toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13517 discussions

Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
by postmaster＠ineco.es 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification. Delivery to the following recipients failed. addreugenia.ortiz(a)ineco.es

1 0

Disallowed attachment type found in sent message "Returned mail: Data format error"
by System Anti-Virus Administrator 11 Jul '06

11 Jul '06

Attention: toasters(a)mathworks.com A Disallowed attachment type was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The Disallowed attachment type was reported to be: .COM files not allowed per Systinet security policy Please contact your IT support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com RCPT TO: jacek(a)idoox.com ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com Received: from 185.65.179.60.broad.nb.zj.dynamic.cndata.com (HELO mathworks.com) (60.179.65.185) by relaycz.systinet.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2006 10:02:25 -0000 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: jacek(a)idoox.com Subject: Returned mail: Data format error Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 18:02:18 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_1EFB2310.E8AA3EE8" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 --- The original message is kept in: relaycz:/var/qmail/qmailscan/quarantine/new/relaycz115261214649422808 where the System Anti-Virus Administrator can further diagnose it. The Email scanner reported the following when it scanned that message: --- ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type '.COM files not allowed per Systinet security policy' found in file /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/relaycz115261214649422808/jacek_idoox.com ---perlscanner results --- Disallowed attachment type '.COM files not allowed per Systinet security policy' found in file /var/qmail/qmailscan/tmp/relaycz115261214649422808/jacek(a)idoox.com --- ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________

1 0

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT
by gladwell_odieno2＠virgilio.it 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT FROM MR.GLADWELL ODIENO TI-KENYA Dear Friend, FUND RELOCATION FOR INVESTMENT I humbly seek your assistance in a business transaction that requires your ability to invest on our behalf for a minimum period of 5years, without the inference of a third party. The fund emanated from individual wealth of former government officials in the administration of Mr Daniel Arap-moi former president kenya. contract kick - back I now wish to relocate the funds to you for safe keeping/Investment, hence my decision to contact you. Details would be disclosed on your ability to handle this transaction legally and the possibility to have my lawyer meet with you in europe. The fund for the investment is valued at $ 20 Million. Thanks and look forward to your response. Regards, Gladwell Odieno. Executive Director Transparency International Kenya. Confidentila Email: gladwellodieno00(a)aim.com

1 0

VIRUS (Win32/MyDoom.O!Worm): IN UNA E-MAIL DA LEI INVIATA
by Content-filter at bolino.trampi.mpi.it 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviate da Lei -> (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> avee02000d(a)istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (host193-171-static.19-80-b.business.telecomitalia.it [80.19.171.193]) by mx4.istruzione.it (Mail Service) with ESMTP id 83792663D7C for <avee02000d(a)istruzione.it>; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:23:34 +0200 (CEST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: avee02000d(a)istruzione.it Subject: LLEIHZSU Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 13:24:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_79721F93.BAA30C8A" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060710112334.83792663D7C(a)mx4.istruzione.it> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

For your Kind Attention
by drpetrit＠estranet.it 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

FOR YOUR ATTENTION: In our search for a trustworthy person to faithfully carry out this private and confidential transaction,we came upon your highly esteemed profile. My name is Dr.Petrit Revania working with a liquidation firm appointed by the High Court of Justice (Chancery Division)as the Official Receiver(O.R) to wind up a large company here in England(NOW LIQUIDATED).The company was involved in child labour and have borrowed money from various creditors and persistently refused to pay back,hence the winding up process against it. In the process,it was our responsibility to sell the properties of the company and pay all debts owed to the creditors .It is part of the law that all directors and management staff of the company shall cease to hold office when we the liquidators take over.This gives us full control. Presently I have accessed the debts of the company,I came to find out that there is excess of funds available.Working with my partner the principal Audit Officer,we have agreed that the company is not worth having this money because of their inhuman and ungodly act to fellow humans. We therefore seek your kind assistance to incorporate you to our already laid out plan for the perfection of this business to include you as one of the creditors to enable us keep part of the excess funds for ourselves.we will ensure that the Chancery Division recognises you as one of the debenture holder of the company holding the value of Security Shares we shall attach to your name and make approval for payment in your favour. You can be rest assured that all legal procedures will be followed to avoid any risk.Kindly respond to this message via this email(drpetritr(a)yahoo.co.uk) I await your response Sincerely, Petrit Revania

1 0

FAS920 / 940 - What kind of RAM Modules?
by René Bormann 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

Hello Toasters, we asked our selfs what kind of RAM modules fit in the FAS920/920 memory slots? Are these 512 MB DDR ECC Reg. PC2100 - DDR266 ? Thanks for you help, Rene

1 1

Re: problems with nfs and fedora
by Tim McCarthy 10 Jul '06

10 Jul '06

There is also a bug in RHEL4U2 and earlier where using autofs you could hit a race condition that actually fails a mount. If at the same time an autofs mount times out and you go to use a file on the same mount, then it looks like the mount failed and you get some type of file access error. If you check immediately after that the file is fine. When you are doing grid-related jobs that take hours-days-weeks, it really stinks to hit this bug. It supposedly only affects "ghosted" auto-mounts. A workaround I use is to use --timeout=0. It half-defeats the purpose of autofs, but when you have lots of mounts, it sure makes it easy. --tmac Graeme Fowler wrote: > Hi > > On 05/07/2006 09:11, Josef Radinger wrote: >> We have a bunch of linux-systems, which get some mounts from two >> netapp-filers FAS3020. both filers run under ontap 7.0.3 > <snip> > > http://www.netapp.com/library/tr/3183.pdf has several useful > recommendations, particularly in section 4. > > I've had great success (and no hangs) using FC1, FC2 and FC4 against > NetApp filers (although I have no access to those systems at present!) > and if I recall correctly, I used a combination of mount options > something like: > > filer:/vol/vol1/export /export nfs > rw,vers=3,hard,intr,tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,bg > > That gave me no problems whatsoever. > > The document recommends very strongly that you use TCP as your transport > protocol instead. Have a read and a play, and see what you find. > > Graeme > >

1 0

{Disarmed} {Virus?} PayPal Online Department Security Notice 1
by PayPal Online Dept. 08 Jul '06

08 Jul '06

UWAGA !!! Z tej wiadomosci zostal usuniety jeden lub wiecej zalacznikow (the entire message). Prosze przeczytaj zalacznik "Ostrzezenie.txt" aby uzyskac wiecej informacji na ten temat To jest wiadomosc z systemu ochrony antywirusowej poczty elektronicznej MailScanner ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Zalacznik "the entire message" dolaczony do wiadomosci e-mail najprawdopodobniej zostal zainfekowany wirusem ktory mogl byc niebezpieczny dla Twojego komputera. Zalacznik ten zostal usuniety i zastapiony ta wiadomoscia. Aby otrzymac ten zalacznik popros nadawce aby przeslal Ci niezainfekowana kopie pliku. Skaner antywirusowy przekazal nastepujaca informacje: msg-21411-403.html contains HTML.Phishing.Pay-152 -- Postmaster

1 0

BANNED (P=p003,L=1,M=multipart/mixed | P=p002,L=1/2,M=application/octet-stream,T=exe,T=exe-ms,N=north@isb.compol.com) IN MAIL FROM YOU
by Content-filter at isb.compol.com 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Our content checker found banned name: P=p003,L=1,M=multipart/mixed | P=p002,L=1/2,M=application/octet-stream,T=exe,T=exe-ms,N=north(a)isb.compol.com in email presumably from you (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), to the following recipient: -> north(a)isb.compol.com Our internal reference code for your message is 18624-04. Delivery of the email was stopped! The message has been blocked because it contains a component (as a MIME part or nested within) with declared name or MIME type or contents type violating our access policy. To transfer contents that may be considered risky or unwanted by site policies, or simply too large for mailing, please consider publishing your content on the web, and only sending an URL of the document to the recipient. Depending on the recipient and sender site policies, with a little effort it might still be possible to send any contents (including viruses) using one of the following methods: - encrypted using pgp, gpg or other encryption methods; - wrapped in a password-protected or scrambled container or archive (e.g.: zip -e, arj -g, arc g, rar -p, or other methods) Note that if the contents is not intended to be secret, the encryption key or password may be included in the same message for recipient's convenience. We are sorry for inconvenience if the contents was not malicious. The purpose of these restrictions is to cut the most common propagation methods used by viruses and other malware. These often exploit automatic mechanisms and security holes in certain mail readers (Microsoft mail readers and browsers are a common and easy target). By requiring an explicit and decisive action from the recipient to decode mail, the dangers of automatic malware propagation is largely reduced. For your reference, here are headers from your email: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (unknown [67.137.29.18]) by isb.compol.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1078E72306 for <north(a)isb.compol.com>; Sat, 8 Jul 2006 00:41:00 +0600 (PKST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: north(a)isb.compol.com Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 12:41:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_4E8305B4.A39B3535" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060707184100.1078E72306(a)isb.compol.com> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

Delivery Notification for <christie.ja@pg.com>
by Postmaster＠bdsn4038.na.pg.com 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

This is a delivery status notification, automatically generated by MTA bdc-filter02.na.pg.com on Fri, 07 Jul 2006 12:12:40 -0400 Regarding recipient(s) : christie.ja(a)pg.com Delivery status : Failed. Message could not be delivered to the domain - pg.com. Error while sending data. MTA Response :550 The original message headers are included as attachment.

1 0

BE MY BUSINESS PARTNER
by tutututu2＠virgilio.it 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

My Doctor, In view of the urgent and private nature of our intentions to go into a joint investment programme with your establishment in your Country, we wish and request that you forward to us the direct contact of your Establishment. I understand that your country is good for an investment. I am soliciting your humble attentions to this matter as we will like to discuss the terms and conditions of the investment policies before we can commence with the perfection of documentations that will assume this venture the beneficiary of the investment funds. We (Late MR. BOCKRIE Tutu FAMILY) has in our disposal a sum of ($15.5M) Fifty Million, Five Hundred Thousand United States dollars that we wish for your ventures co- operation in securing and investing these funds into the financial system of your country without any complication, We have confidence in your investment opportunities to withstand the value of these funds for the required period of time we shall agree on. I will also like you to treat my humble request with integrity and confidentiality as the political system in the country in Europe demands that we secure and invest these funds now without delay. Please response to me through the email address bellow: E-mail: johnsonatutu(a)aim.com Please be fast to forward your private e-mail addresses, mobile phone number(s), and direct fax line so that I can open communication with you, discuss your percentage of your due share without further delay. Thanks and always Remain blessed. Johnson Tutu. E-mail:johnsonatutu@aim.com

1 0

From: Mr. Lawrence Matheson (Reply Urgently)
by Lawrence Matheson 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

FROM THE DESK OF: Mr. Lawrence Matheson, Senior Audit Officer, Halifax Bank Plc, Trinity Road, Halifax, West Yorkshire HX1 2RG. ATTN: My name is Mr. Lawrence Matheson. I am located in the north of London and work in the establishment stated above this email. I am writing to direct an urgent business proposal to you. I simply haven't met with you before, but I will need your assistance and guidelines in making a business investment on landed properties or in any lucrative sphere of business in your country. Owing to the nature of this transaction, I would appreciate an immediate response from you acknowledging the receipt of my email and I will be obliged to furnish you with explicit details of the project and the urgency at which I need to get the funds transferred out of the United Kingdom. Please contact me as a matter of urgency via email for further directives relating to this project. Kind regards, Lawrence Matheson.

1 0

RE: lun destroy frees space very slowly ?
by Glenn Walker 07 Jul '06

07 Jul '06

Steve, This might be of help: http://now.netapp.com/Knowledgebase/solutionarea.asp?id=ntapcs17113 There is also a mechanism (that you alluded to) called the delayed free scanner. There were some issues with this, but I believe they were resolved in 7.0.2 and newer (perhaps 7.1). Opening a case with NetApp support would get you a bit farther than what I'm able to provide, sorry. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephen C. Losen Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 5:23 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: lun destroy frees space very slowly ? I have two flex vols in the same aggregate and I need to shrink one and grow the other. To shrink the first volume I destroyed two LUNs (500 GB each) that I don't need any more to free 1000 GB. But I'm afraid to shrink the volume because according to df the space has not been freed yet. As a matter of fact, after over an hour, df reports that I have only gotten back about 35 GB. The free space is still dribbling back. The CPU is about twice as busy as usual and there seems to be extra disk activity. But at this rate it may not even finish tomorrow. Can anyone tell me what's going on here? Is the filer zeroing all the old LUN data blocks? I believe that I read somewhere that a filer recovers free disk blocks with a separate thread that runs at a low priority. I have the luxury of time here, but what happens if you need to free a lot of space and move it to another volume or perhaps create a new LUN in a hurry? This is DOT 7.0.1R1 and I checked "bugs online" but didn't find anything to indicate that this slow behavior is a bug. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

RE-Netapp disks on ebay
by mikeboy 06 Jul '06

06 Jul '06

Hi all, I have been tasked by my boss to source some Netapp Fibre drives, We require some for spares for our DS14 Drive enclosures, has anybody had any experience buying second hand drives for these, there are some on ebay at present (item number 9741294785)that are inexpensive, this guy states that they have been data wiped, would there be any problems with having wiped the data i.e. are there any special partitions that may have been wiped any help would be much appreciated thanks guys. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/RE-Netapp-disks-on-ebay-t1796884.html#a4896698 Sent from the Network Appliance - Toasters forum at Nabble.com.

3 2

REPRESENTATIVE
by eden timber 06 Jul '06

06 Jul '06

Eden Timbers capes Investment 72 Steel Road, Cape Town, South Africa +27 73 593 6052 Dear Sir, Dear Prospective Representative, OFFER TO ACT AS PAYMENT REPRESENTATIVE First and foremost, I will like to introduce to you Eden Timbers capes Investment, is a company registered and based in South Africa We are into timber business which is exported to America, Europe and Asia and sold to our numerous customers all over the World. Presently, we are faced with some problems most especially with our Payment methods, as most clients we have in the United States, Canada, and Europe prefer to pay us with cheque rather than cash and this is crippling our business. We have numerous customers in the United States/Canada and Europe. We cannot afford to loose them due to this problem. We hereby request for your hand in partnership to act as our payment representatives (Eden Timber Capes Investment), to act as our clients who shall receive payment on our behalf from our customers in the United States, Canada and Europe You shall be entitled to 10% of each payment you receive on our behalf and this shall be a continuous process, part time work. Importantly, we are a corporate company and we do not require your out of pocket money instead we pay you for your services. To indicate your interests please send to us. 1.Your full names 2.Your Full contact addresses 3. Tel and Fax numbers 4.Country 5 Ages Upon receipt of this requested information I shall provide you with the Necessary details of how to become our representative. For official purpose, please send your response to our Head office email address: - edengroup(a)gawab.com Yours sincerely, George Pedro For: Eden Timbers capes Investment _________________________________________________________________ Discover the magic of RSS feeds at MSN South Africa! http://za.msn.com/

1 0

lun destroy frees space very slowly ?
by Stephen C. Losen 05 Jul '06

05 Jul '06

I have two flex vols in the same aggregate and I need to shrink one and grow the other. To shrink the first volume I destroyed two LUNs (500 GB each) that I don't need any more to free 1000 GB. But I'm afraid to shrink the volume because according to df the space has not been freed yet. As a matter of fact, after over an hour, df reports that I have only gotten back about 35 GB. The free space is still dribbling back. The CPU is about twice as busy as usual and there seems to be extra disk activity. But at this rate it may not even finish tomorrow. Can anyone tell me what's going on here? Is the filer zeroing all the old LUN data blocks? I believe that I read somewhere that a filer recovers free disk blocks with a separate thread that runs at a low priority. I have the luxury of time here, but what happens if you need to free a lot of space and move it to another volume or perhaps create a new LUN in a hurry? This is DOT 7.0.1R1 and I checked "bugs online" but didn't find anything to indicate that this slow behavior is a bug. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

Virus warning
by MAILER-DAEMON＠cgpfe1.candwall.com 05 Jul '06

05 Jul '06

A message which was sent to you was rejected by the AntiVirus plugin. The details of what was detected and the original message header are below. For your protection, the original message has been destroyed. Virus(es) found: Email-Worm.Win32.Mydoom.m Viruses: 1 The sender is <MAILER-DAEMON(a)mathworks.com> (may be faked) --- The message header follows: --- Received: from [216.110.122.184] (HELO mathworks.com) by cgpfe1.candwall.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 23673081 for toasters(a)mathworks.com; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 15:22:50 -0400 From: "MAILER-DAEMON" <MAILER-DAEMON(a)mathworks.com> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RETURNED MAIL: SEE TRANSCRIPT FOR DETAILS Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:36:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_DC80B80A.96D849AB" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <auto-000023673081(a)cgpfe1.candwall.com>

1 0

YOU ARE A WINNER!!
by smithsjulian 05 Jul '06

05 Jul '06

  INORBIT PROMOTION BV, Hovanstraat 28-35, Postcode 2525RH, Rotterdam, Nether-lands. Attn; REF NO; ILPB642857301 Ticket NO: NL100655905 In view of the yearly sweepstake of the above named organization held on the 4th of July 2006.It is my pleasure to inform you that your e-mail address attached to the above Ref No came up in the third dip. This invariably means that you have emerged as the prize recipient in the third category with an allocated sum of Eight Hundred and Fifty Thousand United States Dollars (850.000.00USD).Be informed that all participants were selected from a random computing ballot system. This charitable sweepstake is sponsored by a group of corporate organizations and governmental parastatals drawn from major cities in Europe. As a matter of principle, you are to donate at the minimum one tenth of the fund to an outstanding charity project in your locality, after the reception of your fund. To file for your claim and other enquiries, contact the designated fiducial consultant ; Mr. Martyn Jensen; (martynjensen(a)netscape.net)   Congratulations once more Faithfully yours, Julian Smith NB; Ensure that your Ref No is sent in your application to the above designated office  

1 0

Delivery Status Notification
by Mail Delivery Service 05 Jul '06

05 Jul '06

- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server: linux-team(a)rtfm.be; Failed; 5.1.1 (bad destination mailbox address) Remote MTA bbsporcess-1.rtfm.be: SMTP diagnostic: 550 sorry, no mailbox here by that name (#5.1.1 - chkusr)

1 0

problems with nfs and fedora
by Josef Radinger 05 Jul '06

05 Jul '06

Hello, We have a bunch of linux-systems, which get some mounts from two netapp-filers FAS3020. both filers run under ontap 7.0.3 filer1 has SCSI disks filer2 has SATA disks from time to time some systems (nfs-clients) hang: *) our redhat enterprise linux 3 and 4 systems never hang :) *) 2 systems running fedora 5 hang sometimes. they mount only filer1 *) a third system (fedora 5) uses filer1 and filer2 and sometimes the mount to filer2 hangs. the mount to filer1 never hangs. those mounts get exported via samba. i testwise installed the el4 kernel on fedora, but that did not solve the problem. the local logs on the clients leave no hints. the systems never hang all at the same time and get solved by rebooting the clients, therefore i dont think its a problem with the filers. the fixes for nfs in 7.0.4 dont seem to solve our problems. mount options: 172.16.11.7:/vol/vol0/home/software on /home/software type nfs (rw,hard,nfsvers=3,addr=172.16.11.7) 172.16.11.9:/vol/medispace on /mnt/filer2 type nfs (rw,hard,nfsvers=3,addr=172.16.11.9) is there something i could do to debug that? nfsstat during the last hang: Server packet stats: packets udp tcp tcpconn 0 0 0 0 Server rpc stats: calls badcalls badauth badclnt xdrcall 0 0 0 0 0 Server reply cache: hits misses nocache 0 0 0 Server file handle cache: lookup anon ncachedir ncachedir stale 0 0 0 0 0 Server nfs v2: null getattr setattr root lookup readlink 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% read wrcache write create remove rename 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir fsstat 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Server nfs v3: null getattr setattr lookup access readlink 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% read write create mkdir symlink mknod 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Client packet stats: packets udp tcp tcpconn 0 0 0 0 Client rpc stats: calls retrans authrefrsh 18554079 0 0 Client nfs v2: null getattr setattr root lookup readlink 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% read wrcache write create remove rename 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir fsstat 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% Client nfs v3: null getattr setattr lookup access readlink 0 0% 2529703 13% 293474 1% 2255451 12% 620143 3% 90 0% read write create mkdir symlink mknod 11571652 62% 712881 3% 208088 1% 280 0% 3 0% 0 0% remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus 206185 1% 262 0% 892 0% 0 0% 18787 0% 127760 0% fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit 8425 0% 3 0% 0 0% 0 0% yours josef

2 1

Notification de l'état de remise
by Service de distribution du courrier 05 Jul '06

05 Jul '06

Ce rapport fait référence à un message envoyé avec les champs d'en-tête suivants : Message-id: <0J1V006FDZ8TEK20(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:07:24 -0700 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr Subject: eoiilbtcm Le message a été placé en file d'attente et reste indisponible pendant 8 heures pour les destinataires suivants : Adresse du destinataire : helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr Raison : unable to deliver this message after 8 hours Delivery attempt history for your mail: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 23:23:27 +0200 (CEST) helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr: smtp;552 RCPT TO:<helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr> Mailbox disk quota exceeded Tue, 04 Jul 2006 21:18:04 +0200 (CEST) helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr: smtp;552 RCPT TO:<helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr> Mailbox disk quota exceeded Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:15:44 +0200 (CEST) helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr: smtp;552 RCPT TO:<helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr> Mailbox disk quota exceeded Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:08:07 +0200 (CEST) helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr: smtp;552 RCPT TO:<helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr> Mailbox disk quota exceeded Le système de messagerie essaiera de remettre le message pendant encore 40 heures. UmVwb3J0aW5nLU1UQTogZG5zO3NwNjA0MDA0bXQuZ3BtLm5ldWYubGQgKHRjcC1k YWVtb24pCgpPcmlnaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjtoZWxlbmUuYm9pc3Np ZUBsaWJlcnR5c3VyZi5mcgpGaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjtoZWxlbmUu Ym9pc3NpZUBsaWJlcnR5c3VyZi5mcgpBY3Rpb246IGRlbGF5ZWQKU3RhdHVzOiA0 LjQuNyAodW5hYmxlIHRvIGRlbGl2ZXIgdGhpcyBtZXNzYWdlIGFmdGVyIDggaG91 cnMpCgo= Return-path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from tcp-daemon.sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) id <0J1W00E0IO41C300(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld>; Wed, 05 Jul 2006 03:00:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mathworks.com ([84.103.82.10]) by sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J1V006FBZ8SEK20(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:02:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:07:24 -0700 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: eoiilbtcm To: helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr Message-id: <0J1V006FDZ8TEK20(a)sp604004mt.gpm.neuf.ld> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_wcrKgXDcdVuYDBSfla5mmg)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_wcrKgXDcdVuYDBSfla5mmg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT The original message was received at Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:07:24 -0700 from [71.66.18.177] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to 182.189.152.144: 554 <helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr>... Mail quota exceeded 554 <helene.boissie(a)libertysurf.fr>... Service unavailable --Boundary_(ID_wcrKgXDcdVuYDBSfla5mmg) Content-type: application/octet-stream; name=file.zip Content-transfer-encoding: base64

1 0

RE: default setup password for F85 ?
by Fox, Adam 04 Jul '06

04 Jul '06

There is no default password on a filer. If you need to reset the password, and you have console access, then watch it boot, and press CTRL-C when prompted to do so. This will boot to the 1-5 menu. Choose option #3 which will allow you to reset the password. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Frank Bonnet [mailto:f.bonnet@esiee.fr] Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 5:41 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: default setup password for F85 ? Hello I have an old F85 that don't want to restart after a power outage this weekend ... I have access to the setup console that shows primary and secondary SCSI PCI controller OFF There is also an admin passwd that appears locked and I don't know the default passwd of this machine ... I am sure I never changed it so it may be the default one anyone knows it ? thanks a lot -- Cordialement Frank Bonnet

1 0

Dear Friend
by Mr Daniel koku 04 Jul '06

04 Jul '06

Dear Friend I'm happy to inform you about my success in getting the fund transferred under the cooperation of a new partner from Paraguay. Presently Im in Paraguay for investment projects with my own share of the total sum. meanwhile, I didn't forget your past efforts and attempts to assist me in transferring those funds despite the fact that, it failed us some how. Now contact my secretary, his name is Mr Emeka Frances and his email address is Mr emeka_frances3(a)latinmail.com Ask him to send you the total $500.000.00 in a Certificate Bank Draft which i mapped out for your compensation for all the past efforts and attempts to assist me in this matter. I appreciated your efforts at that time very much, so, feel free and get in touched with my secretary Mr Emeka Frances and instruct him where to send the amount to you. Please do let me know immediately you receive it so that we can share the joy after all the suffer ness at that time. At the moment, I am very busy here because of the investment projects which i and the new partner are having at hand. finally, Remember that I had forwarded instruction to the secretary on your behalf to receive that money, so feel free to get in touch with Paul Clerk and he will send the amount to you without any delay. I am now a happy man in life Thanks, and remain blessed. Mr Daniel Koku.

1 0

Failed Email. (Scan Fail)
by email.release＠uk.thalesgroup.com 04 Jul '06

04 Jul '06

Your attention is being drawn to a message sent on Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:35:29 +0800 via mailscan(a)uk.thalesgroup.com which is detailed below: From: 'toasters(a)mathworks.com' To: bill.cooper(a)ntscxch1.int.rdel.co.uk Subject: 'Message could not be delivered' As part of our anti-virus and security measures, we routinely content scan email prior to delivery. This email has been quarantined due to a problem with the format which prevented the content scan completing successfuly. This does not indicate that your mail has a virus. More likely reasons for failure are CDA or MIME format errors, character set problems, incomplete or corrupt messages. As a first step in resolving this issue, you may like to try re-raising the email message. We will not normally release messages that cannot be successfully scanned. The message will be erased without further notification after 14 days Mail Administrator Thales Crawley (02/2001)

1 0

Auto-reply
by International Students Office 04 Jul '06

04 Jul '06

Thank you for your email. Due to the volume of enquiries being processed, it might take us up to 3 working days to respond to your email. Please note that your email has been received and we will endeavour to respond to it as soon as possible. We apologise for any inconvenience that this might cause. Kind regards, ECU International Edith Cowan University

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters