toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

2 participants
13517 discussions

single vs. multiple nfs mounts
by George Kahler 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

My apologies, I forgot to include a subject for this note >Hi - >I have all our Oracle9i databases defined as individual qtrees spread >over two filers. Some time ago the decision was to split an individual >database into 3 separate components (qtrees), one for the data >(tables) the other two qtrees for duplex logs, one on each filer head. >A Sun Solaris 8 dataserver that runs 6 Oracle databases then has 18 nfs mounts. > >On the recommendation of NetApp the qtrees are mounted with these >options: rw,hard,intr,bg,proto=tcp,llock > >The DBAs now would like to have this rearranged so that there is a >single qtree per dataserver host (think of this as one large blob of >space) with ALL of the databases that this server will run as a >sub-directory of this qtree. > >I'm a bit worried over the resultant nfs performance all going though >this single mount point. Can someone comment on the issues of multiple >nfs mounts vs. a single mount ? >What about locking ? Thanks, George

3 2

RE: Windows Shadow Copy client
by Iain Barnetson 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

I've been trying to use Windows Shadow Copy client but when I right click a file/folder although the previous version tab is there no previous versions show. I'm using WinXP sp1, Data OnTap 7, the shadown copies are set to visible from the Web GUI. Do I have to enable something on the filer? I believe that's the case for Windows 2000 clients, but this is solely for WinXP sp1 & sp2 clients. Cheers Iain

2 1

RE: Windows Shadow Copy client
by Battle, Evan (CBC) 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

When you make a change to a file then try using the previous versions tab, does the previous version appear? Thanks, Evan -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Iain Barnetson Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 4:24 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Windows Shadow Copy client I've been trying to use Windows Shadow Copy client but when I right click a file/folder although the previous version tab is there no previous versions show. I'm using WinXP sp1, Data OnTap 7, the shadown copies are set to visible from the Web GUI. Do I have to enable something on the filer? I believe that's the case for Windows 2000 clients, but this is solely for WinXP sp1 & sp2 clients. Cheers Iain Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use or disclosure of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete the original message. Your compliance is appreciated.

1 0

RE: Quotas
by Iain Barnetson 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Actually that sounds very similar, at first this affected only a few Qtrees & Home folders on the two volumes. Toward the end of yesterday afternoon I thought the filer had sorted itself out, this morning it started again around 09:30Hrs and was affecting pretty much all our qtreees & home folders. The problem became apparent yesterday around 13:00Hrs and dropped off around 16:30Hrs, starting again around 09:30hrs this morning but worse! So there may be some correlation between filer workload and this problem. What DFM was reporting and initially alerted one of the guys to there being a problem, was that about a dozen Qtrees were, according to DFM, set at 50Mb. The quotas file had them set to 31.5Gb. When a asked the filer for a quota report it itially told me that the quotas were set to 50Mb as well, after a quota off followed by a quota on I again queried the filer for a quota report, this time it reported the quotas correctly BUT still users couldn't write to their Qtrees or Home folders. I even forced the cluster partner to take over the disks and rebooted the filer having the problem but that dind't resolve it either. Iain -----Original Message----- From: Adam McDougall [mailto:mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu] Sent: 15 March 2005 21:29 To: Iain Barnetson Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Quotas An issue that may be related that I noticed, if I perform a quota resize, it silently drops random users to a default user quota I have specified. If I run quota resize again, it complains about the default user entry. Quotas remain confused like this until I perform a full quota off/on, then quotas seem to operate perfectly fine for me. On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:17:15PM -0000, Iain Barnetson wrote: Of two filers updated to Data OnTap 7.0.1 Sunday morning, one has now got a Quotas problem. Users are getting disk full errors when trying to write to Qtrees or Home folders despite have copious amounts of free space. The volumes and disks have space. The Qtrees are on one traditional volume and the Home folders on another traditional volume. When the quotas are off there's no problem. Have checked the filer is reading the quotas file correctly by doing a rdfile /etc/quotas and comparing to the physical quotas file and it's exact. Have tried switching on and off the quotas, and also rebooting the filer (it works for MS boxes!) Have a ticket open with NetApp but so far no resolution. Anyone experienced anything similar or any ideas on a resolution? Iain T: +44 1224 776913 E: iain.barnetson(a)halliburton.com

1 0

RE: Quotas
by Iain Barnetson 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Of two filers updated to Data OnTap 7.0.1 Sunday morning, one has now got a Quotas problem. Users are getting disk full errors when trying to write to Qtrees or Home folders despite have copious amounts of free space. The volumes and disks have space. The Qtrees are on one traditional volume and the Home folders on another traditional volume. When the quotas are off there's no problem. Have checked the filer is reading the quotas file correctly by doing a rdfile /etc/quotas and comparing to the physical quotas file and it's exact. Have tried switching on and off the quotas, and also rebooting the filer (it works for MS boxes!) Have a ticket open with NetApp but so far no resolution. Anyone experienced anything similar or any ideas on a resolution? Iain T: +44 1224 776913 E: iain.barnetson(a)halliburton.com

3 2

RE: Quotas
by Iain Barnetson 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Yes it's a typo but the jist of the email wasn't ;) -----Original Message----- From: Chris Thompson [mailto:cet1@cus.cam.ac.uk] Sent: 15 March 2005 20:42 To: Iain Barnetson Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Quotas Iain.Barnetson(a)Halliburton.com writes > > Of two filers updated to Data OnTap 7.0.1 Is that a typo for 7.0.0.1? I didn't think 7.0.1 was out yet. > Sunday morning, one has now > got a Quotas problem. > > Users are getting disk full errors when trying to write to Qtrees or > Home folders despite have copious amounts of free space. The volumes > and disks have space. The Qtrees are on one traditional volume and the > Home folders on another traditional volume. When the quotas are off > there's no problem. > > Have checked the filer is reading the quotas file correctly by doing a > rdfile /etc/quotas and comparing to the physical quotas file and it's > exact. > > Have tried switching on and off the quotas, and also rebooting the > filer (it works for MS boxes!) > > Have a ticket open with NetApp but so far no resolution. > > Anyone experienced anything similar or any ideas on a resolution? Well, it's alarmingly reminiscent of two recent toasters threads "unix quota and df" (Charles Bartels) "df size reporting differences in ONTAP 7.0" (Adam McDougall) except that they didn't actually report "disk full" conditions. I think the chances of us going to ONTAP 7.x at Easter are now almost indistinguishable from zero! Many thanks to those of you who jumped in the deep end, and let us know where to send the wreath ... :-) It's a pity that no-one from NetApp has contributed to any of these threads. Surely someone there at least knows what they were _trying_ to do with (NFSPROC_STATFS, NFSPROC3_FSSTAT, etc.) results? -- Chris Thompson Email: cet1(a)cam.ac.uk

1 0

RE: single vs. multiple nfs mounts
by Jeff Mohler 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Well..back in the bad old days (1998ish) when I was running God's own public Usenet service with cyclone/typhoon products, I learned that parellelizing NFS mounts was a -huge- performance benefit in the Solaris of the day until you reached the limits of the machine itself. The filer didnt care, the client OS sure did. I can only assume it's the same today. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Steve Losen Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 3:18 PM To: George Kahler Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: single vs. multiple nfs mounts > >I'm a bit worried over the resultant nfs performance all going though > >this single mount point. Can someone comment on the issues of multiple > >nfs mounts vs. a single mount ? > >What about locking ? I don't think that single vs. multiple mount points per se makes a performance difference. However, if it makes sense to use different NFS options for different applications, then I believe you can still do it. Just mount the same netapp volume on different mount points with different sets of NFS options, and on the NFS client have each app use the appropriate mount point for the NFS options it needs. mount -o rw,hard,opt2,opt3 toaster:/vol/big /mnt1 mount -o rw,hard,opt4,opt5 toaster:/vol/big /mnt2 ... Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

None
by George Kahler 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Hi - I have all our Oracle9i databases defined as individual qtrees spread over two filers. Some time ago the decision was to split an individual database into 3 separate components (qtrees), one for the data (tables) the other two qtrees for duplex logs, one on each filer head. A Sun Solaris 8 dataserver that runs 6 Oracle databases then has 18 nfs mounts. On the recommendation of NetApp the qtrees are mounted with these options: rw,hard,intr,bg,proto=tcp,llock The DBAs now would like to have this rearranged so that there is a single qtree per dataserver host (think of this as one large blob of space) with ALL of the databases that this server will run as a sub-directory of this qtree. I'm a bit worried over the resultant nfs performance all going though this single mount point. Can someone comment on the issues of multiple nfs mounts vs. a single mount ? What about locking ? Thanks, George

1 0

RE: unix quota and df
by Grant, Derek 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

I believe this has shown up as a bug on the NOW site. I would check. I seem to remember seeing something like this in 7.0+ bug list. Derek -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Charles Bartels Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 1:48 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: unix quota and df Hi, I have a filer running ONTAP 7.0 connecting to a Solaris box with automounted home directories, and I'm getting different results depending on whether I have a quota in a qtree vs. a volume. If anyone can shed some light on this "problem" I would appreciate it. Thanks. -C. In the examples below, there is 35GB qtree ("home") under vol0 and a 35GB flexible volume ("home"). Both have default user quotas of 5GB. If a user's home directory is in a qtree and they do "df" on the unix box, their "partition" shows up sized to their quota. This is good; although this is *not* the way things worked pre-ONTAP 7.0 Ex. User1@unixbox> df -kh . Filesystem Size Used Available Use% Mounted on filer:/vol/vol0/home/user1 5.0G 2.0G 3.0G 40% /home/user1 If a user's home directory is in a volume, their "partition" shows up sized to the size of the volume. They need to run "quota -v" on the client to get their quota. Ex. User2@unixbox> df -kh . Filesystem Size Used Available Use% Mounted on filer:/vol/home/user2 32G 11G 21G 35% /home/user2 User2@unixbox> quota -v Disk quotas for user2 (uid 1001): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft /home/user2 1914808 5242880 5242880 2172 -1 -1

2 1

Full volume backup with Legato Networker
by Palmer, Jason (EMEA) 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Hi - At present, we back up our F800 series filers with Legato Networker using NDMP and direct attached tape devices. We are looking to purchase an R200 and mirror our live data on a daily basis to this device in an offsite location and perform periodic backups to tape. We would like to backup the full volumes - the current file system plus all of the snapshots. I understand that a Dump commnd can be used to push the whole volume out to tape and a snapmirror to tape type scenario could also be used. Does anyone currently do this using their Legato backup software ? If so, could they give details of how this could be done ? I have heard that Netvault from Bakbone may have this type of functionality - anyone out there using this ? Many thanks, ----------------------------------- Jason Palmer <Storage> Messaging & Storage Implementation MCI [EMEA] ----------------------------------- [e]: jason.palmer(a)uk.mci.com [i]: http://www.mci.com/uk <http://www.mci.com/uk> -----------------------------------

1 0

RE: Multimode VIF
by Dean, Phil (ITO) 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

You need to take into account the port now. So a dual card has ports a and b so you do e4a and e4b to create the vif for all ports on card 4. if you had a quad port card then you have a, b, c and d as the ports so e4a to e4d. Regards, Phil Dean IBS/PBS Data Storage Support Institutional and Business Systems Premium Business Services Level 5, 48 Martin Place Sydney, NSW 2000 * 02 9378-5988 Fax: 02 9378-5202 Mob: 0407 478 695 * deanph(a)cba.com.au -----Original Message----- From: drew.odonnell(a)americas.bnpparibas.com [mailto:drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Multimode VIF I just picked up a few netapps and I was looking to create some VIFS I have not done before. Basically I have two of the new dual GB cards one in slot 4 and the other in slot five. I would like some ideas since I have only historically done single mode VIFS (1 port per card) like the following: vif create single trunk1 e4 e5 vif favor e4 ifconfig trunk1 x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 wins route add default x.x.x.x 1 What I want to do is a multimode using the 2 dual cards, each one going to separate switches (2 connections per card - per switch). Unfortunately from what I understand, the Cisco 6509 does not support Active Active trunk groups across 2 different switches. We can however have an active active trunk created between 2 ports on the same switch. So I would like to have 1 dual card go to one switch (On two different blades), and the send the other two to another switch. I would like 2 of the 4 ports transmitting/receiving under 1 virtual address. Essentially, most of the switch failures I have seen are logical, on the port or blade. In this event the netapp does not failover. My thoughts are if I go on 2 different blades on the same switch, and I have both cards transmitting, and receiving, then if I lose one port or blade, I will have another card. If we lose the whole switch,then we would failover to the secondary VIF. Do I create 2 different VIFS, and then create a 3rd VIF, (Essentially viffing the VIFS) I am sure I am not the first to head down this road, so any helpful advice would be great, I am not finding to much on the NOW site. Thanks Drew This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. --------------------------------------------- Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

2 1

RE: Multimode VIF
by Dean, Phil (ITO) 15 Mar '05

15 Mar '05

Drew, Got a little ahead of myself. Yes you would have to create 3 vifs, first 2 combining the two ports on each switch and then the 3rd vif to combine them all. Are you trying for a little load balancing as well? We essentially have just single vifs going to 2 ports on different switches and at most you lost a few pings when one port goes down and it switches to the other port. Regards, Phil Dean IBS/PBS Data Storage Support Institutional and Business Systems Premium Business Services Level 5, 48 Martin Place Sydney, NSW 2000 * 02 9378-5988 Fax: 02 9378-5202 Mob: 0407 478 695 * deanph(a)cba.com.au -----Original Message----- From: drew.odonnell(a)americas.bnpparibas.com [mailto:drew.odonnell@americas.bnpparibas.com] Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 10:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Multimode VIF I just picked up a few netapps and I was looking to create some VIFS I have not done before. Basically I have two of the new dual GB cards one in slot 4 and the other in slot five. I would like some ideas since I have only historically done single mode VIFS (1 port per card) like the following: vif create single trunk1 e4 e5 vif favor e4 ifconfig trunk1 x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 wins route add default x.x.x.x 1 What I want to do is a multimode using the 2 dual cards, each one going to separate switches (2 connections per card - per switch). Unfortunately from what I understand, the Cisco 6509 does not support Active Active trunk groups across 2 different switches. We can however have an active active trunk created between 2 ports on the same switch. So I would like to have 1 dual card go to one switch (On two different blades), and the send the other two to another switch. I would like 2 of the 4 ports transmitting/receiving under 1 virtual address. Essentially, most of the switch failures I have seen are logical, on the port or blade. In this event the netapp does not failover. My thoughts are if I go on 2 different blades on the same switch, and I have both cards transmitting, and receiving, then if I lose one port or blade, I will have another card. If we lose the whole switch,then we would failover to the secondary VIF. Do I create 2 different VIFS, and then create a 3rd VIF, (Essentially viffing the VIFS) I am sure I am not the first to head down this road, so any helpful advice would be great, I am not finding to much on the NOW site. Thanks Drew This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. --------------------------------------------- Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie. ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Multimode VIF
by drew.odonnell＠americas.bnpparibas.com 14 Mar '05

14 Mar '05

I just picked up a few netapps and I was looking to create some VIFS I have not done before. Basically I have two of the new dual GB cards one in slot 4 and the other in slot five. I would like some ideas since I have only historically done single mode VIFS (1 port per card) like the following: vif create single trunk1 e4 e5 vif favor e4 ifconfig trunk1 x.x.x.x netmask 255.255.255.0 wins route add default x.x.x.x 1 What I want to do is a multimode using the 2 dual cards, each one going to separate switches (2 connections per card - per switch). Unfortunately from what I understand, the Cisco 6509 does not support Active Active trunk groups across 2 different switches. We can however have an active active trunk created between 2 ports on the same switch. So I would like to have 1 dual card go to one switch (On two different blades), and the send the other two to another switch. I would like 2 of the 4 ports transmitting/receiving under 1 virtual address. Essentially, most of the switch failures I have seen are logical, on the port or blade. In this event the netapp does not failover. My thoughts are if I go on 2 different blades on the same switch, and I have both cards transmitting, and receiving, then if I lose one port or blade, I will have another card. If we lose the whole switch,then we would failover to the secondary VIF. Do I create 2 different VIFS, and then create a 3rd VIF, (Essentially viffing the VIFS) I am sure I am not the first to head down this road, so any helpful advice would be great, I am not finding to much on the NOW site. Thanks Drew This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. --------------------------------------------- Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses destinataires et sont confidentiels. Si vous recevez ce message par erreur, merci de le detruire et d'en avertir immediatement l'expediteur. Toute utilisation de ce message non conforme a sa destination, toute diffusion ou toute publication, totale ou partielle, est interdite, sauf autorisation expresse. L'internet ne permettant pas d'assurer l'integrite de ce message, BNP PARIBAS (et ses filiales) decline(nt) toute responsabilite au titre de ce message, dans l'hypothese ou il aurait ete modifie.

1 0

unix quota and df
by Charles Bartels 14 Mar '05

14 Mar '05

Hi, I have a filer running ONTAP 7.0 connecting to a Solaris box with automounted home directories, and I'm getting different results depending on whether I have a quota in a qtree vs. a volume. If anyone can shed some light on this "problem" I would appreciate it. Thanks. -C. In the examples below, there is 35GB qtree ("home") under vol0 and a 35GB flexible volume ("home"). Both have default user quotas of 5GB. If a user's home directory is in a qtree and they do "df" on the unix box, their "partition" shows up sized to their quota. This is good; although this is *not* the way things worked pre-ONTAP 7.0 Ex. User1@unixbox> df -kh . Filesystem Size Used Available Use% Mounted on filer:/vol/vol0/home/user1 5.0G 2.0G 3.0G 40% /home/user1 If a user's home directory is in a volume, their "partition" shows up sized to the size of the volume. They need to run "quota -v" on the client to get their quota. Ex. User2@unixbox> df -kh . Filesystem Size Used Available Use% Mounted on filer:/vol/home/user2 32G 11G 21G 35% /home/user2 User2@unixbox> quota -v Disk quotas for user2 (uid 1001): Filesystem usage quota limit timeleft files quota limit timeleft /home/user2 1914808 5242880 5242880 2172 -1 -1

2 1

Cisco CCNA
by Network Academy 13 Mar '05

13 Mar '05

Network Academy="Network Academy" РЕГИОНАЛЬНАЯ АКАДЕМИЯ CISCO ОБЪЯВЛЯЕТ НАБОР СЛУШАТЕЛЕЙ НА КУРСЫ ПО ПРОГРАММЕ ОБУЧЕНИЯ CISCO CCNA. ЦЕНА ДЛЯ СТУДЕНТОВ - ВСЕГО 2500 ГРИВЕН. После прохождения обучения в Академии Cisco слушатели получают знания, необходимые для проектирования и обслуживания локальных и глобальных сетей, а также практические навыки работы с оборудованием Cisco Systems. Более подробно с учебным планом можно ознакомиться по адресу http://www.gnc.ukrtelecom.ua/cisco/ua/learn/plan.htm Набор производится в группы со стационарной фомой обучения. Группа Время проведения занятий Период обучения I 16.00 - 18.00 28.03.05 - 6.06.05 05.09.05 - 11.11.05 II 18.00 - 20.00 28.03.05 - 6.06.05 05.09.05 - 11.11.05 Занятия проводятся 5 дней в неделю. Продолжительность обучения составляет 5 месяцев. На летние месяцы - перерыв. Стоимость обучения (в гривнах): Юр.лица: 5000грн Физ.лица: 3800грн Студенты: 2500грн Возможна посеместровая оплата. Возможно обучение в кредит. Выпускникам Академии предоставляется существенная скидка (до 70 процентов) при сдаче теста на сертификат CCNA. Стоимость сертификационного теста CCNA не входит в стоимость обучения. Обучение осуществляется сертифицированными инструкторами. Каждое рабочее место оснащено компьютером, подключенным к Internet. Кондиционеры создают необходимый микроклимат в помещении. Наши выпускники работают в хорошо известных фирмах и организациях, у Internet-провайдеров, в банках и государственных учреждениях Украины. Более подробную информацию можно получить на нашем сайте http://www.gnc.ukrtelecom.ua/cisco -- С уважением, администрация Академии тел.: (044)443-55-10; (044)443-10-89 cisco(a)gnc.ukrtelecom.ua

1 0

NFS analysis tools
by Derek Lai 10 Mar '05

10 Mar '05

Has anyone played with good NFS analysis tools? I googled about NFS tracing and saw a couple of interesting research papers. One is from Daniel Ellard and Margo Seltzer of Harvard University. The other one from Matt Blaze of Princeton University. Daniel Ellard has the nfsdump and nfsscan tools and Matt Blaze has the rpcspy and nfstrace tools. I just took a quick scan and am sitting down to read the papers. Just wondering if anyone else has looked at these and know which ones are better? Or if you know of other good tools, please share. I'm trying to trouble-shoot occasional NFS server not responding error. The filer does not appear to be very busy and only one of the 2 HP-UX servers is having this issue. Although the particular file system is our database production file system and is only pounded on by the production server. Derek

1 0

The next oil super-st0ck
by Lila Jensen 10 Mar '05

10 Mar '05

The Oil and Gas Advisory Now that Oi| and Gas has entered a long-term bu|l market, our specia|ty in pinpointing the hottest companies of the few remaining undervalued energy plays has produced soaring returns. Emerson Oil and Gas (EOGI) is an energy developer in the US "Oi| Be|t" and in Canada's most highly coveted reservoirs with generating potential of Millions per week. Symbol - EOGI Price - .12 Se|| Target - .33 = Diamond Play The value of EOGI's shares wi|l skyrocket: 1. Price charts confirm oil prices are experiencing the strongest bu|| market in a generation. 2. Natural Gas prices have trip|ed in the |ast two years. 3. With mu|tip|e projects in high-gear and the expanding production on reserves worth multi-millions, EOGI is se||ing for |ess than 1/4 the va|ue of its assets. 4. Emerson Oil and Gas specia|izes in using new technology to turn unproductive oil and gas deposits into profitab|e enterprises. A|ready shares in the oi| and gas sector are rising faster than the overa|| market. In fact, four of Dow Jones' ten top performing industry sectors for the past year are energy re|ated. But it's in the mid-sized explorers and developers |ike Emerson (EOGI) that the biggest gains are being made. In the |ast 12 months, many of these stocks made trip|e and even quadrup|e returns. Our subscribers need to pay particular|y c|ose attention to underva|ued EOGI shares, because it won't be a bargain for long. This sma|l company with a comparably small market value, is sitting on a bonanza of oi| and gas reserves - an unrecognized bonus for investors especial|y with the daily jump in energy prices. But a|| that wi|| change in a few short weeks, as these reserves move into production, bringing an exp|osion of cash that is expected to capture the attention of the market, and have an equa|ly explosive effect on the share price. What will the cash flow from these projects do for the price of Emerson Oil and Gas' shares? We|| we do know this - the great thing about investing in EOGI is that your gains don't depend on further increases in the price of oi| and gas. Even if energy prices stay f|at, or decline s|ightly, you wi|| sti|l make a very hea|thy return. Of course, energy prices are expected to continue their meteoric rise over the next year or so as predicted, meaning the value of EOGI's assets and earnings wi|| soar even higher. In that case, the reward for investors wi|| be staggering. Overa|l, we consider EOGI to be one of the |ast outstanding energy plays in the oi| and gas sector. Once this discovery has been realized, EOGI shares wi|l surge sharp|y on heavy investor attention. We have identified this discovery for immediate accumu|ation. EOGI's oi| and gas reserves are wel| estab|ished and are going into massive production. Early investors will secure optimum gains, and any additional news in this area wi|l rea||y turn up the heat, causing us to revise our targets upward in next week's bulletin. Oil and Gas Advisory (OGA) is not a investment expert. Certain statements contained in this news|etter may be future-|ooking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such terms as expect, believe, may, wi|l, and intend or simi|ar terms may identify these statements. Past-performance is not an indicator of future-results. This is not an expert to acquire or sell securities. OGA is an independent pub|ication that was paid fifteen thousand dol|ars by a third party for the continuing coverage and dissemination of this company information. Investors are suggested to seek proper guidance from a financial expert. Investors should use the information provided in this news|etter as a starting point for gathering additional information on the profiled company to allow the investor to form their own opinion regarding investment. If you wish to stop future mai|ings, or if you fee| you have been wrongfu||y placed in our membership, please go here or send a blank e mai| with No Thanks in the subject to (-st0ck17@ yahoo.com-)

1 0

RE: iSCSI for HP-UX
by Derek Lai 08 Mar '05

08 Mar '05

Srinivas, Can you share the reports? I'm particularly curious about the performance compared to NFS. Did you use the HP iSCSI initiator? Is there more than 1 available? Derek -----Original Message----- From: Addanki, Srinivas [mailto:addanki@netapp.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 5:00 PM To: Derek Lai; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: iSCSI for HP-UX Do you mean to say that iSCSI initiator on HP-UX and the target is the filer? Yes, I have worked with that before and did some performance measurements. It was quite good, but unfortunately I don't have any of those reports with me. I haven't had experience with Oracle though. Srinivas -----Original Message----- From: Derek Lai [mailto:Derek.Lai@onyxco.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 4:40 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: iSCSI for HP-UX Has anyone tried iSCSI with filers on HP-UX? We are running HP-UX 11i and I noticed that HP does have drivers for iSCSI. Just wondering how robust it is. Anyone actually running Oracle with it? Derek

1 0

RE: iSCSI for HP-UX
by Addanki, Srinivas 08 Mar '05

08 Mar '05

Do you mean to say that iSCSI initiator on HP-UX and the target is the filer? Yes, I have worked with that before and did some performance measurements. It was quite good, but unfortunately I don't have any of those reports with me. I haven't had experience with Oracle though. Srinivas -----Original Message----- From: Derek Lai [mailto:Derek.Lai@onyxco.com] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 4:40 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: iSCSI for HP-UX Has anyone tried iSCSI with filers on HP-UX? We are running HP-UX 11i and I noticed that HP does have drivers for iSCSI. Just wondering how robust it is. Anyone actually running Oracle with it? Derek

1 0

iSCSI for HP-UX
by Derek Lai 08 Mar '05

08 Mar '05

Has anyone tried iSCSI with filers on HP-UX? We are running HP-UX 11i and I noticed that HP does have drivers for iSCSI. Just wondering how robust it is. Anyone actually running Oracle with it? Derek

1 0

RE: command line for a filerview output (snapshot used)
by Ta, Quy 07 Mar '05

07 Mar '05

"snap delta" Quy Ta Network Appliance 888.463.8277 Technical Support 512-554-2545 mobile -----Original Message----- From: aaron hirsch [mailto:aaronh@uptime.net] Sent: Monday, March 07, 2005 2:52 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: command line for a filerview output (snapshot used) >Using Filerview, one can see the amount of space consumed by each snapshot on any volume, by >going to Volume->Snapshots->Manage screen. >Is there a command line option that will give me the same output? >Volume Name Date Used Total Status >vol1 nightly.3 Mar 02 23:26 405.3 MB 1.133 GB normal >vol1 nightly.2 Mar 03 23:22 735.1 MB 754.5 MB normal >vol1 nightly.1 Mar 04 23:23 13.21 MB 19.47 MB normal >vol1 weekly.0 Mar 05 23:19 3.145 MB 6.262 MB normal >vol1 nightly.0 Mar 06 23:18 1.691 MB 1.691 MB normal Are you looking for the exact same syntax? If not, "snap list" should do the trick for you. If you want it on a per volume basis "snap list <volume name>"

2 1

Re: Quick access to quota information
by JacekN 07 Mar '05

07 Mar '05

Todd Sawler wrote: > Jacek, > > Have you looked at BlueArc? We are a reseller....take a look at the > website. > > www.bluearc.com <http://www.bluearc.com> And how can you solve my probleM/ Best regards, Jacek

1 0

RE: command line for a filerview output (snapshot used)
by aaron hirsch 07 Mar '05

07 Mar '05

>Using Filerview, one can see the amount of space consumed by each snapshot on any volume, by >going to Volume->Snapshots->Manage screen. >Is there a command line option that will give me the same output? >Volume Name Date Used Total Status >vol1 nightly.3 Mar 02 23:26 405.3 MB 1.133 GB normal >vol1 nightly.2 Mar 03 23:22 735.1 MB 754.5 MB normal >vol1 nightly.1 Mar 04 23:23 13.21 MB 19.47 MB normal >vol1 weekly.0 Mar 05 23:19 3.145 MB 6.262 MB normal >vol1 nightly.0 Mar 06 23:18 1.691 MB 1.691 MB normal Are you looking for the exact same syntax? If not, "snap list" should do the trick for you. If you want it on a per volume basis "snap list <volume name>"

1 0

07 Mar '05

Hi, Using Filerview, one can see the amount of space consumed by each snapshot on any volume, by going to Volume->Snapshots->Manage screen. Is there a command line option that will give me the same output? Volume Name Date Used Total Status vol1 nightly.3 Mar 02 23:26 405.3 MB 1.133 GB normal vol1 nightly.2 Mar 03 23:22 735.1 MB 754.5 MB normal vol1 nightly.1 Mar 04 23:23 13.21 MB 19.47 MB normal vol1 weekly.0 Mar 05 23:19 3.145 MB 6.262 MB normal vol1 nightly.0 Mar 06 23:18 1.691 MB 1.691 MB normal TIA -G

1 0

RE: nis.group_update.enable
by Luke Howard 05 Mar '05

05 Mar '05

>Does anyone have experience using LDAP to obtain group information on >filers using the RFC 2307 compliant options in DOT 6.5 and up, >specifically with Novell eDirectory? I had some success configuring it against XAD (which supports a variant of RFC 2307). More information is at: http://www.padl.com/TechNotes/XADONTAPConfigurationNote.html >I'm also curious about how the ldap.usermap.* options work - the >documentation is a bit vague on what the filer expects to see in the >.attribute.*account options and how/when lookups are performed. Anyone >played this or know what the code does? I think this is to handle the case where a single identity has different user names for UNIX and Windows. eg: options ldap.usermap.attribute.unixaccount uid options ldap.usermap.attribute.windowsaccount sAMAccountName Presumably you can avoid the overhead of an extra lookup if user names are the same in your deployment. -- Luke --

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters