortas, Matt 12 May '04

12 May '04

There's an excellent solution called "HyperIP" from http://www.netex.com -Mk -----Original Message----- From: Alan Biren [mailto:ABIREN@amccorp.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 8:27 AM To: Holland, William L; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: TCP/IP Compression I've used both CNT and RadWare products with great success. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Holland, William L Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:32 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: TCP/IP Compression We have need to use SnapMirror over a WAN, currently T-1. Any suggestions on TCP/IP compression products to help minimize the amount of WAN bandwidth needed? Thanks in advance. Bill Holland RM/GFS/GS/ISM US Department of State IT Specialist Voice: (843) 308-5311 IVG: 35311 Fax: (843) 746-0543 IVG: 60543 Network Appliance Storage Associate Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator - Windows 2000 ************************************************************************ ***************************** If you have received this email in error please notify the the system manager or the sender immediately and do not disclosed the to anyone or make copies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals or malicious content ** ** To find out eSafe(TM) and other Aladdin Security Products, contact AMC Corporation at (212) 620-0700 ************************************************************************ *****************************

1 0

RE: TCP/IP Compression
by Alan Biren 12 May '04

12 May '04

I've used both CNT and RadWare products with great success. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Holland, William L Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 6:32 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: TCP/IP Compression We have need to use SnapMirror over a WAN, currently T-1. Any suggestions on TCP/IP compression products to help minimize the amount of WAN bandwidth needed? Thanks in advance. Bill Holland RM/GFS/GS/ISM US Department of State IT Specialist Voice: (843) 308-5311 IVG: 35311 Fax: (843) 746-0543 IVG: 60543 Network Appliance Storage Associate Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft Certified Systems Administrator - Windows 2000 ***************************************************************************************************** If you have received this email in error please notify the the system manager or the sender immediately and do not disclosed the to anyone or make copies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals or malicious content ** ** To find out eSafe(TM) and other Aladdin Security Products, contact AMC Corporation at (212) 620-0700 *****************************************************************************************************

1 0

Monthly Newsletter From Malik Taalib, Prudential Patterson
by Malik Taalib 08 May '04

08 May '04

Agent Photo Below is a link to our monthly newsletter. Please take a few minutes to have a look. I am sure you will find many helpful tips. Thank you for subscribing to this free service and have a terrific day! http://www.myagentupdate.com/n.asp?RId=30112 If you have any questions, email us at: maliktaalib(a)excite.com Malik Taalib Prudential Patterson 7451 N. Lindbergh St. Louis, MO 63042 Phone: (314) 503-6552 Fax: (314) 838-2793 Mobile: (314) 249-7831 Feel free to visit our web site again at: http://www.maliksellsrealestate.com To automatically unsubscribe, simply click on the link below: http://www.myagentupdate.com/a.asp?subscriber=15719636 `

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters