toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13517 discussions

I Hope On Your Advice
by Sali MOHAMED 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Dear , I celebrate the opportunity to reach you this day with an investment opportunity.I would like to ask for your advice on what business opportunity could be best to get involve in within your country.I have a substantial capital i intend to invest into a very lucrative business venture which you dim good enough for good retures,for the mutual benefits of both of us. I would like to count on your advice in creative ideals on how money will be invested and properly managed.Presently am financially ready for this investment but i will like to know first if you are interested then i can request that my fund be transfer to your custody with you assistance after due comunication and agreement from both of us. Meanwhile, on indication of your willingness to handle this transaction sincerely by protecting our interests and upon your acceptance of this proposal, I would furnish you with the full detailed information, procedure, amount involve and mutually agree on your percentage interest for businesto secure the release of the deposit and investing the money.I shall be glad to reserve this respect and opportunity for you, if you so desire,do urgent and give the matter your immediate attention it deserves. You are also free to ask me anything you intend to know as regarding myself and financial capacity. Looking forward to your earliest reply. Respectfully yours, Sali Ahmed. --------------------------------- New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.

1 0

snapvault - quiescing status
by John Stoffel 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Hi all, I've got some NetApps which are snapvaulting across a large fat network. But I'm seeing a huge lag in my snapvaults and they're all mostly in the quiescing state, with a lag upto 300 hours now. Sigh... Is there any way to speed up things? Or to monitor the actual state of the quiescing stage so I can hopefully figure out what the heck is going on here? Here's a status from the secondary side of things: Snapvault secondary is ON. Source: marlfs1:/vol/data01/narad Destination: sjdr0:/vol/marlfs1_data01/narad Status: Quiescing Progress: - State: Snapvaulted Lag: 307:12:16 Mirror Timestamp: Fri Mar 24 14:00:34 PST 2006 Base Snapshot: sjdr0(0050404441)_marlfs1_data01-base.168 Current Transfer Type: - Current Transfer Error: - Contents: Transitioning Last Transfer Type: Retry Last Transfer Size: 13012 KB Last Transfer Duration: 00:06:45 Last Transfer From: marlfs1:/vol/data01/narad Here's the status from the source side: Source: marlfs1:/vol/data01/narad Destination: sjdr0:/vol/marlfs1_data01/narad Status: Idle Progress: - State: Source Lag: 145:16:04 Mirror Timestamp: Fri Mar 31 11:00:02 EST 2006 Base Snapshot: sv_hourly.2 Current Transfer Type: - Current Transfer Error: - Contents: - Last Transfer Type: - Last Transfer Size: 13012 KB Last Transfer Duration: 00:06:45 Last Transfer From: - Thanks, John

1 1

RE: snapvault - quiescing status
by John Clear 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

What versions of DataOnTap are the primary and secondary running? Have you checked to make sure the secondary volume isn't full? I had some issues snapvaulting from 6.4.1 to 7.0.1 where the snapvaults would get stuck quiescing. I'd do a 'snapvault update' on the session that had a size listed (Ex: Quiescing (122 GB done)), which usually was able to get it unstuck. Sometimes I would need to do a abort and then update. That problem has been resolved by upgrading the primaries. I frequently have trouble with snapvault filling the volume on the secondary, and unfortunately, the only indication snapvault gives is that it gets stuck quiescing. John -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of John Stoffel Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 10:18 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: snapvault - quiescing status Hi all, I've got some NetApps which are snapvaulting across a large fat network. But I'm seeing a huge lag in my snapvaults and they're all mostly in the quiescing state, with a lag upto 300 hours now. Sigh... Is there any way to speed up things? Or to monitor the actual state of the quiescing stage so I can hopefully figure out what the heck is going on here? Here's a status from the secondary side of things: Snapvault secondary is ON. Source: marlfs1:/vol/data01/narad Destination: sjdr0:/vol/marlfs1_data01/narad Status: Quiescing Progress: - State: Snapvaulted Lag: 307:12:16 Mirror Timestamp: Fri Mar 24 14:00:34 PST 2006 Base Snapshot: sjdr0(0050404441)_marlfs1_data01-base.168 Current Transfer Type: - Current Transfer Error: - Contents: Transitioning Last Transfer Type: Retry Last Transfer Size: 13012 KB Last Transfer Duration: 00:06:45 Last Transfer From: marlfs1:/vol/data01/narad Here's the status from the source side: Source: marlfs1:/vol/data01/narad Destination: sjdr0:/vol/marlfs1_data01/narad Status: Idle Progress: - State: Source Lag: 145:16:04 Mirror Timestamp: Fri Mar 31 11:00:02 EST 2006 Base Snapshot: sv_hourly.2 Current Transfer Type: - Current Transfer Error: - Contents: - Last Transfer Type: - Last Transfer Size: 13012 KB Last Transfer Duration: 00:06:45 Last Transfer From: - Thanks, John

1 0

RE: OnTap 6.x, mixed shelves, and spares. (SUMMARY)
by Patwardhan, Nate 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Thanks to the following people who'd responded: - Tim McCarthy - John McLoughlin - July Your clarifications were perfect. As it turns out, we were running OnTap 6.3.x on a 740. We ended up seeing the insidious '1111' messages before enabling the DS14 shelves crashed the filer (upon boot and otherwise). We updated to OnTap 6.5.x and all became happy in the land of DS14s. In addition, we had one of the drives on the FC9 fail this afternoon and it grabbed one of the spare 36g drives -- NOT the 144g drives as I'd hoped. Per your clarification(s), it looks like the remedy is to provide enough spares for the FC9 so failures of 36g drives won't tap into our pool of 144g spares. -- Nathan Patwardhan, UNIX System[s] Administrator, Sr. Akamai Technologies, 839B/8CC x 83035 npatward(a)akamai.com AIM: notoriousnvp71 -----Original Message----- From: Patwardhan, Nate [mailto:nvp@akamai.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:52 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: OnTap 6.x, mixed shelves, and spares. All, I am migrating a 740 so that the shelf/volume configuration looks like the following: vol0 -> 1 x DS9 @ 36g (raid4) data -> 1 x DS14 @ 144g (raid4) Basically, I wanted to not waste a 144g drive on vol0 while maximizing my space on the DS14. Note that we're also going to be consolidating many of our NetApps in the future, so it made sense (to me, at least) to keep 'data' on a separate shelf. However, I have concerns with the above configuration. I'm not concerned with disk failures on 'vol0' (or any other volume that might live on 36g drives) since I'm pretty sure that OnTap will do the right thing and take a 36g drive from the spares pool. I am pretty concerned that 'data' might pull a 36g drive from the spares pool instead of a 144g drive. Is my concern justified? Will OnTap 6.3.x do the right thing for the 'data' volume and pull a 144g drive from the spares pool or is there the chance that it would pull a 36g drive? Or is OnTap smart enough to know that a 144g disk with more than 36g utilization should be replaced with a disk of at least 36g? -- Nathan Patwardhan, UNIX System[s] Administrator, Sr. Akamai Technologies, 839B/8CC x 83035 npatward(a)akamai.com AIM: notoriousnvp71

1 0

(no subject)
by Lisa Bello 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Unsubscribe

1 0

RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after dayl ight saving
by Holland, William L 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

What is happening is that Windows is translating the date/time to be relative to the current time zone - now Daylight Savings vs Standard time. To better illustrate this, change the time zone on a Windows computer then look at date/time stamps on files. The stamp hasn't been changed at all, just how Windows is translating it for you. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:Jochen.Willeke@wincor-nixdorf.com] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:49 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving Hi everybody, i have a case of one user who stored some files from his Windows2000 client onto a CIFS share on a fas3050 with Ontap 6.5.4. When he first copied the files onto the share the creation time was 10:00 o'clock. This was the Friday before we had the daylight saving change. On next monday the creation time was not 10:00 but 11:00. I have no clue how this could happen. Anybody got an idea? I would be glad even if i get some information about how timestamps are created so i can make a research myself. Thanks a lot for any suggestions in advance Jochen

2 1

RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving
by Hirschorn, Steven 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Hi Jochen, We saw a similar effect. We have lots of files on the filer which are indexed by an indexing service, and at 1am (GMT) on the 26th March the indexer decided that all the files needed reindexing because all their timestamps had changed! Our filer is in zone Europe/London. I did a search on the NOW knowledgebase and found bug #34324, described below. I haven't had time to look into it fully (and had trouble understanding the implications anyway!) but it does look like the behaviour of the filer has been changed in recent ONTAP releases. Something to do with the filer trying to compensate for Windows behaviour when it reports timestamps. If anyone can clarify this for me too, that would be great! http://now.netapp.com/NOW/cgi-bin/bol?Type=Detail&Display=34324 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Willeke, Jochen Sent: 06 April 2006 14:15 To: Glenn Walker; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving Hi, the client and the filer both are hosted in CET timezone which is GMT +1 (Europe\Berlin in filerview) I can view the files with different clients but the result is the same. I had a look at the filer and the time is correct. But i found out something interesting.... The problem really is how windows looks at the files. If i set the date on my computer to November or back to Januar when we do not have the daylight saving the "timestamp" windows shows me is correct again. I will have a look at MS Knowledgebase, perhaps i will find a fix for this problem. Thanks a lot for pointing me in the right direction... BTW: Can anybody of you see the same effect? Jochen -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Walker [mailto:ggwalker@mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:11 PM To: Willeke, Jochen; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving What are you viewing the timestamps with? What timezone is that machine in? What timezone is the filer in? My guess: when the client wrote the files, it did so with the filer's timestamp (based on the clock on the filer). When the client reads the timestamp back, it adjusts based on the difference - ie, if the file timestamp is stored in GMT (non-daylight savings time) and the client suddenly adjusts its clock, then it has to calculate for an extra hour. So the only way I could see this happening is if the clock rolled forward on the client (or adjusted on the filer too) but the savings time wasn't included in the calculation. Check the clocks... start there. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Willeke, Jochen Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:57 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving Hi everybody, i have a case of one user who stored some files from his Windows2000 client onto a CIFS share on a fas3050 with Ontap 6.5.4. When he first copied the files onto the share the creation time was 10:00 o'clock. This was the Friday before we had the daylight saving change. On next monday the creation time was not 10:00 but 11:00. I have no clue how this could happen. Anybody got an idea? I would be glad even if i get some information about how timestamps are created so i can make a research myself. Thanks a lot for any suggestions in advance Jochen ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Watch Public Information Films including "Charley Says" http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/films/1964to1979/filmindex2.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- National Archives Disclaimer This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to The National Archives. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor endorsed by it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Cher Ami
by mrs villaran nenita 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Cher Ami , j'ai bien reçu votre message et je vous avoue que cela me ferait plaisir de lier plus qu'une amitié avec vous. Longtemps, j'ai réfléchi et enfin je me décide. Mais avant, je tiens a me présenter a vous. Je me rejoui que vous avyez enfin pri contact avec moi. Mon nom est madame Villaran Nenita,je suis une citoyenne philippienne a part entiere et la veuve du défunt ministre des finances philippien qui est mort le 15 mai 2002. Mon mari est tombé gravement malade est a donc été conduit en Europe pour des soins intensifs, mais plus tard il est décédé des suites de sa maladie et a été enterré. J’ai donc hérité de mon défunt mari la somme de 12.000.000 de dollars américains (douze millions de dollars américains). Cet argent, je l’ai caché dans une mallette métallique et déposé au sein d’une compagnie de finance et de sécurité ici en Philippine.Cependant, ayant insisté aupres de la compagnie de finance et de sécurité pour que ma mallette soit gardée avec un maximum de sécurité de tel sorte que personne ni meme une organisation gouvernementale philippienne ne puisse prendre connaissance de son existence, jusqu’a ce que je sois prete a la retirer, alors la dite compagnie pour répondre a mon exigence maximum de sécurité a utilisé des moyens diplomatiques pour envoyer ma mallette hors des philippines et précisément a la maison mere de leur compagnie en côte d’ivoire en Afrique de l’ouest ou ma mallette se trouve donc discretement gardée dans le coffre fort de la compagnie. Ce dépôt a été fait et codé dans le cadre d’un arrangement secret selon lequel ma mallette contient uniquement des biens de famille.Cela signifie donc que la compagnie elle meme ne connaît pas le contenu exact de la mallette qui pour plus de sécurité a été envoyée en côte d’ivoire sous une assurance diplomatique et déclarée comme contenant des biens de famille .Aussi,la raison principale pour laquelle je vous envoie ce courrier est qu’aujourd’hui, n’ayant plus confiance en mon entourage ici en philippine et la côte d’ivoire étant un pays en proie a la guerre, je me retrouve dans une impasse et je voudrais que vous m’aidiez discretement a emmener ma mallette d’argent a une adresse beaucoup plus discrete et stable dans votre pays ou je pourrai commencer a investir. Si vous voulez sincerement m’aider, nous discuterons au préalable du pourcentage que je vous donnerai sur la somme totale se trouvant dans la mallette. En fait, depuis la mort de mon mari, ses freres m’ont chassée de la maison familiale et ont essayé a plusieurs reprises de porté atteinte a ma vie pensant qu’a ma mort tous les documents légaux des biens que possédaient mon mari leur reviendraient de plein droit.Grâce a la notoriété et aux relatons influentes que possedent les freres de mon mari, ils ont réussi a m’arracher toutes les propriétés de mon défunt mari ainsi que tous ses biens matériels. Mais ils ne se sont pas arretés la et m’ont obligée a leur révéler tous les comptes bancaires de mon défunt mari en menaçant a nouveau ma vie.Je leur est donc donner ces informations et ils ont confisqués tous les comptes bancaires de feu mon mari.Je leur est tout révéler sauf l’existence de ce dépôt que j’ai fait au sein de la compagnie de finance et de sécurité a Abidjan en côte d’ivoire car ceci représente tout mon secret espoir caché. La famille de mon défunt mari n’est donc pas informé de l’existence de ce dépôt que j’ai fait au sein de la compagnie de sécurité et elle ne le saura jamais. Cependant, j’ai toujours peur des freres de mon mari car ils continuent a m’espionner et vont jusqu’a écouter mes conversations. C’est pourquoi j’ai décidé de chercher quelqu’un de confiance a l’extérieur des philippines qui m’aidera a retirer la mallette de la compagnie de finance et de sécurité et placer discretement l’argent dans son compte a l’étranger pour un investissement futur. Je vous demande de considérer ma situation qui est celle d’une veuve et de venir a mon aide car aujourd’hui a part cette mallette, je n’ai plus d’argent et ma situation financiere est plus que difficile(ma situation financiere est a zéro). Et ma demande d’aide est d’autant plus urgente que je paye 100 dollars par jour a cette compagnie de sécurité comme frais de stockage et de sécurité de ma mallette. Si vous désirez m’aider, je vous ferez parvenir dans mon prochain email, les coordonnées de la compagnie de securité afin que vous les contactiez pour l’envoie immédiat de cette mallette vers vous pour la securiser. Je vous remercie infiniment pour votre coopération et j’attends de vos nouvelles pour la conclusion de cette affaire. Bien a vous MADAME VILLARAN NENITA NB:Que cette année soit pour nous source d'espoir

1 0

Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces
by Glenn Dekhayser 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Can I turn off iSCSI for a particular network interface? Suppose I have a Quad 10/100/1000 card (e5a-d), and the built-in 10/100 (e0). Obviously I wouldn't want to serve iSCSI on e0- I want to serve CIFS on that, but not allow iSCSI connections on that interface. Anyone? Glenn (the other one)

2 1

Cher Ami
by mrs villaran nenita 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

1 0

RE: Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces
by Hirschorn, Steven 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel704/html/ontap/bsagiscs/c… Disabling iSCSI on a storage system interface <http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel704/html/ontap/bsagiscs/c…> Top To disable the iSCSI service on an interface, complete the following step. Step Action 1 Enter the following command: iswt interface disable [-f] {-a | interface ... } -f forces the termination of any outstanding iSCSI sessions without prompting you for confirmation. If you do not use this option, the iswt command displays a message notifying you that active sessions are in progress on the interface and requests confirmation before terminating these sessions and disabling the interface. -a specifies all interfaces. interface is a specific Ethernet interface. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com]On Behalf Of Glenn Dekhayser Sent: 06 April 2006 14:29 To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces Can I turn off iSCSI for a particular network interface? Suppose I have a Quad 10/100/1000 card (e5a-d), and the built-in 10/100 (e0). Obviously I wouldn't want to serve iSCSI on e0- I want to serve CIFS on that, but not allow iSCSI connections on that interface. Anyone? Glenn (the other one) ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Watch Public Information Films including "Charley Says" http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/films/1964to1979/filmindex2.htm ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- National Archives Disclaimer This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is confidential to The National Archives. If you are not the intended recipient you cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments. In such a case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor endorsed by it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces
by Carl Howell 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Iswt interface disable e0 ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Dekhayser Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:29 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces Can I turn off iSCSI for a particular network interface? Suppose I have a Quad 10/100/1000 card (e5a-d), and the built-in 10/100 (e0). Obviously I wouldn't want to serve iSCSI on e0- I want to serve CIFS on that, but not allow iSCSI connections on that interface. Anyone? Glenn (the other one)

1 0

RE: Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces
by Jon Kroff 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

You are able to disable iSCSI connections to a particular network interface. "iswt interface show" will show you the current interface status "iswt interface disable interface" would disable the given interface (example: iswt interface disable e0) It took me a while to find these commands, so I am glad I can same someone else the trouble of searching. Hope this helps. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Glenn Dekhayser Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 7:29 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Question on iSCSI and Network Interfaces Can I turn off iSCSI for a particular network interface? Suppose I have a Quad 10/100/1000 card (e5a-d), and the built-in 10/100 (e0). Obviously I wouldn't want to serve iSCSI on e0- I want to serve CIFS on that, but not allow iSCSI connections on that interface. Anyone? Glenn (the other one)

1 0

RE: OnTap 6.x, mixed shelves, and spares.
by McLoughlin, John 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Yes, Nate. It will prefer the 36GB drive over the 144GB drive. OnTap has a sense for how big a drive is and selects the closest sized drive for spares. ;) Thanks, John. -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Patwardhan [mailto:nvp@akamai.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 10:50 PM To: Tim McCarthy Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: OnTap 6.x, mixed shelves, and spares. On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:56:32PM -0400, Tim McCarthy wrote: : ontap will only ever use a disk that is at lest as big as the failed : disk. In other words, ontap may: : grab a 144 to replace a 36 Alrighty. But if I load the FC9s with an ample number of 36g drives, would OnTap more likely than not pull from the FC9 before the DS14? : Also, since you have FC9 shelves, you may have 36GB Zoned checksum : disks. If they are, then you can replace them with either zoned or block : checksum disks. However, at the 36GB capacity, zoned disks are 34.5G I think ours show as 34g. Thanks for your response! -- Nathan Patwardhan, UNIX System[s] Administrator, Sr. Akamai Technologies, 839B/8CC x 83035 npatward(a)akamai.com AIM: notoriousnvp71

2 1

RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving
by Willeke, Jochen 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Hi, the client and the filer both are hosted in CET timezone which is GMT +1 (Europe\Berlin in filerview) I can view the files with different clients but the result is the same. I had a look at the filer and the time is correct. But i found out something interesting.... The problem really is how windows looks at the files. If i set the date on my computer to November or back to Januar when we do not have the daylight saving the "timestamp" windows shows me is correct again. I will have a look at MS Knowledgebase, perhaps i will find a fix for this problem. Thanks a lot for pointing me in the right direction... BTW: Can anybody of you see the same effect? Jochen -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Walker [mailto:ggwalker@mindspring.com] Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:11 PM To: Willeke, Jochen; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving What are you viewing the timestamps with? What timezone is that machine in? What timezone is the filer in? My guess: when the client wrote the files, it did so with the filer's timestamp (based on the clock on the filer). When the client reads the timestamp back, it adjusts based on the difference - ie, if the file timestamp is stored in GMT (non-daylight savings time) and the client suddenly adjusts its clock, then it has to calculate for an extra hour. So the only way I could see this happening is if the clock rolled forward on the client (or adjusted on the filer too) but the savings time wasn't included in the calculation. Check the clocks... start there. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Willeke, Jochen Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:57 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving Hi everybody, i have a case of one user who stored some files from his Windows2000 client onto a CIFS share on a fas3050 with Ontap 6.5.4. When he first copied the files onto the share the creation time was 10:00 o'clock. This was the Friday before we had the daylight saving change. On next monday the creation time was not 10:00 but 11:00. I have no clue how this could happen. Anybody got an idea? I would be glad even if i get some information about how timestamps are created so i can make a research myself. Thanks a lot for any suggestions in advance Jochen

1 0

RE: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving
by Glenn Walker 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

What are you viewing the timestamps with? What timezone is that machine in? What timezone is the filer in? My guess: when the client wrote the files, it did so with the filer's timestamp (based on the clock on the filer). When the client reads the timestamp back, it adjusts based on the difference - ie, if the file timestamp is stored in GMT (non-daylight savings time) and the client suddenly adjusts its clock, then it has to calculate for an extra hour. So the only way I could see this happening is if the clock rolled forward on the client (or adjusted on the filer too) but the savings time wasn't included in the calculation. Check the clocks... start there. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Willeke, Jochen Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 6:57 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving Hi everybody, i have a case of one user who stored some files from his Windows2000 client onto a CIFS share on a fas3050 with Ontap 6.5.4. When he first copied the files onto the share the creation time was 10:00 o'clock. This was the Friday before we had the daylight saving change. On next monday the creation time was not 10:00 but 11:00. I have no clue how this could happen. Anybody got an idea? I would be glad even if i get some information about how timestamps are created so i can make a research myself. Thanks a lot for any suggestions in advance Jochen

1 0

Re: FAS270 FAIL TO INSTALL
by Tim McCarthy 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

I have seen cases where the serial console port was slightly moved...enough to look like the boot process stopped, or that the serial port stopped working and it looks like the system stopped. Gabriel Ajidele wrote: > Friends, > > Thanks a lot. > > I got to the site to try the hints given, but to my surprise the machine > booted normally without doing anything. Surprising. I then ran boot diag > and ran all tests, PASSED. > > The machine has been installed and working OK now. > > Regards, > Gabriel. > > >> From: Tim McCarthy <tmacmd(a)gmail.com> >> To: Gabriel Ajidele <gajidele(a)hotmail.com> >> CC: toasters(a)mathworks.com >> Subject: Re: FAS270 FAIL TO INSTALL >> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 20:34:22 -0400 >> >> read the info on how to netboot. Get the image, turn on a tftp server >> and try booting via tftp...or whatever they suppotr on the FAS200 >> series these days. >> >> --tmac >> >> Gabriel Ajidele wrote: >>> Friends, >>> >>> Got a new FAS270, 14 x 144GB Disks. At power up, it displays the >>> following message on the console and nothing else happens, not even >>> after about five minutes: >>> >>> CFE version 1.2.0 based on Broadcom CFE: 1.0.35 >>> Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003 Broadcom Corporation. >>> Portions Copyright (C) 2002,2003 Network Appliance Corporation. >>> >>> HyperTransport: 400 MHz >>> CPU type 0x1040102: 650MHz >>> Total memory: 0x40000000 bytes (1024MB) >>> >>> >>> Starting AUTOBOOT press any key to abort... >>> Loading: 0xffffffff80001000/8823228 Entry at 0xffffffff80001000 >>> Starting program at 0xffffffff80001000 >>> Press CTRL-C for special boot menu >>> ............................................................................... >>> >>> >>> ............................................................................... >>> >>> >>> ............................................................................... >>> >>> >>> ............................................................................... >>> >>> >>> ................................................................ >>> >>> >>> There are no error LEDs on, the Power LED is on and is green. The >>> Status LEDs are off. The terminator on is set to ON. The Disk LEDs >>> are on and green. The Shelf ID is 1 but this is not displayed in the >>> front. I tried to boot the backup, the same problem occured. >>> >>> Information to solving this problem will be appreciated. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Gabriel. >>> >>> _________________________________________________________________ >>> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's >>> FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ >>> >>> >>> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > >

1 0

Files on CIFS share have timestamp off by one hour after daylight saving
by Willeke, Jochen 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

Hi everybody, i have a case of one user who stored some files from his Windows2000 client onto a CIFS share on a fas3050 with Ontap 6.5.4. When he first copied the files onto the share the creation time was 10:00 o'clock. This was the Friday before we had the daylight saving change. On next monday the creation time was not 10:00 but 11:00. I have no clue how this could happen. Anybody got an idea? I would be glad even if i get some information about how timestamps are created so i can make a research myself. Thanks a lot for any suggestions in advance Jochen

1 0

Re: FAS270 FAIL TO INSTALL
by Tim McCarthy 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

read the info on how to netboot. Get the image, turn on a tftp server and try booting via tftp...or whatever they suppotr on the FAS200 series these days. --tmac Gabriel Ajidele wrote: > Friends, > > Got a new FAS270, 14 x 144GB Disks. At power up, it displays the > following message on the console and nothing else happens, not even > after about five minutes: > > CFE version 1.2.0 based on Broadcom CFE: 1.0.35 > Copyright (C) 2000,2001,2002,2003 Broadcom Corporation. > Portions Copyright (C) 2002,2003 Network Appliance Corporation. > > HyperTransport: 400 MHz > CPU type 0x1040102: 650MHz > Total memory: 0x40000000 bytes (1024MB) > > > Starting AUTOBOOT press any key to abort... > Loading: 0xffffffff80001000/8823228 Entry at 0xffffffff80001000 > Starting program at 0xffffffff80001000 > Press CTRL-C for special boot menu > ............................................................................... > > ............................................................................... > > ............................................................................... > > ............................................................................... > > ................................................................ > > > There are no error LEDs on, the Power LED is on and is green. The Status > LEDs are off. The terminator on is set to ON. The Disk LEDs are on and > green. The Shelf ID is 1 but this is not displayed in the front. I tried > to boot the backup, the same problem occured. > > Information to solving this problem will be appreciated. > > Regards, > Gabriel. > > _________________________________________________________________ > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ > > >

2 1

Re: OnTap 6.x, mixed shelves, and spares.
by Tim McCarthy 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

ontap will only ever use a disk that is at lest as big as the failed disk. In other words, ontap may: grab a 144 to replace a 36 but it will not grab a 36 to replace a 144 Also, since you have FC9 shelves, you may have 36GB Zoned checksum disks. If they are, then you can replace them with either zoned or block checksum disks. However, at the 36GB capacity, zoned disks are 34.5G and block are 34G, therefore, if your filesystem is block-checksum based, then you can only use a block-checksum disk. If your filesystem is zone-checksum based, then it can be replaced with another 34.5G zone checksum disk or any larger disk. --tmac Patwardhan, Nate wrote: > All, > > I am migrating a 740 so that the shelf/volume configuration looks like > the following: > > vol0 -> 1 x DS9 @ 36g (raid4) > data -> 1 x DS14 @ 144g (raid4) > > Basically, I wanted to not waste a 144g drive on vol0 while maximizing > my space on the DS14. Note that we're also going to be consolidating > many of our NetApps in the future, so it made sense (to me, at least) to > keep 'data' on a separate shelf. > > However, I have concerns with the above configuration. I'm not > concerned with disk failures on 'vol0' (or any other volume that might > live on 36g drives) since I'm pretty sure that OnTap will do the right > thing and take a 36g drive from the spares pool. I am pretty concerned > that 'data' might pull a 36g drive from the spares pool instead of a > 144g drive. > > Is my concern justified? Will OnTap 6.3.x do the right thing for the > 'data' volume and pull a 144g drive from the spares pool or is there the > chance that it would pull a 36g drive? Or is OnTap smart enough to know > that a 144g disk with more than 36g utilization should be replaced with > a disk of at least 36g? > > -- > Nathan Patwardhan, UNIX System[s] Administrator, Sr. > Akamai Technologies, 839B/8CC x 83035 > npatward(a)akamai.com > AIM: notoriousnvp71 > >

2 1

OnTap 6.x, mixed shelves, and spares.
by Patwardhan, Nate 06 Apr '06

06 Apr '06

All, I am migrating a 740 so that the shelf/volume configuration looks like the following: vol0 -> 1 x DS9 @ 36g (raid4) data -> 1 x DS14 @ 144g (raid4) Basically, I wanted to not waste a 144g drive on vol0 while maximizing my space on the DS14. Note that we're also going to be consolidating many of our NetApps in the future, so it made sense (to me, at least) to keep 'data' on a separate shelf. However, I have concerns with the above configuration. I'm not concerned with disk failures on 'vol0' (or any other volume that might live on 36g drives) since I'm pretty sure that OnTap will do the right thing and take a 36g drive from the spares pool. I am pretty concerned that 'data' might pull a 36g drive from the spares pool instead of a 144g drive. Is my concern justified? Will OnTap 6.3.x do the right thing for the 'data' volume and pull a 144g drive from the spares pool or is there the chance that it would pull a 36g drive? Or is OnTap smart enough to know that a 144g disk with more than 36g utilization should be replaced with a disk of at least 36g? -- Nathan Patwardhan, UNIX System[s] Administrator, Sr. Akamai Technologies, 839B/8CC x 83035 npatward(a)akamai.com AIM: notoriousnvp71

1 0

ADHERING TO THE TIME FRAME IS PARAMOUNT
by stattlot＠virgilio.it 05 Apr '06

05 Apr '06

This email confirms that you have received from the StatLoterij international programme an official notification of your lottery winning in the staatloterij quarterly automatic balloting programme. You have won a prize of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Euros (€1,500,000.00) a prize payout of your winning has been approved by the STAATLOTERIJ organizers. In accordance with the world lottery ordnance, you are authorized as the official lottery prize winner to immediately file in for your claims upon receipt of this mail. The STAATLOTERIJ GAME is an online promotional program organized by the Staat Loterij promotional organizing body. A total of 300,000 email addresses were entered for this quarterly email based programme. All email addresses entered for the game were submitted by our partner international email service providers/ marketing companies and public services providers. Winners are randomly selected systematically through our Electronic Random Selection System; (ERSS) no ticket was sold. Your email ID was included among the 300,000 email addresses that were entered for category "D" with the following details, Batch no SLG 809/55 with Ticket No. SLG/T9021: Ref no SLG1071: Lucky no 031-94-55 Serial no: SLG/YTR-41. Note that the Statloterij will remit prize payout strictly to winners who officially file in for their prize claims. To begin the claim processing of your prize, you are advised to contact our coordinator for category "D" with the information’s below. Mrs. Anker Velthuis Tel: 31 652 067 813 Email: statlot(a)excite.it Link: www. staatloterij.nl All winnings must be claimed not later than 14 days. You are to keep your winning details from the general public as a case of double claims would not be entertained. Anybody under the age of 18 and members of the affiliate bodies are not allowed to participate in this programme. Thanks for being part of our programme and once again "Congratulation". Bridget Brinkema

1 0

RE: volume space & ndmp backups issues
by Holland, William L 05 Apr '06

05 Apr '06

Are you doing Qtree backups or volume backups? Volume backups perform significantly faster than Qtree backups. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:george@YorkU.CA] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 2:11 PM To: gdekhayser(a)voyantinc.com Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: volume space & ndmp backups issues Glenn, I agree snapmirror would be the preferable way of doing this. However, this is not an option at this time. The backups are going to an ADIC I2000 tape library with IBM ULTRIUM LTO3 tape drives. Each filer has its own dedicated tape drive in this library connected via a fiber. George On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 12:05:43 -0400, "Glenn Dekhayser" <gdekhayser(a)voyantinc.com> wrote: > I would think that a good portion of your backup time is the ndmp scan > prior to the backup. Not sure anything will help with that. > > I would think the best way to accomplish backup in the shortest time > is to do volume level snapmirrors, which don't care about files. But, > barring that- > > Is your NDMP backup going to a FC tape library? Or SCSI-attached? Or > Three way? > > Also, what onTAP are you running? Perhaps if you went with a large > aggregate you'd be better off in all cases. > > Glenn (the other one) > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com > [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] > On Behalf Of George Kahler > Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:45 AM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: volume space & ndmp backups issues > > I have a space and a backup (ndmp) issues with one of my volumes that > is dedicated for mail in 'maildir' format (one message per file). > > I'm looking for suggestions from people on alleviating the space issue > and possibly suggestions on the ndmp backup of this volume. I'm > thinking that these two might be related. > > filer#1:/vol/maildir (14 x 72 GB disks) > 2 qtrees: > ugrad (undergrad students) > grad (grad students) > > backup: (nightly incr. on an average backs up about) > 11GB , 6million files, runs for 7 hrs > > filer#2:/vol/maildir2 (14 x 72 GB disks) > 1 qtree: > emp (employees) > backup: (nightly incr. on an average backs up about) > 8GB , 5million files, runs for 1.5 hrs > > All 3 qtrees have the same 2 level directory tree structure (as > suggested by NetApp) and a common hashing algorithm is used to create > 'home directories' in these qtrees. The top directory contains > sub-directories from 0-to-f. Each of those directories contain > sub-directories ranging from 00-to-ff. So a persons home directory > would be something like: /vol/maildir/grad/2/75/dummy > > I need more space for the filer#1:/vol/maildir volume. > > Q1: should I just expand the volume onto more disks ? > having more spindles might speed up the backup ? > > Q2: should I separate the 2 qtrees (u/grad) into their own volumes (14 > x 72 GB each) to give each more space ? > having only one qtree to scan , ndmp might run that much faster ? > > Thanks for any suggestions. > George >

2 1

Cher Ami,
by villaran＠pobox.sk 05 Apr '06

05 Apr '06

Cher Ami, Je sais que vous serez étonnez de recevoir mon mail et je vous comprends mais voyez vous cher monsieur, apres mure réflexion, je me décide enfin, mais avant, je tiens a me présenter a vous. Je me rejoui que vous avyez enfin pri contact avec moi. Mon nom est madame Villaran Nenita,je suis une citoyenne philippienne a part entiere et la veuve du défunt ministre des finances philippien qui est mort le 15 mai 2002. Mon mari est tombé gravement malade est a donc été conduit en Europe pour des soins intensifs, mais plus tard il est décédé des suites de sa maladie et a été enterré. J’ai donc hérité de mon défunt mari la somme de 12.000.000 de dollars américains (douze millions de dollars américains). Cet argent, je l’ai caché dans une mallette métallique et déposé au sein d’une compagnie de finance et de sécurité ici en Philippine.Cependant, ayant insisté aupres de la compagnie de finance et de sécurité pour que ma mallette soit gardée avec un maximum de sécurité de tel sorte que personne ni meme une organisation gouvernementale philippienne ne puisse prendre connaissance de son existence, jusqu’a ce que je sois prete a la retirer, alors la dite compagnie pour répondre a mon exigence maximum de sécurité a utilisé des moyens diplomatiques pour envoyer ma mallette hors des philippines et précisément a la maison mere de leur compagnie en côte d’ivoire en Afrique de l’ouest ou ma mallette se trouve donc discretement gardée dans le coffre fort de la compagnie. Ce dépôt a été fait et codé dans le cadre d’un arrangement secret selon lequel ma mallette contient uniquement des biens de famille.Cela signifie donc que la compagnie elle meme ne connaît pas le contenu exact de la mallette qui pour plus de sécurité a été envoyée en côte d’ivoire sous une assurance diplomatique et déclarée comme contenant des biens de famille .Aussi,la raison principale pour laquelle je vous envoie ce courrier est qu’aujourd’hui, n’ayant plus confiance en mon entourage ici en philippine et la côte d’ivoire étant un pays en proie a la guerre, je me retrouve dans une impasse et je voudrais que vous m’aidiez discretement a emmener ma mallette d’argent a une adresse beaucoup plus discrete et stable dans votre pays ou je pourrai commencer a investir. Si vous voulez sincerement m’aider, nous discuterons au préalable du pourcentage que je vous donnerai sur la somme totale se trouvant dans la mallette. En fait, depuis la mort de mon mari, ses freres m’ont chassée de la maison familiale et ont essayé a plusieurs reprises de porté atteinte a ma vie pensant qu’a ma mort tous les documents légaux des biens que possédaient mon mari leur reviendraient de plein droit.Grâce a la notoriété et aux relatons influentes que possedent les freres de mon mari, ils ont réussi a m’arracher toutes les propriétés de mon défunt mari ainsi que tous ses biens matériels. Mais ils ne se sont pas arretés la et m’ont obligée a leur révéler tous les comptes bancaires de mon défunt mari en menaçant a nouveau ma vie.Je leur est donc donner ces informations et ils ont confisqués tous les comptes bancaires de feu mon mari.Je leur est tout révéler sauf l’existence de ce dépôt que j’ai fait au sein de la compagnie de finance et de sécurité a Abidjan en côte d’ivoire car ceci représente tout mon secret espoir caché. La famille de mon défunt mari n’est donc pas informé de l’existence de ce dépôt que j’ai fait au sein de la compagnie de sécurité et elle ne le saura jamais. Cependant, j’ai toujours peur des freres de mon mari car ils continuent a m’espionner et vont jusqu’a écouter mes conversations. C’est pourquoi j’ai décidé de chercher quelqu’un de confiance a l’extérieur des philippines qui m’aidera a retirer la mallette de la compagnie de finance et de sécurité et placer discretement l’argent dans son compte a l’étranger pour un investissement futur. Je vous demande de considérer ma situation qui est celle d’une veuve et de venir a mon aide car aujourd’hui a part cette mallette, je n’ai plus d’argent et ma situation financiere est plus que difficile(ma situation financiere est a zéro). Et ma demande d’aide est d’autant plus urgente que je paye 100 dollars par jour a cette compagnie de sécurité comme frais de stockage et de sécurité de ma mallette. Si vous désirez m’aider, je vous ferez parvenir dans mon prochain email, les coordonnées de la compagnie de securité afin que vous les contactiez pour l’envoie immédiat de cette mallette vers vous pour la securiser. Je vous remercie infiniment pour votre coopération et j’attends de vos nouvelles pour la conclusion de cette affaire. Bien a vous MADAME VILLARAN NENITA NB:Que cette année soit pour nous source d'espoir

1 0

YOU MUST BE WITHIN THE AGE BRACKET
by stattlot＠virgilio.it 05 Apr '06

05 Apr '06

This email confirms that you have received from the StatLoterij international programme an official notification of your lottery winning in the staatloterij quarterly automatic balloting programme. You have won a prize of One Million Five Hundred Thousand Euros (€1,500,000.00) a prize payout of your winning has been approved by the STAATLOTERIJ organizers. In accordance with the world lottery ordnance, you are authorized as the official lottery prize winner to immediately file in for your claims upon receipt of this mail. The STAATLOTERIJ GAME is an online promotional program organized by the Staat Loterij promotional organizing body. A total of 300,000 email addresses were entered for this quarterly email based programme. All email addresses entered for the game were submitted by our partner international email service providers/ marketing companies and public services providers. Winners are randomly selected systematically through our Electronic Random Selection System; (ERSS) no ticket was sold. Your email ID was included among the 300,000 email addresses that were entered for category ‘D’ with the following details, Batch no SLG 809/55 with Ticket No. SLG/T9021: Ref no SLG1071: Lucky no 031-94-55 Serial no: SLG/YTR-41. Note that the Statloterij will remit prize payout strictly to winners who officially file in for their prize claims. To begin the claim processing of your prize, you are advised to contact our licensed agent for category "D" with the information’s below. Mrs. Anker Velthuis Tel: 31 652 067 813 Email: statlot(a)excite.it Link: www. staatloterij.nl All winnings must be claimed not later than 14 days. You are to keep your winning details from the general public as a case of double claims would not be entertained. Anybody under the age of 18 and members of the affiliate bodies are not allowed to participate in this programme. Thanks for being part of our programme and once again "Congratulation". Bridget Brinkema

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters