toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

NFS hangs from linux clients
by Gil Freund 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

Hi, We have three Debian systems (two with 2.6.x Kernel and one with 2.4) using a NetApp 720 (6.5.3) as an NFS server. On two occasions in the last two weeks, when one of the Linux hosts tried to mount a file system from the netapp we got the error: Host nono not responding. (nono being the filer name) From that moment, no action could be preformed from any of the Linux hosts on the netapp. We see not errors in the log files of either the Linux nor the netapp. Other functions (CIFS, NIS and DNS lookups) continue with not issues. Attempting to stop and start the NFS service on the netapp did not have any effect, neither did rebooting the clients. The only workaround was rebooting the filer, after which all NFS operations resumed without a problem. I have started a trace on NFS, but did not get the same hangup yet. Did anyone encounter a similar situation, or alternatively can advise on where and what to check? Thanks Gil

4 5

Re: NFS hangs from linux clients
by Gil Freund 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

Yizhong Zhou wrote: > > Hi Gil, > > You may want to try 1) forcing tcp (using '-o proto=tcp' on client's > mount command); 2) lowering udp transfer size to 8192 > (using '-o rsize=8192,wsize=8192' on client's mount command). We currently use: rsize=8192,wsize=8192,timeo=14,intr on our fstab. I will look into the tcp option > > We experienced the hanging problem with Linux clients (mostly 2.4 > kernels). Reducing the udp transer size greatly alleviated the problem > and forcing tcp further improve the situation. Starting at kernel 2.4.x > (forgot what x exactly is), they started to use 32KB as the default udp > transfer size. My understanding is that the Linux NFS clients' default > buffer size is too small causing lots of packet loss and retransmission. > This translates to the hanging and 'nfs server not responding' problem. Thanks > > > Yizhong Zhou zhou(a)mathworks.com, (508) 647-7371 > The Mathworks, Inc. 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA 01760 > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Gil Freund wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>We have three Debian systems (two with 2.6.x Kernel and one with 2.4) >>using a NetApp 720 (6.5.3) as an NFS server. >> >>On two occasions in the last two weeks, when one of the Linux hosts >>tried to mount a file system from the netapp we got the error: >>Host nono not responding. >>(nono being the filer name) >> >> From that moment, no action could be preformed from any of the Linux >>hosts on the netapp. We see not errors in the log files of either the >>Linux nor the netapp. >>Other functions (CIFS, NIS and DNS lookups) continue with not issues. >> >>Attempting to stop and start the NFS service on the netapp did not have >>any effect, neither did rebooting the clients. >> >>The only workaround was rebooting the filer, after which all NFS >>operations resumed without a problem. >> >>I have started a trace on NFS, but did not get the same hangup yet. >> >>Did anyone encounter a similar situation, or alternatively can advise on >>where and what to check? >> >> >>Thanks >> >>Gil >> >> > > > -- ================================================ Gil Freund Systems Analyst ------------------------------------------------ Sysnet consulting POB 396 Rehovot 76103 Israel email: gilf(a)sysnet.co.il http://www.sysnet.co.il voice: +972-54-2035888 Fax: +972-8-9356026 ================================================

1 0

iSCSI and OnTap 7 on F720
by Gil Freund 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

Hi, I have an F720 used for CIFS and NFS on a site with about 30 users and a 4 port VIF (100Mbit/s x 4). The filer in constant use, but is not under heavy load. We would like to move data which is in DAS (mainly our mail store, which is a Cyrus IMAP server on Linux), which we would like to move to the filer. Since I don't want to use NFS for this, and the virtual volumes would be very handy in NDMP backups I was wondering whether it made sense to use those on an F720. Any thoughts / field notes welcome Gil

1 0

RE: SnapLock Questions
by Michael Christian 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

Anyone using snaplock to protect against rogue admin? Good/bad/useless? (Compared to offsiting tapes) _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Merrick, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:48 AM To: aaron hirsch; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: SnapLock Questions The man page for the vol command specifies that one can use suffixes of d/m/y for days/months/years when specifying the volume retention period parameters. A Snaplock Enterprise volume doesn't let an admin "expire the volume" but it does let an admin destroy it. From a Linux system, you can see the atime (access time of a file, which is overloaded to keep the retention date if the file is on a WORM volume) by mounting the file system and running "stat <filename>" From Solaris, mount the file system and run "ls -lu <filename>" Jeff -----Original Message----- From: aaron hirsch [mailto:aaronh@uptime.net] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: SnapLock Questions Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

2 2

Archiving, R200 and SnapVault.
by Ngoh, Clarence 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

G'day toaster folks, Our backups in Lidcombe are having issues completing its backups - the cause is yet unknown. As a result of our EOM backups not completing successfully, it is eating into our snapshot space. We have raised a case with NetApp and we are trying to isolate the root case of the problem. I am not after suggestions to fix this at the moment. Rather ... We have just purchased a R200 for achiving purpose and we are thinking of utilising this to alleviate the issue we are having. We wish to dump some of the EOMs to this box and backup to tape when we resolve the backup issue. Our scenario is common ... A production site and a DR site. We backup our EOMs at the DR site. We are wondering if the process is as simple of copying over the EOM snapshots from the DR filer to the R200 via SnapVault and configuring our backups (Veritas NetBackup) to backup from the R200 to cassette. Question : From what I have read, backups to cassette can be done straight from the R200. Any real life experiences to share? Are they any caveats that we should be aware of? Sorry if this question seems somewhat simple -- I am still ploughing through a pile of whitepapers at the moment, but because this issue is somewhat urgent, any suggestions would be much appreciated. Cheers Clarence. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

TKO NOTICE: Compromised Account
by aw-confirm＠ebay.com 28 Jan '05

28 Jan '05

Dear (toasters(a)mathworks.com), In an effort to protect your eBay account security, we have suspended your account until such time that it can be safely restored to you. We have taken this action because your password may have been compromised. Although we cannot disclose our investigative procedures that led to this conclusion, please know that we took this action in order to maintain the safety of your account. However, your account is marked for too many successful logins last week (January, 20-28, 2005). It is more interesting that the hostnames are from different countries: United States (c-67-160-224-80.client.comcast.net) Canada (HSE-Toronto-ppp304429.sympatico.ca) Sweden (c213-100-93-27.swipnet.se) Russia (32.122-140-213.telenet.ru) Please authorize your registration information on or before February 3, 2005. Currently registration information will be screened when you login. Follow the link to make sure you are on a secure eBay webpage. https://signin.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?SignIn Thank you for using eBay! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Copyright © 1995-2005 eBay Inc. All Rights Reserved. Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners. eBay and the eBay logo are trademarks of eBay Inc.

1 0

SNMP CPU queries suddenly returning zero
by Gavin Kelman 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hi, I recently started graphing CPU busy time with SNMP and it worked fine for a few weeks, and then all of sudden one day, it always returned 0 and has done ever since. I suspect rebooting the filer would bring the SNMP CPU reading back to life, but I was wondering if anyone had a better idea... I'm running NetApp Release 6.5.2R1P9 on an F940 and using the following command to get the information: snmpget netapp public -m NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB.txt \ NETWORK-APPLIANCE-MIB::cpuBusyTimePerCent.0 Telneting to the filer and running "sysstat" returns normal (non-zero) CPU usage information. Ideas? Cheers, Gavin. -- Gavin Kelman gavin(a)metahusky.net

2 2

RE: SnapLock Questions
by Merrick, Jeffrey 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

The man page for the vol command specifies that one can use suffixes of d/m/y for days/months/years when specifying the volume retention period parameters. A Snaplock Enterprise volume doesn't let an admin "expire the volume" but it does let an admin destroy it. >From a Linux system, you can see the atime (access time of a file, which is overloaded to keep the retention date if the file is on a WORM volume) by mounting the file system and running "stat <filename>" >From Solaris, mount the file system and run "ls -lu <filename>" Jeff -----Original Message----- From: aaron hirsch [mailto:aaronh@uptime.net] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: SnapLock Questions Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

Online banking records confirmation
by WAMU Personal Online Banking 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

1 0

RE: SnapLock Questions
by aaron hirsch 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Rene, SnapLock comes in two versions, Compliance and Enterprise. I'm not sure if you can change either to day/hours/minutes, but the Enterprise version is MUCH more flexible and will allow you, as admin, to expire the volume at any given time you choose. As for the outside software I'm not sure... -----Original Message----- From: Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes [mailto:Rene.Koehnen-Wiesemes@morse.com] Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 8:06 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: SnapLock Questions Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

SnapLock Questions
by Rene Koehnen-Wiesemes 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Hello, with the new ONTAP 7G (7.0RC5) release I've found new vol options parameters: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3y · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10y Is it possible to decrease these values for test purpose to month or days e.g.: · vol options volume_name snaplock_minimum_retention 3d · vol options volume_name snaplock_default_period min · vol options volume_name snaplock_maximum_period 10d Additional I need to know if there is a software outside to set the "Last Access Date" metadata of files (the Retention Date for snaplock!) on Solaris or Windows based systems? Thanks for your help. René -- Dipl.-Ing. René Köhnen-Wiesemes Senior IT Specialist Morse GmbH Oskar-Messter-Straße 13 D-85737 Ismaning Tel: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-228 Mobil: +49 (0) 172 829 0367 Fax: +49 (0)89 94 49 40-110 mailto:rene.koehnen-wiesemes@morse-techsol.de <www.morse.de>

1 0

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

Along this same vein, is there a way to turn off notification of saving of the CIFS audit log? -----Original Message----- From: Holland, William L Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 5:36 AM To: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: RE: DFM 3.1 Events You're my hero! -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: DFM 3.1 Events if you want to disable the reminder of the autosupport benefit on your filer type the following telnet command : options autosupport.support.reminder off (or something like that, type options autosupport to find the exact name) this way, at the source (the filer), this anoying - pardon - warning message will be turned off and you should'nt see it on dfm Holland, William L schrieb: >Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For >instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration >policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that >AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of >turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop >notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. >Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - >I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if >you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I >have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I >don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to >filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my >paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In >short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, >the usefulness is being diluted. > > >

2 1

RE: DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 27 Jan '05

27 Jan '05

You're my hero! -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:stephane.bentebba@fps.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 5:40 PM Cc: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' Subject: Re: DFM 3.1 Events if you want to disable the reminder of the autosupport benefit on your filer type the following telnet command : options autosupport.support.reminder off (or something like that, type options autosupport to find the exact name) this way, at the source (the filer), this anoying - pardon - warning message will be turned off and you should'nt see it on dfm Holland, William L schrieb: >Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For >instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration >policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that >AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of >turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop >notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. >Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - >I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if >you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I >have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I >don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to >filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my >paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In >short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, >the usefulness is being diluted. > > >

1 0

DFM 3.1 Events
by Holland, William L 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

Anyone found a way to stop DFM 3.1 from recording certain events? For instance, we have AutoSupport turned off due to security configuration policies. However, every few hours the filers dutifully report that AutoSupport is turned off and try to cajole me with all the benefits of turning it on. I know it's off, I purposefully turned it off, stop notifying me about it. I don't want to see this event in my DFM events. Another example is when CIFS event log is full and it creates another one - I get LOTS of these every day. I don't care about them. Only tell me if you couldn't create one. These two events alone spread across 3 filers, I have gathered approximately 1700 events in the week I've had DFM running. I don't want these events taking up space in my database, I don't want to filter through them every day looking to see if there is some event worth my paying attention to that I may not have yet established an alarm for. In short, by being inundated with informational events that I don't care about, the usefulness is being diluted.

2 1

RE: Windows explorer add-in
by Maglinger, Paul 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

If it was a snake, it would've bit me. I thought it was called something else. Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: Summers, John [mailto:John.Summers@netapp.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 9:56 To: Maglinger, Paul Subject: RE: Windows explorer add-in Secure Share Access http://now.netapp.com/NOW/download/tools/ssaccess/ John Summers -----Original Message----- From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:PMAGLINGER@scvl.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2005 10:17 AM To: 'NetApps list server' Subject: Windows explorer add-in There used to be a add-in for Windows Explorer that would add a tab on the explorer window allowing you to change the Unix permissions on a Unix qtree. I could've sworn I downloaded from NOW, but I can no longer find it. Anyone remember this and know where I can get it? A hammer is a great tool... but not for cutting glass. ________________________________ Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com ________________________________

1 0

Windows explorer add-in
by Maglinger, Paul 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

There used to be a add-in for Windows Explorer that would add a tab on the explorer window allowing you to change the Unix permissions on a Unix qtree. I could've sworn I downloaded from NOW, but I can no longer find it. Anyone remember this and know where I can get it? A hammer is a great tool... but not for cutting glass. ________________________________ Paul Maglinger, A+, CA, CCA, CET, MCSE Systems Administrator Shoe Carnival Inc. (812)867-4674 pmaglinger(a)scvl.com ________________________________

2 1

Re: Ontap 7.0RC2 and Samba
by Luke Howard 26 Jan '05

26 Jan '05

I hear that SAMBA works. Also, our XAD identity server supports ONTAP: http://www.padl.com/Products/XAD.html Scroll down to "Data ONTAP Configuration Notes" for specific information. -- Luke >From: Frank Bonnet <f.bonnet(a)esiee.fr> >Subject: Ontap 7.0RC2 and Samba >To: toasters(a)mathworks.com >Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:47:31 +0100 > >Hello > >Someone told me that Ontap 7.0 RC2 could use a >Samba 3.0.10 server as PDC ? > >Any Netapp guru could confirm this ? > >Thanks a lot . >-- >Cordialement/Regards >Frank Bonnet --

1 0

RE: OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ?
by Hart, Paul 25 Jan '05

25 Jan '05

I have been running ONTAP 7 RC 4 just over 2 weeks and I have been quite happy with it. One of the first things I did was to move my /etc to a virtual volume and it saved an bunch of space and let me put those two drives back into productive use. Setting up new virtual volumes is great. This is much cleaner that using qtree w/quotas. Paul Hart Certified NetApp Expert SRA International Inc ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Palmer, Jason (EMEA) Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 9:41 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ? Hi - Anyone know or heard when ONTAP 7.0 is likely to go to GA or FCS ? RC1 was announced on 27th Oct 2004 and we are now at RC5 ! The suspense is killing me :o) Anyone running with the RC versions ? If so, does it live up to what it says it claims to do ? Any feedback good/bad would be appreaciated... Many thanks, ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk -----------------------------------

2 1

SV: OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ?
by Langborg Tom 25 Jan '05

25 Jan '05

Hi We have 7.0rc4 and its works for use. This machine has only uptime for 8 days now. We also try with ldap and ldap.usermap enable. The major benefit as I see this is not wasting so much disk. Today only 50% of disk is useful. This machine is a r200 so it is not so much loaded (yet). I have nothing bad to say yet. /tom -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Palmer, Jason (EMEA) [mailto:jason.palmer@uk.mci.com] Skickat: den 25 januari 2005 15:41 Till: toasters(a)mathworks.com Ämne: OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ? Hi - Anyone know or heard when ONTAP 7.0 is likely to go to GA or FCS ? RC1 was announced on 27th Oct 2004 and we are now at RC5 ! The suspense is killing me :o) Anyone running with the RC versions ? If so, does it live up to what it says it claims to do ? Any feedback good/bad would be appreaciated... Many thanks, ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk <http://www.mci.com/uk> -----------------------------------

1 0

RE: OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ?
by Chandler, Paul 25 Jan '05

25 Jan '05

We are just installing a couple of FAS940's and have been told (by NetApp engineer) that 7.0 will GA in February. Paul. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Palmer, Jason (EMEA) Sent: 25 January 2005 14:41 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ? Hi - Anyone know or heard when ONTAP 7.0 is likely to go to GA or FCS ? RC1 was announced on 27th Oct 2004 and we are now at RC5 ! The suspense is killing me :o) Anyone running with the RC versions ? If so, does it live up to what it says it claims to do ? Any feedback good/bad would be appreaciated... Many thanks, ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk ----------------------------------- http://www.sthree.com This email transmission is confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, you must not disclose, copy or distribute the contents of this transmission. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately. If you do not wish to receive transmissions from us, or wish to qualify how your personal data is held by us, please send your request via email to personnel(a)sthree.com Please see our privacy statement at: http://www.sthree.com/privacy-policy.html

1 0

OnTap 7.0 RC5 ??? Any news on a GA or FCS release ?
by Palmer, Jason (EMEA) 25 Jan '05

25 Jan '05

Hi - Anyone know or heard when ONTAP 7.0 is likely to go to GA or FCS ? RC1 was announced on 27th Oct 2004 and we are now at RC5 ! The suspense is killing me :o) Anyone running with the RC versions ? If so, does it live up to what it says it claims to do ? Any feedback good/bad would be appreaciated... Many thanks, ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk -----------------------------------

1 0

Ontap 7.0RC2 and Samba
by Frank Bonnet 25 Jan '05

25 Jan '05

Hello Someone told me that Ontap 7.0 RC2 could use a Samba 3.0.10 server as PDC ? Any Netapp guru could confirm this ? Thanks a lot . -- Cordialement/Regards Frank Bonnet

1 1

RE: Change in quotas interpretation?
by Michael Christian 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

Perfect, that was it! -----Original Message----- From: Cao, Vinh V (Vinh) [mailto:vcao@lucent.com] Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:00 PM To: Michael Christian; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Change in quotas interpretation? I think this is what you are prefer to: http://teaparty.mathworks.com/toasters/13803.html Hope that help. Vinh -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Michael Christian Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:30 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Change in quotas interpretation? My memory fails me, but I remember some discussion a few months back about an upgrade changing the interpretation of the quotas file. (GB vs MB or something like that.) Anyone recall that problem? I couldn't find anything on now... Thanks, -MikeC

1 0

RE: Change in quotas interpretation?
by Cao, Vinh V (Vinh) 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

I think this is what you are prefer to: http://teaparty.mathworks.com/toasters/13803.html Hope that help. Vinh -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Michael Christian Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:30 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Change in quotas interpretation? My memory fails me, but I remember some discussion a few months back about an upgrade changing the interpretation of the quotas file. (GB vs MB or something like that.) Anyone recall that problem? I couldn't find anything on now... Thanks, -MikeC

1 0

Change in quotas interpretation?
by Michael Christian 24 Jan '05

24 Jan '05

My memory fails me, but I remember some discussion a few months back about an upgrade changing the interpretation of the quotas file. (GB vs MB or something like that.) Anyone recall that problem? I couldn't find anything on now... Thanks, -MikeC

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters