toasters May 2021

toasters@lists.teaparty.net

16 participants
9 discussions

Re: WAFL error on a flexgroup?
by Vanderyt, Jeff 26 May '21

26 May '21

I don't know that error, but you can see the constituents by: vol show -vserver vserver_name -is-constituent true -jeff From: Toasters <toasters-bounces(a)teaparty.net> on behalf of "Rue, Randy" <randyrue(a)gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 at 11:28 AM To: Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Subject: [SUSPECTED SPAM]WAFL error on a flexgroup? External Email - Use Caution Hello All, Seeing this error repeatedly in the logs: wafl.vol.fsp.full:error]: volume … [View More]

4 10

WAFL error on a flexgroup?
by Rue, Randy 26 May '21

26 May '21

Hello All, Seeing this error repeatedly in the logs: wafl.vol.fsp.full:error]: volume scharp_systems__0002@vserver:51aa02de-9c6e-11eb-9f37-d039ea257af4: insufficient space in FSP wafl_remote_reserve to satisfy a request of 0 holes and 12 overwrites. An online search is giving me nothing meaningful, not even NetApp specific results. Note that this is a constituent volume for a larger flexgroup (which are new to us). Is the constituent volume full? If so, is there some reason data isn't … [View More]

1 0

Expanding Raid groups to grow an aggregate
by Fred Grieco 25 May '21

25 May '21

Toasters, I am setting up a new A400 that came with 3.5 disk shelves (3 shelves with 24 disks and one shelf with 12 disks), for a total of 84 disks. Setting the partitioning bit aside (I think I have that right..), I configured raid group sizes of 20, two groups each into two aggregates, one on each controller. This uses 2 x 2 x 20 or 80 disks and leaves 2 spare disks on each controller, which are actually 4 partitions per side spread out on the SSDs. There will be an issue if we … [View More]

1 0

2node system, migration to a new box?
by Sami Kapanen 21 May '21

21 May '21

We have 2node FAS2520 (no switches). How to migrate SVMs to a new cluster? Want to preserve CIFS server names and IP addresses. Last time we used 7MTT to do the migrations.. is there similar tool for cluster mode migrations? br, sk

4 5

Forcing SAS Speed
by Heino Walther 20 May '21

20 May '21

1 0

4 node cluster - only two nodes coming up
by John Stoffel 18 May '21

18 May '21

Hi all, We're in the middle of hell, where our 4-node FAS8060 cluster was shutdown cleanly for a move, but only one pair made it onto the truck to the new DC. Luckily I have all the volumes snapmirrored between the two pairs of nodes and their aggregates. But now I need to bring up the pair that made the trip, figure out which mirrors are source and which are destination on this pair, and then break the destination ones so I can promote them to read-write. This is not something I've … [View More]

5 9

Ndmpcopy times out...
by Heino Walther 18 May '21

18 May '21

4 10

Change local user SID
by Jeff Cleverley 11 May '21

11 May '21

Greetings, Is there a way to change the SID of a local NetApp user account? We have some instances where we archive old data from a primary cluster to a secondary cluster. We use local accounts instead of domain in many cases. We create the new local account on the secondary NetApp, but we now have a user account that shows as a SID and not as the actual user name. If we use SnapMirror, it tramples the top level permissions and we have to add the new local account permissions for the tree. … [View More]

1 0

Re:
by André M. Clark 01 May '21

01 May '21

One thing that I have always thought about with SVM root vol protection is, if it is an operational recommendation, why aren’t they automatically created in a System Manager workflow when a NAS SVM is created? Things to make you say, Hmmmmmmmn From: Scott M Gelb via Toasters <toasters(a)teaparty.net> <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Reply: Scott M Gelb <scottgelb(a)yahoo.com> <scottgelb(a)yahoo.com> Date: April 28, 2021 at 16:46:47 To: Parisi, Justin <justin.parisi(a)… [View More]netapp.com> <justin.parisi(a)netapp.com>, John Stoffel <john(a)stoffel.org> <john(a)stoffel.org> Cc: toasters(a)teaparty.net <toasters(a)teaparty.net> <toasters(a)teaparty.net> Subject: I have used both DP and LS over the years and am back to using LS more often for reasons Justin wrote, and also for an NAE/NVE workaround where DP make-vsroot had some hoops to jump through to re-create the mirrors after a failover test. LS mirror promote and recreate after had no issues with NAE/NVE in my testing. In all the years doing this, I've never had to recover svm root, but to follow best practices for NAS, still implement them. I don't create mirrors on all nodes and use 1-2 copies depending on cluster size. An interesting test in mirror activation, is that the mirror picks up the existing SVM junctions regardless of the state of SVM root mirror. For example: 1) An SVM has 4 junction paths 2) SVM root mirror LS or DP to protect SVM root 3) unmount 3 of the junction paths leaving 1 junction path 4) failover to the root mirror (promote LS or break/make-vsroot DP) 5) SVM root running on the failed over volume has the 1 junction path, not the 4 that existed at the time of the mirror... there was no real failure, and the procedure with the SVM running keeps the current state. If a real disaster, I would expect recovery to what was in the mirror, but have never had to recover svm root. An RFE on my wish list is to have the SVM root virtualized in the RDB, then we don't need to manage, replicate or ever move SVM root. I know this isn't an easy task and would use mroot/vol0, and cause more cluster traffic, but still would welcome seeing a change to do this if feasible. Not a show stopper or requirement, nor high priority. On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, 11:24:12 AM PDT, John Stoffel < john(a)stoffel.org> wrote: Justin> Another pretty major difference between LS and DP methods; Justin> DP method requires manual intervention when a failover/restore is needed. This is fine in my case, because I'm really trying to protect against a shipping failure, though it's tempting to do more to protect against root volume failures as well. Though I've honestly never had one, nor had a netapp fail so badly in 22+ years of using them that I lost data from hardware failures. Closest I came was on a F740 (I think) using the DEC StorageWorks canisters and shelves. I had a two disk failure in an aggregate. One disk you could hear scrapping the heads on the platter, the other was a controller board failure. Since I had nothing to lose, I took the good controller board off the head crash drive and put it onto the other disk. System came up and found the data and started rebuilding. Whew! Raid-DP is a good thing today for sure. Justin> LS Mirrors are running in parallel and incoming reads/access Justin> requests (other than NFSv4) hit the LS mirrors rather than the Justin> source volume, so if one fails, you don’t have to do anything Justin> right away; you’d just need to resolve the issue at some Justin> point, but no interruption to service. That's a decent reason to use them. Justin> LS mirrors can also have a schedule to run to avoid needing to Justin> update them regularly. And, if you need to write to the SVM Justin> root for some reason, you’d need to access the .admin path in Justin> the vsroot; LS mirrors are readonly (like DP mirrors). The default for 9.3 seems to be 1 hour, but I bumped it to every 5 minutes, because I have Netbackup backups which use snapshots and 'vol clone ...' to mount Oracle volumes for backups. I had to hack my backuppolicy.sh script to put in a 'sleep 305' to make it work properly. Trying to make it work generically with 'snapmirror update-ls-set <vserver>:<source>' wasn't working for some reason, so the quick hack of a sleep got me working. But I am thinking of dropping the LS mirrors and just going with DP mirrors of all my rootvols instead, just because of this issue. But let's do a survey, how many people on here are using LS mirrors of your rootvols on your clusters? I certainly wasn't across multiple clusters. Jhn _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters(a)teaparty.net https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters _______________________________________________ Toasters mailing list Toasters(a)teaparty.net https://www.teaparty.net/mailman/listinfo/toasters [View Less]

5 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

toasters May 2021