toasters

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

13517 discussions

Sense titol
by msf_charity＠terra.es 21 Jul '06

21 Jul '06

Good Day, I am writing you in respect of the GLOBAL relief agency Medecins Sans Frontieres Charity Organization reimbursement donors campaign worldwide. The Organization is refunding back to donors their money out of the surplus 83 million euros they want to return to all donors who refused the Charity's offer to redirect their donations to lower profile cases like Sudan or the Democratic Republic of Congo. Please check the web link below for more information: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/4535565.stm I am soliciting for your kind co-operation, to act as one of those that have donated funds to this charity organization and would want his/her fund return back to him/her so that part of this surplus 83 million euros will be reimbursed to you for us to share. Moreover, the amount to apply for should be 6.5million euro. This is the amount I have updated the information in my department and everything is set to be done legally without any fear or doubt. Upon your acceptance, reply me through my personal mailbox :(philippe.gil@3xl.net) for details. And I will send you backing documents issued to those who donated to victims of tsunami through MSF to enable the Organization reimbursed you with (6.5million euro) part of these surplus funds they are returning. In regards to your agreement with me, I will inform you on your percentage for your assistance. Best Regards, Philippe Gilot Account Officer, Medicines Sans Frontieres Charity Home. Prueba el Nuevo Correo Terra; Seguro, rápido, fiable.

1 0

Support for F760s?
by Patricia Dunkin 21 Jul '06

21 Jul '06

My records indicate that NetApp stops supporting F760s at the end of this month. Does anyone have experience with companies providing third-party support, especially in New Jersey? Thanks. -- Patricia Dunkin Lucent Technologies - Bell Labs Innovations pdunkin(a)lucent.com 600 Mountain Avenue 3C-306C Phone: 908-582-5843 Murray Hill, NJ 07974-0636

3 2

FAS3050 and Oracle over NFS - recommendation needed
by Sto Rage© 21 Jul '06

21 Jul '06

Fellow Toasters, We purchased a new FAS3050c with the intent of using it for Oracle over NFS. This will be our first exposure to Oracle over NFS as we are migrating from a SAN environment (EMC Symm 8430), so we need to ensure we get as good a performance we got from our SAN. The filers would also be serving regular CIFS and NFS data. Here's the configuration, please suggest the best way to lay out the aggregates in order to provide optimum performance for Oracle over NFS. Filer Configuration: - FAS3050c with 6 shelves (3 shelves per head). Shelves are with 300GB 10K FC drives. No additional add-on cards, just with 4 built-in Gig-E and FC ports each. - The 3 shelves are all on a single loop now, would this be a problem? There are 2 FC ports free for future shelf expansion. Should we start off with 2 loops now, 1 loop with 2 shelves and 1 with just 1 shelf? - On each head, we have created a VIF using 2 NICs each, exclusive for Oracle NFS traffic with Jumbo frames enabled and hooked to a dedicated Gigabit switch with no routing outside. One NIC is configured for regular CIFS/NFS traffic and will be on our normal LAN. The 4th NIC is un-configured at present. There will be 4 Solaris 10 boxes running Oracle, 2 production and 2 dev, each with 1 NIC dedicated for oracle NFS and jumbo frames enabled. We may add a 2nd NIC to the production hosts and trunk it for Oracle NFS in the future and at that time add the 3rd NIC on the filers to the VIF. Does this network configuration look reasonable. The oracle application will have about 100 to 150 users running ERP, with about 50 to 60 concurrent users. The database size is not large, under 500GB (including dev and production) Now the question on creating the aggregates. We definitely want to get the best performance possible and at the same time don't want to sacrifice too much capacity by creating smaller RAID groups. So this is what I have in mind: On each head, create 2 aggregates with 20 disks each, leaving 2 disks as spare. The aggregates will have a raid size of 20 disks (instead of the default 16), there by maximizing the disks for data (about 4 TB usable per aggregate). This means there is just 1 RAID set per aggregate. Is this OK? What would be the impact when there is a disk failure and rebuilds? Is it better to create smaller raid groups with a raidsize of 10 to minimize rebuild performance? Should we look at creating 1 single aggregate with 40 disks? I know more the spindles the better for an aggregate, how big a difference will a 40 disk aggregate make over a 20 disk one? When does the spindle count max out performace? Hope this is enough information to start a meaningful discussion. Looking forward to all of your valuable inputs. The NetApp white papers don't have these kind of detailed configuration inforamtion. TIA -G

2 1

ESTATE ACQUISITION
by Rev Dave Igebe 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

Hello Dear, I am Dave Igebe, a West African based legal practitioner from Britain,a spiritual counsellor with MEN OF FAITH INT. and Pro- Director of Rwanda Rehabilitation Project. I have a colleague/client who was the former Director of environmental matters in the defunct Government of assasined President Juvenal Habyarimana of Rwanda. My client was unjustly removed from office by succeeding President Bizimungu for being a Tutsi origin; She was detained and brutalised for her historical origin. You can visit this website: http://news.bbc.co. uk/1/hi/world/africa/1288230.stm http://www2.unog. ch/news2/documents/newsen/sg04003e.htm http://www.un. org/av/photo/unhq/projectrwanda040704.htm for further details. My client ( Ms Mebezu Osimatoye) is presently in Adis Ababa and wants to acquire Estates or landed properties in your country. Considering her very strategic and influential position, She would want the transaction to be as strictly confidential as possible.She further wants her identity to remain undisclosed at least for now, untill the completion of the transaction to avoid traces by the present Government of President Paul Kagame that laid embargo on fund transfer to/from Rwanda more especially when it has to do with Tutsi origins; Hence her desire to have an overseas agent. I am therefore making enquiries on her behalf if you would agree to act as her oversea agent in order to actualize this dream. The deal,in brief, is that the funds with which she intend to carry out her proposed investments in your country is invested in the oil rich Delta region of West Africa; she needs your assistance to transfer the invested funds to your country in a convenient bank account that will be provided by you before she can put the funds into use in your country. Should you be interested to help, feel free to contact me with your private telephone numbers for discussion of this transaction. Thank you in anticipation of your cooperation. Sincerely, Rev. (Barr) Dave Igebe Pro-Director, Rwanda Rehabilitation Project (www.rwandaproject.org)

1 0

áòì òñ÷? îçöé àçåæ àúä éëåì ìäéåú òùéø.. çùåá òì æä
by ùé 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

- This mail is a HTML mail. Not all elements could be shown in plain text mode. - ???? ????? ???? ?? - 150,000 ??? ?????? ?????? ??? ??÷ ????÷ ?? 0.5 ???? ??????? ? ????? ????... ????? ????? ???? 650 ?"? + ??"? ???? ????? ???? 150,000 ???? ??? ???? 0523571250 ?? ????? ?????? ?????? ???? ?÷?? ? shaike306(a)walla.com

1 0

Questions on Storage Allocation with Snap Manager for Exchange
by Hadrian Baron 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

We are running Snap Manager for Exchange 3.1 R1 with an Exchange 2000 cluster. LUNs are sitting on a 940C with DOT 7.1. Lately we have been having issues with our server getting very close to filling up their log drive. We have the Snap Manager directory also sitting on the Exchange log drive. To alleviate this issue temporarily I created a seperate LUN and pointed SME to store its own log files there instead. Until we can upgrade to SME 4.x (no more SME log directory), I have two questions: 1. Is this a best practice to store the SME log files on a different drive/LUN than the Exchange log lun? 2. Would it harm or significantly slow down the SME backup process to store the SME log LUN on an R200 instead of our 940? How does everyone else have this set up? Thanks for your input, Hadrian Baron Network Engineer VEGAS.com

2 1

RE: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270
by Fox, Adam 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

That's pretty much the accepted procedure using ndmpcopy. Of course, if your plan is only to do one pass of the active filesystem, you will need to cut off users during that transfer so that changes don't get lost. Or you could do multiple levels of ndmpcopy and cut off users at the last one. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Michael Homa [mailto:mhoma@uic.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:30 PM To: Fox, Adam Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com; Blair, Bill Subject: RE: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 > It is possible to preserve snapshots and migrate data, but it's > tedious at best and unpractical at worst, it just depends on your > data. > > You can use ndmpcopy or qtree SnapMirror (I prefer QSM if you have it). > But basically > you start with the oldest snapshot you want to keep. Migrate that > snapshot for each qtree you want to migrate (or I suppose you can just > do the volume if you are doing ndmpcopy). > Then take a local snapshot on the destination flex vol (probably with > the same name). > > Repeat this process with each snapshot you want to preserve. > Basically, I think I have the idea but let me repeat it. Let's assume that my volume, call it, vol2, has two filesystems: A and .snapshot. Under .snapshot, I have three snapshots: oldest, old, latest. I start out by ndmpcopy the oldest: ndmpcopy -da -sa source:/vol/vol2/.snapshot/oldest/A destination/vol/vol2 Then, I take a snapshot on the destination: snap create oldest Next, I do old: ndmpcopy -da -sa source:/vol/vol2/.snapshot/old/A destination:/vol/vol2 snap create old Finally, latest: ndmpcopy -da -sa source:/vol/vol2/.snapshot/latest/A destination:/vol/vol2 snap create latest. Then, I proceed to do a level 0 ndmpcopy of vol2 ndmpcopy -da -sa source:/vol/vol2 destination:/vol/vol2 Michael Homa Operating Systems Support and Database Group Academic Computing and Communication Center University of Illinois at Chicago email: mhoma(a)uic.edu > you are > building them from the ground up. It works, but like I said, it's > tedious for most and impossible for some. > > Another alternative for those who don't want to go through this > process is to just copy the active filesystem over using anything you > want, then keep the older disks around until they would have been > deleted anyway. Not sure how that would work with your manual > snapshots, but some sites with time-based snapshots have found that to > be more practical, even if a bit inconvient, for a few weeks/months. > > Hope this helps. > > > -- Adam Fox > adamfox(a)netapp.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Homa [mailto:mhoma@uic.edu] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:51 PM > To: toasters(a)mathworks.com > Subject: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 > > Hi: > > Recently, we elected to replace our primary 740 (we have two) with a > 270. > The 740, running 6.4.5, has traditional volumes whereas the 270, > running 7.0.4, has flex volumes. I'm using ndmpcopy to migrate volumes > from the old box to the new. My question concerns snapshots. I was > told that I can't use ndmpcopy to migrate the snapshot (if that's not > true, feel free to tell me). Anyway, we have some user-created > snapshots that hold important changes. I'm looking for suggestions on > getting the information contained in the snapshots migrated. > > Thanks > > Michael Homa > Operating Systems Support and Database Group Academic Computing and > Communication Center University of Illinois at Chicago > email: mhoma(a)uic.edu >

1 0

Your message to LUMI awaits moderator approval
by lumi-admin＠citinv.it 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

Your mail to 'LUMI' with the subject Syndony Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision.

1 0

RE: directory efficiency
by Glenn Dekhayser 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

There used to be a Netapp tech report (I can't find it anymore) that gave some specifics on this very question; it was about large directories on Netapp versus other technologies; perhaps the paper has obsolete information. Glenn (the other one) -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Stephen C. Losen Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:54 PM To: Glenn Walker Cc: Page, Jeremy; David Lee; toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Re: directory efficiency > These considerations still matter, but the number of files in a directory have to be pretty large for performance considerations to come into play. Typically speaking, splitting up the entries so that there are less per directory is still a good idea - but in this case, I'd say that only 200 per directory is too small and a bit of a waste. > > What you're looking for is a ceiling at which the max entries will become too much to bear - that depends on the application. I would think keeping it less than 100,000 wouuld suffice for WAFL, but at some point the client will take an inordinate amount of time to enumerate all of the entries. Perhaps something more along the lines of 10,000 entries would be a good place to start? > Directories with thousands of entries are always slow if you need to scan the entire directory to list its contents or look for file names that match a pattern. But if you are accessing one file whose name you know, then WAFL will access it very quickly, even if the directory has many thousands of entries. I am pretty sure that WAFL avoids sequential directory scans by using hashing and/or search trees. Steve Losen scl(a)virginia.edu phone: 434-924-0640 University of Virginia ITC Unix Support

1 0

Virus warning
by MAILER-DAEMON＠cgpfe3.candwall.com 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

A message which was sent to you was rejected by the AntiVirus plugin. The details of what was detected and the original message header are below. For your protection, the original message has been destroyed. Virus(es) found: Email-Worm.Win32.Mydoom.m Viruses: 1 The sender is <MAILER-DAEMON(a)mathworks.com> (may be faked) --- The message header follows: --- Received: from [216.110.122.184] (HELO mathworks.com) by cgpfe3.candwall.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 19897092 for toasters(a)mathworks.com; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 09:59:10 -0400 From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <MAILER-DAEMON(a)mathworks.com> To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:13:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0003_A8C8A3B4.642F8E52" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: <auto-000019897092(a)cgpfe3.candwall.com>

1 0

RE: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270
by Fox, Adam 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

It is possible to preserve snapshots and migrate data, but it's tedious at best and unpractical at worst, it just depends on your data. You can use ndmpcopy or qtree SnapMirror (I prefer QSM if you have it). But basically you start with the oldest snapshot you want to keep. Migrate that snapshot for each qtree you want to migrate (or I suppose you can just do the volume if you are doing ndmpcopy). Then take a local snapshot on the destination flex vol (probably with the same name). Repeat this process with each snapshot you want to preserve. Basically, you are building them from the ground up. It works, but like I said, it's tedious for most and impossible for some. Another alternative for those who don't want to go through this process is to just copy the active filesystem over using anything you want, then keep the older disks around until they would have been deleted anyway. Not sure how that would work with your manual snapshots, but some sites with time-based snapshots have found that to be more practical, even if a bit inconvient, for a few weeks/months. Hope this helps. -- Adam Fox adamfox(a)netapp.com -----Original Message----- From: Michael Homa [mailto:mhoma@uic.edu] Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 3:51 PM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: Suggestions regarding migration from 740 to 270 Hi: Recently, we elected to replace our primary 740 (we have two) with a 270. The 740, running 6.4.5, has traditional volumes whereas the 270, running 7.0.4, has flex volumes. I'm using ndmpcopy to migrate volumes from the old box to the new. My question concerns snapshots. I was told that I can't use ndmpcopy to migrate the snapshot (if that's not true, feel free to tell me). Anyway, we have some user-created snapshots that hold important changes. I'm looking for suggestions on getting the information contained in the snapshots migrated. Thanks Michael Homa Operating Systems Support and Database Group Academic Computing and Communication Center University of Illinois at Chicago email: mhoma(a)uic.edu

4 3

Mail System Error - Returned Mail
by Mail Administrator 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason: Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server. The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why each recipient was rejected. Recipient: <ctio(a)noao.edu> Reason: ctio(a)noao.edu unknown user account Please reply to <Postmaster(a)mx.bigpond.com> if you feel this message to be in error. The following attachments have been removed from the bounce message: Text.scr

1 0

Dr Claude Leobert JACOMO / 0022 508 569 621.
by leobert jacomo 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

Je vous salue avec déférence, puis me présente à vous avec votre permission, Docteur Claude Leobert JACOMO, Administrateur Exécutif d'un Organe Attributaire Gouvernementale en Côte d'Ivoire. De par mes capacités de Leader de ce Comité d'Attribution de Marchés, je vous fais ce contact dans l'optique recherchée d'une relation partenariale solide, à rejaillissement mutuel bénéfique, et ne comportant aucun risque pour nos carrières ou familles respectives. Le Comité d'Attribution sous ma direction, est en phase d'opérer à l'octroi d'un marché ouvert, dont la valeur globale est chiffrée à plusieurs millions d'euros. Je planifie du haut de ma qualité d'Administrateur Exécutif, dinfluencer légalement et de manière ordinaire la donne d'attribution de ce marché encours, et cela, lors du Conclave des Administrateurs prévu pour la désignation du meilleur postulant. Pourront-y prendre part des opérateurs économiques nationaux ou étrangers. Aussi et surtout, je voudrais vous informer qu'en seulement 5 jours ouvrables de travail en pleine collaboration, nous pourrions, pour le volet Attribution remplir dûment les modalités documentaires fixées, passant bien évidemment par la conception d'un dossier de candidature de poids pour vous. Il importe peu que vous soyez fonctionnaire de l'Etat, Travailleur du privé, ou tout simplement Particulier à votre propre compte, puisque vous soumissionnerez en tant qu'opérateur économique (entrepreneur libéral) à ce marché. L'attribution de ce marché à vous, fera suite immédiatement à l'opération de mobilisation de l'avance forfaitaire, qui est habituellement de la moitié de la valeur financière du marché. Cette avance de démarrage se confirmera dans un lapse de 48 à 72 heures en rapport avec le mode de paiement choisi par le bénéficiaire du marché. Je vous en prie, faisons de la légitimité, de la légalité et de la grande confidentialité, nos atouts majeurs de réussite dans cette opportunité qui reste à saisir. Je vous renseignerai dans les détails, à la réception de votre réponse montrant votre intérêt dans ce projet imminent. Bien à vous, Dr. Claude-Léo JACOMO 0022 508 569 621. executif(a)dr.com ¡Miles de amigos con tus mismas aficiones! http://www.latinchat.com

1 0

CONTACT ME FOR URGENT BUSINESS( daughter of president charles taylor)
by taylor jan 20 Jul '06

20 Jul '06

我有新的電郵地址！你現可電郵給我：j_invest5(a)yahoo.com.hk WE HAVE $35 MILLION TO INVEST MISS JAN CHARLES TAYLOR REPUBLIC OF SIERRALEONE -

1 0

Warning - eMail Blocked due to a potentially harmful attachment
by Postmaster 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

We are sorry, but a message apparently sent by you was received by our Mail Servers and blocked due to a potentially harmful attachment. We block messages that contain potentially harmful attachments to protect our customers. If you need to send an attachment, it is recommended that you compress your attachment(s) prior to sending with an industry standard compression tool such as WinZip. For more information regarding WinZip, please visit: http://www.winzip.com Regards, Customer Service Unified eMail, llc. Providing Hosting Messaging Services for reliable communications http://www.unifiedemail.net Postmasters, the original message was sent by toasters(a)mathworks.com from 203.210.217.69 and had the following header information: Received: from mathworks.com ([203.210.217.69]) by unifiedemail.net with MailEnable ESMTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:34:55 -0400 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: rosnthl(a)itsa.ucsf.edu Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:34:24 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_D0C19C42.20893453" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Received-SPF: none (unifiedemail.net: mathworks.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)

1 0

RE: directory efficiency
by Page, Jeremy 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

I think it might, as far as I know filers still use inodes, and it seems that the nested levels would be what would cause the problems here...but since they are going to increase the number of blocks then can address at the ^2 of the number of inodes deep I'm surprised this would cause performance issues. Adam probably can give you a 100% answer. -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of David Lee Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 10:37 AM To: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: directory efficiency (Is the following an FAQ? If so, apologies, point me in the right direction...) In years gone by, on a typical UNIX filesystem, creating entries (e.g. new files) in a directory could become badly inefficient as that directory size increased. By the time that (for instance) a "/var/spool/mail" reached (say) 20,000 entries, the acts of creating and deleting lockfiles in that directory could seriously impede things. (As a consequence, various sites devised various workaround; for instance we split into 100 subdirectories based on "uid mod 100", so that each subdir was only around (say) 200 entries. When we migrated this to NetApp a couple of years back, we simply kept this subdivision in place. But now another consideration is coming into play which would be eased if we could consider reverting to the single large (~20,000 entry) directory. Do such efficiency considerations matter in NetApp WAFL? -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : Durham University : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. : This message (including any attachments) contains confidential and/or proprietary information intended only for the addressee. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution or reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may constitute a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by responding to this e-mail, and delete the message from your system. If you have any questions about this e-mail please notify the sender immediately.

4 3

Undeliverable Mail
by Postmaster 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Requested action not taken: virus detected Original message follows. Received: from mathworks.com [201.208.119.125] by mail.cary.lib.il.us with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.20) id AFC20210; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 13:53:54 -0500 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: lconn(a)cary.lib.il.us Subject: Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:50:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_5861584F.365C54FF" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <200607191353390.SM00464(a)mathworks.com> X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM: (7fc0015300000856) This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0009_5861584F.365C54FF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ------=_NextPart_000_0009_5861584F.365C54FF Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="transcript.zip" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="transcript.zip" UEsDBAoAAAAAAEiW8zTNH+VvwHAAAMBwAAAOAAAAdHJhbnNjcmlwdC5zY3JNWpAAAwAAAAQAAAD/ /wAAuAAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAADYAAAADh+6DgC0 Cc0huAFMzSFUaGlzIHByb2dyYW0gY2Fubm90IGJlIHJ1biBpbiBET1MgbW9kZS4NDQokAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABQRQAATAEDAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAOAADwEL AQcAAGAAAAAQAAAAgAAAAO0AAACQAAAA8AAAAABQAAAQAAAAAgAABAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAA AQAAEAAAAAAAAAIAAAAAABAAABAAAAAAEAAAEAAAAAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABT1AAAwAQAAAPAA ABQFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAFVQWDAA AAAAAIA AAAAQAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIAAAOBVUFgxAAAAAABgAAAAkAAAAGAAAAAE AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABAAADgLnJzcmMAAAAAEAAAAPAAAAAIAAAAZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAA wAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA [message truncated]

1 0

RE: Mapping of LUN's in Windows
by Willeke, Jochen 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Hi, thanks everybody for your help!! I think with following your tips i will not run into any trouble! Best Regards Jochen -----Original Message----- From: Glenn Dekhayser [mailto:gdekhayser@voyantinc.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 5:33 PM To: Willeke, Jochen Cc: toasters(a)mathworks.com Subject: RE: Mapping of LUN's in Windows Jochen: After you've disabled the Exchange services, use SnapDrive to 'disconnect' (NOT delete) the LUN, move the filer and/or the hosts, then use SnapDrive to 'connect' the existing LUN again to the old drive names or mount points. If you've got multi-pathing, and you're using the latest SnapDrive, you'll be able to choose the primary/preferred path to the LUN. This technique is supported, and will guarantee that your data within the LUN remains consistent. Glenn (the other one) -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Willeke, Jochen Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:15 AM To: NetApp Toasters List Subject: Mapping of LUN's in Windows Hi toasters, we want to move two Filers from one building to another. Due to this we need to have a SAN redesign, as those filers host our exchange data. In our HBA configuration we have currently automapping. So possibly it could be that we have a WWPN with another SCSI ID after the change. As we use snapdrive i suppose snapdrive to be responsible for the coordination of LUN's to driveletters. But i am not really sure, so i just want to ask some experts, if we can run into problems with wrong driveletters after the change. Has anybody experience with this? Best Regards and thanks in advance Jochen

1 0

BANNED (P=p003,L=1,M=multipart/mixed | P=p002,L=1/2,M=application/octet-stream,T=exe,T=exe-ms,N=north@isb.compol.com) IN MAIL FROM YOU
by Content-filter at isb.compol.com 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

BANNED CONTENTS ALERT Our content checker found banned name: P=p003,L=1,M=multipart/mixed | P=p002,L=1/2,M=application/octet-stream,T=exe,T=exe-ms,N=north(a)isb.compol.com in email presumably from you (<toasters(a)mathworks.com>), to the following recipient: -> north(a)isb.compol.com Our internal reference code for your message is 02496-07. Delivery of the email was stopped! The message has been blocked because it contains a component (as a MIME part or nested within) with declared name or MIME type or contents type violating our access policy. To transfer contents that may be considered risky or unwanted by site policies, or simply too large for mailing, please consider publishing your content on the web, and only sending an URL of the document to the recipient. Depending on the recipient and sender site policies, with a little effort it might still be possible to send any contents (including viruses) using one of the following methods: - encrypted using pgp, gpg or other encryption methods; - wrapped in a password-protected or scrambled container or archive (e.g.: zip -e, arj -g, arc g, rar -p, or other methods) Note that if the contents is not intended to be secret, the encryption key or password may be included in the same message for recipient's convenience. We are sorry for inconvenience if the contents was not malicious. The purpose of these restrictions is to cut the most common propagation methods used by viruses and other malware. These often exploit automatic mechanisms and security holes in certain mail readers (Microsoft mail readers and browsers are a common and easy target). By requiring an explicit and decisive action from the recipient to decode mail, the dangers of automatic malware propagation is largely reduced. For your reference, here are headers from your email: ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: <toasters(a)mathworks.com> Received: from mathworks.com (mbl-99-56-239.dsl.net.pk [203.99.56.239]) by isb.compol.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBEE72305 for <north(a)isb.compol.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:25:26 +0600 (PKST) From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: north(a)isb.compol.com Subject: Message could not be delivered Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 22:25:44 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0008_BF5FBC27.FA44935C" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-Id: <20060719172526.4BBEE72305(a)isb.compol.com> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------

1 0

Await your willingness
by felix_bioh 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Dear friend I am Felix Bioh, working with Diplomatic securities and finance company in europe,i have a deal which i want to talk with you. Our company have assisted some of the african leaders and politicians to move some fund and valuableS  through our special arrangments as a consignment.Some of these consignments where not claimed as a result of deaths and some government restriction, therefore sent to suspense whare house. Presently we have some unclaimed ones ready for suspense whare house,but i have perfected arrangment to claim one the the consigment containing a lot of funds if i have a reiable person to assist me. if you are interested in the matter, you let know through this email adress ( felixbioh(a)walla.com )  for more datails and how to proceed. Sincerely Felix Bioh

1 0

RE: Mapping of LUN's in Windows
by Glenn Dekhayser 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Jochen: After you've disabled the Exchange services, use SnapDrive to 'disconnect' (NOT delete) the LUN, move the filer and/or the hosts, then use SnapDrive to 'connect' the existing LUN again to the old drive names or mount points. If you've got multi-pathing, and you're using the latest SnapDrive, you'll be able to choose the primary/preferred path to the LUN. This technique is supported, and will guarantee that your data within the LUN remains consistent. Glenn (the other one) -----Original Message----- From: owner-toasters(a)mathworks.com [mailto:owner-toasters@mathworks.com] On Behalf Of Willeke, Jochen Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:15 AM To: NetApp Toasters List Subject: Mapping of LUN's in Windows Hi toasters, we want to move two Filers from one building to another. Due to this we need to have a SAN redesign, as those filers host our exchange data. In our HBA configuration we have currently automapping. So possibly it could be that we have a WWPN with another SCSI ID after the change. As we use snapdrive i suppose snapdrive to be responsible for the coordination of LUN's to driveletters. But i am not really sure, so i just want to ask some experts, if we can run into problems with wrong driveletters after the change. Has anybody experience with this? Best Regards and thanks in advance Jochen

1 0

directory efficiency
by David Lee 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

(Is the following an FAQ? If so, apologies, point me in the right direction...) In years gone by, on a typical UNIX filesystem, creating entries (e.g. new files) in a directory could become badly inefficient as that directory size increased. By the time that (for instance) a "/var/spool/mail" reached (say) 20,000 entries, the acts of creating and deleting lockfiles in that directory could seriously impede things. (As a consequence, various sites devised various workaround; for instance we split into 100 subdirectories based on "uid mod 100", so that each subdir was only around (say) 200 entries. When we migrated this to NetApp a couple of years back, we simply kept this subdivision in place. But now another consideration is coming into play which would be eased if we could consider reverting to the single large (~20,000 entry) directory. Do such efficiency considerations matter in NetApp WAFL? -- : David Lee I.T. Service : : Senior Systems Programmer Computer Centre : : Durham University : : http://www.dur.ac.uk/t.d.lee/ South Road : : Durham DH1 3LE : : Phone: +44 191 334 2752 U.K. :

1 0

EUROMILLONES LOTTERY
by primitivalotto 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

EUROMILLONES LOTTERY AWARD SPAIN MADRID   (¡) Batch No: WNTO/7416/VA/ES (¡¡) Ticket No: TWMT/1800/806 (¡¡¡)Lucky No: 07-13-31.54-64 (¡v) Ref  No: EMLES/2006/M (v) Serial No: CNMMM/67000/MMC   In view of the yearly promotion of the above named organisation held on the 15th of July, 2006; It is my pleasure to inform you that your e-mail address, as attached to the above PIN NUMBERS:, came up in the third dip.   You have therefore been picked as the lucky owner of the PIN No as attached to your email with the designated amount of Eight Hundred & Fifty thousand, Nine Hundred & Fifty British Pounds Sterlings US$950,000:00 (Nine Hundred and Fifty Thousand United States Dollars Only).    * This programme is financed by a group of corporate establishments and non-governmental organisation, from major cities worldwide. Based on management regulations, you are to remit 10% of the winnings to a reputable non governmental organization, after receiving your fund. To process your winnings, contact immediately the designated consultant with the following information below;   BARRISTER MARTIN CARLOS MERIDIANO SEGURUDAD COMPANY S.A Tel:+34 695 112 138 Email;meridianosegurudad(a)yahoo.co.uk   We advise that all information’s about your winnings must be kept very confidential {especially the Pin numbers}, until you have received your winnings  prize money in your hand.in 3 or 4 working days. The Validity period of the winnings is for 14 working days hence you are expected to make your claims immediately.   Accept my heart felt congratulations.   Yours sincerely, FLORINDO WEBER (MR) PROGRAM CO-ORDINATOR

1 0

virus found in sent message ""
by System Anti-Virus Administrator 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Attention: toasters(a)mathworks.com A virus was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The virus was reported to be: W32/MyDoom-O Please update your virus scanner or contact your IT support personnel as soon as possible as you have a virus on your system. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com RCPT TO: witkowski_ids(a)univ.szczecin.pl ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: toasters(a)mathworks.com Received: from adsl-75-26-fixip.tiscali.ch (HELO mathworks.com) (212.254.75.26) by sus.univ.szczecin.pl with SMTP; 19 Jul 2006 10:01:24 -0000 From: toasters(a)mathworks.com To: witkowski_ids(a)univ.szczecin.pl Subject: Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 12:01:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_B01D1FC6.76ED0064" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 ---

1 0

Mapping of LUN's in Windows
by Willeke, Jochen 19 Jul '06

19 Jul '06

Hi toasters, we want to move two Filers from one building to another. Due to this we need to have a SAN redesign, as those filers host our exchange data. In our HBA configuration we have currently automapping. So possibly it could be that we have a WWPN with another SCSI ID after the change. As we use snapdrive i suppose snapdrive to be responsible for the coordination of LUN's to driveletters. But i am not really sure, so i just want to ask some experts, if we can run into problems with wrong driveletters after the change. Has anybody experience with this? Best Regards and thanks in advance Jochen

2 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters