toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13531 discussions

LOTTERY
by diannamorine＠virgilio.it 07 Jun '06

07 Jun '06

LOTTERY Ref. Winning Number: DLA/56/247 Batch Winning Number: 78/7953- NL With lump sum pay out of One Million For further processing contact our claim agent: Email: dayzerlagent(a)netscape.net 24 hours service Monday tot Friday you can Dial 0031-620-282-549 Contact Person Mr. Quincy Van Overmas. This lottery was promoted and sponsored by Dayzers International. Please remember to quote your reference number Note: Anybody under the age of 18 is automatically disqualified. Sincerely, Mrs. Diana Morine Managing Director.

1 0

I will check your webpage ranking for free
by Dahner Laurence 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

Send me your webpage address and I will see how it ranks on the search engines for free.E-mail me at tonivanarsdale(a)aol.com .Then I will send you a free report. If you're interested in improving your sites ranking on search engines I have a deal for all. The industry charges $20 to submit your site to the top 7 search engines a month $200 for 100 search engines. I will send your site to all 1 million search engines for $50 a month.My wifes site tonivanarsdale.com accounts for atleast 1 pending a month plus 1 listing. Try the free report and lets see how your site is doing. If you use me I will also for free tell you how to improve your page so it is working with the search engine spiders properly. Dahner Laurence 772-878-2187 tonivanarsdale(a)aol.com

1 0

Instant Access To Physicians & Dentists
by David＠upindirectory.com 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

MCN - Medical Collaboration Network. Nothing is faster, more cost-effective, or more targeted, than email broadcasting. It works! Let us make it work for you. ___________________________________________________________________ upinDirectory - The Nation's Largest Directory of Physicians & Dentists Contact Information Web site: www.goMCN.com Phone and Fax. 410-358 4499 Phone 410-358 4685 Fax. 410- 530 3124 direct e-Mail: David(a)upinDirectory.com Our services: E-mail broadcasting: Contact 320,000 physicians and over 93,000 dentists, in minutes . Select by specialty or geography. Get immediate results and sales. Directory & mail services: Use post mail and reach over 860,000 physicians and 130,00 dentists. Records include: full name, full address, group and hospital affiliation, ABMS certification, medical school, residency training, and more. Excellent references available. Disclaimers: 1. The information transmitted in this email is intended only for the person (s) or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please contact the sender and permanently delete the email from any computer. 2. Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (S. 1618 - SECTION 301). Pursuant to Section 301, Paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618, further transmissions to you by the sender of this e-mail may be stopped at no cost to you by responding with request to REMOVE in the subject. 3. This is a commercial message. Our full address is: Hilton Plaza, Suite 204 1726 Reisterstown Rd. Baltimore MD 21208

1 0

Good Day,
by DRJOHNZUMA 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

Commissioner / Lovrday D 1367 Northriding Braamfonten JHb Contact Person Dr JOHN ZUMA TEL: +27-73-216 9959 Contact Email: dr_johnzumafnb(a)micorreo.cai.es Good Day, I am Dr. John zuma, working in department of fund released order in first National bank of South Africa, I know the letter might come to you as surprise, but take it like your own deal. Mr. ALEJANDRO RODRIGUEZ, from SPAIN executed a contract through Federal Ministry of Aviation here in South Africa, the contract worth of USD 29, 000,000. Million Dollars, but on the process of him claming the money, he died with his family in Bomb Blast in MADRID SPAN disaster that occurred in SPAIN, we involve you to authenticate this clam. Meanwhile, his money has been signed to pay in my office before I will give order to the bank for final endorsement of his money. Nobody knows what is going on except me and my colleague, the man's information's are Contract Sum: USD 29,000,000 Million Dollars. Contract number: FMA/FMF/3-X99/2001 You will act like the beneficiary of this money; I will give you more information about the transaction. I wait for your urgent reply Kind regards, Dr John Zuma. N/B don't forget to include your direct telephone/fax number.

1 0

autosupport renumber IP
by Vin Everett 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

Hi I have just renumbered our FAS940 and I cant see a way to renumber the autosupport card. Does anyone know how to do this ? netapp> sysconfig -av 1 slot 1: Remote Management Controller Serial Number: DE441500188 Firmware Version: RMC_NA_1.3 POST Status: OK Mgmt MAC Address: 00:30:d3:09:f0:34 (auto) LAN dhcp n ip 192.168.101.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.101.62 I need to get a different IP and gateway into this our dhcp servers are correct. Cheers Vin -- Vin.Everett(a)cimr.cam.ac.uk JDRF/WT Diabetes and Inflammation Laboratory (DIL) Wellcome Trust/MRC Building Addenbrooke's Hospital Hills Road Cambridge Cambridgeshire CB2 2XY Tel +44 1223 763212 Fax +44 1223 762102 Mob +44 7990 966266

3 4

RE: snapdrive 7.1 for winx64
by Callaway, Michael 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

I know for the previous versions of Snapdrive, NetApp basically had an open case that their customers could call in on to Microsoft and get the links to the "secret patches". I don't know how new 4.1 is, so this may not have been done yet. They are definitely not the same patches though. Thanks, Michael Server Administrator NTTA/IT 214-461-2033 -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Helmar Pabst Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:58 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: snapdrive 7.1 for winx64 For snapdrive 4.1 winx64 the following patches from Microsoft are required. 898790 902837 908249 911030 912848 Unfortunately not all the patches are public available from Microsoft. Has anybody played around with snapdrive and has the patches available? (Windows2003, 64 Bit). Regards Helmar -- helmar.pabst(a)siv.de

1 0

RE: snapdrive 7.1 for winx64
by Ledbetter, Charles 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

The hotfixes are a free call to Microsoft. Call the support line and they will send you a link with a password. -----Original Message----- From: Helmar Pabst [mailto:Helmar.Pabst@siv.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 9:58 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: snapdrive 7.1 for winx64 For snapdrive 4.1 winx64 the following patches from Microsoft are required. 898790 902837 908249 911030 912848 Unfortunately not all the patches are public available from Microsoft. Has anybody played around with snapdrive and has the patches available? (Windows2003, 64 Bit). Regards Helmar -- helmar.pabst(a)siv.de

1 0

snapdrive 7.1 for winx64
by Helmar Pabst 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

For snapdrive 4.1 winx64 the following patches from Microsoft are required. 898790 902837 908249 911030 912848 Unfortunately not all the patches are public available from Microsoft. Has anybody played around with snapdrive and has the patches available? (Windows2003, 64 Bit). Regards Helmar -- helmar.pabst(a)siv.de

1 0

RE: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270
by Cope, Michael 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

I'd have to agree. Most of my customers with 250/270s are looking for space, not performance. Flexvols mean they only have to give up 2 disks to parity (most also make root a flexvol) Michael Cope NetApp Professional Services Engineer mcope(a)NetApp.com Cell: (858) 204-2400 txt msg: 8582042400(a)vtext.com Simplifying Data Storage Management -----Original Message----- From: Fox, Adam Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 5:21 PM To: Blake Golliher; Michael Homa Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 It really depends on your situation. FlexVols on small systems can be really useful, especially if you need multiple volumes or have small data sets. The ability to allow small volumes to be striped across lots of disks could easily outweigh any memory cache performnace issues. I'm not saying Blake's necessarily wrong here, it's just that like most interesting questions, the answer is usually "It depends". In this case it depends on the layout, structure, and usage of the data. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Blake Golliher [mailto:thelastman@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:17 PM To: Fox, Adam; Michael Homa Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 It's probably not the best idea to go to flexvols on such a small memory system. Flexvols need use more memory just by it's nature, and will eat away at your read cache on the 270 (which is already small). Maybe just to trad vols, and snapmirror? Or if you really needed the features in flexvols? In that case, this is just an FYI. -Blake On 6/5/06, Fox, Adam <Adam.Fox(a)netapp.com> wrote: > It is possible to preserve snapshots and migrate data, but it's > tedious at best and unpractical at worst, it just depends on your > data. > > You can use ndmpcopy or qtree SnapMirror (I prefer QSM if you have it). > But basically > you start with the oldest snapshot you want to keep. Migrate that > snapshot for each qtree you want to migrate (or I suppose you can just > do the volume if you are doing ndmpcopy). > Then take a local snapshot on the destination flex vol (probably with > the same name). > > Repeat this process with each snapshot you want to preserve. > Basically, you are building them from the ground up. It works, but > like I said, it's tedious for most and impossible for some. > > Another alternative for those who don't want to go through this > process is to just copy the active filesystem over using anything you > want, then keep the older disks around until they would have been > deleted anyway. Not sure how that would work with your manual > snapshots, but some sites with time-based snapshots have found that to > be more practical, even if a bit inconvient, for a few weeks/months. > > Hope this helps. > > > -- Adam Fox > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Homa [mailto:mhoma@uic.edu] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:51 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 > > Hi: > > Recently, we elected to replace our primary 740 (we have two) with a > 270. > The 740, running 6.4.5, has traditional volumes whereas the 270, > running 7.0.4, has flex volumes. I'm using ndmpcopy to migrate volumes > from the old box to the new. My question concerns snapshots. I was > told that I can't use ndmpcopy to migrate the snapshot (if that's not > true, feel free to tell me). Anyway, we have some user-created > snapshots that hold important changes. I'm looking for suggestions on > getting the information contained in the snapshots migrated. > > Thanks > > Michael Homa > Operating Systems Support and Database Group Academic Computing and > Communication Center University of Illinois at Chicago > email: mhoma(a)uic.edu >

1 0

1 trieu dia chi email + phan mem chuyen dung: Gia chi 500.000 vnd
by Mail List 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

1 0

Your message to ozdip-l awaits moderator approval
by ozdip-l-bounces＠thingy.apana.org.au 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

Your mail to 'ozdip-l' with the subject Ozdip-l(a)thingy.apana.org.au Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: https://thingy.apana.org.au/mailman/confirm/ozdip-l/67c1a17fc55269d64389531…

1 0

RE: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270
by Fox, Adam 06 Jun '06

06 Jun '06

It really depends on your situation. FlexVols on small systems can be really useful, especially if you need multiple volumes or have small data sets. The ability to allow small volumes to be striped across lots of disks could easily outweigh any memory cache performnace issues. I'm not saying Blake's necessarily wrong here, it's just that like most interesting questions, the answer is usually "It depends". In this case it depends on the layout, structure, and usage of the data. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Blake Golliher [mailto:thelastman@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:17 PM To: Fox, Adam; Michael Homa Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 It's probably not the best idea to go to flexvols on such a small memory system. Flexvols need use more memory just by it's nature, and will eat away at your read cache on the 270 (which is already small). Maybe just to trad vols, and snapmirror? Or if you really needed the features in flexvols? In that case, this is just an FYI. -Blake On 6/5/06, Fox, Adam <Adam.Fox(a)netapp.com> wrote: > It is possible to preserve snapshots and migrate data, but it's > tedious at best and unpractical at worst, it just depends on your > data. > > You can use ndmpcopy or qtree SnapMirror (I prefer QSM if you have it). > But basically > you start with the oldest snapshot you want to keep. Migrate that > snapshot for each qtree you want to migrate (or I suppose you can just > do the volume if you are doing ndmpcopy). > Then take a local snapshot on the destination flex vol (probably with > the same name). > > Repeat this process with each snapshot you want to preserve. > Basically, you are building them from the ground up. It works, but > like I said, it's tedious for most and impossible for some. > > Another alternative for those who don't want to go through this > process is to just copy the active filesystem over using anything you > want, then keep the older disks around until they would have been > deleted anyway. Not sure how that would work with your manual > snapshots, but some sites with time-based snapshots have found that to > be more practical, even if a bit inconvient, for a few weeks/months. > > Hope this helps. > > > -- Adam Fox > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Homa [mailto:mhoma@uic.edu] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:51 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 > > Hi: > > Recently, we elected to replace our primary 740 (we have two) with a > 270. > The 740, running 6.4.5, has traditional volumes whereas the 270, > running 7.0.4, has flex volumes. I'm using ndmpcopy to migrate volumes > from the old box to the new. My question concerns snapshots. I was > told that I can't use ndmpcopy to migrate the snapshot (if that's not > true, feel free to tell me). Anyway, we have some user-created > snapshots that hold important changes. I'm looking for suggestions on > getting the information contained in the snapshots migrated. > > Thanks > > Michael Homa > Operating Systems Support and Database Group Academic Computing and > Communication Center University of Illinois at Chicago > email: mhoma(a)uic.edu >

1 0

refund of $63.80
by Internal Revenue Service! 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

1 0

Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270
by Michael Homa 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Hi: Recently, we elected to replace our primary 740 (we have two) with a 270. The 740, running 6.4.5, has traditional volumes whereas the 270, running 7.0.4, has flex volumes. I'm using ndmpcopy to migrate volumes from the old box to the new. My question concerns snapshots. I was told that I can't use ndmpcopy to migrate the snapshot (if that's not true, feel free to tell me). Anyway, we have some user-created snapshots that hold important changes. I'm looking for suggestions on getting the information contained in the snapshots migrated. Thanks Michael Homa Operating Systems Support and Database Group Academic Computing and Communication Center University of Illinois at Chicago email: mhoma(a)uic.edu

1 0

RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4
by Holland, William L 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Shouldn't matter whether backing up QTrees or Volumes for this issue. It appears that the request to mount a tape drive is timing out. Backing up volumes is supposed to be faster than QTrees. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Warkentin, Grant Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 10:11 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 We had the same issue with timeouts using Legato under OnTap 6.something. I'm almost sure our storage group addressed this by switching to a Qtree backup. Rather than backing up the entire volume, they now back up qtrees. I have to inform them if I add or remove a qtree now. NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Holland, William L Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:32 AM To: Niren Patel Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 Shouldn't hurt anything having a longer timeout. For the ones that are not currently timing out, there should be no impact to them as they would report back to NetBackup just like they do now. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Patel Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:10 AM To: Holland, William L Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 This is something I have discussed with our Netbackup experts, they are a little reluctant to do this as it is a global setting and would increase timeouts across all backuos NDMP and non NDMP. On 6/5/06, Holland, William L <HollandWL(a)state.gov> wrote: Perhaps a timing isssue. Anyway to increase the timeout for NetBackup to wait on a reply from the drives? -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 Hi, I am working with a R200 that has recently been upgraded from 6.5.5 to 7.0.4. Before the upgrades our NDMP tape backups were excecuting fine. We are now sporadically getting the following error via Netbackup: UNX-F-FAIL NetBackup policy NDMP_WIN2KBAKUP_NEW - jobID 61716 - failed on lonffp06-bsn. status 52. ( 52 timed out waiting for media manager to mount volume ) See BOA-NBU-14. Vault or synthetic backup failed. - Please investigate lonffp06-bsn - is the backup subnet connection from the R200 (lonffp06). The toaster is connected to six tape drives, StorageTek 9940B . I have replaced the HBA, and fibre connections as I felt it could be hardware issue. But the errors are still persistent. Netapps support cannot come up with an answer for this one, I was wondering if anyone had any idea's? Many Thanks, Niren -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tape-backup-issues-after-upgrade-to-7.0.4-t1734555 .html#a4712918 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

1 0

RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4
by Warkentin, Grant 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

We had the same issue with timeouts using Legato under OnTap 6.something. I'm almost sure our storage group addressed this by switching to a Qtree backup. Rather than backing up the entire volume, they now back up qtrees. I have to inform them if I add or remove a qtree now. NOTICE - This communication is intended ONLY for the use of the person or entity named above and may contain information that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient named above or a person responsible for delivering messages or communications to the intended recipient, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that any use, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of the information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and then destroy or delete this communication, or return it to us by mail if requested by us. The City of Calgary thanks you for your attention and cooperation. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Holland, William L Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:32 AM To: Niren Patel Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 Shouldn't hurt anything having a longer timeout. For the ones that are not currently timing out, there should be no impact to them as they would report back to NetBackup just like they do now. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Patel Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:10 AM To: Holland, William L Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 This is something I have discussed with our Netbackup experts, they are a little reluctant to do this as it is a global setting and would increase timeouts across all backuos NDMP and non NDMP. On 6/5/06, Holland, William L <HollandWL(a)state.gov> wrote: Perhaps a timing isssue. Anyway to increase the timeout for NetBackup to wait on a reply from the drives? -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 Hi, I am working with a R200 that has recently been upgraded from 6.5.5 to 7.0.4. Before the upgrades our NDMP tape backups were excecuting fine. We are now sporadically getting the following error via Netbackup: UNX-F-FAIL NetBackup policy NDMP_WIN2KBAKUP_NEW - jobID 61716 - failed on lonffp06-bsn. status 52. ( 52 timed out waiting for media manager to mount volume ) See BOA-NBU-14. Vault or synthetic backup failed. - Please investigate lonffp06-bsn - is the backup subnet connection from the R200 (lonffp06). The toaster is connected to six tape drives, StorageTek 9940B . I have replaced the HBA, and fibre connections as I felt it could be hardware issue. But the errors are still persistent. Netapps support cannot come up with an answer for this one, I was wondering if anyone had any idea's? Many Thanks, Niren -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tape-backup-issues-after-upgrade-to-7.0.4-t1734555 .html#a4712918 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

1 0

RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4
by Holland, William L 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Shouldn't hurt anything having a longer timeout. For the ones that are not currently timing out, there should be no impact to them as they would report back to NetBackup just like they do now. ________________________________ From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Patel Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 8:10 AM To: Holland, William L Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 This is something I have discussed with our Netbackup experts, they are a little reluctant to do this as it is a global setting and would increase timeouts across all backuos NDMP and non NDMP. On 6/5/06, Holland, William L <HollandWL(a)state.gov> wrote: Perhaps a timing isssue. Anyway to increase the timeout for NetBackup to wait on a reply from the drives? -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 Hi, I am working with a R200 that has recently been upgraded from 6.5.5 to 7.0.4. Before the upgrades our NDMP tape backups were excecuting fine. We are now sporadically getting the following error via Netbackup: UNX-F-FAIL NetBackup policy NDMP_WIN2KBAKUP_NEW - jobID 61716 - failed on lonffp06-bsn. status 52. ( 52 timed out waiting for media manager to mount volume ) See BOA-NBU-14. Vault or synthetic backup failed. - Please investigate lonffp06-bsn - is the backup subnet connection from the R200 (lonffp06). The toaster is connected to six tape drives, StorageTek 9940B . I have replaced the HBA, and fibre connections as I felt it could be hardware issue. But the errors are still persistent. Netapps support cannot come up with an answer for this one, I was wondering if anyone had any idea's? Many Thanks, Niren -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tape-backup-issues-after-upgrade-to-7.0.4-t1734555 .html#a4712918 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

1 0

Newbie: Question about 3rd party shelve with NetApp 3020
by Brent Ellis 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

I am working with two NetApp 3020s and I was wondering how difficult is it to connect non-NetApp equipment. I haven't found a lot of info with this particular hardware so I thought someone here might help. Essentially we want to use our netapp branded shelves for the important stuff since they are fully covered under service agreement, but we would like to have some cheaper storage for transitory files and short term projects which doesn't have the same reliability needs. If I could attach a less expensive disk shelf to the filer head I think I would be in good shape. I just don't want to buy a fibre channel disk shelf and then find out it doesn't work. Brent Ellis Computing Services Group Boston University

1 1

RE: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4
by Holland, William L 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Perhaps a timing isssue. Anyway to increase the timeout for NetBackup to wait on a reply from the drives? -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Niren Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:01 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4 Hi, I am working with a R200 that has recently been upgraded from 6.5.5 to 7.0.4. Before the upgrades our NDMP tape backups were excecuting fine. We are now sporadically getting the following error via Netbackup: UNX-F-FAIL NetBackup policy NDMP_WIN2KBAKUP_NEW - jobID 61716 - failed on lonffp06-bsn. status 52. ( 52 timed out waiting for media manager to mount volume ) See BOA-NBU-14. Vault or synthetic backup failed. - Please investigate lonffp06-bsn - is the backup subnet connection from the R200 (lonffp06). The toaster is connected to six tape drives, StorageTek 9940B . I have replaced the HBA, and fibre connections as I felt it could be hardware issue. But the errors are still persistent. Netapps support cannot come up with an answer for this one, I was wondering if anyone had any idea's? Many Thanks, Niren -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tape-backup-issues-after-upgrade-to-7.0.4-t1734555 .html#a4712918 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

2 1

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT
by khawale.bonny＠virgilio.it 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT FROM MR.BONNY KHALWALE KENYA Dear Friend, FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT I humbly seek your assistance in a business transaction that requires your ability to invest on our behalf for a minimum period of 5years, without the inference of a third party. The fund emanated from individual wealth, Political contribution, and contract kick - back by party members towards their next parliamentary election. With the present situation, I urge to relocate the funds to you for safe keeping/Investment, hence my decision to contact you. Details would be disclosed and the possibility to meet with you, on your ability to handle this transaction legally. The fund for the investment is valued at $ 50 Million. Thanks and look forward to your response. Regards, Bonny Khalwale Email: bonnykhalwale(a)aim.com

1 0

I Will Check Your Webpage Performance For Free
by Dahner Laurence 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Send me your webpage address and I will see how it ranks on the search engines for free.Then I will send you a free report. If you're interested in improving your sites ranking on search engines I have a deal for all. The industry charges $20 to submit your site to the top 7 search engines a month. $200 for 100 search engines. I will send your site to all 1 million search engines for $50 a month.My wifes site tonivanarsdale.com accounts for atleast 1 pending a month plus 1 listing. Try the free report and lets see how your site is doing. If you use me I will also for free tell you how to improve your page so it is working with the search engine spiders properly. Dahner Laurence Real Estate of Florida 772-878-2187 tonivanarsdale(a)aol.com

1 0

Tape backup issues after upgrade to 7.0.4
by Niren 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Hi, I am working with a R200 that has recently been upgraded from 6.5.5 to 7.0.4. Before the upgrades our NDMP tape backups were excecuting fine. We are now sporadically getting the following error via Netbackup: UNX-F-FAIL NetBackup policy NDMP_WIN2KBAKUP_NEW - jobID 61716 - failed on lonffp06-bsn. status 52. ( 52 timed out waiting for media manager to mount volume ) See BOA-NBU-14. Vault or synthetic backup failed. - Please investigate lonffp06-bsn - is the backup subnet connection from the R200 (lonffp06). The toaster is connected to six tape drives, StorageTek 9940B . I have replaced the HBA, and fibre connections as I felt it could be hardware issue. But the errors are still persistent. Netapps support cannot come up with an answer for this one, I was wondering if anyone had any idea's? Many Thanks, Niren -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tape-backup-issues-after-upgrade-to-7.0.4-t1734555.ht… Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

1 0

Compliments of the day Beloved
by elizabeth kone 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

Compliments of the day Beloved, I am mother ELIZABETH KONE, Formerly ELIZABETH .Weddell,i was born in norway I am 50 years old. But I am resident in ABIDJAN( COTED'IVOIRE) at present which will be probably my final resting place. I was born an orphan in 1955. I have no father or mother,and I have no relatives. I was blessed to have married a humble and kind man,Dr. Johnathan KONE .We both struggled and worked hard and the Almighty blessed us abundantly with riches.He was a dealer in textiles, apparel. I am now old and sick without a husband and children.This has made me unhappy. I have not re-married due to the fact that I want to cherish my husband`s memory. For 2 years now i have been seriously sick. I am presently in hospital suffering from cancer and I had a stroke which has affected my speech. The left side of my body is paralysed. The doctors say I have a few months to live.I can only move my right hand,and I am able to write a little with it and what I have written is beensent to you via e-mail by my private computer. I have little time so I have committed it to spreading my wealth towards better health care for mankind because this will be what my husband wanted. I am currently being attended to by a private nurse at my abode. I have earmarked some funds for the management and to upgrade and build a new cancer research facility where I was being treated up to a few months ago. This will provide better health care for other cancer patients.I don`t know you, I was able to get your e-mail address through a specialized source.There are several projects of which i don`t have time to execute at present so I am contacting different individuals with the hope that you will carry out my instructions for the sake of humanity. Closer to his call home, he made me aware of the liquid funds and kind worth $40.9 million U.S.D. In currency and kind with a financial company.I want you to take custody of the deposit,and use the money to build an orphanage in your country.I do not want any of my husband`s relatives to benefit from our labour because most of them avoided us when we were struggling. They have no idea about my present location. Giving to the poor and less privileged is what being a christian is about. All I need from you is your assurance that you will use this funds judiciously as stated in this message.I am not able to use my laptop as often as I will like due to the advice given me by the doctors. This is all for now. Please for effective communication I want you to reply this mail through this yahoo email box (elikon06(a)yahoo.fr) May you remain blessed. ELIZABETH KONE

1 0

I: L D L
by lottolotto11＠virgilio.it 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

1 0

RE: Newbie: Question about 3rd party shelve with NetApp 3020
by Fox, Adam 05 Jun '06

05 Jun '06

You can't connect 3rd party shelves to the same filer that has NetApp shelves. There is limited support for 3rd party disk arrays connected to filer heads via the V-Series product line. Now, I'm not sure how less expensive the supported arrays will be, but if they are (or you already have purchased those disks), consider a V-Series head. Also, as Glenn said, you can connect NetApp ATA shelves to your existing head with FC disks and that could be cheaper, but still NetApp gear. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Walker [mailto:ggwalker@mindspring.com] Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 11:08 AM To: Brent Ellis; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Newbie: Question about 3rd party shelve with NetApp 3020 NetApp doesn't support 3rd party equipment, but you can purchase ATA-based storage from them that will work with a 3020. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Brent Ellis Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 6:18 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Newbie: Question about 3rd party shelve with NetApp 3020 I am working with two NetApp 3020s and I was wondering how difficult is it to connect non-NetApp equipment. I haven't found a lot of info with this particular hardware so I thought someone here might help. Essentially we want to use our netapp branded shelves for the important stuff since they are fully covered under service agreement, but we would like to have some cheaper storage for transitory files and short term projects which doesn't have the same reliability needs. If I could attach a less expensive disk shelf to the filer head I think I would be in good shape. I just don't want to buy a fibre channel disk shelf and then find out it doesn't work. Brent Ellis Computing Services Group Boston University

1 0

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters