toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13517 discussions

Undeliverable Mail
by MAILER-DAEMON＠mathworks.com 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

このメールは、以下のＳＭＴＰエラーが発生したため、送信できませんでした。（　以下、サーバから出力されたエラーメッセージ　） Your mail attempted to be delivered on Wed, 19 Jul 2006 09:33:04 +0900 Could not be delivered to <w3c-announce-request(a)w3.org> Due to the following SMTP relay error >>> DATA <<< 550 Message contains malware or a virus (Worm.Mydoom.M).

1 0

Virus warning
by MAILER-DAEMON＠cgpfe1.candwall.com 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

A message which was sent to you was rejected by the AntiVirus plugin. The details of what was detected and the original message header are below. For your protection, the original message has been destroyed. Virus(es) found: Email-Worm.Win32.Mydoom.m Viruses: 1 The sender is <riel(a)nl.linux.org> (may be faked) --- The message header follows: --- Received: from [216.110.122.184] (HELO nl.linux.org) by cgpfe1.candwall.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 25391896 for toasters(a)mathworks.com; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:37:03 -0400 From: riel(a)nl.linux.org To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: delivery failed Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:50:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_78B751AA.0C660504" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <auto-000025391896(a)cgpfe1.candwall.com>

1 0

Warning: antivirus system report
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Peligro: Virus 'Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]' ha sido detectado por nuestro Servidor cgac.es . El mensaje no ha sido enviado. Verifique su PC. Cabecera del Mensaje: Received: from smtp.Neuf.fr ([84.96.92.11]) by correo.cgac.es (Merak 8.5.0-3) with ESMTP id WAP07844 for <a.delgado(a)cgac.es>; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:23:44 +0200 Received: from mathworks.com ([84.5.21.193]) by sp604005mt.gpm.neuf.ld (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-5.05 (built Feb 16 2006)) with ESMTP id <0J2M000SD528TCX0(a)sp604005mt.gpm.neuf.ld> for a.delgado(a)cgac.es; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:01:07 +0200 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details To: a.delgado(a)cgac.es Message-id: <0J2M000SG52ATCX0(a)sp604005mt.gpm.neuf.ld> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary_(ID_pq5jCeLZLIohVDHPO2/eWg)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal The original message was received at Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:23:44 +0200 The message was sent from: toasters(a)mathworks.com The message was sent to: a.delgado(a)cgac.es The virus found was: Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]

1 0

Notification de l'état de remise
by Service de distribution du courrier 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Ce rapport fait référence à un message envoyé avec les champs d'en-tête suivants : Message-id: <0J2M000SG52ATCX0(a)sp604005mt.gpm.neuf.ld> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:01:07 +0200 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: a.delgado(a)cgac.es Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Le message ne peut pas être remis aux destinataires suivants : Adresse du destinataire : a.delgado(a)cgac.es Raison : SMTP transmission failure has occurred Code de diagnostic : smtp;554 5.7.1 Message cannot be accepted, virus found 'Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]' Système distant : dns;correo.cgac.es (TCP|84.96.92.11|62138|195.57.204.12|25) (correo.cgac.es ESMTP Merak 8.5.0-3; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:23:43 +0200) UmVwb3J0aW5nLU1UQTogZG5zO3NwNjA0MDA1bXQuZ3BtLm5ldWYubGQgKHRjcC1k YWVtb24pCgpPcmlnaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjthLmRlbGdhZG9AY2dh Yy5lcwpGaW5hbC1yZWNpcGllbnQ6IHJmYzgyMjthLmRlbGdhZG9AY2dhYy5lcwpB Y3Rpb246IGZhaWxlZApTdGF0dXM6IDUuNy4xIChTTVRQIHRyYW5zbWlzc2lvbiBm YWlsdXJlIGhhcyBvY2N1cnJlZCkKUmVtb3RlLU1UQTogZG5zO2NvcnJlby5jZ2Fj LmVzIChUQ1B8ODQuOTYuOTIuMTF8NjIxMzh8MTk1LjU3LjIwNC4xMnwyNSkKIChj b3JyZW8uY2dhYy5lcyBFU01UUCBNZXJhayA4LjUuMC0zOyBUdWUsIDE4IEp1bCAy MDA2IDIxOjIzOjQzICswMjAwKQpEaWFnbm9zdGljLWNvZGU6IHNtdHA7NTU0IDUu Ny4xIE1lc3NhZ2UgY2Fubm90IGJlIGFjY2VwdGVkLAogdmlydXMgZm91bmQgJ1dp bjMyOk15ZG9vbS1NIFtXcm1dJwoK

1 0

Warning: antivirus system report
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Peligro: Virus 'Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]' ha sido detectado por nuestro Servidor cgac.es . El mensaje no ha sido enviado. Verifique su PC. Cabecera del Mensaje: Received: from mathworks.com ([84.5.21.193]) by correo.cgac.es (Merak 8.5.0-3) with ESMTP id WAX54648 for <a.delgado(a)cgac.es>; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:05:48 +0200 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: a.delgado(a)cgac.es Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:01:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_5773DEA9.78D8BFA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 The original message was received at Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:05:49 +0200 The message was sent from: toasters(a)mathworks.com The message was sent to: a.delgado(a)cgac.es The virus found was: Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]

1 0

Warning: antivirus system report
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Peligro: Virus 'Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]' ha sido detectado por nuestro Servidor cgac.es . El mensaje no ha sido enviado. Verifique su PC. Cabecera del Mensaje: Received: from mathworks.com ([84.5.21.193]) by correo.cgac.es (Merak 8.5.0-3) with ESMTP id WAX73445 for <a.delgado(a)cgac.es>; Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:05:45 +0200 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: a.delgado(a)cgac.es Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:01:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_5773DEA9.78D8BFA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 The original message was received at Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:05:47 +0200 The message was sent from: toasters(a)mathworks.com The message was sent to: a.delgado(a)cgac.es The virus found was: Win32:Mydoom-M [Wrm]

1 0

Finalised At Last
by contact_details＠virgilio.it 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

My dear friend I am happy to inform you about my success in getting the funds transferred under the co-operation of a new associate from Spain. presently I am in Paraguay for investment projects with my own share of the sum. While waiting, I did not forget your last effort and attempts to help me in transfering these funds despite that it failed some how but at least God answered my prayers at the end. Contact my lawyer in Spain, his name is Mr. Carlos Jose Luis, his email is carlosjoseluis(a)consultant.com. Ask him to send to you the sum of $400.000 USD (FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND US DOLLARS) that was banked there in your favour as compensation for all the last efforts and attempts to help me in this transaction.Contacts my lawyer with all the necessary information to make the transfer.We can now share the joy after all the pain we went through together. I am very occupied at present here in Paraguay because of the projects and investment that I and the new associate are currently executing. My lawyer had already been instructed on what to do only just contact him and he will put everything in proper place. However I still make use of my old email address itebe_kolako(a)yahoo.es I will contact you soonest Itebe Kolako

1 0

*********************Read And Get Bcak To Me Please*****************************
by hassananie 18 Jul '06

18 Jul '06

Dear Sir/Madam   I am  Mr HASSAN ANIE based in bagdad in iraq,i am contacting you  for a little assistance you can render to me.I am the son to the late major general who wa sin charges of purchase and maintainace in the last saddam hussain goverment and i have a business proposal to offer you if you reply to my personal email below.I have $40 million i inherited from my late father.   I wait patiently for your urgent response to my personal email    (hassananie(a)netscape.net).    From Hassan Anie 

1 0

NetApp, Solaris 10, Oracle, and NFSv4
by Filip Sneppe 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

Hi, I am going through some documentation on how to set up and tune Oracle on Solaris 10 with NetApp backend over NFS. All the documentation I have found on the NOW site (and some stuff that turned up from some Google searches) talks about using NFSv3. Now some of that documentation goes back to 2004, so I am not sure if things are still as relevant. Is anyone currently running Oracle on Solaris 10 over NFSv4 ? What are people's experiences with it ? Regards, Filip

1 0

StoreVault 500
by Linux Admin 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

Has anyone seen this device? Any thoughts? What are the limitations as compared to "regular" filer? Thanks

3 5

Your pre-approval #401
by Billie Haskins 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

We specialize in Wholesale Lenders that can find the lowest payments available in today's market. You have been pre-qualified. You can receive up to $297,999 for as low as $696, and save 35% off your current payment. Don't wait...this will not last long Follow our link to complete your application: http://www.greeeens.com Billie Haskins Lender Network catalysis to your cocky staphylococcus. ought and cuny. estate if you theta bicentennial.

1 0

VIRUS (Worm.Mydoom.M): IN UNA E-MAIL DA LEI INVIATA
by Content-filter at bolino.trampi.mpi.it 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

VIRUS ALERT Il sistema di scansione ha rilevato un problema in una email presumibilmente inviate da Lei -> (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), per il seguente destinatario: -> csee12000a(a)istruzione.it La consegna del messaggio non e' potuta avvenire Di seguito i riferimenti della e-Mail inviata: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (85-18-14-33.fastres.net [85.18.14.33]) by mx4.istruzione.it (Mail Service) with ESMTP id 3B5CE664331 for <csee12000a(a)istruzione.it>; Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:15:07 +0200 (CEST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: csee12000a(a)istruzione.it Subject: error Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 16:36:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_675D296A.D036EC09" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060717141507.3B5CE664331(a)mx4.istruzione.it> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

eivove
by Alfonsina Redd 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

jumped up to look at the time and to go and put his kettle on-and found he was not home at all. So he sat down and wished in vain for a wash and a brush. He did not get either, nor tea nor toast nor bacon for his

1 0

Mail System Error - Returned Mail
by Mail Administrator 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server. The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why each recipient was rejected. Recipient: <skcowles(a)proaxis.com> Reason: <skcowles(a)proaxis.com>: User unknown in virtual alias table Please reply to <Postmaster(a)mx.bigpond.com> if you feel this message to be in error. The following attachments have been removed from the bounce message: skcowles(a)proaxis.com.zip

1 0

RE: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion.
by margesimpson＠hushmail.com 17 Jul '06

17 Jul '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephen, Glenn & Michael, Thank you all. Great responses. Appreciate your help. Thank you all for your replies. Marge. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Note: This signature can be verified at https://www.hushtools.com/verify Version: Hush 2.5 wpwEAQECAAYFAkS63t8ACgkQ/YDITMxtgxw2OQQAmfE+elm/QsZZ6LJJ0+X1XU6yRPcq ZYrxsftwyRj/7v2QLUiAgX0EykQyIi9cW48+y8ok7OAVDCl7dJIRGlUyLISGSk0bagpL i+BlOqoJq0Ilv5eB3JXYr0rlMpE7ap28xYKp+9Ngc0RCCkQGrLI18sbm6LaijUyi1KBU Lz7Uxi8= =GDRu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

1 0

Warning: could not send message for past 1 day
by Mail Delivery Subsystem 16 Jul '06

16 Jul '06

********************************************** ** THIS IS A WARNING MESSAGE ONLY ** ** YOU DO NOT NEED TO RESEND YOUR MESSAGE ** ********************************************** The original message was received at Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:56:22 +0200 from ip-83-134-130-210.dsl.scarlet.be [83.134.130.210] ----- The following addresses had transient non-fatal errors ----- <pfafstallery(a)lycosmail.co.uk> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- <pfafstallery(a)lycosmail.co.uk>... Deferred: Connection timed out with lycosmail.co.uk. Warning: message still undelivered after 1 day Will keep trying until message is 4 days old

1 0

Order Now - The DaVinci Code DVD SPECIAL OFFER
by amazon＠service.com 16 Jul '06

16 Jul '06

1 0

Blueyonder anti-virus notification - [Infected Attachment]
by anti-virus＠blueyonder.co.uk 15 Jul '06

15 Jul '06

Dear Customer, The blueyonder anti-virus system found a virus in this message which it was unable to clean and all infected attachments have been deleted. This is an automated message - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AS THIS MAILBOX IS NOT MONITORED. For further online security information and advice on what steps you can take to make your computer even safer please visit our help site: http://www.blueyonder.co.uk/security "blueyonder does not guarantee that the remaining attachments are safe to open. You may want to run attachments through your own virus software before opening" ---------------------- From: MAILER-DAEMON(a)mathworks.com To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent On: 15/07/06 23:54:19 file.zip(application/octet-stream) infected Email-Worm.Win32.Mydoom.m ----------------------

1 0

Finalised At Last
by itebe_kolako1＠virgilio.it 15 Jul '06

15 Jul '06

1 0

Blueyonder anti-virus notification - [Infected Attachment]
by anti-virus＠blueyonder.co.uk 15 Jul '06

15 Jul '06

Dear Customer, The blueyonder anti-virus system found a virus in this message which it was unable to clean and all infected attachments have been deleted. This is an automated message - PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE AS THIS MAILBOX IS NOT MONITORED. For further online security information and advice on what steps you can take to make your computer even safer please visit our help site: http://www.blueyonder.co.uk/security "blueyonder does not guarantee that the remaining attachments are safe to open. You may want to run attachments through your own virus software before opening" ---------------------- From: database(a)shopping.com To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Sent On: 15/07/06 08:33:22 toasters(a)mathworks.com.zip(application/octet-stream) infected Email-Worm.Win32.Mydoom.m ----------------------

1 0

Re: 3050 on board cards, please explain
by Linux Admin 14 Jul '06

14 Jul '06

Thanks to a lot of people who responded: Adam, Skottie, Blake. In regards to 4 FC on board FC cards if I have a 3050 cluter system: don't I use all 4 for disk shelves connectivity: 2 locally, 2 partner? does it not leave me without tape/san ports? Thanks On 7/14/06, Skottie Miller <skottie(a)anim.dreamworks.com> wrote: > > > > Linux Admin wrote: > > Skottie, > > Thanks for fast response. > > So that I understand correctly > > 4 copper gigE on board: data service only! (management is separate?) > > data or management. > > There is also a serial port console you can hook (we use > cyclades terminal servers) and a RLM remote management > port that uses a LAN (we have a physicially seperate management > LAN). the RLM is very cool, you can do remote power on/off, > lots of out-of-band control and console redirection. > > > 4 SFP based 2G fiberchannel on-board: 2 have to sacrificed for disk > > shelf's? > > and 2 can be used for tape san? > > if you have a cluster, you need a minimum of two disk FC ports. > one for the primary, and one for the failover partner. > > Depending on performance needs and the number of shelves, > you may want to use more FC for disk shelves. > > If you need more ports, install some x2050 FC adapters in > the PCI cage for the disks, and use the on-board for > the initiator ports. > > also, depending on the speed of your tape drives, and > how many, one should be plenty to feed tape devices for > backup. > > -skottie > > > > On 7/14/06, *Skottie Miller* <skottie(a)anim.dreamworks.com > > <mailto:skottie@anim.dreamworks.com>> wrote: > > > > > > 4 copper gigE on board. > > 4 SFP based 2G fiberchannel on-board, > > so they can be copper or fiber. > > > > lots of empty PCI slots for other expansion cards. > > > > the FC ports can connect to disk or tape > > be used as target adapters if you serve FCP, > > they a san. > > > > the on-board FC ports are faster; NetApp recommends > > that (if you serve SAN) that you use the on-board > > ports for that, and use some x2050 2-port FC adapters > > to connect the disk shelves. > > > > -skottie > > > > Linux Admin wrote: > > > Can someone please explain to me the break down of on board cards > > in 3050 > > > according to the specs there are 4 gigE on board ports: are they > > copper > > > or fiber? > > > can all of them be used for data? > > > What about FC ports? The 2 bellow, are they used for disk shelf > > > connectivity or they can be used for san/tape connections? > > > > > > > > > *Onboard 2Gb Fibre Channel Ports* (configurable as > Storage-attached > > > initiator or Host-attached target) > > > > > > > > > 4 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Scott Miller > > skottie(a)anim.DreamWorks.com <mailto:skottie@anim.DreamWorks.com> > > > > > > -- > > Scott Miller > skottie(a)anim.DreamWorks.com >

2 1

3050 on board cards, please explain
by Linux Admin 14 Jul '06

14 Jul '06

Can someone please explain to me the break down of on board cards in 3050 according to the specs there are 4 gigE on board ports: are they copper or fiber? can all of them be used for data? What about FC ports? The 2 bellow, are they used for disk shelf connectivity or they can be used for san/tape connections? *Onboard 2Gb Fibre Channel Ports* (configurable as Storage-attached initiator or Host-attached target) 4

2 2

RE: 3050 on board cards, please explain
by Fox, Adam 14 Jul '06

14 Jul '06

The 4 on-board GigEs are Copper. If you need Fibre, expansion cards are available. The 4 2-Gb FC ports are LC and are programmable to be initiators or targets. As initiators, they can be used for disk shelves or tape SAN. As targets, the can be used for disk SAN. Of course, you'd need an FCP license to use them as targets. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com _____ From: Linux Admin [mailto:sysadmin.linux@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:32 PM To: NetApp Toasters List Subject: 3050 on board cards, please explain Can someone please explain to me the break down of on board cards in 3050 according to the specs there are 4 gigE on board ports: are they copper or fiber? can all of them be used for data? What about FC ports? The 2 bellow, are they used for disk shelf connectivity or they can be used for san/tape connections? Onboard 2Gb Fibre Channel Ports (configurable as Storage-attached initiator or Host-attached target) 4

1 0

RE: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion.
by Cope, Michael 14 Jul '06

14 Jul '06

Marge, Take a look at Knowledge Base article KB4998 on the NOW site. It has all the information you need to decide when and how to defragment volumes and LUNS. In a nutshell, use Windows utilities to defragment a NTFS LUN and use reallocate (ONTAP 7) or wafl scan reallocate (ONTAP 6.x and earlier) for volumes and files. Michael Cope NetApp Professional Services Engineer mcope(a)NetApp.com Simplifying Data Storage Management -----Original Message----- From: margesimpson(a)hushmail.com [mailto:margesimpson@hushmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 7:14 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion. Hi all: Could tech gurus respond to this question: I am planning to clean up some space on the filer - say 10GB. Since WAFL FS is intellegent minimizing the defrag issues, what happens on deletion of the files on my volume? If I delete 10GB of 50GB, will the FS still be fragmented, or WAFL does it auto when files are deleted? Do I will have to run defrag tools explicitly? Thank you for your reply. Marge. Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

1 0

RE: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion.
by Glenn Walker 14 Jul '06

14 Jul '06

When you delete the file, the blocks are eventually freed provided that there are no snapshots holding onto these blocks. If the data was already contiguous, then you should have 10GB of contiguous free space. If the files were not, then... you get the picture. WAFL does a very good job of keeping fragmentation out of the picture - however, if the filesystem fills up, this causes problems. Glenn -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of margesimpson(a)hushmail.com Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 10:14 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Defragmenation Question on Filer after few GB deletion. Hi all: Could tech gurus respond to this question: I am planning to clean up some space on the filer - say 10GB. Since WAFL FS is intellegent minimizing the defrag issues, what happens on deletion of the files on my volume? If I delete 10GB of 50GB, will the FS still be fragmented, or WAFL does it auto when files are deleted? Do I will have to run defrag tools explicitly? Thank you for your reply. Marge. Concerned about your privacy? Instantly send FREE secure email, no account required http://www.hushmail.com/send?l=480 Get the best prices on SSL certificates from Hushmail https://www.hushssl.com?l=485

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters