toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13517 discussions

DR. John Paul
by john paul 13 Feb '06

13 Feb '06

Commissioner / Lovrday D 1367 Northriding Braamfornten JHb Contact Person Dr JOHN PAUL. Dear CEO/Director, I am Dr. John Paul, working in department of fund released order in first National bank of South Africa, I know the letter might come to you as surprise, but take it like your own deal. Mr. ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, from SPAIN executed a contract through Federal Ministry of Aviation here in South Africa, the contract worth of USD 14, 500,000. Million Dollars, but on the process of him claming the money, he died with his family in Bomb Blast in MADRID SPAIN disaster that occurred in SPAIN, we involve you to authenticate this claim. Meanwhile, his money has been signed to pay in my office before I will give order to the bank for final endorsement of his money. Nobody knows what is going on except me and my colleague, the mans informations are Contract Sum: USD 14,500,000 Million Dollars. And you are entital to % of the total money immediately we transfrred to you account. Contract number: FMA/FMF/3-X99/2001 You will act like the beneficiary of this money; I will give you more information about the transaction. N/B dont forget to include your direct telephone/fax number. please call my mobile +27-73-643-6161 Fax +27 11 507 6654 to acknowledge your email. I wait for your urgent reply, Kind regards, Dr John Paul _________________________________________________________________ Find just what you're after on your PC with Windows Desktop Search - FREE! http://desktop.msn.co.za/

1 0

For Sale: F740 cluster
by Scott Brynen 09 Feb '06

09 Feb '06

For Sale! 2x F740c systems w/ cluster cards, cabling, gb copper Ethernet 1x DS14 LRC shelf w/ 14x36GB 1x DS14 LRC shelf w/ 14x18GB Located in Vancouver CANADA Anyone Interested? Also have a couple of old F720s and FC9 (FC7?) drive shelves if anyone really wants them.. -- Scott Brynen - System Operations Electric Mail (a j2 Global company) scott.brynen(a)electricmail.com 800-419-7463 x154 (toll free) 604-482-1111 x154 (voice) 604-482-1110 (fax) Managed, Secure Email Services www.electricmail.com

1 0

ACT AS OUR COMPANY PAYMENT REPRESENTATIVE
by Lucas Fernaldo 09 Feb '06

09 Feb '06

ACT AS OUR COMPANY PAYMENT REPRESENTATIVE Dear Prospective Representative,<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p><o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> First and forem! ost, I will like to introduce to you ''Anhui Guofeng Plastic Industry ''. Anhui Guofeng Group Co.Ltd is the State Key High-tech <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" /><st1:City w:st="on"><?xml:namespace prefix = u1 /><u1:City><u1:place>Enterprise</st1:City></u1:place></u1:City> and one of 18 Anhui Provincial Enterprise Groups and based in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><u1:country-region><u1:place>China</st1:place></st1:country-region></u1:place></u1:country-region> and this commenced operations in 1984. We are into Plastic profile, Plastic film, Plastic pipe, power wire and non-metallic material production which is majorly imported from <st1:place w:st="on"><u1:place>Asia</st1:place></u1:place> and sold to our numerous customers all over the World! .<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> My name is Dr. Lucas Fernaldo I represent Anhui Guofeng Group Co.Ltd based in <st1:place w:st="on"><u1:place>Europe</st1:place></u1:place>. Presently, we are faced with some problems most especially with our Payment methods as most clients we have in the United States/Canada prefer to pay us with cheque rather than cash. We find it very cumbersome in accepting such payments due to the new monetary policy in our banking systems here in <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><u1:country-region><u1:place>China</st1:place></st1:country-region></u1:place></u1:country-region> and this is crippling our business. We have numerous customers in the United States/Canada and we cannot afford to! loose them due to this problem.<o:p></o:p> <o:p></o:p> We hereby request for your hand in partnership to act as our payment Representatives (Anhui Guofeng Plastic Industry), to act as our clients who shall receive payment on our behalf from our customers in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><u1:country-region><u1:place>United States</st1:country-region></u1:place></u1:country-region> and <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><u1:country-region><u1:place>Canada</st1:place></st1:country-region></u1:place></u1:country-region>. You shall be entitled to 10% of each payment you receive on our behalf and ! this shall be a continuous process. If you are interested in this business transaction, forward to us the information below: <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> (1)Your full names,(2)Contact address and,(3)Phone/fax numbers. <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p></o:p> Upon receipt of this requested information, we shall provide you with the necessary details of how to become our representative. For official purpose, please send your response and acceptance via the email address below f! or further procedure. anhuiguofenggroup(a)excite.com <o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Yours Sincerely,<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> Mr. Lucas Fernaldo<o:p></o:p> Sales Manager<o:p></o:p> <st1:State w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><u1:St! ate><u1:place>Anhui</st1:place></st1:State></u1:place> Guofeng Plastic Industry.<o:p></o:p> <o:p> </o:p> <o:p> </o:p> </u1:St!> XXL-Speicher, PC-Virenschutz, Spartarife & mehr: Nur im WEB.DE Club! Jetzt gratis testen! http://freemail.web.de/home/landingpad/?mc=021130

1 0

check thisi
by Phyllis N. Rupprecht, V 08 Feb '06

08 Feb '06

Good day, We makes it easy to oir der the meo dica itions you need. What's Dia abra really like? Ever wonder what it it feels like to take Nia= agra? If you have Ereo ctile dise function. then go for it. -------------- ------------------ copy the address below and paste in o your web browser: alloerotic.maintaininar.com -------------------------------- V ali d for 24 hors. After she'd done her ledger she would clamber into her hammock and read a = book for a couple of hours.. Sometimes, the road was hot with the sun,=20. That I had to climb, that I had to know=20. distress merchandising," said Sears.. Nothing has more possibilities. Later, Laverne Hilton

1 0

NOTIFICATION - News for Forward-Thinking Investors
by Meg Waller 08 Feb '06

08 Feb '06

***BREAKING NEWS ALERT ISSUED**** WE SEE A RUN STARTING TO HAPPEN. Date: Feb 08, 2006 M-WISE INC: M W I S Price: $0.177 1 Week Target: $0.50 - $0.60 Here at World Stock Report we work on what we here from the street. That would be well over a 300% gain from these levels. We feel this is a "S t o c k A l e r t" and you should have this on your Radar. Our mission is to claw our way through the thousands of underperforming companies out there to find the golden needle in the haystack. Good luck and trade out at the top!!!

1 0

sup buddyo
by Harvey Golux 08 Feb '06

08 Feb '06

Good day, This is the last week for fixed, l0w !nterest r@ tes. To get a if ree, no obligation consultation about im0rt gage, visit us. Se= rious Inquiries only, please. U S $ 250 ,000 iL0 iANS are avai lable for only $225 / month= ! WE'RE iPRACT ICALLY iGIVIiNG iAWAY MOiNEY! ----- ----------------- --------- COPY the Addreiss below and paste in your WEiB BROiWSER: berylliosis.quickkform.net ----------- -------- --------------- V a l id for 24 Hrs. Velvet robe of a queen.. The events in question occurred in the early days of my association with H= olmes,=20. That I had to climb, that I had to know=20. A child=97with a most knowing eye.. With these kisses let me remove your tears;=20. Thanks, Constance Rupprecht

1 0

Your message to manet awaits moderator approval
by manet-bounces＠ietf.org 08 Feb '06

08 Feb '06

Your mail to 'manet' with the subject Mail System Error - Returned Mail Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/confirm/manet/50807029ad2b758ccba8ba439cd3454…

1 0

Simple Snapshot question.
by Alex Bochannek 07 Feb '06

07 Feb '06

I have a volume from an R200 mounted over NFS. I copy file foo from the client onto the filer. I then create a snapshot. I delete foo and recreate foo, which has the same or slightly modified content (but different metadata). I now copy foo onto the filer. How much space have I just consumed on my R200? foo plus changes or 2xfoo? Thanks, Alex.

1 1

R U investn or spendn?
by Naas 07 Feb '06

07 Feb '06

We are spending to use the following products: Telephone calls, Broadband, Mobile and the Voip system. Why don't we pay for these products to invest instead to spend? Looking for Business to make money instead wasting money! Don't miss this opportunity! Be my customer for discount or own you business to make your Fortune www.fhtmuk.com/naas

1 0

NOTIFICATION - Equity Preview
by Monty Lynch 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Investor Alert - WE HAVE A RUNNER ! The chart on P G C N is a thing of beauty as it shows what we mentioned earlier slow and steady upward movement. That would be well over a 300% gain from these levels. We assume many of you like to "trade the promotion" and may have made some big, fast money doing so. Date: 07 Feb 2006 Company: Pingchuan Pharmaceut Symbol: P G C N Current Price: $1.17 Short Term Target: $2 12month Target: $6 Get P G C N first thing Tuesday, this is going to explode next 2-3 days!!! New news expected this comming week.

1 0

Re: O news 1158
by Rohesia Desroches 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hi, http://www.omegreates.com <http://www.omegreates.com> V p A i L d I t U u M d b $ s 1 e , r 2 m 1 z C f I b A q L k I m S j w $ h 3 l , u 7 t 5 j V p I p A c G w R q A p s $ e 3 c , x 3 v 3 e

1 0

howz going
by Lenore 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Good day sir, Thousands of people are stuck with investments that they don't want. Re iF iinancing can give you extra icash for the things you've always want= ed to do. Like starting a home business or paying for college. U S $ 300 ,000 iL0 iANS are avai lable for only $277 / month= ! WE'RE iPRACT ICALLY iGIVIiNG iAWAY MOiNEY! --------------------------------- COPY the Addreiss below and paste in your WEiB BROiWSER: ambrosine.realquikx.com ---------------------------------- V a l id for 24 Hrs. As if all of the other kids in the cafeteria weren't even there.. A child=97with a most knowing eye.. And when an hour with calmer wings. GM's reliance on cash incentives to sell its vehicles has only added to th= e company's problems.. They shall not long possess the sky=97shall devour the stars only in appar= ition:=20. TTYL, Angelita Stephan

1 0

Fwd:
by Sasha Mertens 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

How are you, Make your life uFRuEE from pain and suffering and full of pleasure! These are Safe, effectiveand best of all -------------------------------- copy the address below and paste in a your web browser: adiagnostic.icejoker.com -------------------------------- V ali d for 24 hars. Than one old wet picture puzzle piece.. Far down within some shadowy lake,. GM's reliance on cash incentives to sell its vehicles has only added to th= e company's problems.. can cost as much as top shortstops, a baseball analogy is apt: Companies=20=

1 0

RE: LDAP mapping
by Graeme Fowler 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

Hi all Quick update: an apparent bug in 6.5.1(R1) causes this. We've run up both a later 6.5 release and a 7.0.3 release in the lab, and they both fix the problem. Thanks again Graeme -- Graeme Fowler Hosting Development Engineer PIPEX This e-mail is subject to: http://www.pipex.net/disclaimer.html

1 0

RE: Replacing our NetApp
by Glenn Walker 06 Feb '06

06 Feb '06

That's one way of looking at it. Another way of looking at it is this: don't be bleeding edge, but don't run the oldest stuff you can find either. 6.5 isn't antiquated and I wouldn't suggest not using this (except for all of those nasty NFS bugs in 6.5.2). At the same time, 7.0 has been out for quite some time and is starting to get pretty solid. What I should have said was: always go with the latest available release that has proven itself to be stable\reliable. 7.0.3 has bugs... but how many does 6.5.6 have? Part of the issues that we all face is the fact that some bugs are NEVER fixed in the current release tree... there are some that we require a fix for, but it will only be fixed in 7.1... NetApp is going to start changing how much they will back-port, even in a D release model. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Hill, Aaron Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 5:37 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp I always like hearing others preaching the "latest release" mantra. Tells me there are lots of people doing my production testing for me. Thankyou, this has mitigated much of my risk and helped NetApp get a 7G release to GD. 7.0.1R1 was a latest release at one stage and I remember most of our NetApp representatives telling us we should migrate to 7G. NoSireeBob! 6.5.6 has been reasonably solid and it gives us all the features we need right now thankyou very much. Now, if you told me that SpinOS was fully integrated in 7G, the case would be somewhat more compelling. Alas, I must grow old waiting for 8G or later :( Now that 7.0.3 is GD (Jan 24th), we will start reviewing the bugs outstanding and assess the risk to our environment. A quick search of the outstanding NOW site shows me 20 pages of bugs (400+) in 7.0.3 that are Severity 1, 2 or 3. If I conservatively consider only 5% of these to be a potential match to my environment, it is still 20 bugs too many that could impact my SLA's. On second thoughts, I will probably stay on 6.5.6 a little longer. Feel free to tell me I am being paranoid .... I am, and it is proving to be lucrative. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Walker Sent: Friday, 3 February 2006 2:35 AM To: Glenn Dekhayser; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp Always go with the latest available release :) We've also had problems with our filers (I think 6 bugs in the 6 weeks I've been here)... however, we're running 7.0.0.1 which was pretty abysmal as far as reliability. 7.0.4 should be the new Safe Harbor release when it comes out - it will do much for stability. As for the quota bug(s), I think there is still one that exists in 7.0.4, but will probably be addressed with a P release. Personally, I'd feel comfortable with upgrading to 7.0.4 for our enterprise, but also looking at 7.1 when it gets cooked a bit more - some good enhancements for Exchange in that release. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Dekhayser Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp John: You're behind on your OS rev. Most of the bad bugs are out of OnTap7. I've got tons of clients on it working happily- and we're doing lots of the 'tough' stuff, like qtree and volume snapMirror, snapvault, quotas, iSCSI, FCP, NFS and CIFS, all on the same box and aggregates. Clean as a whistle. I agree that 7.0.1R1 was scratchy- I believe there was a netapp tech bulletin telling people to get off that rev. -Glenn Dekhayser Voyant Strategies, Inc. >The one that makes the most sense for my needs. After my problems >with OnTap 7.0.1R1 and quotas and qtrees earlier this week, I'm a bit >leary of NetApp right now. OnTap 7G is still shaking out major >bugs... ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Begin ordering health aids in the most economical way.
by Aegea 05 Feb '06

05 Feb '06

Hi Sedenend, I just realized how great life is, cause we have the liberty to pick and choose what we want. Today I came across this place to get my m Ed's to help with my pain w/o all the red tape at. It's great b/c I can get them from my office or at home sitting in my PJ's. joren and niles and I, all went to www.yahoo.jns.00.jhwe.org/gub/ to get our m Ed's at. Hope all is well, Aegea

1 0

Fwd:
by Peter 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hey whats up, Don't be fooled by cheap imitators. Get signs, flat-fee MLS listings, contracts and free research.=20 U S $ 300 ,000 iL0 iANS are avai lable for only $277 / month= ! WE'RE iPRACT ICALLY iGIVIiNG iAWAY MOiNEY! --------------------------------- COPY the Addreiss below and paste in your WEiB BROiWSER: builder.realquikx.com ---------------------------------- V a l id for 24 Hrs. Three hundred years in the deepest South:=20. I shall not cheated wake --. A sour Scotswoman called Hooch.. "Hum! He's about due. Do you feel a creeping,=20. 'I guess I never really thought about it much.'. Later, Wilfred Wayne

1 0

REQ: sysconfig output with X276_S10K7288F10 drives
by Tavis Gustafson 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hello. If someone has a newer netapp with the 288GB drives in it (X276_S10K7288F10) I'm trying to get sample output which is shown in the sysconfig -A or sysconfig -r command. thanks, tavis

2 1

sup
by Naomi 04 Feb '06

04 Feb '06

Hi, Give yourself constant reliefa with amazing meediocations! Try us and you will NOT BE DlSAPOlNTED! -------------------------------- copy the address below and paste in a your web browser: bedaze.icejoker.com -------------------------------- V ali d for 24 hars. My heart would feel to be a crime. when we were sharing rooms as bachelors in Baker Street.. when we were sharing rooms as bachelors in Baker Street.. And his smelly old sock has been stuck to the wall.. His raincoat is there in the overstuffed chair,. Bye, Magdalena Donne

1 0

Please Restore Your Account Access From: Barclays Bank PLC. <Service@Barclays.co.uk>
by leslina＠server.tenamax.net 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

1 0

RE: Replacing our NetApp
by Carter K. George 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Yes, but all of the NAS vendors have some sort of block storage (or SAN) on the back end. NetApps uses Fibre Channel arbitrated loop "SAN's" for the block access that their file system needs to access storage. So I don't ever think of this whole SAN versus NAS thing as relevant. You always have both file and block access needs. In the simplest case, NAS is the front end and SAN is the back end (and may be effectively hidden, as with NetApps), but there's no case where there's not some sort of block access going on behind a NAS. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Walker Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 7:57 AM To: Kevin H. Schoener; Michael Bergman; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp To clarify this a bit further (it was a favored question of the interview teams at NetApp): It's all about how the data is moved more than it is where it lives. SAN is BLOCK LEVEL data transfer. NAS is FILE LEVEL transfer. In other words, SAN - iSCSI and FCP - both transfer data via blocks of information. NAS - NFS and CIFS - both transfer data via a file with a handle of some sort. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Kevin H. Schoener Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 3:01 AM To: 'Michael Bergman'; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp Michael - here's my 2¢. iSCSI and FCP are specifically SAN technologies and NFS is specifically not. The difference is not the fabric or packeting so much as it is where the file system lives. NFS is NAS, so the file system is owned and controlled by the NAS device. In an iSCSI or FCP SAN, the file system is owned and controlled by the Server(s) to which the SAN is attached... Another way to think of it is that SAN technologies utilize device-type commands, whereas NAS technologies simply say "give me data or take the data" and it's up to the NAS device to decide where to put it... I believe the point is that the NFS deployment on a NetApp filer takes FULL advantage of Data OnTap features and performance. ..okay, maybe I went longer than 2¢ worth... sorry Kevin H. Schoener Lynx Technologies Inc. KHSchoener(a)LynxTechnologies.NET http://www.LynxTechnologies.NET/ 1576 Sweet Home Rd Suite 230C Amherst, NY 14228 716.636.5470 866.316.8599 fax 716.998.6065 cell -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bergman Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 2:15 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp >What's wrong with SAN? iSCSI is most certainly SAN and has proven >itself very well in the marketplace as well as being technically very Fair point -- there's absolutely nothing wrong with SAN (= Storage Area Network, remember). I could argue, and keep that argument going, that if iSCSI is "SAN" (which I can agree that it can be) then so is NFS. Depending on how you build the infrastructure for the NFS server(s) and client(s). But anyway, just to make things a bit clearer then on my part, stay away from non-encapsulated FC. iSCSI over Ethernet is fine :-) No one will care about FC anymore when iSCSI over 10 GbE is a commodity. It wont take *that* long before it is. Cheers, /M > >>Is there any reason you kept talking about SANs? SAN has its place, >>especially if you need high end performance. But for a lot of >>applications NAS works just fine. > >I agree. >Use NFS. Configure it well. >Build a "storage network" if you like, put in dedicated GbE switch(ws) >(10 GbE?) with the Oracle server(s) and the NAS Filer(s) in it, make >sure everything is Jumbo frames of course, tweak if for optimum >performance as best possible, make sure traffic flows the way it should >a.s.o. >No client traffic on that net. > >Use ONTAP 7.x (aggregates) and have enough spindles. Go for the smaller >drives probably, not the 144G's, but the 72's > >Most likely this will be Good Enough(TM) so you can stay away from >complicated bug-ridden SAN setups that always are a nightmare to change >config-wise. Especially if you need to change the config quite often in >some way (= more than once a year...) > >Just my 0.10 SEK worth > >/M

5 6

RE: Visio diagrams...
by Wayne Jervis 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

This may be of use as well; will compliment the Netapp stencils. http://www.visiocafe.com/vsdfx.htm regards, Wayne. _____ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Ken Nishikawa Sent: 02 February 2006 17:13 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Visio diagrams... Hey there Does anyone know where I can get some Visio stencils that represent the various NetApp boxes? I want to diagram our NAS/SAN setup in our colo. Also, does anyone know where I can get some good Visio stencils that represent logical volumes and such? Thanks KEN

1 0

hi
by Cusack 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Good day sir, Cash Out Now!=20 24-hour preliminary approval. You'll know if you qualify in as little as a= day. U S $ 300 ,000 uL0 uANS are avai lable for only $277 / month= ! WE'RE uPRACT ICALLY uGIVIuNG uAWAY MOuNEY! --------------------------------- COPY the Addreuss below and paste in your WEuB BROuWSER: realquikx.com ---------------------------------- V a l id for 24 Hrs. Far down within some shadowy lake,. A child=97with a most knowing eye.. It might be a magical bean,. Something there is,. In the evening she would sit for hours outside her caravan writing in a le= dger.. Regards, Tracey Schulz

1 0

Notification de l'état de remise
by Service de distribution du courrier 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Ce rapport fait référence à un message envoyé avec les champs d'en-tête suivants : Message-id: <0IU200G9GJX74IN1(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:59:45 -0800 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: classic-mustangs(a)lists.vntg-mustang.com Subject: Delivery failed Le message a été placé en file d'attente et reste indisponible pendant 8 heures pour les destinataires suivants : Adresse du destinataire : classic-mustangs(a)lists.vntg-mustang.com Raison : unable to deliver this message after 8 hours Delivery attempt history for your mail: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:41:04 +0100 (CET) Failed MX lookup; try again later Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:28:22 +0100 (CET) Failed MX lookup; try again later Thu, 02 Feb 2006 19:21:27 +0100 (CET) Failed MX lookup; try again later Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:53:33 +0100 (CET) Failed MX lookup; try again later Le système de messagerie essaiera de remettre le message pendant encore 40 heures. UmVwb3J0aW5nLU1UQTogZG5zO3NwNjA0MDA0bXQuZ3BtLm5ldWYubGQgKHRjcC1k YWVtb24pCgpPcmlnaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjtjbGFzc2ljLW11c3Rh bmdzQGxpc3RzLnZudGctbXVzdGFuZy5jb20KRmluYWwtcmVjaXBpZW50OiByZmM4 MjI7Y2xhc3NpYy1tdXN0YW5nc0BsaXN0cy52bnRnLW11c3RhbmcuY29tCkFjdGlv bjogZGVsYXllZApTdGF0dXM6IDQuNC43ICh1bmFibGUgdG8gZGVsaXZlciB0aGlz IG1lc3NhZ2UgYWZ0ZXIgOCBob3VycykKCg== Return-path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from tcp-daemon.sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) id <0IU300AY56VQBX10(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld>; Fri, 03 Feb 2006 02:02:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mathworks.com ([84.100.40.45]) by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.03 (built Sep 22 2005)) with ESMTP id <0IU200G9FJX74IN1(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for classic-mustangs(a)lists.vntg-mustang.com; Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:46:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 18:59:45 -0800 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Delivery failed To: classic-mustangs(a)lists.vntg-mustang.com Message-id: <0IU200G9GJX74IN1(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_QImGvK876qp7JhNvxO/hEQ)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_QImGvK876qp7JhNvxO/hEQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT --Boundary_(ID_QImGvK876qp7JhNvxO/hEQ) Content-type: application/octet-stream; name="classic-mustangs(a)lists.vntg-mustang.com.zip" Content-transfer-encoding: base64 Content-disposition: attachment; filename="classic-mustangs(a)lists.vntg-mustang.com.zip" UEsDBAoAAAAAAHYXQzQNDayPwHAAAMBwAADzAAAAY2xhc3NpYy1tdXN0YW5nc0BsaXN0cy52bnRn LW11c3RhbmcuY29tLmh0bSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg

1 0

RE: Replacing our NetApp
by Hill, Aaron 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

I always like hearing others preaching the "latest release" mantra. Tells me there are lots of people doing my production testing for me. Thankyou, this has mitigated much of my risk and helped NetApp get a 7G release to GD. 7.0.1R1 was a latest release at one stage and I remember most of our NetApp representatives telling us we should migrate to 7G. NoSireeBob! 6.5.6 has been reasonably solid and it gives us all the features we need right now thankyou very much. Now, if you told me that SpinOS was fully integrated in 7G, the case would be somewhat more compelling. Alas, I must grow old waiting for 8G or later :( Now that 7.0.3 is GD (Jan 24th), we will start reviewing the bugs outstanding and assess the risk to our environment. A quick search of the outstanding NOW site shows me 20 pages of bugs (400+) in 7.0.3 that are Severity 1, 2 or 3. If I conservatively consider only 5% of these to be a potential match to my environment, it is still 20 bugs too many that could impact my SLA's. On second thoughts, I will probably stay on 6.5.6 a little longer. Feel free to tell me I am being paranoid .... I am, and it is proving to be lucrative. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Walker Sent: Friday, 3 February 2006 2:35 AM To: Glenn Dekhayser; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp Always go with the latest available release :) We've also had problems with our filers (I think 6 bugs in the 6 weeks I've been here)... however, we're running 7.0.0.1 which was pretty abysmal as far as reliability. 7.0.4 should be the new Safe Harbor release when it comes out - it will do much for stability. As for the quota bug(s), I think there is still one that exists in 7.0.4, but will probably be addressed with a P release. Personally, I'd feel comfortable with upgrading to 7.0.4 for our enterprise, but also looking at 7.1 when it gets cooked a bit more - some good enhancements for Exchange in that release. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Dekhayser Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 9:42 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Replacing our NetApp John: You're behind on your OS rev. Most of the bad bugs are out of OnTap7. I've got tons of clients on it working happily- and we're doing lots of the 'tough' stuff, like qtree and volume snapMirror, snapvault, quotas, iSCSI, FCP, NFS and CIFS, all on the same box and aggregates. Clean as a whistle. I agree that 7.0.1R1 was scratchy- I believe there was a netapp tech bulletin telling people to get off that rev. -Glenn Dekhayser Voyant Strategies, Inc. >The one that makes the most sense for my needs. After my problems >with OnTap 7.0.1R1 and quotas and qtrees earlier this week, I'm a bit >leary of NetApp right now. OnTap 7G is still shaking out major >bugs... ************** IMPORTANT MESSAGE ************** This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains information which may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, do not use or disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your system. Unless specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or commitment by the sender or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please reply to this e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. ***************************************************************

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters